DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Analysis with The COSMOS-standard AISBL and The Regulation of Korean Organic Cosmetic Standard

COSMOS-standard AISBL과 우리나라 유기농 화장품 기준에 관한 분석

  • 최성철 (단국대학교 유기농업연구소) ;
  • 손상목 (단국대학교 유기농업연구소)
  • Received : 2015.01.30
  • Accepted : 2015.03.20
  • Published : 2015.03.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the tendency of certified organic cosmetics market and the certification standards and regulations they are under, compare one of the most commonly used COSMOS-standard AISBL with the Korea Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) organic cosmetic standard regulation. And then examining their differences and any potential issues is to present suggestions to be made as data for certification standard for natural & organic cosmetics in Korea regulation. This contents of study will be used as good research and development to promote the sustainable growth of the natural & organic cosmetic ingredients which have been grown by organic farmers certified. Also certified organic ingredients may help to growth the organic industry. I believe these are actual comparative for application to develop of natural and organic cosmetics in Korea as well the strengthening of the competitiveness of organic cosmetics certified in the world.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, M. H. 2011. (The) effect of the advertising types of organic cosmetics and the moderating influence of subjective health consciousness and product involvement. Hongik University, Master's thesis. pp. 10-12.
  2. Kwon, C. Y. 2010. The study of the recognition and preference for organic cosmetics. Sookmyung Women's University, Master's thesis. pp. 31-33, p. 113, p. 118.
  3. Jang, S. N. 2011. Female college students's perceptions on the use of cosmetics; and the changes in the number of colonies of microorganisms depending on the storage temperature and the formulation of general cosmetics and organic cosmetics. Seokyeong University, Master's thesis. p. 7.
  4. Lee, B. M. and Kwon, S. B. 2013. The Guideline of Cosmetics' Labels and Advertisements and Regulations for Verification in Korea. Konkuk university, medical specialty preference, Skin Science laboratory. pp. 14-15.
  5. Lee, Y. J. 2009. (A) study of the effect of package design's central and peripheral cues on consumers' purchase behavior : focusing on the package design for organic cosmetics. Hongik University, Master's thesis. pp. 67-68, pp. 73-78, p. 121.
  6. Song, Y. J. and An, H. S. 2012. Comparative analysis purchasing behavior of well-being cosmetics &food according to the consumer's behavior type. Sungshin Women's University. Graduate School of Cultural Industry. p. 143.
  7. Jang, Y. S. 2008. Agriculture revival movement. pp. 237-239, pp. 257-259.
  8. Cho, Y. K. 2012. Natural Cosmetic clinic, RH korea. pp. 21-24.
  9. Korea Customs Service. Cosmetics trade to generate aggregate statistics data. 2010.
  10. Korea Cosmetic Industry Association, South Korea Health Industry Development Institute. 2013.
  11. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. press releases. 2010.
  12. University of Incheon Maritime ris Agency. Response Strategies of cosmetics, international standard. pp. 35-41.
  13. Korea Health Industry Development Institute, 2011. The cosmetics industry analysis report. p. 7.
  14. Korea Consumer Agency, 2012. cosmetics and consumer trends in consumer policy.
  15. Cosmetic Act Enforcement Regulations, cosmetics. 2012.
  16. Cosmetic Industry Association and national and international regulatory changes. 2012. Response Strategies of the Enforcement Regulations. pp. 73-107
  17. Beauty Industry Development Institute. 2012. Cosmetics science Jeju University Research Center. 2012.
  18. http://www.cosmos-standard.org
  19. Natural Personal Care Consumers, Datamonitor, 2007.
  20. http://www.ifoam.org
  21. http://www.ioas.org
  22. http://www.thedailycosmetic.com
  23. http://www.soilassociation.org
  24. http://www.ecocert.com
  25. http://www.bdih.de
  26. http://www.cosmebio.org/
  27. http://www.icea.info/en/