Teacher Noticing in the Context of a Learning Community

학습 공동체의 맥락에서 일어나는 교사의 노티스(Noticing)

  • Received : 2015.03.04
  • Accepted : 2015.05.14
  • Published : 2015.05.31

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate teacher learning in the context of a community. For the purpose of this study, two research questions about the kinds of teacher noticing in a community and the role of partnership were addressed. To build a learning community, a professional development project, PRIME, established partnerships with 11 high schools and one of the cluster meetings were investigated in this study. Three mentor teachers, three preservice teachers, and one university supervisor participated in the cluster meeting. For this study, the multiple data such as audio tapes of cluster meetings, observation notes, and interviews were analyzed using the analysis of narratives. The results showed that the participants engaged in different kinds of noticing of their own beliefs about teaching and learning, teacher practices, and teacher identities including noticing of students' understanding in classroom situations. The partnership played the crucial role of reinforcing relationships among teachers, assigning tasks, and creating various communities.

본 연구의 목적은 공동체의 맥락에서 일어나는 교사 학습을 관찰하는데 있다. 이를 위하여 공동체에서 교사가 노티스(주목) 하는 것의 종류와 공동체를 구성하게 한 파트너십의 역할에 관한 연구 문제를 제기하였다. 본 연구에서 관찰한 학습 공동체는 PRIME이라는 전문성 발달 프로젝트를 통해 대학과 학교간의 파트너십을 기반으로 생성된 팀들 가운데 하나로 세 명의 멘토교사와 세 명의 예비교사, 한 명의 대학에서 온 감독관이 참여하였다. 연구를 위하여 학교에서의 미팅은 오디오 녹음으로 자료화하고 관찰 노트와 인터뷰 등의 여러 자료를 내러티브 분석법을 이용하여 분석하였다. 연구 결과 참가자들은 학습 공동체에서의 활동을 통하여 교실 활동 상황을 포함한 교수 학습에 관한 활동과 자신들의 교수 학습에 관한 신념 등을 새롭게 노티스하게 되었다. 파트너십은 교사들 간의 관계를 강화하고 임무를 할당하며 다양한 공동체를 구성하는데 필수적인 역할을 하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Allee, V. (2000). Knowledge networks and communities of practice. OD Practitioner, Journal of the Organization Development Network, 32(4), 4-13.
  2. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003
  3. Brahier, D. J., & Schaffner, M. (2004). The effects of a study-group process on the implementation of reform in mathematics education. School Science and Mathematics, 104(4), 170-177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2004.tb18238.x
  4. Carroll, D. (2005). Learning through interactive talk: A school-based mentor teacher study group as a context for professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 457-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.005
  5. Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. New York:National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
  6. DuFour, R. (2004, May). What is a "professional learning community"? Educational Leadership, 61, 6-11.
  7. Dyson, A. H., & Genishi, C. (2005). On the case. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  8. Eaker, R., DuFour, R. & DuFour, R. (2002). Getting started: Reculturing schools to become professional learning communities. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
  9. Gellert, U, Amato, S., Bairral, M., Zanette, L., Bloch, I., Gadanidis, G.,Namukasa, I. K., Krummheuer, G. Grevholm, B. Bergsten, C. Miller, D., Peter-Koop, A., Wollring, B., Proulx, J., Rosu, L., Arvold, B., Sayac N. (2009). Practicing Mathematics Teacher Education: Expanding the Realm of Possibilities. In R. Even and D. L. Ball (Eds.) The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics (pp. 35-55). Dordrecht:Springer.
  10. Goode, W. J. (1957). Community within a community:The professions. American Sociological Review, 22, 194-200. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088857
  11. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record, 103, 942-1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00140
  12. Hammerman, J. K. (1997). Leadership in collaborative teacher inquiry groups. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. (ERIC Document No. ED408362)
  13. Henderson, M. (2007). Sustaining online teacher professional development through community design. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 24(3), 162-173. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650740710762202
  14. Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities:What are they and why are they important? Issues … about Change, 6(1). Austin, TX:Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
  15. Huffman, J. (2003). The role of shared values and vision in creating professional learning communities. NASSP, 87, 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263650308763703
  16. Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. C. & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children's mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 169-202.
  17. Jaworski, B. (2007). Building and sustaining Inquiry communities in mathematics teaching development: teachers and didacticians in collaboration. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education (vol.3) (pp. 309-330). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  18. Kastberg, S. E., D'Ambrosio, B., Mcdermott, G. Saada, N. (2005). Context matters in assessing students' mathematical power. For the Learning of Mathematics, 25(2), 10-15.
  19. Katz, S. & Earl, L. (2010). Learning about networked learning communities. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(1), 27-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450903569718
  20. Krainer, K. (2001). Teachers' growth is more than the growth of individual teachers: The case of Gisela. In F. L. Lin & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Making sense of mathematics teacher education (pp. 271-293). Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Kluwer.
  21. Krainer, K. (2003). Editorial: Teams, communities & networks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 93-105. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023918616310
  22. Kwak, Y., Yin, S., Min, J., Baek, I., & An, S. (2014). Ways to reinforce teachers' professionalism on curriculum organization and implementation at the school level (II). Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation, RRC 2014-9-1.
  23. Kwon, N. (2010). Difficulties of building a learning community for professional development. School Mathematics, 12(1), 17-26.
  24. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University.
  25. Lieberman, J. (2009). Reinventing teacher professional norms and identities: the role of lesson study and learning communities. Professional Development in Education, 35(1), 83-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674580802264688
  26. Martin, T. S. (2007). Mathematics teaching today: improving practice, improving student leanring. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  27. Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. London: Routledge Falmer.
  28. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  29. Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839950080103
  30. Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1, 209-229.
  31. Sherin, M. G. (2003). Using video clubs to support conversations among teachers and researchers. Action in Teacher Education, 24(4), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2003.10463277
  32. Sherin, M. G., & Han, S. Y. (2004). Teacher learning in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 163-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.08.001
  33. Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (2011). Situating the study of teaching noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.) Mathematics teacher noticing: seeing through teachers' eyes (pp. 3-13). New York: Routledge.
  34. Sherin, M. G. & van Es. E. A. (2005). Using video to support teachers' ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13, 475-491.
  35. Star, J. R., Lynch, K. & N. Perova (2011). Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers' abilities to attend to classroom features: A replication Study. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.) Mathematics teacher noticing: seeing through teachers' eyes (pp. 117-133). New York:Routledge.
  36. Stein, M. K., & Brown, C. A. (1997). Teacher learning in a social context: Integrating collaborative institutional processes with the study of teacher change. In E. Fennema & B. S. Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teaches in transition (pp. 155-191). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  37. Tepylo, D. H., & Moss, J. (2011). Examining change in teacher mathematical knowledge through lesson study. In L. Hart, A. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education (pp. 59-77). New York: Springer.
  38. van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.) Mathematics teacher noticing: seeing through teachers' eyes (pp. 139-151). New York: Routledge.
  39. van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers' interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 571-596.
  40. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  41. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.