DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

주변녹지 여부에 따른 도시공원의 생태성 평가와 비교에 관한 연구

A Study on the Ecological Attributes Assessment and Comparison of Urban Parks according to Types of the Surrounding Green Areas

  • 투고 : 2015.03.29
  • 심사 : 2015.04.21
  • 발행 : 2015.04.30

초록

The purpose of this study was to compare the differences of the ecological attributes in the two types of urban park at Suwon and Goyang city. 'Directly linked park' is forests and rivers in the vicinity, it is capable of re-supply of the species and 'Isolated park' is forests and rivers apart, it is a difficult re-supply of the species. The result of assessment of the ecological attributes in the two types of urban park was analyzed as the percentage of 'Forest zone' was high, but the percentage of 'Area of permeable pavement' and 'Bush area' was low. 'The planting structure' was mostly 1-layer structure(47%) and 'Foreign tree species' is high by half the proportion. 'Age classes' were a 2-3age classes level, and 'Water body' could barely. Thus, ecological attributes degree was very low. In addition, results of investigation whether the difference of ecological attributes degree between the two types of urban park, also statistically analyzed that there is no difference. Therefore, when establishing the composition of the future plans of the city park, to take full account of the ecological situation in the surrounding parkland, and identify the ecological potential with the parkland. Next, it should be designed and planned of the park that fully utilizing the potential of this ecological attributes.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cho W. 2003. Application of the Ecological Evaluation Method for the Conservation and Development Planning of Urban Natural Park. Journal of Korea Planners Association. Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 21-37. (in Korean with English summary)
  2. Gwak JI. 2007. Improvement plan of the landuse sturcture and the green structure for establishment of the wildbirds' Habitation Base in Urban Area: a case study of Gangdong-gu in Seoul. Master's Thesis, The University of Seoul. (in Korean with English summary)
  3. Kim KD. 2009. Establishing an Urban Eco-network System based upon the Landscape Ecology. Master's Thesis, Hanyang University. (in Korean with English summary)
  4. Kim MR. 2014. Ecological Linkage Assessment of Urban Park by using Connection Components in Establishment Green Network. Master's Thesis, Dankook University. (in Korean with English summary)
  5. Ministry of Environment. 1995. National Green Network initiative. (in Korean)
  6. Park CS and Oh GS. 2007. Ecological Network Planning and Land Use Strategies for Sustainable Urban Landscape and Land Management in Korea. Korea Environment Institute. (in Korean with English summary)
  7. Ryu YS.Lee HT and Ra JH. 2007. The Landscape Ecological Proposal of an Urban Park by Analysis of Its Connection, Circulation, and Isolation. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. Vol. 10, No. 6, p. 16. (in Korean with English summary)
  8. Sung HC and Hwang SY. 2013. A Preliminary Study on Assessment of Urban Parks and Green Zones of Ecological Attributes and Responsiveness to Climate Change. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 107-117. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2013.16.3.107
  9. Sung HC.Kim MR.Hwang SY and Kim SR. 2014. A Basic Study on Connectivity of Urban Parks for the Urban Ecological Network Establishment. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 125-136. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2014.17.2.125
  10. The Seoul Institute. 1997. Green expansion plans for green networking of Seoul. (in Korean)
  11. いきものまちづくり.硏究會(1993) エコロジカルデザイン. 株式會社 ぎょうせい, p. 163.

피인용 문헌

  1. An Integrated Assessment of Park-Type Green Space Considering Functional Characteristics in Daegu vol.19, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2016.19.1.120
  2. 도시공원의 기능적 특성을 고려한 녹지평가 및 계획방향 - 대구광역시 돈지봉공원을 대상으로 - vol.20, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2017.20.2.017