Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society (기술혁신학회지)

Korea Technology Innovation Society (한국기술혁신학회)
권호 표지

Analysis of National R&D Commercialization Policy: An Out-bound Open Innovation Perspective

유출-개방형 기술혁신으로서의 기술사업화 정책 분석

  • 안준모 (서강대학교 기술경영전문대학원)
  • Received : 2015.08.12
  • Accepted : 2015.11.16
  • Published : 2015.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Up to present science and technology (S&T) policy in Korea has focused on producing academic papers and patents through the increase of investment on research and development (R&D). However, as the role of science and technology on boosting national economy has been emphasized and the current government has established 'creative economy' as a main policy agenda, 'technology commercialization' has been moving onto the center of S&T policy. Technology commercialization policy encourages R&D outcomes of public R&D institutions to be utilized in private firms for their new business development, and this concept is in line with out-bound open innovation, in the sense that it involves the flow of technological knowledge from public R&D institutions to private firms. Based on this understanding, this paper analyses government technology commercialization programs and attempts to suggest policy implications. The results suggest that future technology commercialization policy (1) be specialized in a way of reflecting the characteristics of each government ministry, (2) strongly support technology licensing-out, (3) strengthen the linkage between each programs, and (4) nurture expert groups, such as accelerators who can help and foster technology start-ups.

그동안 과학기술정책은 연구개발 투자규모를 늘여서 논문이나 특허 같은 연구성과물을 창출해내는데 집중되어 왔다. 하지만, 과학기술의 경제적 역할이 강조되고 창조경제가 부각되면서, 기술사업화에 대한 정책적 관심이 높아지고 있다. 정부가 추진하는 기술사업화란 공공연구기관의 연구성과물이 민간 기업에서 상용화될 수 있도록 지원하는 일련의 혁신과정을 일컫는데, 조직 외부로의 지식(공공기술)의 흐름과 확산을 수반한다는 점에서 유출-개방형 기술혁신과 그 맥을 같이한다고 볼 수 있다. 본고는 이러한 견지에서, 주요 경제부처(미래창조과학부, 산업통상자원부, 중소기업청)의 기술사업화 예산사업에 대한 분석을 하였다. 이를 통해 현재의 기술사업화 정책현황을 진단하고 향후 정책과제를 도출하였다. 본고는 기술사업화 예산사업이 (1) 부처별로 특화되고, (2) 기술이전에 대한 지원을 강화하며, (3) 통합적 연계를 통해 지원 스펙트럼을 확대하고, (4) 엑셀러레이터 같은 민간 전문가 그룹을 육성하는 방향으로 추진될 것을 정책제언으로 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 교육부 (2014), "산업교육진흥 및 산학연협력 촉진에 관한 법률".
  2. 국가과학기술심의회 (2014), 출연(연)의 중소중견기업 R&D 전진기지화 방안, 과천: 국가과학기술심의회.
  3. 교육과학기술부 (2008), 이명박정부의 과학기술기본계획, 서울: 교육과학기술부.
  4. 미래창조과학부 (2015가), 2013년도 연구개발활동 조사보고서, 과천: 미래창조과학부.
  5. 미래창조과학부 (2015나), 24개 핵심개혁과제, 과천: 미래창조과학부.
  6. 미래창조과학부 (2015다), "연구개발특구의 육성에 관한 특별법".
  7. 미래창조과학부 (2015라), 질 좋은 창업, 기술혁신기업 육성, 과천: 미래창조과학부.
  8. 미래창조과학부.중기청 (2014), 창조경제 New Facilitator 글로벌 엑셀러레이터 육성 계획, 과천: 미래창조과학부.
  9. 산업통상자원부 (2014), "기술의 이전 및 사업화 촉진에 관한 법률".
  10. 산업통상자원부 (2015), 2015년 예산사업설명서, 세종: 산업통상자원부.
  11. 중소기업청 (2015가), "중소기업 기술혁신 촉진법".
  12. 중소기업청 (2015나), "벤처기업육성에 관한 특별조치법".
  13. 중소기업청 (2015다), 중소기업 이렇게 도와드리겠습니다, 대전: 중소기업청.
  14. 한국산업기술진흥원 (2015), 2014년 기술이전.사업화 조사분석 자료집, 서울: 한국산업기술진흥원.
  15. Ahn, J. M., Minshall, T. and Mortara, L. (2015), "Open Innovation: A New Classification and its Impact on Firm Performance in Innovative SMEs", Journal of Innovation Management, 3: 33-54.
  16. Ahn, J. M., Mortara, L. and Minshall, T. (2013), "The Effects of Open Innovation on Firm Performance: A Capacity Approach", STI Policy Review, 4: 74-93.
  17. Bianchi, M., Cavaliere, A., Chiaroni, D., Frattini, F. and Chiesa, V. (2011), "Organisational Modes for Open Innovation in the Bio-pharmaceutical Industry: An Exploratory Analysis", Technovation, 31: 22-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.03.002
  18. Chesbrough, H. (2003), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press.
  19. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (2006), Open innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  20. Chesbrough, H. and Crowther, A. K. (2006), "Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries", R&D Management, 36: 229-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x
  21. Chesbrough, H. and Brunswicker, S. (2013), Managing Open Innovation in Large Firms, Stuttgart: Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering.
  22. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (2014), New Frontiers in Open Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  23. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1990), "Absorptive-Capacity - A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  24. Dahlander, L. and Gann, D. M. (2010), "How Open Is Innovation?", Research Policy, 39: 699-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013
  25. Dyer, J. H., Kale, P. and Singh, H. (2004), "When to Ally and When to Acquire", Harvard Business Review, 82: 108-115.
  26. Enkel, E., Gassmann, O. and Chesbrough, H. (2009), "Open R&D and Open Innovation: Exploring the Phenomenon", R&D Management, 39: 311-316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00570.x
  27. Freeman, C. and Soete, L. (1997), The Economics of Industrial Innovation, The MIT Press.
  28. Hilgers, D. and Piller, F. T. (2011), A Government 2.0: Fostering Public Sector Rethinking by Open Innovation, Paris: Innovation Management.
  29. Huston, L. and Sakkab, N. (2006), "Connect and Develop: Inside Procter & Gamble's New Model for Innovation", Harvard Business Review, 84: 58-66.
  30. Kim, S. K., Ahn, D. H., Song, J. G., Lee, J. W., Bae, Y. H. and Jun, J. Y. (2008), Building Open Innovation System: Theory, Practice and Policy Implication, Seoul: STEPI.
  31. Kirschbaum, R. (2005), "Open Innovation in Practice", Research-Technology Management, 48: 24-28.
  32. Laursen, K. and Salter, A. J. (2014), "The Paradox of Openness: Appropriability, External Search and Collaboration", Research Policy, 43: 867-878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004
  33. Mortara, L., Napp, J., Ford, S. and Minshall, T. (2011), "Open Innovation Activities to Foster Corporate Entrepreneurship", In Cassia, L., Minola, T. and Paleari, S. (eds.), Entrepreneurship and Technological Change, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
  34. Oakey, R. P. (2013), "Open Innovation and its Relevance to Industrial Research and Development: The Case of High-technology Small Firms", International Small Business Journal, 31: 319-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242612458942
  35. Piller, F. (2011), "Open Innovation with Customers: Co-creation at Threadless", In Sloane, P. (eds.), A Guide to Open Innovation and Crowdsourcing. London: Kogan Page.
  36. Roper, S., Vahter, P. and Love, J. H. (2013), "Externalities of Openness in Innovation", Research Policy, 42: 1544-1554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.006
  37. Savitskaya, I., Salmi, P. and Torkkeli, M. (2010), "Barriers to Open Innovation: Case China", Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 5: 10-21. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242010000400002
  38. Schilling, M. A. (2013), Strategic Management of Technological Innovation, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  39. Stokes, Donald E (1997), Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation, London: Brookings Institution Press.
  40. Tennenhouse, D. (2004), "Intel's Open Collaborative Model of Industry-university Research", Research-Technology Management, 47: 19-26.
  41. Van De Vrande, V., De Jong, J. P. J., Vanhaverbeke, W. and De Rochemont, M. (2009), "Open Innovation in SMEs: Trends, Motives and Management Challenges", Technovation, 29: 423-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001
  42. West, J. and Gallagher, S. (2006), "Challenges of Open Innovation: The Paradox of Firm Investment in Open-source Software", R&D Management, 36: 319-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00436.x