Journal of Ecology and Environment

The Ecological Society of Korea (한국생태학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Decomposition of leaf litter of some evergreen broadleaf trees in Korea

  • Received : 2015.08.04
  • Accepted : 2015.10.06
  • Published : 2015.11.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Litter decomposition is an important process in terrestrial ecosystem. However, studies on decomposition are rare, especially in evergreen broadleaf trees. We collected the leaf litter of five evergreen broadleaf trees (Daphniphyllum macropodum, Dendropanax morbifera, Castanopsis cuspidata var. thunbergii, Machilus thunbergii and Quercus acuta), and carried out a decomposition experiment using the litterbag method in Ju-do, Wando-gun, Korea for 731 days from December 25, 2011 to December 25, 2013. Among the five experimental tree species, C. cuspidata var. thunbergii distribution was limited in Jeju Island, and D. macropodum was distributed at the highest latitude at Mt. Baekyang (N 35°40′). About 2% of the initial litter mass of D. macropodum and D. morbifera remained, while 20.9% remained for C. cuspidata var. thunbergii, 30.4% for M. thunbergii, and 31.6% for Q. acuta. D. macropodum litter decayed four times faster (k = 2.02 yr-1) than the litter of Q. acuta (k = 0.58 yr-1). The decomposition of litter was positively influenced by thermal climate such as accumulated mean daily air temperature (year day index) and precipitation, as well as by physical characteristics such as thickness (R2=0.939, P = 0.007) and specific leaf area (SLA) (R2 = 0.964, P = 0.003). The characteristics of chemical composition such as lignin (R2 = 0.939, P = 0.007) and water-soluble materials (R2 = 0.898, P = 0.014) showed significant correlations with litter decomposition. However, the nutrients in litter showed complicated species-specific trends. The litter of D. macropodum and D. morbifera had fast decomposition despite their low nitrogen concentration and high C/N ratio. This means that the litter decomposition was more strongly affected by physical characteristics than chemical composition and nutrient content. On the other hand, the litter of Q. acuta which had the slowest decay rate had a high amount of N and low C/N ratio. Thus, the decomposition of Q. acuta litter was more affected by the P content of the litter than the N content, although all litter had similar physical characteristics.

Keywords

INTRODUCTION

The structure and function of forest ecosystems are maintained by energy flows and nutrient cycling. The production of litter and its decomposition are the basic processes for maintaining ecosystem functioning because they move nutrients and energy from the forest canopy to the soil (Swift et al. 1979). The rate of decomposition and decaying processes of the litter differ in accordance with the chemical composition and physical characteristics of the litter species (Melillo et al. 1982, Moretto et al. 2001). Aspects of the chemical composition of litter, such as the nitrogen and lignin content, C/N ratio, and lignin/N ratio, are important factors controlling decomposition (Swift et al. 1979, Melillo et al. 1982).

Global warming has become a matter of primary concern in recent years, because it induces changes in plant distribution ranges and the migration of northern plants to higher latitudes and altitudes. While southern warm temperate evergreen broadleaf tree species in Korea could migrate, most evergreen broadleaf forests although disturbed, remain as scattered fragments in protected places, such as national conservation areas, or as temple forests and tutelary deity forests (Yim and Lee 1976). Further, the structure and function of the evergreen broadleaf forest on the southern coast of the Korean Peninsula, including Jeju Island, have not been actively studied.

Chang and Han (1985) predicted litter production and decomposition based on a model. Won et al. (2014) and the Long-Term Ecological Research Program of the Korean Ministry of Environment (Han 2014) surveyed and monitored the carbon distribution and dynamics in the evergreen broadleaf forest of Jeju Island. However, the activities of the Subtropical Institute established in Jeju Island have not yet progressed to the ecological function of the southern evergreen broadleaf forest. Instead, the surveys are mostly focused on biodiversity, genetic source conservation and exploitation, and development of management technology for subtropical forests.

In this study, we investigated the decomposition process and decomposition rates of the leaf litter of five main evergreen broadleaf trees in the field, as well as the effects of the physical and chemical characteristics of litters and climatic effects on litter decomposition in the south coast’s typical evergreen broadleaf forests of Judo Island, 300 m away from Wando, Jollanamdo, Korea.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experiment design

The freshly fallen leaf litter of Daphniphyllum macropodum Miq., Dendropanax morbifera Lev., Castanopsis cuspidata var. thunbergii Nakai, Machilus thunbergii S. et Z., and Quercus acuta Thunb. collected in the evergreen forest of Wando Arboretum in December. The leaf litter was dried at 60℃ for 2 weeks until the dry weight stopped changing, and the area, dry weight, thickness, and specific leaf area (SLA) of leaf litter were determined.

Litterbags were made of polyvinyl chloride (PVC)-coated fiberglass cloth with a 2-mm mesh. We put intact dried leaf litter into the bags along with aluminum tags with a unique record number, and the litterbags were closed with a nylon suture to prevent the loss of experiment materials. The size of the litterbags was 15 cm × 15 cm for the litter of D. macropodum and 10 cm × 10 cm for the others, and put on the forest floor with 4 replications. The litterbags were anchored with a wire pin to prevent movement, and were collected at six times at almost identical intervals from December 25, 2011 to December 25, 2013, a total of 731 days.

Experimental site

The experiment took place in the evergreen broadleaf forest of Judo Island, which is 300 m east of the port of Wando (E 126°46′, N 34°17′), in an area of 1.74 ha at 35 m above sea level (Fig. 1). Judo is covered with evergreen broadleaf forests and is a well-conserved natural evergreen plant community because it is traditionally a religious altar for a tutelary deity, and was designated as Natural Monument No. 28 on December 3, 1962. The climate of Judo, according to the Wando meteorological station, shows an annual mean temperature of 13.4℃, annual precipitation of 1,532.6 mm, 105.1℃·month of warmth index (WI), and –2.5℃·month of coldness index (CI) for 30 years from 1981 to 2010 (Yim and Kira 1975, Yim and Lee 1976). Fig. 2 showed the changes in daily mean temperature and precipitation for the 731 day experimental period from December 2011 to December 2013. Most of the precipitation was in the summer months and the temperatures were scarcely below the freezing point in the winter season, with temperatures reaching 30℃ in the summer.

Fig. 1.Map showing the location of the study site.

Fig. 2.Changes in daily mean air temperature and precipitation during the experimental period from December 25, 2011 to December 25, 2013. The data are from the Wan-do meteorological station, which is 500 m away from experimental site.

The vegetation of Judo is dominated by Castanopsis sieboldii, with patches of Lozoste lancifolia, Ilex integra, and M. thunbergii communities. Pinus densiflora, Celtis sinensis, and Albizia julibrissin infrequently occur in the tree layer. The coverage of the tree layer was 85%, with a 12-m-high canopy, and trees with diameter at breast height (DBH) 30~70 cm. I. integra below a DBH of 10 cm frequently occurs with Actinodaphne lancifolia and C. sinensis in the sub-tree layer. Trachelospermum asiaticum var. intermedium is the dominant creeping vine species on the forest floor. C. sieboldii has a basal area of 70.97 m2/ha and comprises 55.5% of the total basal area on Judo. I. integra and L. lancifolia respectively comprise 21.9% and 18.2% of the total basal area.

Analysis of plant materials

Determination of mass loss and decomposition constant

Plants roots and soil that penetrated the litterbag were removed from recovered litterbags, and the litter samples were moved to paper bags and dried at 60℃. The weight of the remaining leaf litter was determined and expressed as a percentage (%) against the initial dry weight when field incubation started.

The decomposition constant, k, was calculated by a non-linear regression model based on a single exponential decay model (Olson 1963, Fioretto et al. 2005, Garrett et al. 2012) of Xt = Xo e-kt, where Xt is the mass at time t, Xo is the initial mass, and k is the exponential (base e) decay constant. Litter half-lives, i.e., the time necessary to reach 50% mass loss, were also calculated by t1/2= -ln0.5/k = 0.693/k, and t0.95= ln(1/0.05)/k = 3/k (Olson 1963, Yang et al. 2010).

The plant materials were ground using a Wiley mill (Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, NJ, USA) to below 0.1 mm and used in the quantification of the carbon and nitrogen content and other chemical analysis.

Chemical analysis of plant materials

Amount of water- and alcohol-soluble substances

The amounts of water- and alcohol-soluble within the initial leaf litter were measured by comparing the weight before and after the immersion of the litter in distilled water or 95% ethanol for industrial use for three days, with the solvents exchanged six times.

Lignin and cellulose content determination

The cellulose and lignin contents of each litter sample were determined according to Rowland and Roberts (1994) and Lim et al. (2011). About 0.5 g of milled litter sample was weighed (W1) and boiled for 1 h in 100 mL CTAB solution (1 g cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide in 100 mL of 0.5 M H2SO4) under continuous stirring. The content was filtered through a pre-weighed sinter (W2) and washed with hot distilled water and acetone, then dried for 2 h at 105℃ and weighed (W3). About 10 mL of cool 72% H2SO4 was added to the cooled sinter and the mixture was kept in 72% H2SO4 for 3 h. Thereafter, the acid was filtered off under vacuum, and the residue was washed with hot distilled water until it was acid-free. The sinter was dried at 105℃ for 2 h, cooled, and weighed (W4). The sinter was then heated at 500℃ for 2 h, cooled, and weighed to determine the ash content of the residue (W5). Lignin (%) and cellulose (%) were calculated as follows:

Soluble carbohydrate content determination

The contents of soluble carbohydrate were determined by the anthrone method after hot water extraction (Allen et al. 1974). About 50 mg of milled litter sample was weighed and boiled for 1 h in 30 mL water. The solution was filtered through Whatman filter paper (No. 42). Then, 2 mL of extract solution was put into a boiling tube with 10 mL anthrone reagent and boil for 10 minutes. After cooling in the dark, the optical density at 625 nm was measured.

Total organic carbon and nitrogen content

Organic carbon content of plant samples was determined by 45% of loss of ignition at 400℃ for 2 h (Lamlom and Savidge 2003, Chen et al. 2005). The total nitrogen contents were determined using FOSS digestion (FOSS, Hillerød, Frederiksborg, Denmark) and a distillation apparatus (FOSS). Then, 0.5 g of ground plant sample was put into 250 mL digestion tubes with two Kjeltab tablets (FOSS, 1527 0003) and 10 mL of sulfuric acid and digested in a digestion system at 400℃ for 1 hour 20 min. After cooling for 15 min at room temperature, the solution was distilled and trapped with 4% boric acid (containing bromocresol green and methyl red), and the total nitrogen content was determined by titration with 0.05 N hydrochloric acid.

Nutrient content of plant samples

In accordance with Helrich (1990), the ground plant samples were digested using nitric acid (HNO3) and 60% perchloric acid (HClO4). Then, 10 mL of HCl (water:HCl=1:1, v/v) was added and adjusted for a total volume of solution of 50 ml. Then, the solution was filtered through Whatman filter paper (No. 42). The solution was used to determine the Ca, K, P, Na, and Mg content by inductively coupled plasma spectrometry JY-ULTIMA-2 (JobinYvon, Longjumeau, France).

Statistical analysis

Differences among samples in mass loss and chemical composition were analyzed statistically using a oneway ANOVA followed by a Tukey HSD test. For each value we provided linear correlation coefficients. All statistical work was performed with SPSS ver. 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, U.S.A.). All significant results were reported at P < 0.05.

 

RESULTS

Physico-chemical characteristics of leaf litter species

The physico-chemical characteristics of each leaf litter species were shown in Table 1. The morphological features of the leaf litter were species-dependent. The litter of D. macropodum and D. morbifera had thin, large leaves and large SLAs of 82.1 and 87.7, respectively. On the other hand, M. thunbergii and Q. acuta had small, thick leaves and small SLAs of 59.8 and 60.2, respectively.

Table 1.Physico-chemical characteristics of the leaf litter of experimental broadleaf evergreen tree species

The species whose leaf litter contained large amounts of water-soluble material also contained large amounts of alcohol-soluble material, but C. cuspidata var. thunbergii contained the highest amount of alcohol-soluble material, 14.22%, while containing a low amount of water-soluble material of 2.30%. Soluble carbohydrate content showed a positive relationship with water-soluble content, but showed an inverse relationship with lignin and cellulose content. The contents of cellulose and lignin in the leaf litter were positively related. D. morbifera contained the lowest amounts of cellulose and lignin, 18.36% and 13.74%, respectively, and M. thunbergii and Q. acuta contained 24.39% and 30.10% cellulose and 33.60% and 33.95% lignin, respectively.

The carbon content of each species was 45.47% to 49.25% of dry weight, but the nitrogen content differed among species. The nitrogen contents of C. cuspidata var. thunbergii and Q. acuta were 0.81% and 0.96%, respectively, while D. macropodum, D. morbifera, and M. thunbergii had lower contents of 0.48%, 0.51%, and 0.57%, respectively. The content of phosphorous in the leaf litter was the highest value at D. morbifera and the lowest at Q. acuta, respectively at 308.08 µg/g and 101.06 µg/g. The phosphorous content in each species showed a negative relationship with nitrogen content (R2 = 0.694, P = 0.182). The C/N ratio was lower in C. cuspidata var. thunbergii and Q. acuta, at 60.5 and 50.3, respectively, than in the other species, where it ranged from 86.9 to 94.6. The species with high C/N ratios had lower C/P ratios.

Litter mass loss

During the 731 experimental days, the leaf litter of D. macropodum and D. morbifera decayed by 98.2% and 98.0%, and C. cuspidata var. thunbergii decomposed by 79.1%. The litter of M. thunbergii and Q. acuta decomposed 69.6% and 68.4% of initial mass. The rate of mass loss was fast in the summer, which has high temperatures and precipitation (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.Remaining dry weight (%) relative to the initial mass of each leaf litter for experimental 2 years in Judo. D, December; M, March; J, June; S, September.

The decomposition constant was 2.02 and 1.95 yr-1 for D. macropodum and D. morbifera, and 0.78, 0.60, and 0.58 yr-1 for C. cuspidata var. thunbergii, M. thunbergii, and Q. acuta, respectively. The half-life of leaf litter decomposition was 0.34 and 0.36 yr for D. macropodum and D. morbifera, and 0.89 yr for C. cuspidata var. thunbergii. The litter of C. cuspidata var. thunbergii took twice as long to reach 50% decomposition than D. macropodum and D. morbifera. The half-life of the litter of M. thunbergii and Q. acuta was three times slower than that of D. macropodum and D. morbifera (Table 2).

Table 2.Decomposition coefficient (k) and decomposition period of 50%, 95%, and 99% decomposition of each type of leaf litter

Changes in nitrogen content in the decaying litter

The nitrogen concentration in decaying leaf litter increased, especially during the first summer. The nitrogen concentration in the litter of D. macropodum and D. morbifera was higher, at 1.90% of litter mass, than for the other species, and the litter of M. thunbergii showed the lowest concentration of 1.08% after 547 days of incubation (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.Changes of remaining nitrogen concentration (%) of each decaying leaf litter for experimental 2 years field incubation in Judo. D, December; M, March; J, June; S, September.

The total amount of nitrogen in decaying leaf litter relative to the initial amount showed two different patterns among the litter species. One was net mineralization in the early stage of decomposition and immobilization in the later stage (after 274 days of incubation), and the other was immobilization of nitrogen in the early stage and net mineralization in the later stage. M. thunbergii and Q. acuta belong to the former, and D. macropodum, D. morbifera, and C. cuspidata var. thunbergii to the latter (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.Change in the remaining nitrogen (%) relative to the initial nitrogen content of each leaf litter species after 2 years of field incubation in Judo. D, December; M, March; J, June; S, September.

The litter of D. macropodum, D. morbifera, and C. cuspidata var. thunbergii showed an increase in total nitrogen at in early stage of decomposition, although the litter mass decreased sharply. These three species showed 110–115% of the initial amount of nitrogen during the net immobilization period. However M. thunbergii and Q. acuta litter showed a net mineralization of nitrogen at 182 days of incubation, in September of the first year, and then showed net immobilization to the beginning of the autumn of the second year. The litter of M. thunbergii and Q. acuta immobilized to 133%, and 106%, respectively, of the initial amount of nitrogen during the net immobilization period.

Factors affecting the decomposition of leaf litters

Litter decomposition showed strong, significantly positive correlations with the precipitation, and year day index (Table 3). The year day index is thermal effect calculated by the accumulation of daily mean temperatures above 5℃ for all leaf litter species. D. macropodum and D. morbifera showed steeper slopes and higher y-intercepts than the other species, meaning that their litter decays were more readily affected by precipitation and year day index.

Table 3.Equations and correlation coefficients between litter mass loss and accumulated daily mean temperatures above 5℃ (year day index) and precipitation

The thickness and SLA of the leaf litter were important factors limiting the decomposition rate of litter species, and these physical characteristics positively affected litter decomposition (Fig. 6). Thick litter species with low SLAs, such as M. thunbergii and Q. acuta, decayed more slowly than thin leaf litter species, such as D. macropodum and D. morbifera. The litter of species with large amounts of cellulose and lignin, such as Q. acuta and M. thunbergii, had slow decomposition. The mass loss of each litter species was negatively correlated with the cellulose (R2 = 0.690, P = 0.081) and lignin (R2 = 0.939, P = 0.007) content. The mass loss rate of each litter species was positively related to the water-soluble contents (R2 = 0.898, P = 0.014), alcohol-soluble contents (R2 = 0.597, P = 0.126), and soluble carbohydrates (R2 = 0.803, P = 0.039). D. morbifera and D. macropodum, which contained large amounts of soluble materials, had fast decomposition rates, while C. cuspidata var. thunbergii and Q. acuta, which contained small amounts of soluble materials, had slow decomposition rates.

Fig. 6.The relationships between mass loss and physical characteristics and macro organic componenets in freshly fallen leaf litter of each species. Dp, Daphniphyllum macropodum; Dm, Dendropanax morbifera; Cc, Castanopsis cuspidata var. thunbergii; Qa, Quercus acuta; Mt, Machilus thunbergii.

Litter decomposition was faster in the litter species containing high contents of the nutrients P, K, Na, Mg, and Ca. However, the total nitrogen content in litters showed a different pattern from the above-mentioned nutrients. The litter of D. macropodum and D. morbifera, which have low nitrogen content, decayed faster than C. cuspidata var. thunbergii and Q. acuta litter, which have a higher concentration of nitrogen. These results are contrary to the general tendency that higher nitrogen content in litter accelerates decomposition (Fig. 7). However, the litter of M. thunbergii, which has a low concentration of nitrogen, decayed slowly, consistent with general trends. For this reason, the nitrogen content negatively affected litter decomposition, and the C/N ratio of each litter species was also positively correlated with the mass loss rate, although M. thunbergii, which had a high C/N ratio, decayed slowly. On the other hand, the lignin/N ratio of each litter species, which is a general prediction index of litter decomposition, did not show a significant relationship with mass loss in any litter species. The phosphorus content was the opposite of that of nitrogen. The litter species contain high C/P ratios decayed slower than low C/P ratio species, with the exception of M. thunbergii, which had a small C/P ratio and slow decomposition.

Fig. 7.The relationships between mass loss and nutrient content, C/N and C/P ratio in freshly fallen leaf litter of each species. Dp, Daphniphyllum macropodum; Dm, Dendropanax morbifera; Cc, Castanopsis cuspidata var. thunbergii; Qa, Quercus acuta; Mt, Machilus thunbergii.

 

DISCUSSION

Litter decomposition is the main process in ecosystems to circulate nutrients (van Vuuren et al. 1993, Vitousek et al. 1994, Aerts and Chapin 2000, Wang et al. 2008, Klotzbücher et al. 2011), supply organic and inorganic elements (Wang et al. 2008), sustain soil fertility (Koukoura et al. 2003), release carbon dioxide to the atmosphere (Coûteaux et al. 1995, Silver and Miya 2001, Austin and Vivanco 2006), and control the carbon cycle and climate change (Saura-Mas et al. 2012).

The original evergreen broadleaf forest was severely disturbed by cutting for firewood or farmland, and so, it is difficult to find the original community or forest in the Korean Peninsula, except in rare cases such as small conservation areas for religious purposes or in very steep areas. The evergreen broadleaf trees and their community are expected to have a northward expansion of their distribution range with global warming. The southern edge of deciduous forest will be displaced by evergreen forest in the near future unless warming is slowed. However, surveys and studies on the evergreen forest in Korea have focused on the flora and distribution, and studies on the structures and functions of the evergreen forest were scarce until the Long Term Ecological Research of the Ministry of Environment. We surveyed the decomposition of leaf litter of five main evergreen broadleaf tree species distributed in the southern coastal area, including Jeju Island.

The experimental five litter species have different physicochemical characteristics and different decomposition rates. The litters decomposed faster in the summer with high temperatures and precipitation. Millar (1974) and Swift et al. (1979) suggested that the litter was actively decomposed in the summer because the concentration of precipitation facilitates the leaching of water-soluble materials and high temperature facilitate the activity of decomposers. The water-soluble materials are used as energy sources for microorganisms in the early stage of decomposition (Swift et al. 1979, Hobbie 1996), and the litter contains large amounts of water-soluble materials that are affected by decomposers more readily in the early stage of litter decomposition. Therefore, the litter of D. morbifera and D. macropodum, which contain higher concentrations of water soluble materials than that of other species, lost litter mass faster than the other species in the summer. The water-soluble substances and soluble carbohydrates, about 80% of the soluble materials, easily leached within a few days after incubation in the early decaying stage (Swift et al. 1979, Gessner 1991, Cunha-Santino et al. 2003).The leaching of soluble materials was influenced by physical characteristics such as the toughness and thickness of litter. Thin litter species such as D. morbifera and D. macropodum, which have a higher SLA, contain more water-soluble materials than thicker leaf litter. In this experiment, the decomposition of each litter species showed a significantly linear correlation with thickness (mass loss, percent = -133.22 thickness + 121.03, R2 = 0.939, P = 0.007) and SLA (mass loss, percent = 1.1414 SLA + 0.2929, R2 = 0.964, P = 0.003).

The decomposition constant differed among the five experimental species. D. macropodum and D. morbifera had rates of 2.02 yr-1 and 1.95 yr-1, respectively, while M. thunbergii and Q. acuta had slower decomposition constant of 0.60 yr-1 and 0.58 yr-1, respectively. C. cuspidata var. thunbergii had a decomposition rate of 0.78 yr-1. These rates are comparable to other studies. Chang and Han (1985) separately collected litter and accumulation layers in an evergreen broadleaf forest regarded as in a steady state of equilibrium between production and decomposition of litter, measured the carbon content, and fitted Olson’s model (1963). They obtained a decomposition coefficient of 0.287 ± 0.0223 yr-1 for Q. acuta. This result is a significantly lower decomposition rate. Won et al. (2014) observed a decomposition constant of 0.49 yr-1 for Q. mysinifolia in Q. acutissima forest in Gongju (N 36°25′21″), and Han (2014) observed a decomposition constant of 0.57 yr-1 for Q. glauca in a 24-month experiment and 0.39 yr-1 for C. cuspidata var. thunbergii in a 23-month in Gotzawal on Jeju Island, respectively, by using the litterbag method.

In addition, litter decomposition is affected not only by the physical characteristics of litter but also by its chemical composition (Swift et al. 1979, Heal et al. 1997, Zimmer 2002, Sariyildiz and Anderson 2003, Polyakova and Billor 2007). Climatic conditions are a general limiting factor to litter decaying at a large scale, and the physico-chemical characteristics determine the decomposition rate at a small scale (Berg et al. 1993, Heal et al. 1997). The decomposition rates of each litter species showed a dispersed distribution on each nutrient content gradient, and differed from those for water-soluble materials and soluble carbohydrate contents.

The chemical composition, such as the lignin and nitrogen contents, determine litter substrate quality (Melillo et al. 1982, Berg et al. 1993, Aerts and De Caluwe 1997, Austin and Vitousek 1998, Cotrufo et al. 1998,), and the litter quality affects the rate of decomposition (Singh et al. 1999, Sundarapandian and Swamy 1999, Ribeiro et al. 2002, Tateno et al. 2007). Our results also showed a significant positive relationship between litter mass loss and lignin, thickness, and SLA. However, the nitrogen content was not a critical factor for our litter species. For example, D. macropodum and D. morbifera, which have low nitrogen, had a high decomposition rate, while the litter of Q. acuta contained high nitrogen content, but had a low mass loss rate. In addition, the litter mass loss of each litter species distributed on the C/N ratio gradient showed no linear relations. These results suggest that other factors acted as critical limiting factors in litter decomposition. D. macropodum and D. morbifera litter contain low lignin content and high SLA, and thin leaf litter leads to fast decomposition, although these litters contain low N and a high C/N ratio. Q. acuta leaf litter has a high concentration of N but a slow decomposition rate because of its thick leaf litter with a small SLA and low content of phosphorus. Wieder et al. (2009) noted the importance of phosphorus in litter decomposition. The physical characteristics of litter, such as thickness and SLA, were greater factors in leaf litter decomposition than nutrient content characteristics, such as N and the C/N ratio (Gallardo and Merino 1992, Yang 1995).

Swift et al. (1979), Melillo et al. (1982), Berg and Lundmark (1987), and Wang et al. (2008) have commented on the effects of lignin and nitrogen content on litter decomposition; our results showed that lignin was more critical for litter decomposition than N content. This result agrees with Bollen (1953) and Fogel and Cromack (1977), who suggested that lignin is more important than N in the relationship between chemical constituents and the decomposition rate. The lignin content seems to be a limiting factor for litter decomposition at a later stage, after the soluble materials are leached out (Fogel and Cromack 1977, Meentemeyer 1978, Swift et al. 1979, Melillo et al. 1982, Hobbie 1996, Klotzbücher et al. 2011).

The nitrogen content in decaying litter showed two patterns in our experiment. One was net mineralization in the early stage of decomposition and immobilization in the later stage (after 274 days of incubation), and the other is immobilization of nitrogen in the early stage and net mineralization in the later stage. We estimated that the litter of M. thunbergii and Q. acuta, which belong to the former group, contained low nitrogen and was tough, inhibiting microbial colonization and leading to net mineralization in the early decomposition stage. On the other hand, D. macropodum, D. morbifera, and C. cuspidata var. thunbergii belong to the latter group containing a large amount of nitrogen that supports increasing microbes on decaying litter in the early decomposition stage.

References

  1. Aerts R, Chapin FS III. 2000. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Adv Ecol Res 30: 1-67.
  2. Aerts R, De Caluwe H. 1997. Nutritional and plant mediated controls on leaf litter decomposition of Carex species. Ecology 78: 244-260. https://doi.org/10.2307/2265993
  3. Allen SE, Grimshaw HM, Parkinson JA, Quarmby CL. 1974. Chemical analysis of ecological materials. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, pp 245-247.
  4. Austin AT, Vitousek PM. 1998. Nutrient dynamics on a precipitation gradient in Hawai’i. Oecologia 113: 519- 529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050405
  5. Austin AT, Vivanco L. 2006. Plant litter decomposition in a semi-arid ecosystem controlled by photodegradation. Nature 442: 555-558. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05038
  6. Berg B, Berg MP, Bottner P, Box E, Breymeyer A, de Anta RC, Couteaux M, Escudero A, Gallardo A, Kratz W, Madeira M, Mälkönen E, Mcclaugherty C, Meentemeyer V, Muñoz F, Piussi P, Remacle J, De Santo AV. 1993. Litter mass loss rates in pine forests of Europe and Eastern United States: some relationships with climate and litter quality. Biogeochemistry 20: 127-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00000785
  7. Berg B, Lundmark JE. 1987. Decomposition of needle litter in lodgepole pine and Scots pine monocultural systems – A comparison. Scand J For Res 2: 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827588709382441
  8. Bollen WB. 1953. Mulches and soil conditioners, Carbon and nitrogen in farm and forest products. J Agric Food Chem 7: 379-381. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf60005a004
  9. Chang NK, Han SE. 1985. A study on the production and decomposition of litters of evergreen broadleaved forests in Haenam and Koje-do. Korean J Ecol 8: 163-169.
  10. Chen X, Wei X, Scherer R. 2005. Influence of wildfire and harvest on biomass, carbon pool, and decomposition of large woody debris in forested streams of southern interior British Columbia. For Ecol Manag 208: 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.11.018
  11. Cotrufo MF, Briones MJI, Ineson P. 1998. Elevated CO2 affects field decomposition rate and palatability of tree leaf litter: Importance of changes in substrate quality. Soil Biol Biochem 30: 1565-1571. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00032-7
  12. Coûteaux MM, Bottner P, Berg B. 1995. Litter decomposition, climate and litter quality. Trends Ecol Evol 10: 63-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)88978-8
  13. Cunha-Santino MBD, Pacobahyba LD, Bianchini Jr I. 2003. Changes in the amount of soluble carbohydrates and polyphenols contents during decomposition of Montrichardia arborescens (L.) Schott. Acta Amazonica 33: 469-476. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0044-59672003000300011
  14. Fioretto A, Di Nardo C, Papa S, Fuggi A. 2005. Lignin and cellulose degradation and nitrogen dynamics during decomposition of three leaf litter species in a Mediterranean ecosystem. Soil Biol Biochem 37: 1083-1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.11.007
  15. Fogel R, Cromack Jr K. 1977. Effect of habitat and substrate quality on Douglas fir litter decomposition in western Oregon. Can J Bot 55: 1632-1640. https://doi.org/10.1139/b77-190
  16. Gallardo A, Merino J. 1992. Nitrogen immobilization in leaf litter at two Mediterranean ecosystems of SW Spain. Biogeochemistry 15: 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00002937
  17. Garrett LG, Kimberley MO, Oliver GR, Pearce SH, Beets PN. 2012. Decomposition of coarse woody roots and branches in managed Pinus radiata plantations in New Zealand – A time series approach. For Ecol Manag 269: 116-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.12.030
  18. Gessner MO. 1991. Differences in processing dynamics of fresh and dried leaf litter in a stream ecosytem. Freshw Biol 26: 387-398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1991.tb01406.x
  19. Han YS. 2014. A study on carbon distribution and budget of dominant plant community in Gotjawal, Jeju Island. MS Thesis. Kongju University, Gongju, South Korea.
  20. Heal OW, Anderson JM, Swift MJ. 1997. Plant litter quality and decomposition: an historical overview. In:Driven by Nature: Plant Litter Quality and Decomposition (Cadisch G, Giller KE, eds). CAB International, Wallingford, pp 3-32.
  21. Helrich KC. 1990. Official methods of Analysis of the AOAC Association of Official Analytical Chemists Inc. Arlington, VA.
  22. Hobbie SE. 1996. Temperature and plants species control over litter decomposition in Alaskan tundra. Ecol Monogr 66: 503-522. https://doi.org/10.2307/2963492
  23. Klotzbücher T, Kaiser K, Guggenberger G, Gatzek C, Kalbitz K. 2011. A new conceptual model for the fate of lignin in decomposing plant litter. Ecology 92: 1052-1062. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-1307.1
  24. Koukoura Z, Mamolos AP, Kalburtji KL. 2003. Decomposition of dominant plant species litter in a semi-arid grassland. Appl Soil Ecol 23: 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(03)00006-4
  25. Lamlom SH, Savidge RA. 2003. A reassessment of carbon content in wood: variation within and between 41 North American species. Biomass Bioenergy 25: 381-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00033-3
  26. Lim SM, Cha SS, Shim JK. 2011. Effects of simulated acid rain on microbial activities and litter decomposition. J Ecol Field Biol 34: 401-410. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2011.042
  27. Meentemeyer V. 1978. Macroclimate and lignin control of litter decomposition rates. Ecology 59: 465-472. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936576
  28. Melillo JM, Aber JD, Muratore JF. 1982. Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 63: 621-626. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936780
  29. Millar CS. 1974. Decomposition of coniferous leaf litter. In:Biology of plant litter decomposition. (Dickinson C H, Pugh G J F, eds). Academic press, London and New York, pp 105-128.
  30. Moretto AS, Distel RA, Didoné NG. 2001. Decomposition and nutrient dynamic of leaf litter and roots from palatable and unpalatable grasses in a semi-arid grassland. Appl Soil Ecol 18: 31-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(01)00151-2
  31. Olson JS. 1963. Energy Storage and the Balance of Producers and Decomposers in Ecological Systems. Ecology 44: 322-331. https://doi.org/10.2307/1932179
  32. Polyakova O, Billor N. 2007. Impact of deciduous tree species on litterfall quality, decomposition rates and nutrient circulation in pine stands. For Ecol Manage 253: 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.06.049
  33. Ribeiro C, Madeira M, Arau´jo MC. 2002. Decomposition and nutrient release from leaf litter of Eucalyptus globules grown under different water and nutrient regimes. For Ecol Manag 171: 31-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00459-0
  34. Rowland AP, Roberts JD. 1994. Lignin and cellulose fractionation in decomposition studies using acid-detergent fibre methods. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 25: 269-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629409369035
  35. Sariyildiz T, Anderson JM. 2003. Interactions between litter quality, decomposition and soil fertility: a laboratory study. Soil Biol Biochem 35: 391-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00290-0
  36. Saura-Mas S, Estiarte M, Penuelas J, Lloret F. 2012. Effects of climate change on leaf litter decomposition across post-fire plant regenerative groups. Environ Exp Bot 77: 274-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.11.014
  37. Silver WL, Miya RK. 2001. Global patterns in root decomposition: comparisons of climate and litter quality effects. Oecologia 129: 407-419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420100740
  38. Singh KP, Singh PK, Tripathi SK. 1999. Litterfall, litter decomposition and nutrient release patterns in four native tree species raised on coal mine spoil at Singrauli, India. Biol Fertil Soils 29: 371-378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050567
  39. Sundarapandian SM, Swamy PS. 1999. Litter production and leaf-litter decomposition of selected tree species in tropical forests at Kodayar in Western Ghats, India. For Ecol Manag 123: 231-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00062-6
  40. Swift MJ, Heal OW, Anderson JM. 1979. Decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. University of California Press, Oakland, CA.
  41. Tateno R, Tokuchi N, Yamanaka N, Du S, Otsuki K, Shimamura T, Xue Z, Wang S, Hou Q. 2007. Comparison of litterfall production and leaf litter decomposition between an exotic black locust plantation and an indigenous oak forest near Yan’an on the Loess Plateau, China. Forest Ecol Manage 241: 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.12.026
  42. Van Vuuren MMI, Berendse F, De Visser W. 1993. Species and site differences in the decomposition of litters and roots from wet heathlands. Can J Bot 71: 167-173. https://doi.org/10.1139/b93-019
  43. Vitousek PM, Turner DR, Parton WJ, Sanford RL. 1994. Litter decomposition on the Mauna Loa environmental matrix, Hawai’i: patterns, mechanisms, and models. Ecology 75: 418-429. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939545
  44. Wang Q, Wang S, Huang Y. 2008. Comparisons of litterfall, litter decomposition and nutrient return in a monoculture Cunninghamia lanceolata and a mixed stand in southern China. For Ecol Manag 255: 1210–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.10.026
  45. Wieder WR, Cleveland CC, Townsend AR. 2009. Controls over leaf litter decomposition in wet tropical forests. Ecology 90: 3333-3341. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-2294.1
  46. Won HY, Kim DK, Lee KJ, Park SB, Choi JS, Mun HT. 2014. Long term decomposition and nutrients dynamics of Quercus mongolica and Pinus densiflora leaf litter in Mt. Worak National Park. Korean J Environ Ecol 28: 566-573. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2014.28.5.566
  47. Yang FF, Li YL, Zhou GY, Wenigmann KO, Zhang DQ, Wenigmann M, Liu SZ, Zhang QM. 2010. Dynamics of coarse woody debris and decomposition rates in an old-growth forest in lower tropical China. For Ecol Manag 259: 1666-1672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.01.046
  48. Yang KC. 1995. Studies on litter decomposition and nutrient release in some three spacies. MS Thesis. Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
  49. Yim YJ, Kira T. 1975. Distribution of forest vegetation and climate in the Korea peninsula; I. Distribution of some indices of thermal climate. Jap J Ecol 25: 77-88.
  50. Yim YJ, Lee WC. 1976. On the vegetations of Judo and Gamagseum. J Plant Biol 19: 49-61.
  51. Zimmer M. 2002. Is decomposition of woodland leaf litter influenced by its species richness?. Soil Biol Biochem 34: 277-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00173-0