Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education (정보교육학회논문지)

Korea Association of Information Education (한국정보교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Design Trend and Improvement Strategies of Contents Developed by Teachers -Focus on Prizewinner of the Research Competition on Educational Informatization-

교사 개발 콘텐츠의 설계 동향과 개선 방안 -교육정보화연구대회 입상작을 중심으로-

  • Jo, Miheon (Dept. of Computer Education, Cheongju National University of Education)
  • 조미헌 (청주교육대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Received : 2015.07.04
  • Accepted : 2015.08.28
  • Published : 2015.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyzed the trend and problems in the design of contents developed by teachers, and suggested strategies for improvement. It analyzed the contents ranked as the first level in the Research Competition on Educational Informatization for the last 3 years. Concerning the 8 types of instructional activities and the 6 types of knowledge acquisition, most contents took limited types(i.e., the individual tutoring type, the concept learning type and the principle learning type). In addition, when the contents were evaluated according to the quality certification criteria for educational software, it was found that the quality level of the design was low in many criteria. When the content analysis was applied for the in-depth analysis of design characteristics, various problems were found in the areas such as evaluation, feedback and learning objectives. Also other common problems were found in the design areas such as level-based differentiated learning, interaction between students and contents, presentation of text and narration, utilization of information on a student, screen design, the content level appropriate for students. In relation to the problems found from the analysis, some strategies for improvement were suggested concerning the following topics: question selection and guidance for evaluation, content and types of feedback, statement of learning objectives, selection of content, interaction, and screen design.

본 연구는 교사가 개발한 콘텐츠의 설계 동향과 문제들을 분석하고, 개선방안을 모색하였다. 교육정보화연구 대회에서 최근 3년 동안 1등급을 받은 콘텐츠들을 분석하였다. 콘텐츠를 8가지 교수 학습 활동 유형과 6가지 지식 유형으로 나누어 살펴보았을 때, 대부분의 콘텐츠가 개인교수 유형과 개념 및 원리 학습 유형에 치중되어 있었다. 한편, 교육용 소프트웨어 품질인증 기준을 적용한 결과, 다수의 준거들에서 미흡하게 설계된 것으로 밝혀졌다. 이와 더불어서, 내용 분석 방법을 적용하여 설계의 특성을 심층적으로 분석한 결과, 평가, 피드백, 학습목표 등과 관련하여 다수의 문제들이 발견되었으며, 이 외에도 수준별 학습 지원, 학습자와 내용 간의 상호작용, 텍스트와 내레이션 제시, 학습자 정보 처리, 화면 설계, 학습자의 수준을 고려한 내용 선정 등에서 몇 가지 공통된 문제들이 발견되었다. 분석 결과로 발견된 문제들과 관련하여 평가 문항 선정 및 안내, 피드백 내용 및 종류, 학습목표 기술, 학습내용 선정, 상호작용, 텍스트 제시, 화면 설계 등에 대한 개선 방안들이 제안되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ban, M. S., Jang, S. H., & Kim, I. S. (2003). Improvement Strategies for the Service Management and Policy of Educational Contents Quality Certification. Korea Education and Research Information Service.
  2. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flipped Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. International Society for Technology in Education.
  3. Byeon, S. Y., Lee, S. K., & Gwon, S. Y. (2006). Analysis of the Current Status of e-Learning in Companies. Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training.
  4. Chang, H. (2010). A Comparative Analysis of Design Methods for Educational Games. Journal of Korea Game Society, 10(6), 25-35.
  5. Clark, R C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). e-Learning and the Science of Instruction. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  6. Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2011). The Systematic Design of Instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
  7. Digital Times (2015, 4, 12). The Korean Intellectual Property Office Plans to Find Excellent e-Learning Contents.
  8. Han, T. M., Ban, M. S., Kim, I. S., & Jang, S. H. (2003). The Development of a Quality Assurance System for Educational Contents. Korea Education and Research Information Service.
  9. Heo, H. O., Lim, K. Y., Seo, J. H., & Kim, Y. A. (2011). Modeling of 21st Century Learner and Teacher Competencies. Korea Education and Research Information Service.
  10. Horton, W. (2012). E-Learning by Design. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  11. Jin, S., & Rha, I. (2009). A framework of teaching competencies and comparison of the perception: between Pre-service and In-service elementary school teachers in Korea. The Journal of Elementary Education, 22(1), 343-368.
  12. Jo, M. H., Kim, M. K., Kim. M. R., Lee, O. H, & Heo, H. O. (2015). Design of e-Learning Contents. KyoungGi: KyoYookBook.
  13. Joo, Y. J., & Lee, J. H. (2005). A study on the criteria for quality assurance in cyber universities. Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 95-130. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.21.1.95
  14. Kang, M. H., Kang, I. A., Song, S. H., Lim, C. I., Cho, I. H., Choi, S. J., & Heo, H. O. (2007). The Design of e-Learning Contents for the Future. KyeongGi: Seohyunsa.
  15. Kim, D. S., Jeong, O. Y., & Kang, S. P. (2002). Exploration of Instructional Design Theories. Seoul: Wonmisa.
  16. Kim, H. B., Park, I., & Lim, B. R. (2005). A Study on Utilizing Strategies for the Cooperating Development & Use e-Learning Contents among Universities. Korea Education and Research Information Service.
  17. Kim, H. J., Heo, H. O., Kim, E. Y., & Ban, M. S. (2012). Research on the Development of a Teacher Training Program for Smart Education. Korea Education and Research Information Service.
  18. Kim, I., & You, Y. (2006). Development of quality assurance support system for e-Learning contents. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 12(1), 107-130.
  19. Kim, S. W. (2015). Understanding of Educational Evaluation. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  20. Kim, Y. S., Kim, H. J., Han, S. Y. (2007). Learning Theory and Design of e-Learning Environment. KyoungGi: KyoYookBook.
  21. Korea Education and Research Information Service, & National e-Learning Quality Assurance Center (2014). Guideline for e-Learning Contents Quality Certification.
  22. Lee, J. J. (2013). The Definition and Value of Contents. CEO&. 9. Retrieved on 10 August from http://blog.naver.com/PostView.nhn?blogId=sh2030100&logNo=80198120388.
  23. Leem, J. (2009). Current status and future tasks of e-Learning contents design in corporate education. Journal of Lifelong Learning Society, 5(1), 45-72.
  24. Lim, B., & Lee, J. (2007). Current status of e-Learning contents in higher education. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 13(2), 277-307.
  25. Lim, C. (2012). Models and Theories of Instructional Design. KyoungGi: KyoYookBook.
  26. Lim, H., Yoo, Y., & Chung, J. (2014). The comparison analysis of domestic research trends of educational technology in last decade. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 20(2), 137-159.
  27. Ministry of Education (2014). Driving Strategies for the 8th Research Competition on Educational Informatization.
  28. Ministry of Education and Science Technology (2011). Driving Strategies for Smart Education.
  29. Ministry of Education, & Korea Education and Research Information Service (2013). 2013 White Paper on ICT in Education Korea.
  30. Ministry of Education, & Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (2015). Analysis Guideline of Assessment Results for Understanding Students' Achievement.
  31. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kalman, H., & Kemp, J. E. (2011). Designing Effective Instruction. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  32. Park, K. (2007). Instructional design model and practice: a survey of design practice. Journal of Educational Technology, 23(4), 1-30.
  33. Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-chellman, A. A. (2009). Instructional Design Theories and Models(Volume III), Florence, Kentucky: Routledge, 2009.
  34. Reiser, R. V., & Dempsey, J. V. (2011). Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology, Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.
  35. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153-189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
  36. Smaldino, W. E., Lowther, D. L., & Russell, J. D. (2007). Instructional Media and Technologies for Learning(9th ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  37. Song, S. H. (2008). Preliminary Study for the Design of Digital Edutainment Content. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 14(2), 159-188.

Cited by

  1. SW교육 콘텐츠 개발의 학습자 선호 분석 vol.21, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2017.21.6.691