정보교육학회논문지 (Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education)

  • 제19권1호
  • /
  • Pages.45-56
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1229-3245(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8428(eISSN)
한국정보교육학회 (Korea Association of Information Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

장기간의 로봇활용교육이 초등학생의 창의성에 미치는 효과

The Effects of a Long Term Robot Based Instruction on the Creativity of Elementary Students

  • 투고 : 2015.01.27
  • 심사 : 2015.03.03
  • 발행 : 2015.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 장기간에 걸친 로봇활용교육이 학생들의 창의성에 어떠한 효과를 미치는지를 밝히는 데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 2011년부터 2012년까지 로봇활용교육 연구학교로 지정된 초등학교의 237명 학생을 대상으로 2차에 걸친 창의성 검사를 실시하였다. 검사 결과를 바탕으로 얻은 결론은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 장기간 동안 로봇활용교육에 참여한 학생들의 창의성은 유의미하게 향상되었고, 특히 1차 검사 점수와 유의미한 향상이 나타났다. 둘째, 창의성 하위요인 중 유창성과 독창성이 유의미하게 향상되었고, 1차 검사 이전에 유의미한 향상이 나타났다. 셋째, 남학생과 여학생 모두 창의성이 유의미하게 향상되었고, 검사 시기와 성별 간의 상호작용은 유의미하지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 초등학교 저 중 고학년 모두 창의성이 유의미하게 향상되었고, 검사 시기와 학년군 간의 상호작용은 유의미하지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 한편, 학년군에 따른 창의성 향상에 대한 차이를 살펴본 결과, 고학년과 중 저학년 간에는 유의미한 차이가 나타났다.

This article examines the effects of a long term robot based instruction on the creativity of elementary students. To explain these effects, we conducted similar creativity test twice to 237 students of schools which had been designated as a robot based instruction model from 2011 to 2012. From these test results, the following three conclusions may be drawn: (1) The creativity of students who had participated in long term robot based instruction increased significantly, especially after the first test. (2) The fluency and originality as two of the sub-creativity factors are also accelerated significantly, especially after the first test. (3) The creativity of male and female students are all improved significantly but the test period factor and the interaction factor between male and female are not significant. (4) All elementary students of the lower grades(1st and 2nd grades), middle grades(3rd and 4th grades) and higher grades(5th and 6th grades) increased significantly but the test period factor and the interaction factor between the grades were not significant. On the other hand, the creativity improvement between lower-middle grades and higher grades is significant.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hong, Ki-Cheon, & Shim, Jae-Guk (2013). A Study of STEAM Education for Elementary Science Subject with Robots. Korea Association of information education, 17(1), 83-91.
  2. Jeon, Kyung-Won, & Jeon, Kyung-Nam (2008). A Expert Guidebook on Creativity Test(K-FCTES) for Elementary School Students. Seoul: Korea Psychological Service.
  3. Jeon, Kyung-Won, & Jeon, Kyung-Nam (2008). Creativity Test(K-FCTES) for Elementary School Students. Seoul: Korea Psychological Service.
  4. Kim, Chul (2012). An Analysis of Domestic Research Trend and Educational Effects in Relation to Robot Education. Korea Association of information education, 16(2), 233-243.
  5. Kim, Chul (2013). A Study on Systematic Review of Learning with a Robot. Korea Association of information education, 17(2), 199-209.
  6. Kim, Jong-Hoon⋅Kim, Jong-Jin, & Lee, Tae-Oak (2006). A Study on the Development of Creativity in Elementary School Through Micro-Robot Education. The Korean Contents Association, 6(8), 124-132.
  7. Kim, Yeong-Ae.Kim, Kyung-Hyun.Baek, Je-Eun.Jang, Yu-Jin.Kim, Du-Gyu.Heo, Kyun, & Chae, Kyung-Hwa (2012). The Effects of the Robot Based Instruction in 2012. Korea Education & Research Information Service, CR 2013-4.
  8. Korea Education & Research Information Service (2013). The Guide of Teaching and Learning Process Plan with a Robot. TL-2013-2-1-9.
  9. Lee, Eun-Kyoung, & Lee, Young-Jun (2008). The Effects of a Robot Based Programming Learning on Learners' Creative Problem Solving Potential. Korean Institute of Industrial Educators, 33(2), 120-136.
  10. Lee, Hwa-Jeong.Han, Jeong-Hey, & Jo, Mi-Heon (2013). Effect Analysis of Learning with a Robot for Improving Creativity in the Regular Curriculum of Elementary School. The Korean society for Child Education, 22(2), 19-35.
  11. Lee, Young-Jun, & Lee, Eun-Kyoung (2008). An Algorithm Learning Program with Robot. The Korean Association of Computer Education, 12(1), 33-44.
  12. Lindh, J., & Holgersson, T. (2007). Does lego training stimulate pupils' ability to solve logical problems?. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1097-1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.12.008
  13. Ministry of Education and Science Technology (2009). The curriculum revision in 2009.
  14. Park, Gwang-Ryeol (2011). A Review of Current Status and Direction of Education of Robot and Educational Materials in Elementary Schools. The Society of Korean Practical Arts Education, 24(3), 323-343.
  15. Park, Gyeong-Jae, & Lee Su-Jeong (2010). A Comparative Study of the Effect of Dolittle and Robot Programming Education on Creativity. Korea Association of information education, 13(4), 619-626.
  16. Park, Heung-Jae, & Moon, Seong-Hwan (2010). Development and Application of a Robot Drama Program for Children's Creativity. The Society of Korean Practical Arts Education, 23(2), 159-181.
  17. Park, Jung-Ho, & Kim, Chul (2011). The Effects of the Robot Based Art Instruction on the Creativity in Elementary School. Korea Association of information education, 15(2), 277-285.
  18. Park, Jung-Ho, & Kim, Chul (2011). The Effects of Robot Based Mathematics Learning on Learners' Attitude and Problem Solving Skills. The Korean Association of Computer Education, 13(5), 71-80.
  19. Resnick, M. (2008). Showing the seeds for a more creative society. Learing & Leading with technology, 25(4), 18-22.
  20. Shin, Na-Min, & Kim, Sang-A (2007). What do robots have to do with student Learning?. Korean Association for Educational International and Media, 13(3), 77-99.
  21. Park, Jung-Ho, & Kim, Chul (2011). The Effect of STEM Integration Education Using Educational Robot on Academic Achievement and Subject Attitude. Korea Association of information education, 15(1), 11-22.
  22. Suh, Hyeong-Eob (2007). The Effects on Improving Creativity with a PBL-based Robot Education Program: Case of a Science High School. Korean Society for Engineering Education, 10(4), 93-122.

피인용 문헌

  1. Recent Trends in R-Learning Research in Korea and its Effects on Preschool and Elementary School Children vol.6, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.30528/jolss.2016.6.2.004
  2. 교육대학교 로봇 활용 소프트웨어 교육 과정 개발을 위한 예비 교사의 인식 조사 연구 vol.21, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2017.21.3.277
  3. 로봇 활용 SW 교육이 초등학생의 컴퓨팅사고력에 미치는 효과 vol.21, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2017.21.3.285