Steel and Composite Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Moment redistribution of continuous composite I-girder with high strength steel

  • Joo, Hyun Sung (School of Civil, Environmental & Architectural Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Moon, Jiho (New Transportation Research Center, Korea Railroad Research Institute (KRRI)) ;
  • Sung, Ik-Hyun (Department of Civil Engineering, Hanseo University) ;
  • Lee, Hak-Eun (School of Civil, Environmental & Architectural Engineering, Korea University)
  • Received : 2013.08.20
  • Accepted : 2014.09.29
  • Published : 2015.04.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The continuous composite I-girder should have a sufficient rotation capacity (or ductility) to redistribute the negative bending moment into an adjacent positive bending moment region. However, it is generally known that the ductility of the high strength steel is smaller than that of conventional steel, and application of high strength steel can cause ductility problems in a negative moment region of the I-girder. In this study, moment redistribution of the continuous composite I-girder with high strength steel was studied, where high strength steel with yield stress of 690 MPa was considered (the ultimate stress of the steel was 800 MPa). The available and required rotation capacity of the continuous composite I-girder with high strength steel was firstly derived based on the stress-strain curve of high strength steel and plastic analysis, respectively. A large scale test and a series of non-linear finite element analysis for the continuous composite I-girder with high strength steel were then conducted to examine the effectiveness of proposed models and to investigate the effect of high strength steel on the inelastic behavior of the negative bending moment region of the continuous composite I-girder with high strength steel. Finally, it can be found that the proposed equations provided good estimation of the requited and available rotation capacity of the continuous composite I-girder with high strength steel.

Keywords

References

  1. ABAQUS (2010), Abaqus Analysis User's Manual version 6.10, Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp.
  2. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (2007), LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, (4th Edition).
  3. Barth, K.E., White, D.W. and Bobb, B.M. (2007), "Negative bending resistance of HPS70W girders", J Construct. Steel Res., 53(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(99)00037-1
  4. Belarbi, A. and Hsu, T.T.C. (1995), "Constitutive laws of softened concrete in biaxial tension-compression", ACI Struct. J., 92(5), 562-573.
  5. Cevik, A. (2007), "Genetic programming based formulation of rotation capacity of wide flange beams", J. Construct. Steel Res., 63(7), 884-893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.09.004
  6. Cevik, A. (2011), "Neuro-fuzzy modeling of rotation capacity of wide flange beams", Expert Syst. Applicat., 38(5), 5650-5661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.10.070
  7. Chen, S. and Jia, Y. (2008), "Required and available moment redistribution of continuous steel-concrete composite beams", J Construct Steel Res., 64(2), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2007.05.006
  8. Earls, C.J. and Shah, B.J. (2002), "High performance steel bridge girder compactness", J. Construct. Steel Res., 58(5-8), 859-880. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00086-4
  9. Felkel, J.P., Rizos, D.C. and Ziehl, P.H. (2007), "Structural performance and design evaluation of HPS 70W bridge girders", J. Construct. Steel Res., 63(7), 909-921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.09.002
  10. Green, P.S., Sause, R. and Ricles, J.M. (2002), "Strength and ductility of HPS flexural members", J. Construct. Steel Res., 58(5-8), 907-941. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00102-X
  11. Guzelbey, I.H., Cevik, A. and Gogus, M.T. (2006), "Prediction of rotation capacity of wide flange beams using neural networks", J. Construct. Steel Res., 62(10), 950-961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.01.003
  12. Joo, H.S., Moon, J. Choi, B.H. and Lee, H.E. (2013), "Rotation capacity and optimum bracing point of high strength steel I-girders", J. Construct. Steel Res., 88, 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.05.008
  13. Kang, S.C., Kim, K.S. and Lee, J.K. (2011), "The evaluation of residual stresses in butt welded and fillet welded specimens with HSB800", RIST Research Paper, 25(1), 1-7. [In Korean]
  14. Kemp, A.R. (1996), "Inelastic local and lateral buckling in design codes", J. Struct. Eng., 122(4), 374-382. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:4(374)
  15. Kemp, A.R. and Dekker, N.W. (1991), "Available rotation capacity in steel and composite beams", The Struct. Eng., 69(5), 88-97.
  16. Kemp, A.R. and Nethercot, D.A. (2001), "Required and available rotations in continuous composite beams with semi-rigid connections", J. Construct. Steel Res., 57(4), 375-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(00)00025-0
  17. Lay, M.G. and Galambos, T.V. (1967), "Inelastic beams under moment gradient", J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 93(1), 381-399.
  18. Nie, J. and Cai, C.S. (2003), "Steel-concrete composite beams considering shear slip effects", J. Struct. Eng., 129(4), 495-506. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:4(495)
  19. Ricles, J.M., Sause, R. and Green, P.S. (1998), "High-strength steel: implications of material and geometric characteristics on inelastic flexural behavior", Eng. Struct., 20(4-6), 323-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00024-2
  20. Sause, R. and Fahnestock, L.A. (2001), "Strengh and ductility of HPS-100W I-girders in negative flexure", J. Bridge Eng., 6(5), 316-323. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:5(316)

Cited by

  1. Numerical investigation of continuous composite girders strengthened with CFRP vol.21, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.21.6.1307
  2. Transmission of ultrasonic guided wave for damage detection in welded steel plate structures vol.33, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.33.3.445