References
- Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:16.e1-4.
- Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG, Firestone AR. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod 2004;74:298-303.
- Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:794-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.023
- Horton HM, Miller JR, Gaillard PR, Larson BE. Technique comparison for efficient orthodontic tooth measurements using digital models. Angle Orthod 2010;80:254-61. https://doi.org/10.2319/041709-219.1
- Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011;14:1-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01503.x
- Sjogren AP, Lindgren JE, Huggare JA. Orthodontic study cast analysis--reproducibility of recordings and agreement between conventional and 3D virtual measurements. J Digit Imaging 2010;23:482-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-009-9211-y
- Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod 2003;73:301-6.
- Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:101-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00152-5
- Gracco A, Buranello M, Cozzani M, Siciliani G. Digital and plaster models: a comparison of measurements and times. Prog Orthod 2007;8:252-9.
- Nalcaci R, Bicakci AA, Ozan F. Noncompliance screw supported maxillary molar distalization in a parallel manner. Korean J Orthod 2010;40:250-9. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2010.40.4.250
- Kim SJ, Chun YS, Jung SH, Park SH. Three dimensional analysis of tooth movement using different types of maxillary molar distalization appliances. Korean J Orthod 2008;38:376-87. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2008.38.6.376
- Ashmore JL, Kurland BF, King GJ, Wheeler TT, Ghafari J, Ramsay DS. A 3-dimensional analysis of molar movement during headgear treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:18-29. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.120687
- Bjork A, Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod 1983;5:1-46. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/5.1.1
- Champagne M. Reliability of measurements from photocopies of study models. J Clin Orthod 1992;26:648-50.
- Jang I, Tanaka M, Koga Y, Iijima S, Yozgatian JH, Cha BK, et al. A novel method for the assessment of three-dimensional tooth movement during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2009;79:447-53. https://doi.org/10.2319/042308-225.1
- Lai EH, Yao CC, Chang JZ, Chen I, Chen YJ. Threedimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:636-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.017
- Cha BK, Lee JY, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Yoshida N. Analysis of tooth movement in extraction cases using three-dimensional reverse engineering technology. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:325-31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm019
- McGuinness NJ, Stephens CD. Storage of orthodontic study models in hospital units in the U.K. Br J Orthod 1992;19:227-32. https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.19.3.227
- Thiruvenkatachari B, Al-Abdallah M, Akram NC, Sandler J, O'Brien K. Measuring 3-dimensional tooth movement with a 3-dimensional surface laser scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135:480-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.040
- Kuroda T, Motohashi N, Tominaga R, Iwata K. Three-dimensional dental cast analyzing system using laser scanning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:365-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70036-7
- Hajeer MY, Millett DT, Ayoub AF, Siebert JP. Applications of 3D imaging in orthodontics: part I. J Orthod 2004;31:62-70. https://doi.org/10.1179/146531204225011346
- Mavropoulos A, Karamouzos A, Kiliaridis S, Papadopoulos MA. Efficiency of noncompliance simultaneous first and second upper molar distalization: a three-dimensional tooth movement analysis. Angle Orthod 2005;75:532-9.
- Bell A, Ayoub AF, Siebert P. Assessment of the accuracy of a three-dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study models. J Orthod 2003;30: 219-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/ortho/30.3.219
- Keating AP, Knox J, Bibb R, Zhurov AI. A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Orthod 2008;35:191-201. https://doi.org/10.1179/146531207225022626
- Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Orthodontic diagnosis: the development of a problem list. In: Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM, eds. Contemporary orthodontics. 4th ed. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby Elsevier;2007. p. 167-233.
- Choi JI, Cha BK, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Choi DS, Jang IS. Validity of palatal superimposition of 3-dimensional digital models in cases treated with rapid maxillary expansion and maxillary protraction headgear. Korean J Orthod 2012;42:235-41. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2012.42.5.235
- Bailey LT, Esmailnejad A, Almeida MA. Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts in extraction and nonextraction cases. Angle Orthod 1996;66:73-8.
- Hoggan BR, Sadowsky C. The use of palatal rugae for the assessment of anteroposterior tooth movements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:482-8. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.113001
- Simmons JD, Moore RN, Erickson LC. A longitudinal study of anteroposterior growth changes in the palatine rugae. J Dent Res 1987;66:1512-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660092001
- Choi DS, Jeong YM, Jang I, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Cha BK. Accuracy and reliability of palatal superimposition of three-dimensional digital models. Angle Orthod 2010;80:497-503.
Cited by
- Novel Method for Superposing 3D Digital Models for Monitoring Orthodontic Tooth Movement vol.46, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-018-2029-3
- A novel method for superimposition and measurements on maxillary digital 3D models-studies on validity and reliability vol.40, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjx029
- The effect of regular dental cast artifacts on the 3D superimposition of serial digital maxillary dental models vol.9, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46887-1
- Digital Models: Comparison of Scanning Angulations and Superimposition vol.10, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4236/ojst.2020.108021
- Assessment of techniques used for superimposition of maxillary and mandibular 3D surface models to evaluate tooth movement: a systematic review vol.42, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjz075
- 3D Scanners in Orthodontics-Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives-A Systematic Review vol.18, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031121