Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Flow and Emotional Experience of College Student Among Type of Occupational Balance Using Experience Sampling Methods Based on Smart Phone

스마트폰 기반 경험표집법을 통해 수집된 작업균형유형에 따른 대학생의 몰입과 정서경험 분석

  • Hong, Seung-Pyo (Department of Occupational Therapy, Dongnam Health College) ;
  • Yoo, Yeon-Hwan (Department of Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Yonsei University) ;
  • Kwo, Jae-Sung (Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Science, Cheongju University)
  • 홍승표 (동남보건대학교 작업치료과) ;
  • 유연환 (연세대학교 대학원 작업치료학과) ;
  • 권재성 (청주대학교 보건의료대학 작업치료학과)
  • Received : 2014.11.17
  • Accepted : 2015.02.20
  • Published : 2015.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify the type of occupational balance of college students and analyze the differences between positive or negative emotions according to degree of flow. The Experience Sampling Methods (ESM) were conducted for 12 college students using smart phones. As a result, in activities of daily living group, apathy showed the highest percentage (34%) and in over work group, flow showed the highest percentage (41%). In occupational balance group, frequency of labor and leisure activities was high but boredom was experience a lot in leisure activities. When the students experienced flow in main activities, mean score of positive emotions showed the highest value. Through this study, we identified the differences of flow experience in occupational performance based on type of occupational balance and confirmed improvement of positive emotions in activities experienced flow.

본 연구에서는 대학생들을 대상으로 스마트폰 어플리케이션 기반의 경험표집법을 통해 학생들의 작업균형 유형을 구분하고, 그에 따른 몰입과 긍정 부정정서의 차이를 분석하고자 하였다. 스마트폰을 사용하는 대학생 12명에게 하루 8회, 5일간 경험표집법을 시행하였다. 경험표집법을 통해서 외적경험으로는 주활동을, 내적경험으로는 몰입과 긍정 부정정서 상태를 파악하였고, 주활동의 빈도수에 따라 작업균형유형을 분류하였다. 분류된 작업균형유형으로는 일상생활군 3명, 노동과다군 8명, 작업균형군 1명이었다. 일상생활군에서는 무관심을 경험한 활동이 34%로 가장 높았고, 노동과다군에서는 노동활동에서 몰입을 경험한 활동이 41%로 가장 높았다. 작업균형군에서는 노동과 여가활동의 빈도가 높았지만, 여가활동에서 지루함을 많이 경험하였다. 연구대상자의 주활동 시 몰입을 경험할 때 긍정정서의 평균값이 가장 높았다. 본 연구를 통하여 작업균형유형에 따른 작업수행영역별 몰입경험에 차이가 있음과 몰입을 경험하는 활동 시 누적된 긍정정서가 높아짐을 확인할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. American Occupational Therapy Association, Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol.56, No.6, pp. 609-639, 2002. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.56.6.609
  2. American Occupational Therapy Association, Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process(2nd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 62, No. 6, pp. 625-683, 2008. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.62.6.625
  3. C. L. Backman, Occupational balance: Exploring the relationships among daily occupations and their influence on well-being. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 71, No. 4, pp. 202-209, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740407100404
  4. E. Townsend, Enabling occupation: An occupational therapy perspective. Canadian Association of Occupational Therapist Publications ACE, 1997.
  5. L. Farnworth, Pediatric issues in occupational therapy: A compendium of leading scholarship. Baltimore: AOTA Press, 2003.
  6. B. J. Jeon, A study on factors influencing elderly's life time use and occupational balance. Ph.D. dissertation, Sungkyunkwan University. 2010.
  7. R. Zemke, & F. Clark, Occupational science: The evolving discipline. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis, 1996.
  8. E. A. Spencer, Toward a balance of work and play: Promotion of health and wellness. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 87-99, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1080/J003v05n04_07
  9. M. Law, C. Baum, & W. Dunn, Measuring occupational performance: Supporting best practice in occupational therapy(2nd. ed.). NY: SLACK Incorporated, 2005.
  10. M. Csikczentmihalyi, & R. Larson, Validity and reliability of the experience sampling method. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Vol. 175, No. 9, pp. 526-536, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-198709000-00004
  11. M. Csikczentmihalyi, Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. NY: Harper Perennial, 1990.
  12. S. Y. Shin, Experience sampling method: Theory and practice. Journal of Korean Society for Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sports Science, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 59-76, 2010.
  13. G. H. Han, & J. Y. Son, Emotional experience of Korean urban elderly in everyday lives using experience sampling method: A focus on gender differences. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Society. Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 1159-1182, 2009.
  14. H. J. Yoo, The consumption experiences and perceived quality of life of Korean housewives through the experiential sampling method: Focused on shopping activity. Korean Journal of Human Ecology. Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 349-365, 2007. https://doi.org/10.5934/KJHE.2007.16.2.349
  15. L. Farnworth, E. Mostert, S. Harrison, & D. Worrell, The Experience Sampling Method: its potential use in occupational therapy research. Occupational Therapy International, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1-17, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.23
  16. K. O. Kim, E. J. Hyun, I. S. Choe, & H. J. Yoo, Flow and internal experiences of Korean high school students in view of the comparison between pubic and proprietary school. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association. Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 127-142, 2004.
  17. J. M. Hektner, J. A. Schmidt, & M. Csikczentmihalyi, Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. NY: SAGE Pub, 2006.
  18. J. K. Jeong, Time diary and experience sampling method: A systematic comparison of time use instruments. Survey Research, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 44-68, 2008.
  19. M. Csikczentmihalyi, & I. S. Csikczentmihalyi, Optimal experience: Psychological studies of Flow in consciousness. NY: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
  20. H. J. Lee, A study for quality of life in musically talented students using experience sampling method. Ph.D. dissertation, Sungkyunkwan University. 2008.
  21. M. Csikczentmihalyi, & R. Kubey, Television and rest of life: A systematic comparison of subjective experience. Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 45, pp. 317-328, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1086/268667
  22. Statistics Korea, Report on the time use survey. Statistics Korea, 2010.
  23. Y. G. Kim, The analysis study of life-style for efficient occupational perfonnance. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy. Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 51-62, 2005.
  24. M. Chang, A typology of division of labor among dual-earner couples with young children and their daily emotional experiences. Ph.D. dissertation, Seoul National University. 2006.
  25. K. L. Rebeiro, & J. M. Polgar, Enabling occupational performance: optimal experiences in therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 14-22, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841749906600102