DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Complication rates in patients using absorbable collagen sponges in third molar extraction sockets: a retrospective study

  • Cho, Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Jung, Hwi-Dong (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Kim, Bok-Joo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dong-A University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Chul-Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dong-A University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jung, Young-Soo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2014.09.06
  • Accepted : 2014.11.17
  • Published : 2015.02.28

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the postoperative complication rates for absorbable type-I collagen sponge (Ateloplug; Bioland) use in third molar extraction. Materials and Methods: From January to August 2013, 2,697 total patients undergoing third molar extraction and type-I collagen sponge application in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Yonsei University Dental Hospital (1,163 patients) and Dong-A University Hospital (1,534 patients) were evaluated in a retrospective study using their operation and medical records. Results: A total of 3,869 third molars in 2,697 patients were extracted and the extraction sockets packed with type-I collagen sponges to prevent post-operative complications. As a result, the overall complication rate was 4.52%, with 3.00% experiencing surgical site infection (SSI), 1.14% showing alveolar osteitis, and 0.39% experiencing hematoma. Of the total number of complications, SSI accounted for more than a half at 66.29%. Conclusion: Compared to previous studies, this study showed a relatively low incidence of complications. The use of type-I collagen sponges is recommended for the prevention of complications after third molar extraction.

Keywords

References

  1. Blondeau F, Daniel NG. Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: postoperative complications and their risk factors. J Can Dent Assoc 2007;73:325.
  2. Bloomer CR. Alveolar osteitis prevention by immediate placement of medicated packing. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90:282-4. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2000.108919
  3. Bouloux GF, Steed MB, Perciaccante VJ. Complications of third molar surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2007;19:117-28, vii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2006.11.013
  4. Bui CH, Seldin EB, Dodson TB. Types, frequencies, and risk factors for complications after third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:1379-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2003.04.001
  5. Phillips C, White RP Jr, Shugars DA, Zhou X. Risk factors associated with prolonged recovery and delayed healing after third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:1436-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2003.08.003
  6. Hwang JK, Kim KW. Complications of impacted third molar extraction: retrospective study. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;36:119-24. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2010.36.2.119
  7. Vezeau PJ. Dental extraction wound management: medicating postextraction sockets. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:531-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(00)90016-8
  8. Alexander RE. Dental extraction wound management: a case against medicating postextraction sockets. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:538-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(00)90017-X
  9. Konishi J, Miyamoto T, Miura A, Osaki K. An investigation into the wound healing action of the atelocollagen tooth extraction wound protection material (TRE-641) on tooth extraction site. J Jpn Soc Biomater 1998;16:266-75.
  10. Niki H, Uchida H, Kubo H, Kakudo K, Shimizutani K, Koseki Y, et al. Computed tomographic examination of bone healing after placement of collagen sponge matrix in the tooth extraction site. J Osaka Odontol Soc 2001;64;369-74.
  11. Haug RH, Perrott DH, Gonzalez ML, Talwar RM. The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons age-related third molar study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:1106-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.04.022
  12. Chiapasco M, Crescentini M, Romanoni G. Germectomy or delayed removal of mandibular impacted third molars: the relationship between age and incidence of complications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:418-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(95)90715-7
  13. Houston JP, McCollum J, Pietz D, Schneck D. Alveolar osteitis: a review of its etiology, prevention, and treatment modalities. Gen Dent 2002;50:457-63.
  14. Nam JW, Kim KW. The effects of atelo-collagen sponge insertion on the periodontal healing of second molars after impacted mandibular third molar extraction. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;35:112-9.
  15. Chuang SK, Perrott DH, Susarla SM, Dodson TB. Risk factors for inflammatory complications following third molar surgery in adults. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:2213-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.067

Cited by

  1. Validity of Collagen Plugs for Ridge Preservation in a Canine Model vol.26, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/id.0000000000000696
  2. Randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of absorbable collagen sponge after extraction of impacted mandibular third molar: split-mouth design vol.20, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-1063-3
  3. A Review of the Effects of Collagen Treatment in Clinical Studies vol.13, pp.22, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13223868