한국식품영양과학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition)

  • 제44권1호
  • /
  • Pages.152-159
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1226-3311(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-5978(eISSN)
한국식품영양과학회 (The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

수단-목적 사슬 이론을 적용한 소비자의 육류 편의제품에 대한 가치 측정: 미국 뉴욕 지역을 중심으로

Means-End Chain Approach to Understand Consumer Motivation Towards Convenience Meat Products: Focus on New York City in US Market

  • 투고 : 2014.08.04
  • 심사 : 2014.12.11
  • 발행 : 2015.01.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 미국 소비자들의 육류 선택 요인과 동기를 분석하고 소비에 따른 궁극적인 가치를 분석하여 한식 육류 편의식품의 해외 시장 진출을 위한 마케팅 커뮤니케이션 전략수립에 있어 기초 자료를 제공하는 것이다. 이를 위해 육류 편의식품의 소비 실태를 조사하고 수단-목적 사슬을 이용한 소비자들의 육류 편의식품에 대한 가치를 측정하고 분석하였다. 첫째, 육류 편의식품의 소비 실태 조사 결과 선호하는 조리 형태는 구이가 가장 많았고 주로 친구나 부모님등 주변의 권유로 정보를 얻는 것으로 조사되었다. 주 구입처와 희망하는 구입처는 모두 슈퍼마켓이었으며 선호하는 프로모션 방법으로는 무료 시식행사가 가장 많은 것으로 조사되었다. 이를 통해 해외시장 진출 전략제품으로 구이 종류의 한식 육류 편의제품에 대한 가능성을 탐색할 수 있었고 한식 육류 편의제품에 대한 소비증진과 잠재소비자 확보를 위해서는 소비자들이 주로 육류 편의식품을 구입하는 슈퍼마켓이나 대형마트 등에서 무료 시식행사를 통한 제품에 대한 적극적인 홍보와 접근성 증대가 필요한 것으로 판단된다. 둘째, 육류 편의식품에 대한 가치 측정 결과 속성-혜택-가치의 연결 관계는 '맛'-'맛이 좋음'-'기쁨', '맛'-'맛이 좋음'-'행복함', '위생'-'질병이 없음'-'삶의 질', '영양'-'건강한 삶'-'삶의 질'의 순으로 나타났다. 이를 통해 소비자들은 육류 편의식품의 '맛에 대한 만족'을 통해 최종적으로 '기쁨과 행복'의 가치를 추구하고 '위생적이고 영양적인 면'은 소비자들의 '삶의 질'을 향상시키고자 하는 가치에 기여하는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 한계점은 조사 대상자의 65.7%가 남성, 20대가 60.8%로 20대 남성에 편중되어 있어 성별과 연령별로 추구하는 가치가 반영되지 못하였을 것으로 사료된다. 이러한 점을 보완하여 추후 다양한 소비자 계층을 대상으로 소비자의 육류 편의제품에 대한 가치 측정이 수행된다면 보다 세분화된 제품의 개발 방향 및 마케팅 커뮤니케이션 전략을 마련할 수 있으리라 판단된다. 또한 향후 소비자의 가치 측정을 통한 한식의 육류 편의제품이 개발된다면 타깃 소비자층의 니즈를 반영하고 그들의 추구 가치를 충족시키기 위한 브랜드 아이덴티티 정립과 일관성 있는 메시지 전달을 통한 마케팅 커뮤니케이션 활동이 가능하리라 생각된다.

The purpose of this study was to analyze how consumers make links between convenience meat products and self-relevant consequences and value. Surveys on convenience meat product consumption patterns and hard laddering based on means-end chain theory were conducted from April 21 to April 25, 2014 and targeted 200 consumers in the US. The most preferred cooking method of convenience meat product was roast (25.9%) and the most common information medium was suggestions by friends and parents (37.1%). The main as well as desired places of purchasing were both the supermarket (33.6% and 27.3%, respectively). The most preferred promotion method was free sample events (38.5%). From analyzing means-end chains of convenience meat products, the most dominant value chain was 'taste (A)'-'good taste (C)'-'feel good (V)'. These results show that consumption of convenience meat products will increase when consumer expectations of taste and satisfaction are met. Further, results of the value measurement provide information on consumer satisfaction and needs and can be applied to set marketing strategies for Korean style convenience meat products.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Rokeach M. 1973. The nature of human values. New York Press, New York, NY, USA. p 1-438.
  2. Peater JP, Olson JC. 1993. Consumer behavior and marketing strategy. 3th ed. Irwin, New York, NY, USA. p 1-772.
  3. Woodruff RB, Schumann DW, Gardial SF. 1993. Understanding value and satisfaction from the customer's point of view. Survey of Business 29: 33-40.
  4. Moskowitz HR. 1985. New directions for product testing and sensory analysis of food. Food and Nutrition Press, Inc., Westport, CT, USA. Vol 30, p 737.
  5. Chamorro A, Miranda FJ, Rubio S, Valero V. 2012. Innovations and trends in meat consumption: An application of Delphi method in Spain. Meat Sci 92: 816-822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.07.007
  6. Resurreccion AVA. 2003. Sensory aspects of consumer choices for meat and meat products. Meat Sci 66: 11-20.
  7. Grunert KG. 2006. Future trends and consumer lifestyles with regard to meat consumption. Meat Sci 74: 149-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.04.016
  8. Brunner TA, van der Horst K, Siegrist M. 2010. Convenience food products. Drivers for consumption. Appetite 55: 498-506 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.08.017
  9. Lee YR. 2012. A study on future direction according to distributor's selling habit for Home Meal Replacement. MS Thesis. Chungang University, Seoul, Korea. p 102.
  10. Munoz AM. 1988. Consumer perceptions of meat. Understanding these results through descriptive analysis. Meat Sci 49: S287-S295.
  11. Jaeger SA, MacFie HJH. 2001. The effect of advertising format and means-end information on consumer expectations for apples. Food Qual Prefer 12: 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(00)00044-6
  12. Sorenson D, Henchion M. 2011. Understanding consumers' cognitive structures with regard to high pressure processing: A means-end chain application to the chilled ready meals category. Food Qual Prefer 22: 271-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.11.003
  13. Gutman J. 1982. A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes. J Marketing 46: 60-72. https://doi.org/10.2307/3203341
  14. Grunert K, Grunert S, Sorensen E. 1995. Means-end chains and laddering: an inventory of problems and an agenda for future research. MAPP, Aarhus, Denmark. Working paper No 34, p 1-26.
  15. Pieters R, Baumgartner H, Allen D. 1995. A means-end chain approach to consumer goal structures. International Journal of Research in Marketing 12: 227-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(95)00023-U
  16. Micthell A. 1983. The nine American life style. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, NY, USA. p 302.
  17. Reynolds TJ. 1985. Implication for value research: A micro vs. macro perspective. Psychology & Marketing 2: 297-305. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220020408
  18. Boecker A, Hartl J, Nocella G. 2008. How different are GM food accepters and rejecters really? A means-end chains application to yogurt in Germany. Food Qual Prefer 19: 383-394 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.11.006
  19. Brunso K, Scholderer J, Grunert KG. 2004. Testing relationships between values and food-related lifestyle: results from two European countries. Appetite 43: 195-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2004.05.001
  20. de Boer J, Hoogland CT, Boersema JJ. 2007. Towards more sustainable food choices: Value priorities and motivational orientations. Food Qual Prefer 18: 985-996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.04.002
  21. Dreezen E, Martijn C, Tenbült P, Kok G, de Vries NK. 2005. Food and values: an examination of values underlying attitudes toward genetically modified- and organically grown food products. Appetite 44: 115-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2004.07.003
  22. Fotopoulos C, Krystallis A, Ness M. 2003. Wine produced by organic grapes in Greece: using means-end chains analysis to reveal organic buyers' purchasing motives in comparison to the non-buyers. Food Qual Prefer 14: 549-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00130-1
  23. Le Page A, Cox DN, Georgie Russell C, Leppard PI. 2005. Assessing the predictive value of means-end-chain theory: an application to meat product choice by Australian middle- aged women. Appetite 44: 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2005.01.007
  24. Barrena R, Sanchez M. 2009. Consumption frequency and degree of abstraction: A study using the laddering technique on beef consumers. Food Qual Prefer 20: 144-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.08.002
  25. Kitsawad K, Guinard JX. 2014. Combining means-end chain analysis and the Portrait Value Questionnaire to research the influence of personal values on food choice. Food Qual Prefer 35: 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.01.003
  26. Bitzios M, Fraser I, Haddock-Fraser J. 2011. Functional ingredients and food choice: Results from a dual-mode study employing means-end-chain analysis and a choice experiment. Food Policy 36: 715-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.06.004
  27. Sorenson D, Henchion M, Marcos B, Ward P, Mullen AM, Allen P. 2011. Consumer acceptance of high pressure processed beef-based chilled ready meals: the mediating role of food-related lifestyle factors. Meat Sci 87: 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.09.006
  28. Santosa M, Guinard JX. 2011. Means-end chains analysis of extra virgin olive oil purchase and consumption behavior. Food Qual Prefer 22: 304-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.12.002
  29. Ares G, Gimenez A, Gambaro A. 2008. Understanding consumers' perception of conventional and functional yogurts using word association and hard laddering. Food Qual Prefer 19: 636-643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.05.005
  30. Lee SE. 2010. A study on analysis of wine lovers' value using means-end chain theory. MS Thesis. Sejong University, Seoul, Korea. p 120.
  31. Han HC, Seo JM. 2009. An analysis on the value pursuit for traditional Korean liquor using means-end chain theory. J Foodservice Manag Soc Korea 12: 205-227.
  32. Oh JS, Kim KS. 2007. An analysis on the consumers' perception structure for beverage using means-end chain theory. The Korean Journal of Advertising 18: 175-197.
  33. Daniel CR, Cross AJ, Koebnick C, Sinha R. 2010. Trends in meat consumption in the United States. Public Health Nutr 14: 575-583.
  34. Datamonitor. 2014. Consumer and innovation trends in meat, fish, and poultry. http://www.datamonitor.com/store/ Product/consumer_and_innovation_trends_in_meat_fish_ and_poultry_2014? productid=CM00198-064 (accessed Oct 2014). p 17-18.
  35. Korean Food Foundation. 2010. Research and marketing guide for Korean food globalization. Korean Food Foundation, Seoul, Korea. p 30.
  36. Korean Food Foundation. 2010. Korean food reception in USA. Korean Food Foundation, Seoul, Korea. p 76-133.
  37. Lee GH. 2001. The research methods of social science. Bobmunsa, Paju, Korea. p 337-340.
  38. Lind LW. 2007. Consumer involvement and perceived differentiation of different kinds of pork-a means-end chain analysis. Food Qual Prefer 19: 690-700.
  39. Kelonsky DB, Gengler CE, Mulvey MS. 1993. Understanding the factors influencing ski destination choice: A meansend analytic approach. Journal of Leisure Research 25: 362-379.
  40. Valette-Rlorence P, Rappacchi B. 1991. Research improvements in means-end chain analysis using graph theory and correspondence analysis. Journal of Advertising Research 31: 30-45.
  41. Datamonitor. 2014. Consumer and innovation trends in processed meat. http://www.datamonitor.com/store/product/consumer_ and_innovation_trends_in_processed_meat?productid =CM00242-039 (accessed Oct 2014). p 1-63.
  42. Jung JW. 2012. Exploring the means-end chain of citizens' complaining behavior: An application of MEC theory and laddering technique. MS Thesis. Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea. p 112.
  43. de A Costa AI, Schoolmeester D, Dekker M, Jongen WMF. 2007. To cook or not cook: A means-end study of motives for choice of meal solutions. Food Qual Prefer 18: 77-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.08.003
  44. Resano H, Perez-Cueto FJ, de Barcellos MD, Veflen-Olsen N, Grunert KG, Verbeke W. 2011. Consumer satisfaction with pork meat and derived products in five European countries. Appetite 56: 167-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.10.008

피인용 문헌

  1. HMR 선택속성이 태도와 재구매의도에 미치는 영향: 브랜드 신뢰의 조절역할을 중심으로 vol.24, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.20878/cshr.2018.24.3.003