DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of cross-beam on stresses revealed in orthotropic steel bridges

  • Received : 2013.02.10
  • Accepted : 2014.05.14
  • Published : 2015.01.25

Abstract

Orthotropic steel highway bridges exist almost everywhere in world, especially in Europe. The design of these bridges started very early in 20th century and ended with a conventional orthotropic steel bridge structure, which is today specified in DIN FB 103. These bridges were mostly built in 1960's and exhibit damages in steel structural parts. The primary reason of these damages is the high pressure that is induced by wheel- loads and therefore damages develop especially in heavy traffic lanes. Constructive rules are supplied by standards to avoid damages in orthotropic steel structural parts. These rules are first given in detail in the standard DIN 18809 (Steel highway- and pedestrian bridges- design, construction, fabrication) and then in DIN- FB 103 (Steel bridges). Bridges built in the past are today subject to heavier wheel loads and the frequency of loading is also increased. Because the vehicles produced today in 21st century are heavier than before and more people have vehicle in comparison with 20th century. Therefore dimensioning or strengthening of orthotropic steel bridges by using stiffer dimensions and shorter spans is an essence. In the scope of this study the complex geometry of conventional steel orthotropic bridge is generated by FE-Program and the effects of cross beam web thickness and cross beam span on steel bridge are assessed by means of a parameter study. Consequently, dimensional and constructional recommendations in association with cross beam thickness and span will be given by this study.

Keywords

References

  1. ANSYS (2010), User Manuals: Swanson Analysis System, USA.
  2. Cook, D.R., Malkus, D.S. and Plesha, M.E. (1989), Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.
  3. Deutsches Institut fur Normung Fachbericht (DIN FB) 103 (2003), Steel bridges, Berlin, Germany.
  4. Deutsches Institut fur Normung Fachbericht (DIN) 18809 (1987), Steel road bridges and foot bridges; design and construction, Berlin, Germany.
  5. Fettahoglu, A. (2012), "Effect of deck plate thickness on the structural behaviour of steel orthotropic highway bridges", Adv. Civil Eng., Ankara, Turkey, October.
  6. Fettahoglu, A. and Bekiroglu, S. (2012), "Effect of kinematic hardening in stress calculations", Adv. Civil Eng., Ankara, Turkey, October.
  7. Gunther, G.H., Bild, St. and Sedlacek, G. (1985), "Zur Frage der Haltbarkeit von Fahrbahnbelagen auf stahlernen Strassenbrucken", Der Stahlbau, 11, 336-342.
  8. Huurman, Name of authors (2002), "3D-FEM for the estimation of the behaviour of asphaltic surfacings on orthotropic steel deck bridges", Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on 3D Finite Element for Pavement Analysis, Design & Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, April.
  9. Jong, de F.B.P. (2007), "Renovation techniques for fatigue cracked orthotropic steel bridge decks", Dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences.
  10. Kozy, B., Connor, R., Paterson, D. and Mertz, D. (2011), "Proposed revisions to the AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications for orthotropic steel deck bridges", J. Bridge Eng., 16(6), 759-767. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000214
  11. Medani, T.O. (2006), "Design principles of surfacing on orthotropic steel bridge decks", Dissertation, Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, The Netherlands.
  12. Mendelson, A. (1968), Plasticity: Theory and Application, The Macmillan Company, New York, NY, USA.
  13. Miki, C. (2006), "Fatigue damage in orthotropic steel bridge decks and retrofit works", Int. J. Steel Struct., 6(4), 255-267.
  14. prEN 1993-1-5 (2004), Design of Steel Structures, Plated Structural Elements, Brussels, Belgium.
  15. Sim, H.B., Uang, C.M. and Sikorsky, C. (2009), "Effects of fabrication procedures on fatigue resistance of welded joints in steel orthotropic decks", J. Bridge Eng., 14(5), 366-373. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2009)14:5(366)
  16. Simo, J.C. and Taylor, R.L. (1985), "Consistent tangent operators for rate-independent elastoplasticity", Comput. Method. Appl. Mech. Eng., 48(1), 101-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(85)90070-2
  17. Xiao, Z.G., Yamada, K., Inoue, J. and Yamaguchi, K. (2006), "Fatigue cracks in longitudinal ribs of steel orthotropic deck", Int. J. Fatigue, 28(4), 409-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.07.017
  18. Xiao, Z., Yamada, K., Ya, S. and Zhao, X. (2008), "Stress analyses and fatigue evaluation of rib-to-deck joints in steel orthotropic decks", Int. J. Fatigue, 30(8), 1387-1397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.10.008
  19. Ya, S., Yamada, K. and Ishikawa, T. (2011), "Fatigue evaluation of rib-to deck welded joints of orthotropic steel bridge deck", J. Bridge Eng., 16(4), 492-499. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000181

Cited by

  1. An experimental and numerical study on the behavior of a continuous orthotropic bridge deck with sandwich construction vol.111, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2016.11.015
  2. Orthotropic Analysis of Steel Deck–Girder–Rib Systems Subjected to Transverse Load pp.2093-6311, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0180-1
  3. Fatigue study on additional cutout between U shaped rib and floorbeam in orthotropic bridge deck vol.28, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.28.3.319
  4. Parametric Optimization of Orthotropic Girders in a Cable-Supported Bridge vol.24, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001499
  5. Effects of Impact Loads on Local Dynamic Behavior of Orthotropic Steel Bridge Decks vol.21, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-020-00421-6