DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characterization of Two GAS1 Genes and Their Effects on Expression and Secretion of Heterologous Protein Xylanase B in Kluyveromyces lactis

  • Lian, Zhao (State Key Laboratory of Agro-Biotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Jiang, Jing-Bo (State Key Laboratory of Agro-Biotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Chi, Shuang (State Key Laboratory of Agro-Biotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Guan, Guo-Hua (State Key Laboratory of Agro-Biotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Li, Ying (State Key Laboratory of Agro-Biotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University) ;
  • Li, Ji-Lun (State Key Laboratory of Agro-Biotechnology, College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University)
  • Received : 2015.05.19
  • Accepted : 2015.09.02
  • Published : 2015.12.28

Abstract

β-1,3-glucanosyltransferases play essential roles in cell wall biosynthesis in yeast. Kluyveromyces lactis has six putative β-1,3-glucanosyltransferase genes. KlGAS1-1 and KlGAS1-2 are homologs of Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene GAS1. RT-qPCR indicated the transcription level of KlGAS1-1 was significantly reduced while heterologous protein (thermostable xylanase B) secretion was enhanced during medium optimization. To evaluate if these two events were related, and to improve xylanase B secretion in K. lactis, we constructed KlGAS1-1 and KlGAS1-2 single deletion strains and double deletion strain, respectively. KlGAS1-1 gene deletion resulted in the highest xylanase B activity among the three mutants. Only the double deletion strain showed morphology similar to that of the GAS1 deletion mutant in S. cerevisiae. The two single deletion strains differed in terms of cell wall thickness and xylanase B secretion. Transcription levels of β-1,3-glucanosyltransferase genes and genes related to protein secretion and transport were assayed. The β-1,3-glucanosyltransferase genes displayed transcription complementation in the cell wall synthesis process. KlGAS1-1 and KlGAS1-2 affected transcription levels of secretion- and transport-related genes. Differences in protein secretion ratio among the three deletion strains were associated with changes of transcription levels of secretion- and transport-related genes. Our findings indicate that KlGAS1-1 deletion is an effective tool for enhancing industrial-scale heterologous protein secretion in K. lactis.

Keywords

Introduction

The yeast Kluyveromyces lactis has been extensively studied and used for development of heterologous protein expression systems because of its strong heterologous protein secretory ability [37]. It has been classified as a GRAS (generally recognized as safe) organism by the US Food and Drug Administration, and utilized for industrial production of a variety of proteins, including serum albumin and interleukin-1β. K. lactis expression systems can be induced by lactose and do not require explosion-proof fermentation equipment like that necessary for large-scale growth of methylotrophic yeasts such as Pichia pastoris [7]. Thus, K. lactis is a safer host strain than P. pastoris and others for industrial production.

The yeast cell wall is typically a physical barrier to movement of large molecules into or out of the cell, and a limiting factor for heterologous protein secretion. It consists of an inner layer containing the polysaccharides β-1,3-glucan, β-1,6-glucan, and chitin, and an outer layer containing mannoproteins. β-1,3-glucan functions as the backbone of a branched network structure that covers large areas of the yeast cell surface [4]. The enzyme β-1,3-glucanosyltransferase plays an important role in β-1,3-glucan remodeling processes during yeast cell wall synthesis [23].

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has five homologs of β-1,3-glucanosyltransferase genes (Gas family genes) [27]. GAS1, GAS3, and GAS5 are expressed mainly during the vegetative growing phase, and GAS2 and GAS4 during the sporulation phase [17,28]. We identified six putative β-1,3-glucanosyltransferase genes in K. lactis, termed KlGas family genes: KlGAS1-1, KlGAS1-2, KlGAS2, KlGAS3, KlGAS4, and KlGAS5. KlGAS1-1 and KlGAS1-2 are homologs of GAS1 in S. cerevisiae. Secreted proteome and cell wall composition analyses demonstrated that the products of KlGas family genes are localized in the K. lactis cell wall [2,21,34].

We previously constructed recombinant strain GKX31 from K. lactis GG799 by inserting a thermostable xylanase B gene (xynB, cloned from Thermotoga maritima MSB8) [43]. xynB has been expressed highly in E. coli [14], P. pastoris [42], and Aspergillus niger [45], but expression was lower in K. lactis. Following medium optimization, the transcription level of KlGAS1-1 was significantly reduced and xylanase B secretion was enhanced, as indicated by RT-qPCR analysis (unpublished data). We hypothesized that these two events were related. To evaluate this possible relationship, and to improve heterologous protein (thermostable xylanase B) secretion in K. lactis, we deleted KlGAS1-1 and KlGAS1-2, the two homologs of GAS1 in S. cerevisiae. The effects of these two gene deletions on other KlGas family genes and on genes involved in protein secretion and transport were examined. KlGAS1-1 and KlGAS1-2 engineering will be useful for improving heterologous protein secretion in K. lactis.

 

Materials and Methods

Strains, Plasmids, and Culture Conditions

The strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. K. lactis strains were grown on YPD (2% yeast extract, 1% tryptone, 2% glucose) or YPL (2% yeast extract, 1% tryptone, 2% lactose) liquid or solid (1.5% agar) media at 30℃ in a shake flask (200 rpm). Geneticin (G-418) (final concentration 300 μg/ml) or hygromycin B (final concentration 150 μg/ml) was added for transformant selection.

Table 1.Strains and plasmids used in this study.

Sequence Alignment and Structure Prediction of KlGas1-1 and KlGas1-2

Multiple-sequence alignment was performed using the Easy Sequencing in the Postscript (ESPript) online program (http://espript.ibcp.fr/ESPript/ESPript/index.php) [30]. The KlGas1-1 and KlGas1-2 structures were predicted using the SWISS-MODEL program (http://swissmodel.expasy.org) [1,10,32].

Construction of KlGAS1s Deletion Mutants

Gene disruption by homologous replacement in K. lactis requires long DNA sequences (preferably 1,000 bp or more) [15,18]. Gene-disruption cassettes were prepared by double-joint PCR [40,44], using the construction method illustrated in Fig. S1A. In the first round of double-joint PCR, the upstream and downstream flanking fragments of target genes for homologous regions and the resistance gene kanMX6 (cloned from pFA6a-kanMX6) or hph (cloned from pCSN44) were amplified using DNA polymerase KOD-plus-Neo (Toyobo, Japan). In the second round, three fragments were purified, mixed (molar ratio 1:3:1) in the reaction mixture, and joined by PCR without primers. Thermocycling conditions: 94℃ for 2 min; 15 cycles of 94℃ for 30 sec, 58℃ for 10 min, and 68℃ for 2 min; 68℃ for 4 min. In the third round, a pair of nested primers was used for final gene-disruption cassette amplification.

Gene-disruption cassettes were transformed into K. lactis GKX31 by electroporation as described previously [31]. Genomic DNA of transformants was prepared as PCR templates by the DNA-containing cell envelope method [6]. Transformants were confirmed by four rounds of PCR using specific primers. Then the integration regions of positive transformants were sequenced. The primer design method is illustrated in Fig. S1B, and primer sequences are listed in Table S1.

Drug Sensitivity

Cells of each strain were grown in YPD medium until logarithmic phase and then diluted to OD600 = 1. Pure sample and 1:10 serial dilutions (5 μl) of each culture were spotted on YPD plates with no agent addition (control) or with 50 μg/ml osmotic destabilizing agent SDS (Amresco, USA) or 50 μg/ml cell wall-perturbing agent Calcofluor White M2R (CFW; Sigma, USA). Plates were incubated for 48 h at 30℃ and growth parameters were recorded.

Phase Contrast Microscopy and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

For phase contrast microscopy, cells were cultured in YPL until logarithmic phase (48 h) and harvested. Samples were viewed using a microscope (model Eclipse 50i; Nikon; Japan) equipped for phase contrast observation. For accurate evaluation of morphological changes in the mutant strains, minor and major axes were measured for 50 cells in each sample, and the ratio of minor to major axis was calculated.

For TEM, each strain was sampled in the logarithmic phase (38 h) and stationary phase (96 h). Sections (thickness 90 nm) were cut with an ultramicrotome (model UC6i; Leica, Germany), stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and observed by TEM (model JEM-1230; JEOL, Japan). In yeast cells, cell wall thickness varies considerably depending on location, particularly in growing buds. To obtain more reliable values for comparative purposes, we measured cell wall thickness only in mother cells. Forty cells were measured for each condition, and 10 data points for each cell [2].

Xylanase B Activity

Cells of each strain were cultured in YPL, and crude proteins were obtained by centrifugation of the medium. Xylanase B activity was determined by the RBB-xylan method as described in our previous study [43], with reaction at 90℃, the optimal temperature of xylanase B [45].

Western Blotting

A 12% gel was used for western blotting, with 10 μl of each sample added to the lanes. Samples were electroblotted onto PVDF membrane (Roche, UK) and treated with rabbit anti-xylanase B polyclonal antibody (Beijing Protein Institute, China; dilution 1:1,500) and anti-rabbit IgG HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (cat no. CW0103, CWBIO; China; dilution 1:10,000). Data were analyzed using the ImageJ software program (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij).

Total Released Proteins

Cells were cultured in YPL, harvested, and centrifuged. Total proteins in supernatants were determined by Bradford's dye-binding method (Super-Bradford Protein Assay Kit; CWBIO), using BSA as the standard. Data were normalized according to OD600 value, and biomass was estimated on the basic of a linear plot of OD600 vs. weight.

Real-Time RT-qPCR

Cells of each strain were grown in YPL and harvested in logarithmic phase (38 h) and in stationary phase at the time of maximal xylanase B activity (96 h). Total RNA was isolated using an RNAsimple Total RNA kit (Tiangen Biotech, China), and extracted RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega, USA). Quantitative PCR was performed using a Light Cycler 480 RT-qPCR system with the Light Cycler 480 SYBR Green I Master Kit (Roche, Germany). The relative expression of each gene was calculated by the comparative crossing point (CP) method and presented as 2-ΔΔ Cp [19]. Values shown are means of three replicates. KlGAS1-1, KlGAS1-2, KlGAS2, KlGAS3, KlGAS4, and KlGAS5 (respective NCBI Gene IDs 2892386, 2892599, 2897360, 2891804, 2894064, and 2892754) in K. lactis were assayed. KlACT1 (NCBI Gene ID 2893427), which encodes the single essential gene for actin, was used as the internal control and reference. Sixteen secretion-related and transport-related genes, reported to be involved in heterologous protein secretion and transport pathways in other yeast species [13], were also assayed in GKX31 and the mutant strains, to evaluate the effect of target gene deletion on heterologous protein secretory pathways. Primers used for real-time RT-qPCR are listed in Table S2.

 

Results

Identification of Two Homologous Proteins, KlGas1-1 and KlGas1-2

In K. lactis, the KlGAS1-1 gene is composed of 1,668 bp and encodes 555 amino acid residues; the KlGAS1-2 gene is composed of 1,626 bp and encodes 541 amino acid residues. The K. lactis KlGas1-1 and KlGas1-2 proteins are classified as β-1,3-glucanosyltransferases (NCBI Accession No. CAH01681 and CAH01682) and show 67% and 64% homology with β-1,3-glucanosyltransferase Gas1 from S. cerevisiae S288c (NCBI Accession No. NP_014038). Comparative amino acid sequences and predicted protein structures of KlGas1-1, KlGas1-2, and Gas1 are shown in Figs. S2 and S3. Each of these proteins contains a Glyco_hydro_72 domain (glucanosyltransferase domain [24]) and X8 domain (involved in carbohydrate binding [12]). We conclude that the products of KlGAS1-1 and KlGAS1-2 are β-1,3-glucanosyltransferases.

Mutant Strains and Their Growth Curves

Three gene deletion mutant strains were generated: KlGAS1-1 single deletion strain K1-1 (Klgas1-1::kanMX6), KlGAS1-2 single deletion strain K1-2 (Klgas1-2::hph), and double deletion strain KD (Klgas1-1::kanMX6 Klgas1-2::hph).

To assess the effects of KlGAS1-1 and KlGAS1-2 deletion on cell growth, the mutant strains were cultured in YPL and growth curves were constructed. Maximal OD600 values for GKX31, K1-1, and K1-2 were 44.4, 45.6, and 45.5, respectively (Fig. 1A). The growth curves of K1-1 and K1-2 were not notably affected by the gene deletion. For double deletion strain KD, the cell number increase rate at the beginning of the logarithmic phase, maximal OD600 value at the stationary phase (31.7 OD600), and overall growth curve were lower in comparison with K1-1 and K1-2.

Fig. 1.Physiological characteristics of original strain GKX31 and gene deletion strains K1-1, K1-2, and KD.

Cell Morphology and Drug Sensitivity

The cell morphology of GKX31 and the mutants was observed by phase contrast microscopy. Morphological and physiological phenotypes differed for the KlGAS1-1 and KlGAS1-2 single deletion mutants, K1-1 and K1-2. They did not have a rounded shape like that of S. cerevisiae GAS1 mutant, but rather an oval shape like that of GKX31. In double deletion strain KD, the cell shape was spherical, and altered vacuoles were visible. The ratio of minor to major axis width indicated that the shape of KD was nearly a perfect sphere. Average major and minor axis widths were greater for KD than GKX31 (Table 2).

Table 2.Values shown are the mean ± SD from 50 cells.

In experiments with five concentration conditions (pure sample and four serial dilutions) of cells cultured with 50 μg/ml SDS for 48 h at 30℃, K1-1 colonies appeared under all five conditions, but were smaller than in the control (YPD culture without SDS). KD colonies appeared under only one concentration condition, and displayed a growth delay phenotype. Growth of K1-2 and GKX31 was essentially the same in both SDS and YPD cultures (Fig. 1B). Thus, KD and K1-1 were sensitive to SDS, whereas K1-2 was resistant.

In corresponding experiments with cells cultured in 50 μg/ml CFW, GKX31 colonies appeared under all five concentration conditions, but were smaller than in YPD culture controls. K1-1 colonies and K1-2 colonies appeared under two and three concentration conditions, respectively. No KD colonies were able to survive in CFW culture (Fig. 1B). Thus, the three deletion mutants were more sensitive to CFW than was GKX31, and K1-2 had greater resistance to CFW than did K1-1 or KD.

Cell Wall Morphology

Cell wall ultrastructure was observed by TEM. Line segments in Fig. 2G indicate the points where cell wall measurements were taken. For each strain, 40 cells in logarithmic phase (38 h) and stationary phase (96 h) were measured. The data are summarized in Table 3. Effects on cell wall structure were quite different for deletion of GAS1 homologs KlGAS1-1 vs. KlGAS1-2. In the logarithmic phase, the cell wall thickness of K1-1 (143.22 nm) was less than that of GKX31 (173.29 nm) (Figs. 2A, 2B, 2E, 2F), whereas the thickness of K1-2 (271.59 nm) was more than that of GKX31 (Figs. 2C, 2G). In the double deletion mutant (KD), cell wall thickness (126.47 nm) was less than that of K1-1 (Figs. 2D, 2H). Cell wall thickness values in the stationary phase showed the same trend: K1-2 (302.39 nm) > GKX31 (178.55 nm) > K1-1 (156.86 nm) > KD (136.15 nm).

Fig. 2.The four strains were grown as described in Materials and Methods and TEM images were taken in the logarithmic phase (38 h) and stationary phase (96 h).

Table 3.Values shown are the mean ± SD from 40 cells. Cell wall thickness was determined at 10 different points of the mother cell (see Fig. 2G).

Protein Secretory Phenotypes

Strains were cultured in YPL, and xylanase B activity curves were plotted (Fig. 3A). Maximal xylanase B activity values for all strains were observed at 96 h, and were in the order K1-1 (28.86 U/ml) > KD (27.34 U/ml) > GKX31 (24.52 U/ml) > K1-2 (15.78 U/ml).

Fig. 3.Changes over time of secretory phenotypes of the four strains.

Heterologous protein secretory ability was evaluated as xylanase B activity per OD600 (Fig. 3B). Values obtained were in the order KD (0.86 U/ml per OD600) > K1-1 (0.68 U/ml per OD600) > GKX31 (0.58 U/ml per OD600) > K1-2 (0.35 U/ml per OD600).

Extracellular and intracellular amounts of xylanase B were measured by western blotting (Fig. 3C). A higher ratio reflected greater xylanase B secretory ability. Values of xylanase B secretion ratio were in the order KD (57.6%) > K1-1 (50.0%) > GKX31 (43.8%) > K1-2 (35.5%).

For measurement of total released proteins, samples were harvested at 48 h for the logarithmic phase and at 96 h for the stationary phase, based on the growth curves. Values for released proteins were expressed per OD600 (Fig. 3D). The trends observed were the same as for xylanase B secretory ability. In the logarithmic phase, values of total released proteins were in the order KD (9.54 μg/ml per OD600) > K1-1 (4.52 μg/ml per OD600) > GKX31 (4.03 μg/ml per OD600) > K1-2 (3.92 μg/ml per OD600). In the stationary phase, the order was the same: KD (8.81 μg/ml per OD600) > K1-1 (5.18 μg/ml per OD600) > GKX31 (4.85 μg/ml per OD600) > K1-2 (4.28 μg/ml per OD600).

In summary, KlGAS1-1 gene deletion (K1-1) resulted in the highest xylanase B activity value: 28.86 U/ml, 17.7% more than the value for GKX31 ( Fig. 3 A ). Double gene deletion (KD) resulted in the highest xylanase B secretion ratio (57.6%), 13.8% more than the value for GKX31 (Fig. 3C). There was some inconsistency between the enzymatic activity of XynB in K1-2 (Fig. 3A) and western blot band of XynB in K1-2 (Fig. 3C). It can be speculated that although the concentration of XynB was lower, the specific activity of XynB increased in K1-2 as a result of conformation change of XynB.

Transcription Levels of KlGas Family Genes

Transcription patterns of six KlGas family genes were evaluated in GKX31 and the deletion mutants. KlGAS1-1, KlGAS1-2, and KlGAS3 are KlGas family genes most highly expressed in K. lactis. Compared with the transcription level of KlGAS1-1, that of KlGAS1-2 was 3.87-fold higher in logarithmic phase and 1.28-fold higher in stationary phase.

In the logarithmic phase, KlGAS1-1 deletion resulted in 1.15-fold increase of KlGAS1-2 and 0.48-fold decrease of KlGAS3 transcription levels. KlGAS1-2 deletion resulted in 2.32-fold increase of KlGAS1-1 and 0.26-fold decrease of the KlGAS3 transcription level. KlGAS1-1 and KlGAS1-2 double deletion resulted in 6.51-fold increase of the KlGAS5 transcription level (Fig. 4A).

Fig. 4.Transcription levels of KlGas family genes in the logarithmic phase (38 h) and stationary phase (96 h).

In the stationary phase, KlGAS1-1 deletion resulted in 2.22-fold increase of KlGAS1-2 and 0.58-fold decrease of KlGAS3 transcription levels. KlGAS1-2 deletion resulted in 3.86-fold increase of KlGAS1-1 and 2.26-fold increase of KlGAS3 transcription levels. KlGAS1-1 and KlGAS1-2 double deletion resulted in 5.67-fold increase of KlGAS4 and 1.45-fold increase of KlGAS5 transcription levels (Fig. 4B).

In the logarithmic phase, the transcription level of KlGAS1-2 in K1-1 was 1.91-fold higher than that of KlGAS1-1 in K1-2 (Fig. 4A), whereas the cell wall thickness of K1-1(143.22 nm) was less than that of K1-2 (271.59 nm) (Table 3). No significant differences were observed among transcription levels of the other four KlGas family genes (KlGAS2, KlGAS3, KlGAS4, and KlGAS5). Based on these findings, we hypothesized that the β-1,3-glucanosyltransferase specific activity of the KlGAS1-1 product is higher than that of the KlGAS1-2 product.

Transcription Levels of Secretion-Related and Transport-Related Genes

Information (class, product localization, and function) for the assayed genes is summarized in Table 4. Transcription levels of the assayed genes in GKX31 and the gene deletion mutants, in the logarithmic (38 h) and stationary (96 h) phases, are shown in Fig. 5.

Table 4.Secretion-related and transport-related genes assayed.

Fig. 5.Transcription levels of secretion- and transport-related genes in the four strains, in the logarithmic phase (38 h) (A) and stationary phase (96 h) (B).

All strains had faster growth and lower xylanase B activity in the logarithmic phase than in the stationary phase. In most cases, transcription levels of secretion- and transport-related genes were lower in the deletion strains than in GKX31. The exceptions were KlSEC31 (3.45-fold higher in K1-1, 3.41-fold higher in K1-2, and 3.25-fold higher in KD compared with GKX31) and KlERO1 (1.89-fold higher in KD) (Fig. 5A). These findings suggest that the heterologous protein secretory pathway in the logarithmic phase was more active in GKX31 than in the deletion strains. The deletion strains had higher KlSEC31 transcription levels and higher efficiency of protein transport from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to Golgi.

All strains had maximal xylanase B activity in the stationary phase. Heterologous protein secretory ability showed the greatest difference in GKX31 vs. the deletion strains in this phase. These differences were reflected in the transcription levels of secretion- and transport-related genes (Fig. 5B). In double deletion strain KD, which had the highest heterologous protein secretion ratio (Fig. 3), transcription levels were higher than in GKX31 for KlHAC1 (13.42-fold), KlSSA3 (5.07-fold), KlGCN4 (12.07-fold), KlCUP5 (8.06-fold), KlERO1 (9.76-fold), KlKIN2 (2.93-fold), KlSSE1 (7.31-fold), and KlMON2 (8.49-fold). These genes are involved in unfolded protein response, protein folding, vacuolar acidification, endocytosis, and vacuole integrity. These genes also showed higher transcription level in deletion strain K1-1, which had high heterologous protein secretory ability, than in GKX31.

 

Discussion

Two β-1,3-Glucanosyltransferase Genes Display Transcription Complementation That Affects Transcription Levels of Secretion- and Transport-Related Genes

When yeast cells are challenged by stress conditions that affect the cell wall, salvage mechanisms such as the cell wall integrity pathway are activated to promote cell survival through remodeling of the extracellular matrix [16,26]. These mechanisms are reflected by specific transcriptional responses such as enhanced expression of putative cell wall assemblies and potential cross-linking cell wall proteins. In our K. lactis model, two single gene deletions and a double gene deletion increased transcription levels of various KlGas family genes (Fig. 4). Cells thereby increased β-1,3-glucanosyltransferase levels to ensure continued cell wall synthesis and protect themselves against lysis. Differing complementary effects of other KlGas family genes in the three gene deletion strains resulted in differences in cell morphology and cell wall thickness (Fig. 2; Tables 2 and 3). In comparison with original strain GKX31, cell wall thickness was greater in K1-2 and less in the other two deletion mutants (Figs. 2C, 2G). Based on transcription levels of KlGAS family genes in GKX31 (Fig. 4), KlGAS1-1 and KlGAS1-2 appeared to be the most highly expressed KlGas family genes in the logarithmic and stationary phases (Fig. 4). In the logarithmic phase, the transcription level of KlGAS1-2 in K1-1 was higher than that of KlGAS1-1 in K1-2 (Fig. 4A), whereas the cell wall thickness of K1-1 was less than that of K1-2 (Figs. 2B, 2C). Transcription levels of the other four KlGas family genes (KlGAS2, KlGAS3, KlGAS4, and KlGAS5) did not differ significantly between K1-1 and K1-2. These findings indicate that the KlGAS1-1 product had greater cell wall synthesis activity than did the KlGAS1-2 product. KlGAS1-2 deletion increased the complementary effect of KlGAS1-1, and also increased the effect of KlGAS3 and KlGAS4 in the stationary phase (Figs. 4B, 6), resulting in a thicker cell wall in K1-2.

In the present study, two β-1,3-glucanosyltransferase genes affected transcription levels of secretion- and transport-related genes. Previous studies showed that the β-1,3-glucanosyltransferase Gas1 is located in not only the cell wall (where it is involved in cell wall synthesis) but also the nuclear periphery (where it affects transcription levels of genes in genomic regions silenced by Sir2, and modulates Sir2-mediated rDNA stability) [11,17]. We found that deletion of two β-1,3-glucanosyltransferase genes (KlGAS1-1 and KlGAS1-2) in K. lactis affects transcription levels of genes related to protein secretion and transport (Fig. 5). In the stationary phase, the protein secretory ability of all our strains was maximal (Fig. 3B), and differences among the strains in transcription levels of secretion- and transport-related genes were most pronounced (Fig. 5B). The effects of our three deletion treatments on transcription levels of these genes in the stationary phase, using the Cytoscape program (ver. 3.2.0) [5], are summarized in Fig. 6. Only significant changes (≥2-fold) in transcription are shown in this figure. Enhancement of transcription level was observed for 10 secretion- and transport-related genes by KlGAS1-1 and KlGAS1-2 double deletion, for six genes by KlGAS1-1 single deletion, and for four genes by KlGAS1-2 single deletion. The strain having the highest heterologous protein secretion ratio also showed increased transcription of the greatest number of secretion- and transport-related genes (Figs. 3B, 3C, and 6).

Fig. 6.Effects of the three deletion treatments on transcription levels of secretion- and transport-related genes and other KlGas family genes in the stationary phase.

In S. cerevisiae, increased transcription of protein secretion-and transport-related genes enhanced heterologous protein secretion [13]. In K. lactis, overexpression of molecular chaperone gene KlERO1 led to increased yield of a heterologous protein, human serum albumin [20]. We therefore assume that the differences in protein secretion ratio among our deletion strains resulted mainly from changes in transcription levels of secretion- and transportrelated genes. Transcription of secretion- and transport-related genes was higher in the strain with lower β-1,3-glucanosyltransferase function (less cell wall thickness) (Figs. 2, 6). We conclude that the two β-1,3-glucanosyltransferase genes KlGAS1-1 and KlGAS1-2 in K. lactis display transcription complementation that affects transcription levels of secretion- and transport-related genes.

KlGAS1-1 Deletion Is an Effective Engineering Strategy for Enhancing Heterologous Protein Secretion

Structural modification of the cell wall in yeast can improve heterologous protein secretion [8]. Some studies aimed at increasing heterologous protein secretion in K. lactis have focused on genes involved in cell wall synthesis, including α1,6-mannosyltransferase gene OCH1 [36], α1,3-mannosyltransferase genes MNN1 and MNN10 [3,18], and apyrase gene KlYND1 [35]. Studies on β-1,3-glucanosyltransferase gene GAS1 have shown that its deletion increases heterologous protein secretion and inhibits cell growth in S. cerevisiae and other nonconventional yeasts such as P. pastoris, and Zygosaccharomyces bailii [22,25,37]. It is worth noting that the improvements of heterologous protein secretion in GAS1 deletion strains are protein dependent, for the secretion of human trypsinogen and human serum albumin in P. pastoris, human IL-1β in Z. bailii, and Trichoderma reesei endoglucanase I in Ashbya gossypii [29] were not increased after GAS1 deletion.

In this study, we constructed two single deletion mutants (K1-1 and K1-2) and one double deletion mutant (KD) of β-1,3-glucanosyltransferase genes KlGAS1-1 and KlGAS1-2 in K. lactis. Only KD had a phenotype similar to that of the GAS1 deletion mutant in S. cerevisiae, including an abnormal round cell shape and larger size (Table 2), reduced cell growth (Fig. 1A), and increased sensitivity to osmotic destabilizing agents SDS and cell wall-perturbing agent CFW (Fig. 1B). Of the three mutants, KD had the highest heterologous protein secretion ratio (Figs. 3B, 3C) but lower cell growth and cell density, resulting in lower xylanase B activity than that of K1-1 (Figs. 1A, 3A).

Xylanase B activity was highest for K1-1, and transcription of secretion- and transport-related genes was increased by KlGAS1-1 deletion. The genes in K1-1 that showed increased transcription were involved in protein folding (KlERO1, KlSSA3, KlSSE1), unfolded protein response (KlHAC1), vacuole integrity (KlMON2), and vacuolar acidification (KlCUP5) (Fig. 6; Table 4). In a study of P. pastoris, increased transcription of HAC1, ERO1, and SSE1 led to enhanced heterologous protein secretion [9]. We observed that increase of the KlERO1 transcription level in GKX31 promoted xylanase B secretion (data not shown). Our findings indicate that the increased transcription of secretion- and transport-related genes in K. lactis similarly enhances heterologous protein secretion, and K1-1 is a “super-secretor” of heterologous protein xylanase B. KlGAS1-1 deletion was a more effective cell wall engineering approach than the other two deletion treatments for increasing heterologous protein secretion in K. lactis.

In conclusion, the findings presented here demonstrate that modification of the cell wall synthesis gene KlGAS1-1 is a useful strategy for enhancing heterologous protein secretion in K. lactis. The next step in our studies is to examine whether heterologous protein secretion can also be improved by increasing the transcription levels of secretion- and transport-related genes such as KlHAC1, KlSSE1, KlSSA3, and KlCUP5. Only xylanase B secretion was examined in the present study. Future functional screening of secretion- and transport-related genes using other secreted-protein models will allow us to further understand the secretory ability of K1-1.

References

  1. Arnold K, Bordoli L, Kopp J, Schwede T. 2006. The SWISS-MODEL workspace: a Web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics 22: 195-201. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti770
  2. Backhaus K, Heilmann CJ, Sorgo AG, Purschke G, de Koster CG, Klis FM, Heinisch JJ. 2010. A systematic study of the cell wall composition of Kluyveromyces lactis. Yeast 27: 647-660. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.1781
  3. Bartkeviciute D, Sasnauskas K. 2004. Disruption of the MNN10 gene enhances protein secretion in Kluyveromyces lactis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 4: 833-840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.03.001
  4. Cabib E, Arroyo J. 2013. How carbohydrates sculpt cells: chemical control of morphogenesis in the yeast cell wall. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11: 648-655. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3090
  5. Cline MS, Smoot M, Cerami E, Kuchinsky A, Landys N, Workman C, et al. 2007. Integration of biological networks and gene expression data using Cytoscape. Nat. Protoc. 2: 2366-2382. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.324
  6. Danilevich VN. 2002. A new approach to the isolation of genomic DNA from yeast and fungi preparation of DNA-containing cell envelopes and their use in PCR. Russ. J. Bioorg. Chem. 28: 136-146. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015021508321
  7. Feng Z, Ren J, Zhang H, Zhang L. 2011. Disruption of PMR1 in Kluyveromyces lactis improves secretion of calf prochymosin. J. Sci. Food Agric. 91: 100-103. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4156
  8. Ferrer P, Diers I, Asenjo JA, Andrews BA. 1998. Yeast cell permeabilizing β-1,3-glucanases: a tool for the integration of downstream processes and metabolic engineering applications to yeast. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 58: 321-324. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980420)58:2/3<321::AID-BIT32>3.0.CO;2-C
  9. Gasser B, Sauer M, Maurer M, Stadlmayr G, Mattanovich D. 2007. Transcriptomics-based identification of novel factors enhancing heterologous protein secretion in yeasts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 6499-6507. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01196-07
  10. Guex N, Peitsch MC. 1997. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-Pdb Viewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis 18: 2714-2723. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150181505
  11. Ha CW, Kim K, Chang YJ, Kim B, Huh WK. 2014. The β-1,3-glucanosyltransferase Gas1 regulates Sir2-mediated rDNA stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 42: 8486-8499. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku570
  12. Henrissat B, Davies GJ. 2000. Glycoside hydrolases and glycosyltransferases. Families, modules, and implications for genomics. Plant Physiol. 124: 1515-1519. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.124.4.1515
  13. Idiris A, Tohda H, Kumagai H, Takegawa K. 2010. Engineering of protein secretion in yeast: strategies and impact on protein production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 86: 403-417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2447-0
  14. Jiang ZQ, Kobayashi A, Ahsan MM, Lite L, Kitaoka M, Hayashi K. 2001. Characterization of a thermostable family 10 endo-xylanase (XynB) from Thermotoga maritima that cleaves p-nitrophenyl-beta-D-xyloside. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 92: 423-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1723(01)80290-5
  15. Kegel A, Martinez P, Carter SD, Astrom SU. 2006. Genome wide distribution of illegitimate recombination events in Kluyveromyces lactis. Nucleic Acids Res. 34: 1633-1645. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl064
  16. Klis FM, Boorsma A, De Groot PW. 2006. Cell wall construction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 23: 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.1349
  17. Koch MR, Pillus L. 2009. The glucanosyltransferase Gas1 functions in transcriptional silencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106: 11224-11229. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900809106
  18. Liu B, Gong X, Chang SH, Yang YL, Song M, Duan DM, et al. 2009. Disruption of the OCH1 and MNN1 genes decrease N-glycosylation on glycoprotein expressed in Kluyveromyces lactis. J. Biotechnol. 143: 95-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.06.016
  19. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods 25: 402-408. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262
  20. Lodi T, Neglia B, Donnini C. 2005. Secretion of human serum albumin by Kluyveromyces lactis overexpressing KlPDI1 and KlERO1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 4359-4363. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.8.4359-4363.2005
  21. Madinger CL, Sharma SS, Anton BP, Fields LG, Cushing ML, Canovas J, et al. 2009. The effect of carbon source on the secretome of Kluyveromyces lactis. Proteomics 9: 4744-4754. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200800915
  22. Marx H, Sauer M, Resina D, Vai M, Porro D, Valero F, et al. 2006. Cloning, disruption and protein secretory phenotype of the GAS1 homologue of Pichia pastoris. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 264: 40-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00427.x
  23. Mouyna I, Fontaine T, Vai M, Monod M, Fonzi WA, Diaquin M, et al. 2000. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored glucanosyltransferases play an active role in the biosynthesis of the fungal cell wall. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 14882-14889. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.275.20.14882
  24. Mouyna I, Monod M, Fontaine T, Henrissat B, Lechenne B, Latge JP. 2000. Identification of the catalytic residues of the first family of β(1-3)glucanosyltransferases identified in fungi. Biochem. J. 347: 741-747.
  25. Passolunghi S, Riboldi L, Dato L, Porro D, Branduardi P. 2010. Cloning of the Zygosaccharomyces bailii GAS1 homologue and effect of cell wall engineering on protein secretory phenotype. Microb. Cell Fact. 9: 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-9-7
  26. Popolo L, Gualtieri T, Ragni E. 2001. The yeast cell-wall salvage pathway. Med. Mycol. 39: 111-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/mmy.39.1.111.121
  27. Popolo L, Vai M. 1999. The Gas1 glycoprotein, a putative wall polymer cross-linker. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1426: 385-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4165(98)00138-X
  28. Ragni E, Coluccio A, Rolli E, Rodriguez-Pena JM, Colasante G, Arroyo J, et al. 2007. GAS2 and GAS4, a pair of developmentally regulated genes required for spore wall assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot. Cell 6: 302-316. https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.00321-06
  29. Ribeiro O, Magalhaes F, Aguiar TQ, Wiebe MG, Penttila M, Domingues L. 2013. Random and direct mutagenesis to enhance protein secretion in Ashbya gossypii. Bioengineered 4: 322-331. https://doi.org/10.4161/bioe.24653
  30. Robert X, Gouet P. 2014. Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Res. 42: W320-W324. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku316
  31. Sanchez M, Iglesias FJ, Santamaria C, Dominguez A. 1993. Transformation of Kluyveromyces lactis by electroporation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59: 2087-2092.
  32. Schwede T, Kopp J, Guex N, Peitsch MC. 2003. SWISS-MODEL: an automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res. 31: 3381-3385. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg520
  33. Staben C, Jensen B, Singer M, Pollock J, Schechtman M, Kinsey J, Selker E. 1989. Use of a bacterial Hygromycin B resistance gene as a dominant selectable marker in Neurospora crassa. Fungal Genetics Newsl. 36: 79-81. https://doi.org/10.4148/1941-4765.1519
  34. Swaim CL, Anton BP, Sharma SS, Taron CH, Benner JS. 2008. Physical and computational analysis of the yeast Kluyveromyces lactis secreted proteome. Proteomics 8: 2714-2723. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200700764
  35. Uccelletti D, Anticoli S, Palleschi C. 2007. The apyrase KlYnd1p of Kluyveromyces lactis affects glycosylation, secretion, and cell wall properties. FEMS Yeast Res. 7: 731-739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2007.00229.x
  36. Uccelletti D, Farina F, Rufini S, Magnelli P, Abeijon C, Palleschi C. 2006. The Kluyveromyces lactis alpha1,6-mannosyltransferase KlOch1p is required for cell-wall organization and proper functioning of the secretory pathway. FEMS Yeast Res. 6: 449-457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00027.x
  37. Vai M, Brambilla L, Orlandi I, Rota N, Ranzi BM, Alberghina L, Porro D. 2000. Improved secretion of native human insulin-like growth factor 1 from gas1 mutant Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 5477-5479. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.12.5477-5479.2000
  38. Van den Berg JA, van der Laken KJ, van Ooyen AJ, Renniers TC, Rietveld K, Schaap A, et al. 1990. Kluyveromyces as a host for heterologous gene expression: expression and secretion of prochymosin. Nat. Biotechnol. 8: 135-139. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0290-135
  39. van Ooyen AJJ, Dekker P, Huang M, Olsthoorn MMA, Jacobs DI, Colussi PA, Taron CH. 2006. Heterologous protein production in the yeast Kluyveromyces lactis. FEMS Yeast Res. 6: 381-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00049.x
  40. Wach A. 1996. PCR-synthesis of marker cassettes with long flanking homology regions for gene disruptions in S. cerevisiae. Yeast 12: 259-265. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19960315)12:3<259::AID-YEA901>3.0.CO;2-C
  41. Wach A, Brachat A, Rebischung C, Philippsen P. 1997. Heterologous HIS3 Marker and GFP Reporter Modules for PCR - Targeting in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 13: 1065-1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19970915)13:11<1065::AID-YEA159>3.0.CO;2-K
  42. Yang MH, Li Y, Guan GH, Jiang ZQ. 2005. High-level expression of an extreme-thermostable xylanase B from Thermotoga maritima MSB8 in Escherichia coli and Pichia pastoris. Acta Microbiol. Sin. 45: 236-240.
  43. Yin T, Miao LL, Guan FF, Wang GL, Peng Q, Li BX, et al. 2010. Optimized medium improves expression and secretion of extremely thermostable bacterial xylanase, XynB, in Kluyveromyces lactis. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 20: 1471-1480. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1005.05041
  44. Yu JH, Hamari Z, Han KH, Seo JA, Reyes-Dominguez Y, Scazzocchio C. 2004. Double-joint PCR: a PCR-based molecular tool for gene manipulations in filamentous fungi. Fungal Genet. Biol. 41: 973-981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2004.08.001
  45. Zhang JX, Pan J, Guan GH, Li Y, Xue W, Tang GM, et al. 2008. Expression and high-yield production of extremely thermostable bacterial xylanase B in Aspergillus niger. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 43: 513-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2008.07.010

Cited by

  1. GAS1Deficient Enhances UPR Activity inSaccharomyces cerevisiae vol.2019, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1238581