References
- Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue-integrated prostheses: Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago, Quintessence, 1985. p. 199-209.
- Misch CM. Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:767-76.
- Oda T, Sawaki Y, Ueda M. Experimental alveolar ridge augmentation by distraction osteogenesis using a simple device that permits secondary implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:95-102.
- Hammerle CH, Karring T. Guided bone regeneration at oral implant sites. Periodontol 2000 1998;17:151-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1998.tb00132.x
- Ashley FL, Stone RS, Alonsoartieda M, Syverud JM, Edwards JW, Sloan RF, Mooney SA. Experimental and clinical studies on the application of monomolecular cellulose filter tubes to create artificial tendon sheaths in digits. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull 1959;23:526-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-195905000-00006
- Buser D, Halbritter S, Hart C, Bornstein MM, Grutter L, Chappuis V, Belser UC. Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: 12-month results of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients. J Periodontol 2009;80:152-62. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2009.080360
- Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Herten M, Wustefeld M, Sager M, Ferrari D, Becker J. Immunohistochemical characterization of guided bone regeneration at a dehiscence-type defect using different barrier membranes: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:402-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01486.x
- Scantlebury TV. 1982-1992: a decade of technology development for guided tissue regeneration. J Periodontol 1993;64:1129-37. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.11s.1129
- Buser D, Dahlin C, Schenk RK. Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry. Chicago, Quintessence, 1994. p. 32-4.
- Sculean A, Nikolidakis D, Schwarz F. Regeneration of periodontal tissues: combinations of barrier membranes and grafting materials-biological foundation and preclinical evidence: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:106-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01263.x
- Behring J, Junker R, Walboomers XF, Chessnut B, Jansen JA. Toward guided tissue and bone regeneration: morphology, attachment, proliferation, and migration of cells cultured on collagen bar rier membranes. A systematic review. Odontology 2008;96:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-008-0087-y
- Kasaj A, Reichert C, Gotz H, Rohrig B, Smeets R, Willershausen B. In vitro evaluation of various bioabsorbable and nonresorbable barrier membranes for guided tissue regeneration. Head Face Med 2008;4:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-4-22
- Gentile P, Chiono V, Tonda-Turo C, Ferreira AM, Ciardelli G. Polymeric membranes for guided bone regeneration. Biotechnol J 2011;6:1187-97. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201100294
- Polimeni G, Albandar JM, Wikesjo UM. Prognostic factors for alveolar regeneration: effect of space provision. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:951-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00763.x
- Zhang J, Xu Q, Huang C, Mo A, Li J, Zuo Y. Biological properties of an anti-bacterial membrane for guided bone regeneration: an experimental study in rats. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:321-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01838.x
- Jovanovic SA, Hunt DR, Bernard GW, Spiekermann H, Wozney JM, Wikesjo UM. Bone reconstruction following implantation of rhBMP-2 and guided bone regeneration in canine alveolar ridge defects. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:224-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01324.x
- von Arx T, Buser D. Horizontal ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts and the guided bone regeneration technique with collagen membranes: a clinical study with 42 patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:359-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01234.x
- Fujihara K, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S. Guided bone regeneration membrane made of polycaprolactone/calcium carbonate composite nano-fibers. Biomaterials 2005;26:4139-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.014
- Jung RE, Lecloux G, Rompen E, Ramel CF, Buser D, Hammerle CH. A feasibility study evaluating an in situ formed synthetic biodegradable membrane for guided bone regeneration in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:151-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01633.x
- Schwarz F, Herten M, Ferrari D, Wieland M, Schmitz L, Engelhardt E, Becker J. Guided bone regeneration at dehiscence-type defects using biphasic hydroxyapatite + beta tricalcium phosphate (Bone Ceramic) or a collagen-coated natural bone mineral (BioOss Collagen): an immunohistochemical study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36:1198-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2007.07.014
- Felipe ME, Andrade PF, Grisi MF, Souza SL, Taba M, Palioto DB, Novaes AB. Comparison of two surgical procedures for use of the acellular dermal matrix graft in the treatment of gingival recessions: a randomized controlled clinical study. J Periodontol 2007;78:1209-17. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060356
- Wang HL, MacNeil RL, Shieh AT, O›Neal R. Utilization of a resorbable collagen membrane in repairing gingival recession defects. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1996;8:441-8; quiz
- Dahlin C, Linde A, Gottlow J, Nyman S. Healing of bone defects by guided tissue regeneration. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;81:672-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198805000-00004
-
Shim JH, Huh JB, Park JY, Jeon YC, Kang SS, Kim JY, Rhie JW, Cho DW. Fabrication of blended polycaprolactone/ poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)/
${\beta}$ -tricalcium phosphate thin membrane using solid freeform fabrication technology for guided bone regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A 2013;19:317-28. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0730 - Kim SM, Lee JH, Jo JA, Lee SC, Lee SK. Development of a bioactive cellulose membrane from sea squirt skin for bone regeneration-a preliminary research. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;5:440-53.
- Dugan JM, Gough JE, Eichhorn SJ. Bacterial cellulose scaffolds and cellulose nanowhiskers for tissue engineering. Nanomedicine 2013;8:287-98. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.12.211
- Embuscado ME, Marks JS, BeMiller JN. Bacterial cellulose. II. Optimization of cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum through response surface methodology. Food Hydrocoll 1994;8:419-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-005X(09)80085-4
- Rainer J, Luiz FF. Production and application of microbial cellulose. Polym Degrad Stab 1998;59:101-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910(97)00197-3
- Busch O, Solheim E, Bang G, Tornes K. Guided tissue regeneration and local delivery of insulinlike growth factor I by bioerodible polyorthoester membranes in rat calvarial defects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:498-505.
- Wan Y, Gao C, Han M, Liang H, Ren K, Wang Y, Luo H. Preparation and characterization of bacterial cellulose/heparin hybrid nanofiber for potential vascular tissue engineering scaffolds. Polym Adv Technol 2011;22:2643-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.1692
- Nwe N, Furuike T, Tamura H. Selection of a biopolymer based on attachment, morphology and proliferation of fibroblast NIH/3T3 cells for the development of a biodegradable tissue regeneration template: Alginate, bacterial cellulose and gelatin. Process Biochem 2010;45:457-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2009.11.002
- Wan YZ, Huang Y, Yuan CD, Raman S, Zhu Y, Jiang HJ, He F, Gao C. Biomimetic synthesis of hydroxyapatite/bacterial cellulose nanocomposites for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C 2007;27:855-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2006.10.002
- Muller FA, Muller L, Hofmann I, Greil P, Wenzel MM, Staudenmaier R. Cellulose-based scaffold materials for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2006;27:3955-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.031
- Tuzlakoglu K, Bolgen N, Salgado AJ, Gomes ME, Piskin E, Reis RL. Nano-and micro-fiber combined scaffolds: a new architecture for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2005;16:1099-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-005-4713-8
- Helenius G, Backdahl H, Bodin A, Nannmark U, Gatenholm P, Risberg B. In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;76:431-8.
- Miyamoto T, Takahashi S, Ito H, Inagaki H, Noishiki Y. Tissue biocompatibility of cellulose and its derivatives. J Biomed Mater Res 1989;23:125-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820230110
- Zellin G, Linde A. Effects of different osteopromotive membrane porosities on experimental bone neogenesis in rats. Biomaterials 1996;17:695-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(96)86739-1
- Lundgren AK, Sennerby L, Lundgren D. Guided jaw-bone regeneration using an experimental rabbit model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;27:135-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(98)80313-5
- Zaborowska M, Bodin A, Backdahl H, Popp J, Goldstein A, Gatenholm P. Microporous bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater 2010;6:2540-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.004
- Backdahl H, Helenius G, Bodin A, Nannmark U, Johansson BR, Risberg B, Gatenholm P. Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 2006;27:2141-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.026
- Fang B, Wan YZ, Tang TT, Gao C, Dai KR. Proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells on hydroxyapatite/bacterial cellulose nanocomposite scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A 2009;15:1091-8. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0110
- Fujimori E. Ultraviolet light-induced change in collagen macromolecule. Biopolym 2004;3:115-9.
- Rothamel D, Schwarz F, Fienitz T, Smeets R, Dreiseidler T, Ritter L, Happe A, Zoller J. Biocompatibility and biodegradation of a native porcine pericardium membrane: results of in vitro and in vivo examinations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27:146-54.
- Martson M, Viljanto J, Hurme T, Laippala P, Saukko P. Is cellulose sponge degradable or stable as implantation material? An in vivo subcutaneous study in the rat. Biomaterials 1999;20:1989-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00094-0
- Bottino MC, Thomas V, Schmidt G, Vohra YK, Chu TM, Kowolik MJ, Janowski GM. Recent advances in the development of GTR/GBR membranes for periodontal regeneration-a materials perspective. Dent Mater 2012;28:703-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.022
Cited by
- The Effect of Thickness of Resorbable Bacterial Cellulose Membrane on Guided Bone Regeneration vol.10, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10030320
- The Efficacy of Electron Beam Irradiated Bacterial Cellulose Membranes as Compared with Collagen Membranes on Guided Bone Regeneration in Peri-Implant Bone Defects vol.10, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10091018
- Preparation and Characterization of Resorbable Bacterial Cellulose Membranes Treated by Electron Beam Irradiation for Guided Bone Regeneration vol.18, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112236
- Recent developments in the production and applications of bacterial cellulose fibers and nanocrystals vol.37, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2016.1189871
- Immobilisation of phytase producing Gluconacetobacter with bacterial cellulose nano-fibres and promotion of enzyme activities by magnetite nanoparticles vol.12, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-nbt.2017.0206
- Biopolymer-based membranes associated with osteogenic growth peptide for guided bone regeneration vol.13, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/aaaa2d
- Modification of Bacterial Cellulose with Quaternary Ammonium Compounds Based on Fatty Acids and Amino Acids and the Effect on Antimicrobial Activity vol.19, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00183
- Bacterial cellulose-based scaffold materials for bone tissue engineering vol.11, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2018.01.004
- The physical, mechanical, and biological properties of silk fibroin/chitosan/reduced graphene oxide composite membranes for guided bone regeneration vol.30, pp.18, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2019.1666235
- The Mechanical Strength and Morphology of Bacterial Cellulose Films: The Effect of NaOH Concentration vol.515, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/515/1/012053
- The growing merits and dwindling limitations of bacterial cellulose-based tissue engineering scaffolds vol.24, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2019.03.006
- Opportunities of Bacterial Cellulose to Treat Epithelial Tissues vol.20, pp.8, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2174/1389450120666181129092144
- Efficacy of Bacterial Cellulose as a Carrier of BMP-2 for Bone Regeneration in a Rabbit Frontal Sinus Model vol.12, pp.15, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12152489
- Applications of bacterial-synthesized cellulose in veterinary medicine - a review vol.88, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2754/avb201988040451
- Bacterial Cellulose-Modified Polyhydroxyalkanoates Scaffolds Promotes Bone Formation in Critical Size Calvarial Defects in Mice vol.13, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13061433
- Perspective Applications and Associated Challenges of Using Nanocellulose in Treating Bone-Related Diseases vol.9, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.616555
- The facile and controllable synthesis of a bacterial cellulose/polyhydroxybutyrate composite by co-culturing Gluconacetobacter xylinus and Ralstonia eutropha vol.252, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117137
- Tailored nanocellulose-grafted polymer brush applications vol.9, pp.32, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ta03264j