References
- The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:10-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.03.013
- Lee H, So JS, Hochstedler JL, Ercoli C. The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:285-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60208-5
- Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Bohsali K, Goodacre CJ, Lang BR. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:7-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70229-5
- Cox JR, Brandt RL, Hughes HJ. The double arch impression technique: a solution to prevent supraocclusion in the indirect restoration. Gen Dent 2000;48:86-91.
- Ceyhan JA, Johnson GH, Lepe X. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:143-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00276-2
- Ceyhan JA, Johnson GH, Lepe X, Phillips KM. A clinical study comparing the three-dimensional accuracy of a working die generated from two dual-arch trays and a completearch custom tray. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:228-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00237-3
- Hahn SM, Millstein PL, Kinnunen TH, Wright RF. The effect of impression volume and double-arch trays on the registration of maximum intercuspation. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:362-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60194-3
- Kang AH, Johnson GH, Lepe X, Wataha JC. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:332-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60066-4
- Johnson GH, Mancl LA, Schwedhelm ER, Verhoef DR, Lepe X. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:13-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60208-0
- Parker MH, Cameron SM, Hughbanks JC, Reid DE. Comparison of occlusal contacts in maximum intercuspation for two impression techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:255-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70023-4
- Cox JR, Brandt RL, Hughes HJ. A clinical pilot study of the dimensional accuracy of double-arch and complete-arch impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:510-5. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.124489
- Cox JR. A clinical study comparing marginal and occlusal accuracy of crowns fabricated from double-arch and completearch impressions. Aust Dent J 2005;50:90-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2005.tb00346.x
- Kaplowitz GJ. Trouble-shooting dual arch impressions II. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:1277-81. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1997.0405
- Burke FJ, Crisp RJ. A practice-based assessment of the handling of a fast-setting polyvinyl siloxane impression material used with the dual-arch tray technique. Quintessence Int 2001;32:805-10.
- Christensen GJ. Ensuring accuracy and predictability with double-arch impressions. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:1123-5. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0315
- Johnson GH, Mancl LA, Schwedhelm ER, Verhoef DR, Lepe X. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:13-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60208-0
- Patzelt SB, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, Strub JR, Att W. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1687-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1132-y
- Touchstone A, Nieting T, Ulmer N. Digital transition: the collaboration between dentists and laboratory technicians on CAD/CAM restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:15S-9S. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0353
- Miyazaki T, Hotta Y. CAD/CAM systems available for the fabrication of crown and bridge restorations. Aust Dent J 2011;56:97-106.
- Choi HS, Moon JE, Kim SH. The Application of CAD/ CAM in Dentistry. J Korean Dent Assoc 2012;50:110-7.
- Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010;38:553-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.015
- Guth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1201-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0795-0
- Ting-Shu S, Jian S. Intraoral Digital Impression Technique: A Review. J Prosthodont 2015;24:313-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12218
- Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:121-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60028-1
- Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wostmann B. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1759-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0864-4
- Quaas S, Rudolph H, Luthardt RG. Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations. J Dent 2007;35:903-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.08.008
- da Costa JB, Pelogia F, Hagedorn B, Ferracane JL. Evaluation of different methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlays created with CEREC 3D. Oper Dent 2010;35:324-9. https://doi.org/10.2341/09-178-L
- Christensen GJ. Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions?. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:761-3. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0258
- Luthardt RG, Kuhmstedt P, Walter MH. A new method for the computer-aided evaluation of three-dimensional changes in gypsum materials. Dent Mater 2003;19:19-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00013-1
- Price RB, Gerrow JD, Sutow EJ, MacSween R. The dimensional accuracy of 12 impression material and die stone combinations. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:169-74.
- Gimenez B, Ozcan M, Martinez-Rus F, Pradies G. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on parallel confocal laser technology for implants with consideration of operator experience and implant angulation and depth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:853-62. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3343
- Nedelcu RG, Persson AS. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1461-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.027
- Lee SJ, Betensky RA, Gianneschi GE, Gallucci GO. Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:715-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12375
- Stimmelmayr M, Guth JF, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, Beuer F. Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit--an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:851-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0564-5
Cited by
- In vivo evaluation of inter-operator reproducibility of digital dental and conventional impression techniques vol.12, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179188
- Accuracy Evaluation of a Stereolithographic Surgical Template for Dental Implant Insertion Using 3D Superimposition Protocol vol.2017, pp.1687-8736, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4292081
- Intraoral Scanner Technologies: A Review to Make a Successful Impression vol.2017, pp.2040-2309, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8427595
- The influence of change in slice thickness on the accuracy of reconstruction of cranium geometry vol.231, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411916688717
- Digital Implant Impression Technique Accuracy vol.26, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000683
- Verification of a computer-aided replica technique for evaluating prosthesis adaptation using statistical agreement analysis vol.9, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.5.358
- Intraoral scanners in dentistry: a review of the current literature vol.17, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0442-x
- Efficient digitalization method for dental restorations using micro-CT data vol.7, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44577
- A Clinical Comparative Study of 3-Dimensional Accuracy between Digital and Conventional Implant Impression Techniques pp.1059941X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12764
- study vol.10, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.5.388
- Accuracy of four digital scanners according to scanning strategy in complete-arch impressions vol.13, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202916
- Accuracy of new implant impression technique using dual arch tray and bite impression coping vol.10, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.4.265
- Improved accuracy of mandible geometry reconstruction at the stage of data processing and modeling vol.41, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-018-0664-5
- Accuracy evaluation of dental models manufactured by CAD/CAM milling method and 3D printing method vol.10, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.3.245
- Accuracy of Casts Fabricated by Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions vol.45, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-17-00142
- The effect of scanning the palate and scan body position on the accuracy of complete‐arch implant scans vol.21, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12821
- Evaluation of the Adaptation of Complete Dentures Fabricated Using Intraoral Scanning and Conventional Techniques vol.21, pp.12, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2977
- Learning curve of digital intraoral scanning – an in vivo study vol.20, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01278-1
- Three‐Dimensional Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Complete Arch Implant Impressions vol.30, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13264
- Full-arch accuracy of five intraoral scanners: In vivo analysis of trueness and precision vol.51, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2021.51.2.95
- Digital Procedures Compared to Conventional Gypsum Casts in the Manufacturing of CAD/CAM Adhesive Restorations: 3D Surface Trueness and Interfacial Adaptation Analysis vol.11, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115060
- Comparative study of three composite materials in bonding attachments for clear aligners vol.24, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12465
- Accuracy of Implant Level Intraoral Scanning and Photogrammetry Impression Techniques in a Complete Arch with Angled and Parallel Implants: An In Vitro Study vol.11, pp.21, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11219859