DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Existing Situation and Improvements of Administrative ADR

행정형 ADR의 현황과 개선방안

  • 강수미 (연세대학교 법학전문대학원)
  • Received : 2015.11.19
  • Accepted : 2015.11.27
  • Published : 2015.12.01

Abstract

Administrative ADR to solve new problems has the characteristics of a new project, hence ADR is established and operated with a lack of human and material resources in the process of introducing administrative ADR. Therefore, it is preferred to resolve conflicts by less costly counseling and mutual agreement before mediation. When we try to settle the disputes through administrative ADR at the stage before mediation, it causes problems for the neutrality and impartiality of the dispute settlement procedures. In this case administrative ADR systems should introduce devices that ensure the impartiality of the process. In some issues becoming social problems, relevant administrative agencies are inclined to establish ADR systems. If ADR systems become available, a person who may use ADR services may have some trouble grasping ADR institutions because he/she can hardly distinguish their business affairs. By subdividing administrative affairs, when the disputes have the issues that touch on various fields of the affairs, parties in the disputes have to take ADR procedures one by one in all ADR-related institutions. This may lead to too heavy a burden on the disputing parties, furthermore forcing them to give up the remedies of their rights. For more efficient ADR operations, it is necessary that the institutions which set up and operate ADR systems should actively exchange and cooperate with one another. They need to forge and strengthen the solidarity between administrations and courts. The administrative agencies which run ADR themselves have to build up the devices for preparing human resources and material facilities for administrative ADR.

Keywords

Cited by

  1. The Consideration on the 36th provision that provides Confidentiality in 「the Contents Industry Promotion Act」 - with the case of the Content Dispute Resolution Committee - vol.19, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.19051/kasel.2016.19.4.205
  2. 의료분쟁의 법적책임과 ADR제도의 효율적 운영방안 vol.26, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.16998/jas.2016.26.4.129
  3. 조정인 인증제에 관한 국제적 동향 - 미국 및 유럽 국가들을 중심으로 - vol.27, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.16998/jas.2017.27.2.121