The Journal of the Korean dental association (대한치과의사협회지)

The Korean Dental Association (대한치과의사협회)
권호 표지

Current Orthodontic Treatment using CAD/CAM technology: from orthodontic diagnosis to indirect bonding procedure

임상가를 위한 특집 2 - CAD/CAM 기술을 활용한 최신 교정치료 - 교정진단에서 간접부착술식까지

  • Cha, Jung-Yul (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 차정열 (연세대학교 치과대학 교정과학교실)
  • Received : 2013.12.06
  • Accepted : 2013.12.27
  • Published : 2014.01.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Computerized 3D virtual dental models are currently available, and their use has started to improve treatment outcomes. The accuracy of digital models has been demonstrated by many studies and various intra-oral scanners are innovated for short scanning time and high precision. Recently, a digital model was combined with a high technology computer-driven system, which was developed for the application of a digital set-up and indirect bonding of lingual attachments. In this section, virtual treatment planning using a virtual set-up program is be introduced, and the clinical applications and accuracy of computer-generated indirect bonding are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Santoro, M., et al., Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2003(124): p. 101-5.
  2. Redlich, M., et al., A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2008. 11(2): p. 90-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2007.00417.x
  3. Ender, A. and A. Mehl, Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions--an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent. 14(1): p. 11-21.
  4. Ender, A. and A. Mehl, Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent. 109(2): p. 121-8.
  5. Baumgaertel, S., et al., Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2009. 136(1): p. 19-25; discussion 25-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.09.016
  6. Gamba, T.O., et al., Influence of cone-beam computed tomography image artifacts on the determination of dental arch measurements. Angle Orthod.
  7. Graber, Varnarsdall, and Vig, Integration Digital and Robotic Technologies. 5th ed. Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques. Vol. chapter 20 2010: Elsvier. 693p.
  8. Mah, J. and R. Sachdeva, Computer-assisted orthodontic treatment: the SureSmile process. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2001. 120(1): p. 85-7. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.117686
  9. Grauer, D. and W.R. Proffit, Accuracy in tooth positioning with a fully customized lingual orthodontic appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2011. 140: p. 433-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.01.020
  10. Balut, N., et al., Variations in bracket placement in the preadjusted orthodontic appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1992. 102(1): p. 62-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(92)70015-3