디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제12권11호
  • /
  • Pages.171-181
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

AHP를 활용한 지상파 TV방송의 선거보도 공정성 연구

A Study on fairness of broadcasting by AHP

  • 투고 : 2014.09.10
  • 심사 : 2014.11.20
  • 발행 : 2014.11.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

현대 정치에서 매스미디어의 영향력이 확대됨에 따라 방송의 공정성이 중요하게 논의되고 있다. 기존의 연구는 대부분 기계적 공정성만을 추구하는 경향이 있어 이번 연구에서는 정량적 자료와 정성적 자료를 함께 비교하기 위해 AHP 분석방법을 통한 분석을 시도했다. 연구 결과 1계층의 평가항목 중 내용적 균형의 가중치가 상대적으로 높게 나타났으며, 형식적 균형에서는 보도의 순서가 내용적 균형에서는 보도제목이 가장 큰 중요도를 차지하는 지표로 나타났다. 각 방송사별 편향성 비교에서는 MBC가 편향성이 가장 크고 다음이 KBS, SBS순서로 나타났다. 이번 연구는 기존의 공정성 관련 연구가 형식적 분석에 그쳤던 것에 반해 정량적 자료와 정성적인 자료를 하나의 분석틀에서 계량화 하고 이의 정도를 상호 비교할 수 있었다는데 의미가 있다고 할 수 있다.

As the use of mass media in modern politics grows, its influential power is getting larger than before. Therefore, fairness of broadcasting is identified as a very important factor in the current law. In particular, whether the mass media has balanced attitude toward election issues has been a critical point, which maked the current law have separate provisons to deal with it. As for the fairness and bias, most existing studies had focused on how long the media dealt with the specific political issues, which leads to only quantitative analysis. Also, most analysis of the contents had been based on very personal judgement and evaluation of researchers rather than following the criteria which is based on scientific method. This study introduced the AHP analysis method to compare the quantitative data and qualitative data altogether, which aims to develope the indicator for weighted measures and measurement of the fairness. Research findings reveals that each broadcaster has, MBC was highly biased and KBS and SBS followed that. Compared with existing studies regarding the political fairness of the media.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. I. T. Chung, Effects of election campaign media in the Election Law and voting choice : Compared with the 6.3 local election, the 4.11 parliamentary election, and the 12.19 presidential election. Journal of Communication Science, 2013. 12, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 549-589, 2013.
  2. Korea Press Foundation, 2007 Selection of people. Korea Press Foundation, 2008.
  3. O'Keefe, G.,. "Political Campaign and Mass Communication" in S. Chaffee(ed). Political Communication, Beverly hills:Sage, 1975.
  4. Dahrendorf, R, Class und Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford: stanford uni, Press, 1996.
  5. S. G. Baek, Report and bias of the Presidential election candidate. Press Arbitration, 2007, Summer, pp. 4-21, 2007.
  6. H. R. Jeon, A Study on the objectivity of election campaign report. Journal of Political Communication, Vol 8, pp. 269-309, 2008.
  7. N. I. Sung.K. B. Kwon, Constitutonal Review on Election Broadcasting Deliberation System. Journal of SNU Law, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2006.
  8. Ministry of Government Legislation, Commentary of the Constitution, Vol. 1, Ministry of Government Legislation, 2010.
  9. J. I. Lim, Internet press and fairness of Political campaign report. Discussion on the Internet press and the General election report, 2004.
  10. T. Y. Kang, Fairness criteria of TV press. Fairness and Politic Discussion of TV journalism, pp. 1-40, 2004.
  11. Westerstahl, J., Objective newsreporting.Communication Research, 10(3), pp. 403-424, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1177/009365083010003007
  12. Mcquail. D., Mass Communication Theory, SAGE Publications, 2005.
  13. H. S. Lee, A presidential election and TV debate. Nanam, 1996.
  14. H. N. Kwon, Theory and Practice of the media election, Communication Books, 2002.
  15. M. W. Lee, Understanding of the Korea TV journalism, Communication Books, pp. 77-123, 1996.
  16. C. H. Lee, Study on the Institutional strategy of the presidential election press fairness. Korean Broadcasting Commission, The Debate of 16th presidential election TV report, 2004.
  17. Y. S. Lee,. Problem of political campaign report at the field. Kwanhun Journal, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 106-114, 2002.
  18. J. W. Yu, Study on the fair press conception and mean of Korea. Journal of korea press, Vol. 33, pp. 137-164, 1995.
  19. J. D. Moon.Y. T. Yoon, A Reconceptualization of Fairness in the Journalism Focusing on the "Autonomy". Journal of korean Press&Communication, Vol. 27, pp. 93-122, 2004.
  20. Blankenbury, W. B & Walden, R., Objectivity, interpretation and economy in reporting. Journalism Quarterly, 54(3), pp. 591-595, 1997.
  21. Schiller, D., Objectivity and the news: The public and the rise of commercial journalism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1981.
  22. Thomas L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierachy Process. New York:McGrawHill, 1980.
  23. B. C. Kim, Study on the Public relation strategy for public media lab status at the smart media era. Korea Broadcast Advertising Corp, 2011.
  24. Ministry of strategy and finance, Application guide of Preliminary Feasibility Study 2012, Ministry of strategy and finance, 2012.
  25. Thomas L. Saaty, Relative Measurement and Its Generalization in Decision Making Why Pairwise Comparisons are Central in Mathematics for the Measurement of Intangible Factors The Analytic hierachy/Network Process. RACSAM, Vol. 102(2), pp. 251-318, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03191825
  26. Thomas L. Saaty, Decision Making for Leaders. 2nd Edition. RWS Publications, 1990.
  27. S. G. Baek, Semiotics of korean political campaign press. Communication Books, pp. 37-43, 1997.
  28. http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/women/626612.html