Korean Journal of Computational Design and Engineering (한국CDE학회논문집)

Society for Computational Design and Engineering (한국CDE학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Survey Study of the Combat Effectiveness Analysis Models and Future Research Areas

전투체계 효과분석에 대한 주요 연구 리뷰 및 향후 연구방향

  • Kim, Jun-Soo (Department of Industrial & Management Engineering, Myong-Ji University) ;
  • Park, Keon-Young (Department of Industrial & Management Engineering, Myong-Ji University) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Yeong (Department of Industrial & Management Engineering, Myong-Ji University) ;
  • Bae, Sung-Min (Department of Industrial & Management Engineering, Hanbat University) ;
  • Pyun, Jai-Jeong (Agency for Defense Development) ;
  • Kim, Chong-Man (Department of Industrial & Management Engineering, Myong-Ji University)
  • 김준수 (명지대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 박건영 (명지대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 이재영 (명지대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 배성민 (한밭대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 변재정 (국방과학연구소) ;
  • 김종만 (명지대학교 산업경영공학과)
  • Received : 2014.09.24
  • Accepted : 2014.10.21
  • Published : 2014.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

It is important to predict and measure the combat effectiveness (CE) of weapons system in battlefield for acquiring efficient weapon system. Moreover, quantitative calculation of weapon effectiveness under complicated and uncertain battlefield environment is also difficult based on the future network centric warfare. Many papers used the term of combat effectiveness and tried to study a lot of related issues about it. However, there is no paper dealing with the classification of study issue about CE and what will happen in this study field. In this paper, we proposed how to classify the study issue about CE and forecast future direction of this study field. Conceptually, CE is nothing but the assessment results to measure the ability of a military weapon system to accomplish its objective. We believe that it is an appropriate time to review the literature extensively on CE analysis because the research interests and the papers of CE are rapidly growing in these days. This paper reviewed many CE analysis papers, classified them according to their research content and the research methodology applied. Additionally, a comprehensive list of future research areas is also given.

Keywords

References

  1. John M. Green, Bonnie W. Johnson, 2002, Towards a Theory of Measures of Effectiveness.
  2. DoD, 2003, Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, Joint Publication 1-02, pp.100.
  3. Lee, Y.-B. et al., 2009, A Proposal of New MOE to Assess the Combat Power Synergistic Effect of Warfare Information System, IE Interfaces, 22(3), pp.205-213.
  4. Lim, N.-K., 2011, A Methodology for the NCO Effectiveness Analysis Model Development, AJOU University, Korea.
  5. Joint Chiefs of Staff, 2005, Net-Centric Operational Environment, Joint Integrating Concept, Washington, D.C. USA.
  6. Lim, N.-K. et al., 2010, Enterprise Architecture Quality Attributes base Enterprise Architecture Frameworks Analysis, Journal of ITA, 7(1), pp.1-9.
  7. Choe, H.-P., 2010, The Study on Development of Training System implementing M&S :Focused on Army LVC System, HanSung University, Korea.
  8. Kim, H.-J. et al., 1999, A Study of Building a Model for Tactical C4I System, IE Interfaces, 12(2), pp.193-204.
  9. Hong, J.-W. et al., 2012, A Study on the Implementation of Agent-based Combat Object Modeling for Analysis of Armed-Helicopter's Mission Effectiveness, Transactions of the Society of CAD/CAM Engineers, pp.734-740.
  10. Douglas W. Gage, 1995, A Brief History of Unmanned Ground Vehicle (UGV) Development Efforts, Special Issue on Unmanned Ground Vehicles, Unmanned Systems Magazine.
  11. DoD, 2003, Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, Joint Publication 1-02, pp.555.
  12. Kho, Y.-H. et al., 2014, M&S Case Study for Information Sharing Enabled Combat Entities, Journal of the KIMST, 17(4), pp.1-9. https://doi.org/10.9766/KIMST.2014.17.4.395
  13. Lee, J.-Y. and Shin, C., 2004, The Functional Relationship of C2 System Enhancement and Combat Effectiveness Using Schutzer's C2 Theory and Measures of Effectiveness, Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 30(1), pp.65-75.
  14. Hwang, John, 1982, Selected Analytical Concepts in Command and Control, Gordon and Breach, New York.
  15. Park, S.-K. 2003, A Study of Evaluation of Combat Effectiveness Escalation for Integrating the Corps Level Fire Power Operation in C4I System, National Defense University, Korea.
  16. Saaty, T.L., 1980, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw Hill International.
  17. Saaty, Thomas L, 1996, Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback : The Analytic Network Process : the Organization and Prioritization of Complexity, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
  18. Park, S.-K. and Lee, J.-Y., 2003, A Study on The Assesment of Power Improvement Effectiveness of Corps Level C4I System Applied to Integrated Fire Operation, Military Operations Research Society of Korea, 29(1), pp.8-27.
  19. Park, Y.-S. and Jung, C.-K., 2010, A Study on Evaluation of Combat Effectiveness in WMA-EA based on C2 Model, Journal of the KIMST, 13(4), pp.619-626.
  20. Kang, S.-C., 2001, A Study of Combat Effectiveness in the Army Tactical C4I System Using AHP Method, National Defense University, Korea.
  21. Kim, J. J., 2004, A Study of Combat Effectiveness in the C4I System Using ANP Method, National Defense University, Korea.
  22. Jung, W.-S. et al., 2010, An Assessment of Combat Effectiveness for C4I System Considering Network Effect, Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 33(2), pp.23-32.
  23. Jung, W.-S. et al., 2010, NCW A Combat Effectiveness Evaluation Algorithm Considering Technical and Human Factors in C4I System, Journal of the Korea Intelligent Information System Society, 16(2), pp.55-72.
  24. Lee, S.-Y. and Lee, J.-Y. 2001, A Study on the Assessment of Force Improvement Effectiveness of KNTDS, Journal of the Military Operations Research Society of Korea, 27(2), pp.56-75.
  25. Kim, Y.-I. and Hong, Y.-G., 2012, A Study on Effectiveness Analysis Methods for V-C System: Applying Effective Based Operation (EBO) Methodology, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 13(3), pp.1337-1345. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2012.13.3.1337
  26. Park, S.-Y. et al., 2010, Design of the Agentbased Network-Centric Warfare Modeling System, Journal of the Korea Society for Simulation, 19(4), pp.271-280.
  27. Kim, T.-G. and Sung, C.-H., 2007, Objective-driven DEVS Modeling Using OPI Matrix for Performance Evaluation of Discrete Event Systems, SCSC '07 Proceedings of the 2007 Summer Computer Simulation Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, pp.305-311.
  28. Lee, J.-M. et al., 2010, The Combat Effectiveness Analysis of Attack Helicopter Using Simulation and AHP, Journal of the Korea Society for Simualtion, 19(3), pp.63-70.
  29. Jung, C.-Y. et al., 2011, Operational Effectiveness Analysis of Field Artillery Ammunition Support Vehicle for K-55 Self-Propelled Artillery Using Simulation, Journal of the Korea Society for Simulation, 20(3), pp.11-18. https://doi.org/10.9709/JKSS.2011.20.3.011
  30. Song, Y. I., 2010, A Study of Combat Evaluation for the Navy Fleet Combat System in Complex Centric Warfare, Defense Study, 53(1), pp.163-192.
  31. Choi, K.-S. et al., 2012, A Case Study of Effectiveness Analysis of Naval Combat System Design, Korea Association of Defense Industry Studies, 19(2), pp.38-51.
  32. Jeon, J.-H. et al., 2007, The Air-to-Air Combat Analysis Using COBRA Model, Journal of the Korea Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences, pp.428-431.
  33. Jeon, J.-H. et al., 2008, The Air-to-Air Combat Analysis with BVR Missile, Journal of the Korea Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences, pp.1228-1231.
  34. Yoon, J.-S. and Moon, H.-K., 1998, Combat Efficiency Analysis Using JANUS Model, Journal of the Korea Society for Simulation, pp.178-181.
  35. Yoo, S.-K. and Moon, H.-K., 2002, Future Weapon System Effectiveness Analysis with Defense Simulation Model, Journal of the Korea Society for Simulation, pp.137-141.
  36. Jeon, B.-G. and Cho, K.-G., 2005, A Study of Improving Direction for Combat Effectiveness and Active Demolition System, Defense and Technology, No.321, pp.64-73.
  37. Kim, J.-H., 2010, A Methodology Study of Attack Helicopter's Combat Effectiveness Analysis, Gyeongsang National University, Korea.
  38. Kim, T.-G. et al., 2011, DEVSim++ Toolset for Defense Modeling and Simulation and Interoperation, Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, 8(3), pp.129-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548512910389203
  39. Pollock, J.T. and Hodgson, R., 2004 Adaptive Information, Wiley-interscience.
  40. Bae, J.-W. et al., 2012, Methodology of Analyzing the Measure of Combat Effectiveness Reflecting Communication Effects in Network Centric Warfare, Journal of the Korea society for Simulation, 21(3), pp.57-69. https://doi.org/10.9709/JKSS.2012.21.3.057
  41. Kim, T.-G. et al., 2012, Joint Analysis of Combat Power and Communication System via Interoperation of War Game Simulator with Communication Network Simulator, The Journal of Korea Information and Communications Society, 37C(10), pp.993-1003. https://doi.org/10.7840/kics.2012.37C.10.993
  42. Lim, S.-H. et al., 2009, A Study on the Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Effect Analysis and Decision Making of Weapon System, Journal of the KIMST, 12(5), pp.557-562.
  43. Park, T. Y., 1993, A Methodology of Cost Effectiveness for Evaluation of Weapon System, Journal of the Quarterly Journal of Defense Policy Studies, 24, pp.239-258.
  44. Kim, J.-H., 2013, A Study on the Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Survivability Design Optimization of Light Armed Helicopter, Journal of the Korea Society for Aeronautical & Space Sciences, 11, pp.816-865.
  45. Yang, H.-K., 2011, A Study on Improvements of the Interoperability for the Future Warfare, Journal of The Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, 6, pp.717-718.