Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction (한국건축시공학회지)

The Korean Institute of Building Construction (한국건축시공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Study on the Element Technologies of BIM and Importance Analysis of Them through Technology Development Status Analysis

BIM 기술개발 현황분석을 통한 기술개발요소 도출 및 중요도 평가에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Ji-Yun (Department of Architectural Engineering, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Lee, Da-Un (Department of Architectural Engineering, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Song, A-Reum (Department of Architectural Engineering, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Yun, Seok-Heon (Department of Architectural Engineering, Engineering Research Institute, Gyeongsang National University)
  • Received : 2014.06.17
  • Accepted : 2014.09.01
  • Published : 2014.10.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In order to facilitate the application of BIM technologies in construction projects, a lot of developed countries such as Singapore and the United States are developing a technology development road-map of BIM. In order to develop it, current status of BIM technology in domestic projects must be analyzed in advance. In this study, the element technologies of BIM was identified and the current status and the importance priorities of them were analyzed and evaluated. The result shows that the level of technology developments is behind that of other advanced countries in most of the elements. In technology importance analysis, the BIM based preliminary planning technology and the standards for BIM service contracts are ranked in the high position and their developments are also delayed in Korea. The results of this analysis could show the direction of BIM technology development and also be used for developing the technology roadmap of BIM.

현재 미국과 싱가폴 등 많은 나라들에서 실제 건설 프로젝트에 BIM 기술 도입을 촉진시키기 위해 BIM기술개발 로드맵을 개발 중에 있다. 이것을 개발하기 위해서는 최근 국내 프로젝트에서 BIM기술들의 현황을 사전에 분석해야만 한다. 본 연구에서 우리는 BIM의 요소 기술을 정의하고 현황을 분석했다. 또한 도출된 요소기술들에 대한 중요성과 우선순위를 평가하였다. 그 결과 대부분의 요소기술들은 해외보다 뒤떨어지는 수준이었고 특히 기획 및 발주표준 분야가 중요성 및 우선순위는 높게 평가되었으나 현재 국내의 수준은 가장 뒤처지는 것으로 분석되었다. 이러한 결과는 향후 BIM 기술개발 방향 및 로드맵 개발에 도움을 줄 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. KIM KP, Park SH. Comparative analysis of the BIM status in the UK and US for improving the efficiency of construction project management process in Korea. Project Management Review. 2012 Feb;2(2):1-16.
  2. BuildingSmart Korea, Kyunghee University, Seoul National University, SungKyunKwan University, JungLim Architecture, GS E&C. Open BIM-based design environment development in order to improve the productivity of building design. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement(Korea); 2013 Feb. 250p. Report No.:2012-연구기획-D01.
  3. Engineer Research and Development Center. The US Army Corps of Engineers Roadmap for Life-Cycle Building Information Modeling(BIM) Final report. Washington DC: US Army Corps of Engineers(US). 2012 Nov. 52 p. Report No.:SR-12-2.
  4. British Standards Institution. bsi: B/555 Roadmap, Design, Construction & Operational Data & Process Management for the Built Environment[Internet]. British Standards Institution; 2013 Jun. Available from:http://shop.bsigroup.com/upload/Construction_downloads/B555_Roadmap_JUNE_2013.pdf.
  5. Cheng T. Singapore BIM Roadmap[Internet]. Singapore Building & Construction Authority(BCA); 2013 Nov. Available from: http://www.bimmepaus.com.au/libraries/resources/BMA%20Forum%202012/singapore%20bim%20roadmap%202012-rev.pdf
  6. buildingSMART Finland. Common BIM Requirements 2012[Internet]. buildingSMART Finland. 2012 Mar. Available from: http://www.en.buildingsmart.kotisivukone .com/3
  7. John Mitchell, Jim Plume, Mark Tait, Peter Scuderi, Wayne Eastley. National Building Information Modeling Initiative Volume1 : Strategy[Internet]. buildingSMART Austrailasia. 2012 Jun. 64 p. Available from: http://buildingsmart.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/NationalBIMIniativeReport_6June2012.pdf
  8. Keith H, Peter B. Construction 2020 : A Vision for Australia's Property and Construction Industry. 1st rev. Ausralia:CRC Construction Innovation; 2004 Jun. 56 p.
  9. Choi MS. An Evaluation of the Priority Order in Developing the Construction Technologies for Environment friendly Apartment Houses - Laying Stress on the Viewpoints of Contractors. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea. 2007 Sep;23(9):213-20.
  10. Park GY. A Study on Development Plans to Citizen Participatory Budgeting of Local Government - Focus on relative importance and priorities based on AHP [dissertation].[Daejeon(Korea)]: Pai Chai University; 2011. 166 p.