DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Technology Commercialization Factors on Small and Medium Enterprises Performance

기술상용화 요인이 중소기업 성과에 미치는 영향

  • Jo, Ki Dong (Incheon National University School of Business) ;
  • Kim, Jun Woo (Incheon National University School of Business)
  • Received : 2014.06.17
  • Accepted : 2014.09.20
  • Published : 2014.09.28

Abstract

In 21st century, firms are to face mitigating trade barriers between countries as well as to survive among harsh business environment. Also this phenomenon is expanding and gradually faster because the global competition become to intensify and there are significant technology changes. Therefore, in this study, technology commercialization factors on the technological achievement and on the financial performance were investigated in the small and medium enterprises. Firstly, the study finds that technology commercialization factor such as financial resources, human resources, strategic factors corporate financial performance show statistically significant(+). Secondly, the technology commercialization factors such as financial resources, human factors on the technical achievements in the enterprises show statistically significant(+). That means the technology commercialization of factors such as the financial resources as well as the human resources affect the technical performance of the enterprises.

21세기에 있어서 기업들은 무역장벽이 무너지는 등 경영환경이 급변하고 있는 추세이다. 이러한 현상은 기술의 발전과 함께 점차 가속화하고 있으며, 기술의 중요성은 기업에 있어 더욱 절실하게 되었다. 이러한 관점에서 본 연구는 중소기업을 대상으로 기술상용화에 대한 기업성과와의 관계를 규명하고자 하였다. 기존 연구를 토대로 기술상용화에 대한 요인을 재무적, 인적, 전략으로 구분하고 성과를 재무적 성과와 기술적 성과를 구분하여 회귀분석을 이용하여 측정하였다. 연구 결과 모든 요인들이 기업 성과와 밀접한 관계를 나타내었으며, 이러한 연구를 통하여 중소기업들이 성과를 높이기 위해 언급된 세 요인을 모두 중시할 필요가 있을 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. K. W Kim, & S. H, Hyun, Effect on Technology Transfer affected by Bureaucratic Env. and Strategic Resource of University Techno System, The Society of Korean SME, 9(1). 87-109. 2006
  2. S. K. Kim, An Study on The Tech. Diffusion and Policy of Public Research Performance, Science Tech. Policy Research Center, 2002
  3. The Society of Industrial Technology, An Economic Effect Analysis on Research Performance of Related Organizations, 1, 2003
  4. S. Y. Son, & H. K. So, Effective Commercialization Strategies for the R & D in the Area of Information & Communication Technology, The Study of Korean Industrial Engineering, 28(2), 201-215, 2002
  5. D. M. Lee, & S. J. Lim, A Study on Technology Innovation Performance of Exploratory Innovation Strategy and Practical Innovation Strategy, The Conference of Korean Management Society, 100-123. 2009
  6. D. S. Lee, & R. C. Chun, A Study on Management Performance Affected by SME's Technology Innovation Capability and Technology Commercialization., The Society of Korean SME, 32(1), 65-87. 2010
  7. K. H. Lee, The Research Methodology of Social and Science, Seoul : BubMoonSa, 2001
  8. Y, D. Lee, An Analysis of Success Factors of Technology Commercialization, The Study of Technology Renovation, 12(3), 259-276. 2004
  9. Y. J. Lee, The Strategy of Technology Transfer of Public Research Center, STEPI Working Paper Series, WP 2008-03. 2008
  10. G. S. Chung, A Study on Success Factors of Technology Transfer in Public Research Center: A Case of K Research Institute, SungKyunKwan University MA Dissertation. 2010
  11. S. Y. Chun, Strategic Technology Management, Seoul : Bak Young Sa, 2008
  12. Bach, et. al., The Assessment of Socioeconomic Impact of Public R&D in France, Tokyo International Conference. 2000
  13. E. C. Bears, L. L. Johnson, E. W. Merrow, Analysis of Federally Funded Demonstration Projects: Financial Report, Executive Summary, R-1926, Santa Monica: Rand Corporation. 1976
  14. M. P. Bhave, A Process of Entrepreneur Venture Creation, Journal of Business Venturing, 10(3), 223-242. 1994
  15. J. Chen, & W. G. Qu, A New Technological Learning in China, Technovation, 23(11), 861-867, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00038-X
  16. J. Chiang, From 'Mission-Oriented' to 'Diffusion-Oriented' Program: The new Trend of U.S. Industrial Technology Policy, Technovation, 11(6). 1991
  17. R. G. Cooper, Winning at New Products, Addison-Wesley. 1986
  18. A. Griffin, & J. R. Hau ser. Integrating R&D and Marketing: A Review and Analysis of the Literature, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13, 191- 215. 1996 https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1330191
  19. T. Higgins, Innovation Strategies for Successful Product and Process Commercialization in Government R&D, R&D Management, 7(2). 53-59, 1997
  20. R. G. Schroeder, K. A. Bates, M. A. Junttila, A Resource-based View of Manufacturing Strategy and the Relationship to Manufacturing Performance, Strategic Management Journal, 23(29), 105-117. 2002 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.213
  21. S. A. Zahara, & W. C. Bogner, Technology Strategy and Soft-ware New Ventures Performance-A Study of Cooporate-spoon and Independent Biotechnology Ventures, Journal of Business Venturing, 15(2), 135-173, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00009-3
  22. S. A. Zahra, & A. P. Nielsen, Sources of Capabilities : Integration and Technology Commercialization, Strategic Management Journal, 23. 377-398, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.229

Cited by

  1. IT SMEs' Product Planning Capability and Manufacturing Capability in the Context of Digital Convergence: The Mediating Impacts of the Product Exterior and Interior Design Capabilities vol.13, pp.12, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.12.55