DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Anti-inflammatory Triterpenes from Euonymus alatus Leaves and Twigs on Lipopolysaccharide-activated RAW264.7 Macrophage Cells

  • Jeong, Eun Ju (Department of Agronomy & Medicinal Plant Resources and Institute of Fusion Biotechnology, Gyeongnam National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Bae, Ji-Yeong (College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Rho, Jung-Rae (Department of Oceanography, Kunsan National University) ;
  • Kim, Young Choong (College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Ahn, Mi-Jeong (College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Sung, Sang Hyun (College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2014.04.10
  • Accepted : 2014.06.05
  • Published : 2014.10.20

Abstract

As a part of ongoing phytochemical research on Euonymus alatus leaves and twigs, we have isolated one new reissantane-type triterpene (1), together with eight known triterpenes, isoarborinol (2), friedelin (3), abruslactone A (4), $3{\beta},22{\alpha}$-dihydroxyolean-12-en-29-oic acid (5), $3{\alpha},22{\alpha}$-dihydroxyolean-12-en-29-oic acid (6), $3{\alpha},22{\beta}$-dihydroxyolean-12-en-29-oic acid (7), $22{\alpha}$-hydroxy-3-oxoolean-12-en-29-oic acid (8), demethylregelin (9). The structure of 1 has been elucidated as 24,24-dimethyl-reissant-7(8),25-dien-$3{\alpha}$-ol, by extensive 1D and 2D spectroscopic methods including $^1H$-NMR, $^{13}C$-NMR, $^1H-^1H$ COSY, HSQC, HMBC and NOESY. Anti-inflammatory activities of the isolated compounds were determined as potential regulating excessive inflammatory responses in RAW264.7 macrophage cells. Particularly, abruslactone A (4) and demethylregelin (9) showed the most potent activity, which effectively reduced the expression of iNOS protein and subsequent nitric oxide production induced by lipopolysaccharide in RAW264.7 cells.

Keywords

Introduction

Euonymus alatus (Thunb.) Sieb. (Celastraceae) is a deciduous tree which is commonly known as winged euonymus. The cork cambium on the twigs which is called ‘gui-jun woo’ has been traditionally used to regulate blood circulation, to relieve pain, to eliminate stagnant blood and to treat dysmenorrheal. Known constituents of E. alatus include sesquiterpenes, sesquiterpene alkaloids, triterpenes, flavonoids and phenolic compounds.1-3 Based on such background studies, we previously reported anti-inflammatory compounds isolated from the leaves and twigs of E. alatus which showed the significant inhibitory activities on nitric oxide production in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophage cells and BV2 microglia cells.4,5 Continuous to the previous phytochemical study on E. alatus, we further tried to isolate anti-inflammatory constituents from CHCl3 soluble fraction of the methanolic extract of E. alatus leaves and twigs.

Macrophages are widely distributed in the body and play important role such as host defense, inflammatory regulation and tissue remodeling by providing an immediate defense against foreign agents prior to leukocyte migration.6 An effective immune cells, macrophages play pivotal roles in innate and adaptive immune response to pathogens such as phagocystosis, cytokines, bacteria, bacterial products and particulates including lipopolysaccharide (LPS).7-9 Upon activation, various growth factors, cytokines and lipid mediators that promote inflammatory process are released. Hence, macrophages are recognized as target cells of a variety of immunosuppressants and anti-inflammatory drugs, leading to acquired immunity.10 The pharmacological reduction of LPS-inducible inflammatory mediators in macrophage has been recognized as an effective target for the development of anti-inflammatory drugs or immunosuppressants.

In the present study, we report the isolation and structural elucidation of compounds 1-9 from E. alatus leaves and twigs, and the inhibitory activities of the isolated compounds on nitric oxide (NO) production and the expression of iNOS in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells.

 

Experimental

Plant Material. The leaves and twigs of E. alatus were collected in Nambu forest of Seoul National University, Beagwoon Mountain, Gwangyang city, Jeollanam-do, Korea, in September 2007 and authenticated by Dr. Jong Hee Park, professor of Pusan National University. A voucher specimen (CS-99) has been deposited in Herbarium of the Medicinal Plant Garden, College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Koyang, Korea.

Extraction and Isolation of Compounds 1-9. The air-dried leaves and twigs of E. alatus (15 kg) were extracted three times for 3 h each with 80% MeOH (140 L) in room tempearture using an ultrasonic apparatus. Removal of the solvent in vacuo yielded a methanolic extract (1.2 kg). The methanolic extract was then suspended in distilled water and partitioned successively with CHCl3 (9 L), EtOAc (9 L), and n-BuOH (10 L). The CHCl3 fraction (112 g) was subjected to column chromatography on a silica gel column using mixtures of CHCl3−MeOH−Water of increasing polarity as eluents (100:4:1→50:4:1→25:4:1→15:4:1→10:5:1→5:4:1→MeOH) to give 11 fractions (fr. 1 to 11). Compound 3 (420 mg) was obtained through recrystallization with MeOH from fr. 2. Fr. 4 was applied on silica gel column eluting with a gradient of CHCl3−MeOH to yield 6 fractions (fr. 4-1 to 4-6). Compounds 1 (160 mg) and 2 (330 mg) were obtained from fr. 4-6 and fr. 4-5, respectively, by recrystallization with MeOH. Fr. 8 was subjected to ODS gel column chromatography with a gradient elution of MeOH−H2O (20% → 80% MeOH) to give eight fractions (fr. 8-1 to 8-8). Fr. 8-6 was chromatographed on silica gel column eluted with n-hexane−EtOAc (1:1→1:5) to yield 8 fractions (fr. 8-6-1 to 8-6-8). Compound 5 (14 mg) was obtained from 8-6-6 by additional C18 RP HPLC (AcCN−H2O 65:35, 2.0 mL/min, 250 × 10 mm, 210 nm, tR 28.01 min). Fr. 8-7 was subjected to silica gel column chromatography eluted with n-hexane−EtOAc (1:1→1:5) and yielded seven subfractions (fr. 8-7-1 to 8-7-7). Compounds 8 (4.4 mg) and 9 (5.2 mg) were isolated by C18 RP HPLC (AcCN−H2O 70:30, 2.0 mL/min, 250 × 10 mm, 210 nm, tR 25.96 and tR 27.54 min) from fr. 8-7-6. Silica gel column chromatography of fr. 8-8 with a gradient elution of n-hexane-EtOAc afforded six subfractions (fr. 8-8-1 to 8-8-6). Fr. 8-8-1 was further purified by recrystallization with MeOH to yield compound 4 (8.2 mg). Compounds 6 (3.7 mg) and 7 (4.5 mg) were isolated by C18 RP HPLC (AcCN−H2O 70:30, 2.0 mL/min, 250 × 10 mm, 210 nm, tR 39.04 and tR 45.36 min) from fr. 8-8-6.

24,24-Dimethyl-reissant-7(8)-25-dien-3a-ol (1). White amorphous powder, HREIMS m/z 454.4202 [M]+ (calcd. for C32H54O, 454.4175); mp 219-220 ℃, +72.0° (c 1.0, CHCl3); IR (KBr) vmax cm−1: 3477, 2943, 2871, 1457, 1377, 758; NMR data, see Table 1.

Table 1.aAll assignments were made by extensive analysis of 1D and 2D NMR. bMain observed HMBC and COSY correlations are presented.

Cell Cultures. RAW264.7 macrophage cells were obtained from Korea Cell Line Bank (Seoul, Korea). The cell line was maintained in DMEM containing 20 mM HEPES, 2 mM ʟ-Glutamine, 10% FBS with penicillin (100 IU/mL) and streptomycin (10 mg/mL) at 37 ℃ in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air-5% CO2.

Determination of NO Content. RAW264.7 cells were seeded in 48 well plates (1 × 105 cells/well) and incubated at 37 ℃ for 24 h. Then, the cell culture was washed and the medium was replaced with Griess medium to remove any trace of phenol red, and treated with test sample for 1 h before exposure to 0.1 mg/mL of LPS. After 24 h incubation, nitrite in culture medium was measured to assess NO production in RAW264.7 cells using Griess reagent. The absorbance at 550 nm was measured on a microplate reader and the concentration was determined using nitrite standard curve.

Estimation of Cell Viability. After 100 mL of sample aliquot was collected for Griess assay, MTT (0.2 mg/mL) was directly added to cultures, followed by incubation at 37 ℃ for 2 h. The supernatant was then aspirated and 100 mL of DMSO was added to dissolve the formazan. After insoluble crystals were completely dissolved, absorbance at 540 nm was measured using a microplate reader. Data were expressed as percent cell viability relative to control cultures.

Western Blotting. RAW264.7 cells were plated overnight in 6-well plates at a density of 1 × 106 cells per well. The medium was changed to fresh one and treated with test sample for 1 h before exposure to 0.1 ug/mL of LPS. After 8 h incubation, cells were washed twice with phosphatebuffered saline (PBS). The washed cell pellet was lysed in 200 μL of extraction lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 250 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM NaF, 0.5 mM sodium orthovanadate, protease inhibitor cocktail, 1% glycerol) and incubated for 30 min at 4 ℃. Cell lysate was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 ℃ and the supernatant was collected, followed by quick freezing. Protein content was determined using Bradford reagent according to the manufacture’s instruction. Equal amounts of protein (40 ug) were loaded per lane onto 8% SDS-PAGE gel. Protein was transferred to PVDF membranes and subsequently blocked in 5% skim milk for 30 min at room temperature. Anti-iNOS (1:1000 dilution; Cell Signaling Technology) antibodies were employed in 1 % skim milk. The membrane was incubated with the primary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. After washing three times with TBST, the immunoreactive bands were visualized by using immunopure peroxidase conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:10000 dilution; Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). The Blot was washed three times and then developed by enhanced chemiluminescence (iNtRON Biotechnology, Seongnam, Korea).

 

Results and Discussion

Isolation of Compounds 1-9 from E. alatus Leaves and Twigs. The methanolic extract of E. alatus leaves and twigs was suspended in water and successively partitioned with CHCl3, EtOAc and n-BuOH. Each fraction was evaluated for its inhibitory activity on NO production in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. Among the fractions, the CHCl3 soluble fraction showed the greatest inhibitory activity on NO production in RAW264.7 cells (Table 2). The CHCl3 (112 g) was further subjected to repeated column chromatography to yield one new C32 reissantane-type triterpene together with eight arborane, freidelane, oleanane, ursanetype triterpenes. Eight known compounds were identified as isoarborinol (2),11 friedelin (3),1 abruslactone A (4),2 3β,22α-dihydroxyolean-12-en-29-oic acid (5),3 3α,22α-dihydroxyolean-12-en-29-oic acid (6),12 3α,22β-dihydroxyolean-12-en-29-oic acid (7),13 22α-hydroxy-3-oxoolean-12-en-29-oic acid (8),14 demethylregelin (9)15 respectively, by comparison of spectroscopic data with those previously reported (Figure 1). Compounds 2 and 4-9 are reported for the first time from this plant.

Table 2.aValue of RAW264.7 cells not treated with LPS. bValue of RAW264.7 cells treated with 100 ng/mL LPS for 24 h. Mean value is significantly different (*P < 0.001) from the value of the LPS-treated.

Figure 1.Structures of compounds 1-9 isolated from CHCl3 fraction of E.alatus leaves and twigs.

Structural Elucidation of Compound 1. Compound 1 was obtained as white amorphous powder with +72.0 (c 0.1, MeOH). Its IR spectrum showed the presence of OH group (3477 cm−1) and exomethylene (889 cm−1). The molecular formula of 1 was determined as C32H54O from [M]+ ion peak at m/z 454.4202 (calc. 454.4175) in HREIMS. The 1H-NMR spectrum of 1 displayed signals due to nine methyl groups; seven singlets corresponding to tertiary methyl groups (δH 0.76, 0.84, 0.94, 0.99, 0.99, 1.00, 1.04), one doublet of a secondary methyl group (δH 0.85, J = 6.6 Hz) and one vinylic methyl group (δH 1.66). The 1H-NMR spectrum also showed signals assignable to one oxymethine proton at δH 3.41, one olefinic at δH 5.15 (1H, dd, J = 6.5, 1.6 Hz) and one exomethylene at [δH 4.66 (1H, br s), 4.72 (1H, br s)]. The 13C-NMR spectrum exhibited 32 carbon signals sorted by DEPT experiment as nine methyl groups, ten methylenes (including one sp2 carbon at δC 109.3), six methines (including one oxygenated at δC 76.5 and one olefinic carbon at δC 117.6) and seven quaternary carbons. The location of OH group was evidenced by HMBC correlations between C-3 (δc 76.5) and Me-28 (δH 0.94), Me-29 (δH 0.76). The relative configuration of H-3 was determined as equatorial position from the small coupling constant of H-3 (δH 3.41, br s).16

Further structural details were obtained by two dimensional NMR experiments (COSY, HSQC, and HMBC), which coupled with literature data, allowed unambiguous assignment of all carbon signals (Table 1). The elucidated basal structure of 1 was very closed to the series of 19(10→9)abeo-8α,9β,10α-euphane triterpene, which was first time found from Mallotous stenanthusz17 also called as reissantane-type triterpene. From the 1H-1H COSY correlations between H-10 and H-5, H-5 and H-6, H-6 and H-7, and the HMBC correlations of Me-19 with C-8, C-9, C-10 and C-11, it was suggested that 1 was reissantane-type triterpene with double bond between C-7 and C-8 (Figure 2). The stereochemistry of 1 was determined from the cross peaks observed in NOESY spectrum between Me-19 and H-5, Me-29, between Me-28, Me-29 and H-6, between Me-30 and H-17 (Figure 2). Two extra methyl groups, Me-31 (δH 0.99) and Me-32 (δH 0.99) showed the same HMBC correlations with C-23, C-24 and C-25 indicating 24,24-dimethyl position. The presence of 10 carbon side chain was further supported by the characteristic fragment peaks in MS spectrum at m/z 439 (M−Me), 421 (M−H2O−Me), 315 (M–side chain), 313 (M–side chain–2H).18 The remaining exomethylene was determined at C-25 from the HMBC correlations between C-24 (δC 38.7) and H-26 (δH 4.66 and 4.72), H-27 (δH 1.66). The chemical shift (δH 0.85, d, J = 6.6 Hz) of Me-21 in 1H-NMR spectrum, and the positive optical rotation of 1 (+72.0°) also indicated that the relative configuration of the side chain belonged to the euphane rather than the tirucallane series.19 From above data, compound 1 was determined as a C32 reissantane-type triterpenoid which possesses extra two methyl groups at C-24 in the side chain. On the basis of these data, compound 1 was determined to be 24,24-dimethyl-reissant-7(8), 25-dien-3α-ol.

Figure 2.The selected HMBC and NOESY correlations in compound 1.

Anti-inflammatory Activities of Compounds 1-9 in LPS-activated RAW264.7 Cells. Inhibitory effects of compounds 1−11 on LPS-induced NO production in RAW264.7 cells were evaluated using the Griess reaction. The treatment of LPS resulted in a significant increment of nitrite concentration in the medium compared to control. Among the compounds isolated, compounds 4, 5, 6, and 9 showed the strong or moderate inhibitory effects on NO production (Table 2) while the others were inactive. Oleanane-type triterpenoids 4-8 characteristically possessed oxygenated C-3, hydroxyl group at C-22 and carboxyl group at C-29. In those triterpenes, compound 4 in which hydroxyl group at C-22 and carboxyl group at C-29 were connected by ester linkage showed the most potent activity compared to those of compounds 5-7 with free forms of carboxyl group and hydroxyl group. In addition, compound 7 with β-hydroxy group at C-22, and compound 8 with ketone group at C-3 were found to be inactive. At the concentration of 100 μM, the NO production was significantly decreased up to 20 ± 1.5% and 15 ± 0.8% of control level by the pretreatment of compounds 4 and 9, respectively. To verify whether the reduced cell numbers which were caused by the cytotoxicity of these compounds resulted in decrease of NO production, cell viability was measured employing MTT assay. All the compounds tested showed no cytotoxicity at the concentration ranging from 10 μM to 100 μM.

Table 3.aRelative NO production (%) calculated as 100 × (NO of LPS + sampletreated − NO of untreated control)/(NO of LPS-treated − NO of untreated control). bValue of RAW264.7 cells not treated with LPS. cValue of RAW264.7 cells treated with 100 ng/mL LPS for 24 h. NO concentration (μM) of control and LPS-treated cultures were 3.2 ± 0.1 and 15.8 ± 0.3, respectively. dNAME (ω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester) positive control. Mean value is significantly different (*P < 0.01, **P < 0.001) from the value of the LPS-treated.

Since NO has been known to be produced by iNOS in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells, the inhibitory effects of compounds 4 and 9, which showed the most potent inhibitory activity on NO production, on the expression of iNOS protein were measured. Treatment of RAW264.7 cells with LPS resulted in the increment of iNOS expression and subsequent NO production. Pretreatment of RAW264.7 cells with compounds 4 or 9 significantly inhibited the expression level of iNOS protein compared to cells treated with LPS-only. The inhibition of iNOS expression was more remarkable in the treatment of compound 9 at the concentration of 100 μM (Figure 3).

Figure 3.Inhibitory effects of compounds 4 and 9 on LPS-induced iNOS expression in RAW264.7 cells. RAW264.7 cells were pretreated with compounds 4 or 9 for 1 h, then exposed to LPS for 24 h. Cell lysate (40 μg protein) was prepared from the cells and subjected to Western blot analysis using an antibody specific for iNOS as described in the Methods. The values shown are mean ± SD of data from three independent experiments. Significant compared with LPS alone, *P < 0.01, **P < 0.001.

 

Conclusion

Nine triterpenenes including one new reissantane-type was isolated from E. alatus leaves and twigs. Among the compounds isolated, abruslactone A (4) and demethylregelin (9) showed the potent inhibitory activities on NO production and iNOS expression in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. Though further investigations are required to clarify the detailed anti-inflammatory actions of bioactive compounds from E. alatus, the triterpenes isolated herein are thought contribute to anti-inflammatory effects of E. alatus and might possess beneficial therapeutic potential against various inflammation-related diseases.

References

  1. Akihisa, T.; Yamamoto, K.; Tamura, T.; Iida, T.; Nambara, T.; Cheng, F. C. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1992, 40, 789. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.40.789
  2. De Fatima Silva, G. D.; Duarte, L. P.; Da Silva Paes, H. C.; De Sousa, J. R.; Nonato, M. C.; Portezani, P. J. J. Brazil. Chem. Soc. 1998, 9, 461. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-50531998000500009
  3. Liu, C. M.; Wang, H. X.; Wei, S. L.; Gao, K. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 789. https://doi.org/10.1021/np070618n
  4. Jeong, E. J.; Yang, H.; Kim, S. H.; Kang, S. Y.; Sung, S. H.; Kim, Y. C. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2011, 49, 1394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2011.03.028
  5. Jeong, E. J.; Cho, J. H.; Sung, S. H.; Kim, S. Y.; Kim, Y. C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 15, 2283.
  6. Mosser, D. M.; Edwards, J. P. Nature Rev. Immunol. 2008, 8, 958. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2448
  7. Adams, D. O.; Hamilton, T. A. Annu. Rev. Immuno. 1984, 2, 238.
  8. Hinz, B.; Brune, K. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2002, 300, 367. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.300.2.367
  9. Molloy, R. G.; Mannick, J. A.; Rodrick, M. L. Brit. J. Surg. 1993, 80, 289. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800800308
  10. Klein, T. W. Nature Rev. Immunol. 2005, 5, 400. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri1602
  11. Sun, Y.; Zhan, Y. C.; Pei, Y. H. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2007, 9, 321. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286020600727491
  12. Nakano, K.; Oose, Y.; Takaishi, Y. Phytochemistry 1997, 46, 1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(97)80007-6
  13. Nakagawa, H.; Takaishi, Y.; Fujimoto, Y.; Duque, C.; Garzon, C.; Sato, M. J. Nat. Prod. 2004, 67, 1919. https://doi.org/10.1021/np040006s
  14. Kutney, J. P.; Hewitt, G. M.; Lee, G.; Piotrowska, K.; Roberts, M.; Rettig, S. Can. J. Chem. 1992, 70, 1455. https://doi.org/10.1139/v92-182
  15. Takaishi, Y.; Wariishi, N.; Tateishi, H.; Kawazoe, K.; Nakano, K.; Ono, Y. Phytochemistry 1997, 45, 969. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(96)00859-X
  16. Jiang, Z. H.; Tanaka, T.; Hirata, H.; Fukuoka, R.; Kouno, I. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 16999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020(97)10150-8
  17. Pal, R.; Kulshreshtha, D. K.; Rastogi, R. P. Phytochemistry 1975, 14, 2253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)91110-5
  18. Hui, W. H.; Luk, K.; Arthur, H. R.; Loo, S. N. J. Chem. Soc. 1971, 2826.
  19. Mamta, M.; Yogendra, N.; Sushil, K. Phytochemistry 2000, 54, 835. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)00136-9

Cited by

  1. and Their Biological Evaluation vol.13, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.201600083
  2. ChemInform Abstract: Antiinflammatory Triterpenes from Euonymus alatus Leaves and Twigs on Lipopolysaccharide-Activated RAW264.7 Macrophage Cells. vol.46, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/chin.201511267
  3. Triterpenoids pp.1460-4752, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NP00029H
  4. Bioassay-guided Isolation of Antiproliferative Triterpenoids from Euonymus alatus Twigs vol.10, pp.11, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578x1501001131
  5. (3β,16α)-3,16-Dihydroxypregn-5-en-20-one from the Twigs of Euonymus alatus (Thunb.) Sieb. Exerts Anti-Inflammatory Effects in LPS-Stimulated RAW-264.7 Macrophages vol.24, pp.21, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24213848