DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cd(II) and Zn(II) Complexes Containing N,N'-Bidentate N-(Pyridin-2-ylmethylene)cyclopentanamine: Synthesis, Characterisation and Methyl Methacrylate Polymerisation

  • Song, Yujin (Department of Chemistry and Green-Nano Materials Research Center, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Dongil (Department of Chemistry and Green-Nano Materials Research Center, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Ha-Jin (Jeonju Center, Korea Basic Science Institute (KBSI)) ;
  • Lee, Hyosun (Department of Chemistry and Green-Nano Materials Research Center, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2014.04.14
  • Accepted : 2014.06.07
  • Published : 2014.10.20

Abstract

The reaction between $[CdBr_2{\cdot}4H_2O]$ and anhydrous $[ZnCl_2]$ with N,N'-bidentate N-(pyridin-2-ylmethylene)-cyclopentanamine (impy) in ethanol yields dimeric $[(impy)Cd({\mu}-Br)Br]_2$ and monomeric $[(impy)ZnCl_2]$ complexes, respectively. The X-ray crystal structure of Cd(II) and Zn(II) complexes revealed that the cadmium atom in $[(impy)Cd({\mu}-Br)Br]_2$ and zinc in $[(impy)ZnCl_2]$ formed a distorted trigonal-bipyramidal and tetrahedral geometry, respectively. Both complexes showed moderate catalytic activity for the polymerisation of methyl methacrylate (MMA) in the presence of modified methylaluminoxane (MMAO), with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) syndiotacticity of about 0.70.

Keywords

Introduction

Transition metal complexes containing ancillary ligands, pyridyl-imines and N-substituted 2-iminoalkylpyridines have been applied for synthetic, spectroscopic and kinetic studies,1-10 photoluminescence and photochemistry,11 as catalysts for organic transformation,12-18 electrochemistry,19-21 bioinorganic chemistry,22,23 supramolecular chemistry,24,25 molecular magnetism26-29 and olefin polymerisation.30-44 In contrast, poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) is a universal polymer with optical applications. In general, a higher glass transition temperature (Tg) represents a higher optical quality and increased syndiotacticity of PMMA. On the other hand, isotactic PMMA, however, which is commercially produced using conventional radical processes, has a Tg around 65 °C. However, radical-mediated polymerisation of methyl methacrylate (MMA) cannot achieve an enough high Tg or high content of syndiotaticity in PMMA. Thus, studies on nonradical-mediated MMA polymerisation, which able to produce a higher Tg up to 140 °C, have been performed, and some transition metal complexes have successfully been applied to this process.45-53 Recently, we explored the development of transition metal complexes as catalysts for homogeneous polymerisation of MMA to produce syndiotactic PMMA. Although the ligand impy has been applied to rhenium, copper, palladium and platinum complexes, rhenium and copper complexes did not utilized as catalyst for MMA polymerisation.4,54,55 Previously, we reported the palladium and platinum complexes with N-cyclopentyl-1-(pyridin-2-yl)methanimine (impy), in which Pd(II) complex demonstrated a very high activity for MMA polymerisation.54 Thus, we have prepared zinc and cadmium complexes containing the impy to get the higher activity than Pd(II) complexes for the MMA polymerisation. The impy was obtained from the condensation reaction between cyclopentylamine and 2-picolylcarbaldehyde in dichloromethane (Scheme 1). Dimeric [(impy)Cd(μ-Br)Br]2 (88%) and monomeric [(impy)ZnCl2] (96%) complexes were obtained from impy with CdBr2·4H2O and anhydrous ZnCl2, respectively, in anhydrous ethanol. 1H-NMR peaks of both complexes were shifted to low field by approximately δ 0.3 compared with impy, while 13C-NMR peaks of the both complexes were shifted to low field by approximately δ 6 compared with ligand.

Scheme 1.Synthesis of ligand (impy) and complexes [(impy)Cd(μ-Br)Br]2 and [(impy)ZnCl2].

A single crystal suitable for X-ray analysis was obtained from diethyl ether diffusion in DMF for [(impy)Cd(μ-Br)Br]2 and acetone for [(impy)ZnCl2] solution. Crystal data and structure refinement of [(impy)Cd(μ-Br)Br]2 and [(impy)ZnCl2] are listed in Table 1. ORTEP drawings of the complexes are shown in Figure 1 ([(impy)Cd(μ-Br)Br]2) and Figure 2 ([(impy)ZnCl2]). The selected bond lengths and angles were listed in Table 2.

Table 1.Crystal data and structural refinement for [(impy)Cd(μ-Br)Br]2 and [(impy)ZnCl2]

Figure 1.Molecular structure of [(impy)Cd(μ-Br)Br]2 with thermal ellipsoids at 50% probability. The hydrogen atom was omitted for clarity.

Figure 2.Molecular structure of [(impy)ZnCl2] with thermal ellipsoids at 50% probability. The hydrogen atom was omitted for clarity.

Table 2.Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°) of [(impy)Cd(μ-Br)Br]2 and [(impy)ZnCl2]

The bond lengths of Cd-Npyridine and Cd-Nimine in [(impy)Cd(μ-Br)Br]2 were 2.330(11) Å and 2.358(11) Å, respectively. In general, the bond lengths of Pd-Npyridine were shorter than those of Pd-Nimine due to the different basicity of imine and pyridine moieties. However, those in [(impy)ZnCl2] were 2.083(3) Å and 2.068(3) Å, respectively. The double bond of imine N(2)-C(6) of 1.288(17) Å ([(impy)Cd(μ-Br)Br]2) and 1.277(5) Å ([(impy)ZnCl2]) were in the range of accepted carbon-nitrogen double bonds. The C(5)-C(6) bond distance of [(impy)Cd(μ-Br)Br]2 and monomeric [(impy)ZnCl2] was 1.455(19) Å and 1.475(6) Å, respectively, reflecting delocalised π-electrons. In [(impy)Cd(μ-Br)Br]2, the Cd–Brterminal bond [2.5700(18) Å] was shorter than the two Cd–Brbridge bonds [2.6711(17) Å and 2.7786(17) Å]. The angles of N(1)–Zn–N(2) and Cl(1)–Zn–Cl(2) in [(impy)ZnCl2] were 80.63 (14)° and 115.41(5)°, respectively, indicative of a distorted tetrahedral geometry. The N(1)–Cd(1)–N(2), N(1)–Cd(1)–Br(2#), Br(1)–Cd(1)–Br(2#), Br(1)–Cd(1)–Br(2), N(2)–Cd(1)–Br(2), and Br(2)–Cd(1)–Br(2#) angles for the complex [(impy)Cd(μ-Br)Br]2 were 71.9(4)°, 87.8(3)°, 103.58(6)°, 115.43(6)°, 94.7(3)° and 84.76(5)°, respectively. Thus, it showed a distorted square pyramidal geometry with N,N'-bidentate, two bridge bromides and one terminal bromide, achieving a five-coordinated complex. Note that the xz-plane of cyclopentyl rings in the impy of both complexes was distorted by approximately 90° with respect to the xy-plane of the pyridine ring and metal center.

[(impy)Cd(μ-Br)Br]2 and [(impy)ZnCl2] were activated by modified methylaluminoxane (MMAO) to polymerise MMA, yielding PMMA with Tg 120 °C and 126 °C, respectively (Table 3). The triad microstructure [isotactic (mm, δ 0.85), atatic (mr, δ 1.02) and syndiotactic (rr, δ 1.21)] of PMMA was analysed using 1H-NMR spectroscopy.59 To confirm the catalytic activity of MMA polymerisation, blank polymerisation of MMA was performed with anhydrous CdCl2, ZnCl2 and MMAO at 60 °C, respectively. The catalytic activities of [(impy)Cd(μ-Br)Br]2 (4.10 × 104 gPMMA/molCd·h) and [(impy)ZnCl2] (2.07 × 104 gPMMA/molZn·h) were similar to the metal starting materials: CdCl2 (3.53 × 104 gPMMA/molCd·h) and ZnCl2 (1.73 × 104 gPMMA/molZn·h). Since the corresponding Pd(II) complex, [(impy)PdCl2], showed very high activity of 14.5 × 104 gPMMA/molPd·h at 60 °C compared to reference complex PdCl2 (1.97 × 104 gPMMA/molPd·h)54 thus, impy, which effectively generates an electron-rich cloud around the palladium metal and imparts steric hindrance in [(impy)PdCl2] to make an active spices during MMA polymerisation, does not affect the Cd(II) and Zn(II) complexes. The syndiotacticity of PMMA was around 70%, which was similar to both Cd(II) and Zn(II) complexes and [(impy)PdCl2]. Moreover, the moderate syndiotacticity was not sufficient to confer a coordination polymerisation mechanism for both Cd(II) and Zn(II) complexes and [(impy)PdCl2]. Thus, we clearly did not observe steric or electronic effects of impy on cadmium and zinc metals in both of [(impy)Cd(μ-Br)Br]2 and [(impy)ZnCl2] to improve the activity and syndiotacticity of MMA polymerisation.

Table 3.a[M(II) catalyst]0 = 15 μmol, and [MMA]0/[MMAO]0/[M(II) catalyst]0 = 3100:500:1. bYield defined a mass of dried polymer recovered/mass of monomer used. cActivity is g of PMMA/(molM·h) at polymerisation temperature of 60 °C. dTg is glass transition temperature which is determined by a thermal analyzer. eDetermined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) eluted with THF at room temperature by filtration with polystyrene calibration. fMn refers the number average of molecular weights of PMMA. gIt is a blank polymerisation in which anhydrous CdCl2, ZnCl2 and PdCl2 were also activated by MMAO. hIt is a blank polymerisation which was done solely by MMAO. ipolymerisation time was 0.5 h at 60 °C.54

In summary, the iminopyridyl-containing dimeric [(impy)Cd(μ-Br)Br]2 and monomeric [(impy)ZnCl2] have been prepared and structurally characterised. The coordination geometry around cadmium atom in [(impy)Cd(μ-Br)Br]2 and zinc in [(impy)ZnCl2] showed a distorted square pyramidal and tetrahedral coordination, respectively. Both complexes have shown moderate catalytic activity for the polymerisation of MMA in the presence of MMAO with PMMA syndiotacticity characterized by 1H NMR spectroscopy, which value was ca. 0.70.

 

Experimental

Materials and Instrumentation. CdBr2·4H2O, anhydrous ZnCl2, picolinaldehyde, cyclopentylamine and methyl methacrylate (MMA) were purchased from Aldrich and anhydrous solvents such as C2H5OH, DMF, diethyl ether, dichloromethane were purchased from Merck and used without further purification. Modified methylaluminoxane (MMAO) was purchased from Tosoh Finechem Corporation as 6.9% weight aluminum of a toluene solution and used without further purification. Elemental analyses (C, H, N) of the prepared complexes were carried out on an elemental analyzer (EA 1108; Carlo-Erba, Milan, Italy). 1H NMR (operating at 400 MHz) and 13C NMR (operating at 100 MHz) spectra were recorded on a Bruker Advance Digital 400 NMR spectrometer; chemical shifts were recorded in ppm units (δ) relative to SiMe4 as the internal standard. Electronic absorption spectra were obtained on an Ocean Optics USB4000 spectrophotometer (Ocean Optics, Dunedin, FL). Infrared (IR) spectra were recorded on Bruker FT/IR-Alpha (neat) and the data are reported in reciprocal centimeters. The molecular weight and molecular weight distribution of the obtained polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) were carried out using gel permeation chromatography (GPC) (CHCl3, Alliance e2695; Waters Corp., Milford, MA). Glass transition temperature (Tg) was determined using a thermal analyzer (Q2000; TA Instruments, New Castle, DE).

Synthesis of Cd(II)and Zn(II) Complexes. N-Cyclopentyl-1-(pyridin-2-yl)methanimine ([N-(pyridin-2-ylmethylene)-cyclopentanamine]) (impy) was synthesized previously in the literatures.4,54,55

N-Cyclopentyl-1-(pyridin-2-yl)methanimine(dichloro)-cadmium(II) bromide ([(impy)Cd(μ-Br)Br]2). A solution of impy (174 mg, 1.00 mmol) in anhydrous ethanol (10.0 mL) was added to a solution of CdBr2·4H2O (344 mg, 1.00 mmol) in dried ethanol (10.0 mL) at room temperature. Precipitation of white material occurred while stirring at room temperature for 12 hours. The white powder was filtered and washed with ethanol (25.0 mL × 2), followed by washing with diethyl ether (25.0 mL × 2) (0.790 g, 88.0%). The X-ray crystal of [(impy)Cd(μ-Br)Br]2 was obtained within three days from diethyl ether (10.0 mL) diffusion into an DMF solution (10.0 mL) of [(impy)Cd(μ-Br)Br]2 (50.0 mg). Analysis calculated for C22H28N4Br4Cd2: C, 29.6%; H, 3.16%; N, 6.27%. Found: C, 29.8%; H, 3.20%; N, 6.26%. 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ 8.86 (d, 2H, J = 4.8 Hz, -NC5H4-), 8.64 (s, 2H, -N=CH-NC5H4-), 8.19 (t, 2H, J = 9.8 Hz, -NC5H4-), 7.98 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz, -NC5H4-), 7.78 (t, 2H, J = 6.2 Hz, -NC5H4-), 4.11 (m, 2H, -C5H9-), 1.93-1.86 (m, 8H, -C5H9-), 1.73-1.57 (m, 8H, -C5H9-). 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 100 MHz) δ 159.42(s, 2C, -N=CH-NC5H4-), 150.15 (s, 2C, ipso-NC5H4-), 147.76 (s, 2C, -NC5H4-), 140.96 (s, 2C, -NC5H4-), 128.47 (s, 2C, -NC5H4-), 128.21 (s, 2C, -NC5H4-), 70.13 (s, 2C, ipso-C5H9-), 33.13 (s, 4C, -C5H9-), 24.38 (s, 4C, -C5H9-). IR (solid neat; cm−1): 3086 (w), 2884 (w), 2806 (w), 2708 (w), 2614 (w), 2230 (w), 1941 (w), 1777 (s), 1650 (s), 1530 (s), 1444 (w), 1322 (s), 1172 (s), 1089 (s), 1017 (s), 932 (w), 861 (s), 774 (s).

N-Cyclopentyl-1-(pyridin-2-yl)methanimine(dichloro)-zinc(II) chloride ([(impy)ZnCl2]). A solution of impy (87.0 mg, 0.500 mmol) in anhydrous ethanol (10.0 mL) was added to a solution of anhydrous ZnCl2 (68.0 mg, 0.500 mmol) in dried ethanol (10.0 mL) at room temperature. Precipitation of white material occurred while stirring at room temperature for 12 hours. The white powder was filtered and washed with ethanol (25.0 mL × 2), followed by washing with diethyl ether (25.0 mL × 2) (0.150 g, 96.6%). The X-ray crystal of [(impy)ZnCl2] was obtained within three days from diethyl ether (10.0 mL) diffusion into an acetone solution (10.0 mL) of [(impy)ZnCl2] (50.0 mg). Analysis calculated for C11H14N2Cl2Zn: C, 42.5%; H, 4.54%; N, 9.02%. Found: C, 42.1%; H, 4.54%; N, 8.86%. 1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz) δ 8.79 (d, 1H, J = 3.6 Hz, -NC5H4-), 8.59 (s, 1H, -N=CH-NC5H4-), 8.15 (t, 1H, J = 3.8 Hz, -NC5H4-), 8.03 (d, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz, -NC5H4-), 7.72 (t, 1H, J = 7.4 Hz, -NC5H4-), 4.07 (m, 1H, -C6H11-), 1.87-1.84 (m, 4H, -C5H9-), 1.72-1.63 (m, 4H, -C5H9-). 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6, 100 MHz) δ 160.41 (s, 1C, -N=CH-NC5H4-), 149.85 (s, 1C, ipso-NC5H4-), 141.30 (s, 1C, -NC5H4-), 128.61 (s, 1C, -NC5H4-), 126.80 (s, 1C, -NC5H4-), 110.77 (s, 1C, -NC5H4-), 69.24 (s, 1C, ipso-C5H9-), 33.42 (s, 2C, -C5H9-), 24.54 (s, 2C, -C5H9-). IR (solid neat; cm−1): 3102 (w), 3024 (w), 2376 (s), 2313 (s), 2178 (w), 1750 (s), 1694 (s), 1649 (s), 1525 (s), 1217 (w), 1091 (s), 1023 (s), 944 (w), 775 (s), 713 (w), 643 (s).

Catalytic Activity for MMA Polymerisation. Methyl methacrylate (MMA) was extracted with 10% sodium hydroxide, washed with water, dried over magnesium sulfate, and distilled over calcium hydride under reduced pressure before use. To a 100-mL Schlenk flask containing [(impy)Cd(μ-Br)Br]2 (6.7 mg, 15 mmol) or [(impy)ZnCl2] (4.7 mg, 15 mmol) in toluene (10.0 mL) was added MMAO (modified methylaluminoxane, 6.9 wt % in toluene, 3.25 mL, [MMAO]0/[M(II) catalyst]0 = 500) under a dry argon atmosphere. After the mixture had been stirred at 60 °C for 20 minutes, it was transferred into MMA (5.0 mL, 47.1 mmol, [MMA]0/[M(II) catalyst]0 = 3100). Then, the reaction flask was immersed in an oil bath at 60 °C and stirred for 2 hours. The resulting polymer was precipitated in methanol (400 mL) and HCl (3 mL) was added with stirring for 10 minutes. The polymer was filtered and washed with methanol (400 mL × 3) to give poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA), which was vacuum-dried at 60 °C.

X-ray Crystallographic Studies. The crystal was picked up with paratone-N oil and mounted on a Bruker SMART CCD diffractometer equipped with a graphite-monochromatic MoKα (λ= 0.71073 Å) radiation source and a nitrogen cold stream (200 K). Data collection and integration were performed with SMART and SAINT-Plus.56 Semiempirical absorption corrections based on equivalent reflections were applied by SADABS.57 The structure was solved by direct methods and refined by full-matrix least-squares on F2 using SHELXTL.58 All the non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically, and hydrogen atoms were added to their geometrically ideal positions.

References

  1. Chen, Z. F.; Tang, Y. Z.; Liang, H.; Fun, H. K.; Yu, K. B. J. Coord. Chem. 2006, 59, 207. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958970500270893
  2. Govindaswamy, P.; Mozharivskyj, Y. A.; Rao Kollipara, M. Polyhedron 2005, 24, 1710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2005.04.034
  3. Wang, W.; Spingler, B.; Alberto, R. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2003, 355, 386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2003.08.001
  4. Massa, W.; Dehghanpour, S.; Jahani, K. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2009, 362, 2872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2009.01.008
  5. Herrick, R. S.; Houde, K. L.; McDowell, J. S.; Kiczek, L. P.; Bonavia, G. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 589, 29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-328X(99)00298-3
  6. Schulz, M.; Klopfleisch, M.; Gorls, H.; Kahnes, M.; Westerhausen, M. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2009, 362, 4706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2009.06.044
  7. Shakhatreh, S.; Mohanraj, J.; Czapik, A.; Tzimopoulos, D.; Kotoulas, S.; Gdaniec, M.; Akrivos, P. D. J. Mol. Struct. 2011, 1002, 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2011.06.044
  8. Alvarez, C. M.; Garcia-Rodriguez, R.; Miguel, D. J. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 692, 5717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorganchem.2007.09.025
  9. Gonsalvi, L.; Gaunt, J. A.; Adams, H.; Castro, A.; Sunley, G. J.; Haynes, A. Organometallics 2003, 22, 1047. https://doi.org/10.1021/om020777w
  10. Buffin, B. P.; Squattrito, P. J.; Ojewole, A. O. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2004, 7, 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2003.09.015
  11. Vlček, A., Jr. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2002, 230, 225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-8545(02)00047-4
  12. Che, C.-M.; Huang, J.-S. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 2003, 242, 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-8545(03)00065-1
  13. Schoumacker, S.; Hamelin, O.; Pecaut, J.; Fontecave, M. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 8110. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic0346533
  14. Chavan, S. S.; Sawant, S. K.; Sawant, V. A.; Lahiri, G. K. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2010, 363, 3359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2010.06.023
  15. Kanas, D. A.; Geier, S. J.; Vogels, C. M.; Decken, A.; Westcott, S. A. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 8727. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic800703n
  16. Carmona, D.; Vega, C.; Lahoz, F. J.; Elipe, S.; Oro, L. A.; Lamata, M. P.; Viguri, F.; Garcia-Correas, R.; Cativiela, C.; de Víu, M. P. L.-R. Organometallics 1999, 18, 3364. https://doi.org/10.1021/om9810448
  17. Qiu, C.-J.; Zhang, Y.-C.; Gao, Y.; Zhao, J.-Q. J. Organomet. Chem. 2009, 694, 3418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorganchem.2009.06.034
  18. Nienkemper, K.; Kotov, V. V.; Kehr, G.; Erker, G.; Fröhlich, R. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 366.
  19. Datta, P.; Sarkar, S. K.; Mondal, T. K.; Patra, A. K.; Sinha, C. J. Organomet. Chem. 2009, 694, 4124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorganchem.2009.09.017
  20. Roy, S.; Mondal, T. K.; Mitra, P.; Torres, E. L.; Sinha, C. Polyhedron 2011, 30, 913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2010.12.037
  21. Schnodt, J.; Manzur, J.; García, A.-M.; Hartenbach, I.; Su, C.-Y.; Fiedler, J.; Kaim, W. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 1436.
  22. Braymer, J. J.; Choi, J.-S.; DeToma, A. S.; Wang, C.; Nam, K.; Kampf, J. W.; Ramamoorthy, A.; Lim, M. H. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 10724. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic2012205
  23. Alvarez, C. M.; Garcia-Rodriguez, R.; Miguel, D. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 51, 2984. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic2022984
  24. Zhang, J.; Li, W.; Bu, W.; Wu, L.; Ye, L.; Yang, G. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2005, 358, 964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2004.11.039
  25. Bose, D.; Banerjee, J.; Rahaman, S. H.; Mostafa, G.; Fun, H.-K.; Walsh, R. D. B.; Zaworotko, M. J.; Ghosh, B. K. Polyhedron 2004, 23, 2045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2004.04.035
  26. García-Tojala, J.; Rojo, T. Polyhedron 1999, 18, 1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5387(98)00402-1
  27. Gao, E.-Q.; Yue, Y.-F.; Bai, S.-Q.; He, Z.; Yan, C.-H. Cryst. Growth Des. 2005, 5, 1119. https://doi.org/10.1021/cg0496181
  28. Lee, H. W.; Sengottuvelan, N.; Seo, H.-J.; Choi, J. S.; Kang, S. K.; Kim, Y.-I. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2008, 29, 1711. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2008.29.9.1711
  29. Zhang, D.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, P.; Chen, X. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2012, 33, 1581. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2012.33.5.1581
  30. Maldanis, R. J.; Wood, J. S.; Chandrasekaran, A.; Rausch, M. D.; Chien, J. C. W. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 645, 158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-328X(01)01340-7
  31. Johnson, L. K.; Mecking, S.; Brookhart, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 267. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja953247i
  32. Kettunen, M.; Vedder, C.; Brintzinger, H.-H.; Mutikainen, I.; Leskela, M.; Repo, T. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 1081.
  33. Ittel, S. D.; Johnson, L. K.; Brookhart, M. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1169. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr9804644
  34. Johnson, L. K.; Killian, C. M.; Brookhart, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 6414. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00128a054
  35. Svejda, S. A.; Brookhart, M. Organometallics 1999, 18, 65. https://doi.org/10.1021/om980736t
  36. Small, B. L.; Brookhart, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 7143. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja981317q
  37. Small, B. L.; Brookhart, M. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 2120. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma981698s
  38. Small, B. L.; Brookhart, M.; Bennett, A. M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 4049. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja9802100
  39. Vedder, C.; Schaper, F.; Brintzinger, H.-H.; Kettunen, M.; Babik, S.; Fink, G. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 1071. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.200400912
  40. Tellmann, K. P.; Gibson, V. C.; White, A. J. P.; Williams, D. J. Organometallics 2005, 24, 280. https://doi.org/10.1021/om049297q
  41. Britovsek, G. J. P.; Bruce, M.; Gibson, V. C.; Kimberley, B. S.; Maddox, P. J.; Mastroianni, S.; McTavish, S. J.; Redshaw, C.; Solan, G. A.; Stromberg, S.; White, A. J. P.; Williams, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8728. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja990449w
  42. Britovsek, G. J. P.; Gibson, V. C.; Kimberley, B. S.; Maddox, P. J.; McTavish, S. J.; Solan, G. A.; White, A. J. P.; Williams, D. J. Chem. Commun. 1998, 849.
  43. Bianchini, C.; Mantovani, G.; Meli, A.; Migliacci, F.; Laschi, F. Organometallics 2003, 22, 2545. https://doi.org/10.1021/om030227d
  44. Gibson, V. C.; O'Reilly, R. K.; Wass, D. F.; White, A. J. P.; Williams, D. J. Dalton Trans. 2003, 2824. https://doi.org/10.1039/b303094f
  45. He, X.; Yao, Y.; Luo, X.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Q. Organometallics 2003, 22, 4952. https://doi.org/10.1021/om030292n
  46. Bahuleyan, B. K.; Chandran, D.; Kwak, C. H.; Ha, C.-S.; Kim, I. Macromol. Res. 2008, 18, 745.
  47. Lian, B.; Thomas, C. M.; Casagrande, O. L., Jr.; Lehmann, C. W.; Roisnel, T.; Carpentier, J.-F. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 328. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic061749z
  48. Li, J.; Song, H.; Cui, C. Appl. Organometal. Chem. 2010, 24, 82.
  49. Wang, W.; Stenson, P. A.; Marin-Becerra, A.; McMaster, J.; Schroder, M.; Irvine, D. J.; Freeman, D.; Howdle, S. M. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 6667. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma049267z
  50. Yang, M.; Park, W. J.; Yoon, K. B.; Jeong, J. H.; Lee, H. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2011, 14, 189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2010.10.019
  51. Zhang, Z.; Cui, D.; Trifonov, A. A. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 2861.
  52. Lansalot-Matras, C.; Bonnette, F.; Mignard, E.; Lavastre, O. J. Organomet. Chem. 2008, 693, 393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorganchem.2007.11.010
  53. Kim, E.; Woo, H. Y.; Kim, S.; Lee, H.; Kim, D.; Lee, H. Polyhedron 2012, 42, 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2012.05.014
  54. Kim, S.; Kim, E.; Lee, H.-J.; Lee, H. Polyhedron 2014, 69, 149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2013.11.036
  55. Dominey, R. N.; Hauser, B.; Hubbard, J.; Dunham, J. Inorg. Chem. 1991, 30, 4754. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00025a014
  56. SMART and SAINT-Plus v 6.22, Bruker AXS Inc., Madison: Wisconsin, USA, 2000.
  57. Sheldrick, G. M. SADABS v 2.03, University of Gottingen: Germany, 2002.
  58. SHELXTL v 6.10; Bruker AXS, Inc., Madison: Wisconsin, USA, 2000.
  59. Kitaura, T.; Kitayama, T. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2007, 28, 1889. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.200700259

Cited by

  1. -substituted 2-iminomethylpyridine and 2-iminomethylquinoline vol.70, pp.23, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/00958972.2017.1416106
  2. ‐(pyridin‐2‐ylmethylene) aniline derivatives: Synthesis, characterization and methyl methacrylate polymerization pp.1099-0739, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/aoc.4797
  3. Stereoselective polymerization of methyl methacrylate and rac-lactide mediated by iminomethylpyridine based Cu(ii) complexes vol.10, pp.27, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra00805b