Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society

Korean Chemical Society (대한화학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

One-step Microwave Synthesis of Hierarchical Structured LiFePO4 using Citric Acid

  • Wu, Mihye (Advanced Materials Division, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology) ;
  • Choi, Sungho (Advanced Materials Division, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology) ;
  • Kang, Yongku (Advanced Materials Division, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology) ;
  • Jung, Ha-Kyun (Advanced Materials Division, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology)
  • Received : 2014.03.03
  • Accepted : 2014.06.03
  • Published : 2014.10.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The hierarchical-structured $LiFePO_4$ cathode materials were synthesized by one-step microwave synthesis, and their electrochemical properties were investigated. Addition of citric acid during the reaction lead to the formation of hierarchical structured $LiFePO_4$, which has both nano- and micron-characteristics advantageous for energy density and electrode fabrication. Adjusting the molar ratio of Fe to citric acid enhanced the electrochemical properties of $LiFePO_4$.

Keywords

Introduction

There are diverse approaches used in preparing electrode materials (e.g., solid-state, sol-gel, co-precipitation, solvothermal, hydrothermal method).1-8 The electrochemical properties of materials are highly dependent on their method of preparation, so adjusting synthesis methods to be more effective is essential in synthesizing cathode materials.9 Microwave synthesis has been widely adopted as a useful method for preparing electrode materials. The synthetic route is simple and fast, which is economically and environmentally advantageous, and uniformity can be achieved due to reaction processes occurring at the molecular level.10-13

LiFePO4 has been intensively studied as a potential cathode material because of advantages that include excellent thermal stability, good cycleability, low cost, nontoxicity and safety.14-17 However, one of the main problems with LiFePO4 is that the compound has poor ionic and electrical conductivity.18-20 Many efforts have been made to overcome this problem, and reducing the particle size to nano-scale is accepted as being one of the most effective ways to improve the ionic and electrical conductivity of the electrode material. Nano-structuring can facilitate lithiumion diffusion in the electrode materials by shortening the diffusion lengths for lithium ions.21 The electrical conductivity of nano-structured materials can be effectively enhanced by providing short path-lengths for electronic transport.22 Moreover, greater contact area increases the accessibility of electrolyte, leading to high power performance.23

Despite these advantages based on the nano-structuring, there are still disadvantages. Nano-sized materials show lower density comparing with micron-sized materials, which leads to lower energy density of the electrode, and limits the total volumetric energy density of lithium-ion batteries. To enhance the strength and make up for the weakness, some solutions (i.e., fabricating nano/nano-mixed or nano/micro-mixed electrode materials) have been suggested.

In this work, we successively synthesized hierarchical structured LiFePO4, composed of micron-sized particles formed by the nano-sized primary particles by one-step microwave synthesis using citric acid. The hierarchical structuring enables the electrode material to have both nanoand micron-characteristics. Nano-sized primary particles of LiFePO4 can be kinetically and thermodynamically favorable; while micron-sized particles can increase the pack density so that the total volumetric energy density of lithiumion batteries can be increased. The effect of citric acid on synthesizing hierarchical structured LiFePO4 and the electrochemical performance of the material was investigated.

 

Experimental

Preparation of LiFePO4. LiFePO4 was prepared by a one-step microwave synthesis using lithium acetate dihydrate (Sigma-Aldrich, reagent grade), iron(II) sulfate heptahydrate (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.0%), ammonium phosphate monobasic (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.99%), sucrose (Fluka, 99.0%), methacrylic acid (Aldrich, 99.0%) and citric acid monohydrate (DAE JUNG chemicals, 99.5%) as raw materials. All the chemicals were used without further purification.The molar ratio of the Li:Fe:P was 3:1:2. The proper amount of sucrose and methacrylic acid was 15 and 30 wt % of the calculated final product, respectively. The molar ratios of Fe to citric acid were 1:0, 1:0.8, 1:1, 1:1.2, 1:1.4, and 1:1.6. Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) with a molecular weight of 10,000 was dissolved in deionized water resulting in a 25% w/w solution. This solution was then added to the appropriately weighed raw materials. The resultant mixture was transferred and sealed in a Teflon vessel; then placed in a microwave reactor (Model MARS6, CEM Corp., USA). The reaction temperature was raised to 170 °C, maintained for 15 min; then cooled down to room temperature.

Measurements. The crystal structures were analyzed with a powder diffractometer (Rigaku Ultima IV Diffractometer) with graphite-monochromator equipped with Cu Kα radiation; operating at 40 kV and 40 mA. The particle size and morphology were observed using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, Tescan Mira 3 LMU FEG, 20 kV).

The cathode was formulated by mixing LiFePO4 powder, super P, and PVdF in a weight ratio of 7:2:1; dispersed in N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP). The obtained slurry was spread on Al foil as a current collector, followed by vacuum drying at 120 °C for 12 h. The electrolyte was 1 M LiPF6 dissolved in a mixture of ethylene carbonate/dimethyl carbonate (EC/DMC 1:1, v/v). Li foil was used as a negative electrode, and coin cells (CR2032 type) were assembled in an argon-filled glove box.

Galvanostatic charge/discharge characteristics were measured between 1.5 and 4.5 V at a constant current of 0.1C (17 mA/g) and 1C (170 mA/g). The galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT) was employed at a current pulse of 17 mAh/g for 10 min. The current was turned off for 50 min between each pulse.24

The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area was measured by nitrogen adsorption/desorption at 77.3 K. Before measurement, all the samples were degassed for 30 min at 90 °C, and evacuated for 4 h at 200 °C.

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was carried out using an impedance analyzer (Bio-Logic) with a frequency range from 105 to 0.1 Hz at an amplitude of 10 mV. The impedance spectra were normalized by the active mass of the electrode.25,26

 

Results and Discussion

The XRD patterns for the LiFePO4 synthesized with various ratios of Fe to citric acid are shown in Figure 1. The experimental molar ratios of Fe to citric acid were 1:0, 1:0.8, 1:1, 1:1.2, 1:1.4 and 1:1.6, and we refer to products from these ratios as LiFePO4/CAX, where X represents the molar ratio of citric acid to Fe. As indicated all the patterns except LiFePO4/CA0 were indexed on the orthorhombic structure with space group Pnma (JCPDS 97-018-1341), and LiFePO4/CA0 with Pmnb (JCPDS 00-042-1499). The synthesized LiFePO4 was well crystallized without any detectable impurity phases despite using citric acid in the one-step microwave reaction.

Figure 1.XRD patterns for the LiFePO4 synthesized with various ratios of Fe to citric acid.

Figure 2 shows charge and discharge profiles of LiFePO4/CA1.2. The long flat charge and discharge curves were obtained at a potential of about 3.4 V vs. Li/Li+ at 0.1C (17 mA/g), which is related to the two phase redox reaction (LiFePO4 ↔ (1−x)LiFePO4 + xFePO4 + xLi+ + xe−).27 The synthesized LiFePO4/CA1.2 had a discharge capacity of 170 mAh/g, same as its theoretical capacity based on a oneelectron reaction.28 This result shows that the reactivity of the participating lithium ions was very high, and the electrons for the redox reaction were very active. This follows from the fact that the electrochemical reaction of the synthesized LiFePO4 was highly reversible.

Figure 2.Charge and discharge profiles of LiFePO4/CA1.2 at 0.1C (17 mAh/g).

Field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) images of LiFePO4 are shown in Figure 3. Figure 3(a) reveals that LiFePO4/CA0 synthesized without citric acid has thickrod morphology several microns in size; without formation of hierarchical structure. However, the particle morphology changed significantly after adding citric acid for the microwave reaction. Regardless of the molar ratios of Fe to citric acid, all the particles synthesized with citric acid show hierarchical-structure morphology with primary particles of nanorods with a diameter of 20 nm and length of under 400 nm (Figure 3(c), (e), (g), (i), (k)), and hierarchical particles of spherical shape with a diameter of several microns (Figure 3(b), (d), (f), (h), (j)). Moreover, the size of primary particles varies with the molar ratios of Fe to citric acid. The size of nonorods increased with increasing citric acid content. The length of nanorods for LiFePO4/CA0.8 is ranging from 50 to 200 nm, whereas that for LiFePO4/CA1.6 is from 200 to 400 nm, which was grown much longer as the citric acid content increased. The variation in primary particle size influences the diffusion length of lithium ion that can affect the performances of the electrode materials. To investigate the differences of the synthesized LiFePO4 according to the primary particle size, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) techniques were employed. The calculated surface areas were listed in Table 1. A remarkable decrease in the BET surface area was measured for LiFePO4/CA0 compared with other products prepared by adding citric acid. The BET surface area of LiFePO4/CA1.2 was 23.17 m2/g which was about 12 times higher than that of LiFePO4/CA0, 1.96 m2/g. This shows that the greater surface area originated in the hierarchical-structure morphology with primary particles of nanorods. In addition, there were differences in surface area of citric acid added products in accordance with primary particle size. The LiFePO4/CA1.2 exhibited the highest surface area among other products. Therefore, it is obvious that citric acid addition played a key role in the formation of the hierarchical structure of LiFePO4, and the optimum molar ratio of Fe to citric acid for the highest surface area was 1:1.2.

Figure 3.FE-SEM images of LiFePO4: (a) LiFePO4/CA0; (b, c) LiFePO4/CA0.8; (d, e) LiFePO4/CA1; (f, g) LiFePO4/CA1.2; (h, i) LiFePO4/CA1.4; (j, k) LiFePO4/CA1.6.

Table 1.BET surface area

The nano-sized primary particles can provide advantageous electrochemical factors such as shortening the diffusion and electron transport paths, good electrolyte accessibility, increasing reaction sites, and improving cycling performance. The mi cron characteristics of the particles can offer solutions for low volumetric energy density and electrode fabrication problems. To identify the electrochemical properties in respect of morphologies and surface areas, the charge and discharge curves of LiFePO4 synthesized with different molar ratios of Fe to citric acid at 1C are depicted in Figure 4(a). There are noticeable differences of capacity according to the citric acid addition. The discharge capacity of LiFePO4/CA0 was 11 mAh/g, whereas the citric acid added materials showed 100, 107, 121, 106 and 95 mAh/g for LiFePO4/CA0.8, LiFePO4/CA1, LiFePO4/CA1.2, LiFePO4/CA1.4, and LiFePO4/CA1.6, respectively. This dependence of capacity on the inclusion of citric acid is consistent with the FESEM and BET results. LiFePO4/CA0 has only micron characteristics; while the others have not only micron characteristics in their hierarchical morphologies, but also nano characteristics in their primary morphologies. Therefore, it is evident that LiFePO4 products with citric acid show higher discharge capacity than those synthesized without citric acid. Also, LiFePO4/CA1.2 exhibits charge and discharge capacities of 124 and 121 mAh/g; which is the optimum condition for this material preparation that having highest surface area of those synthesized LiFePO4. Figure 4(b) shows the cycling performance and coulombic efficiency of LiFePO4/CA1.2 at 1C. As can be seen, the LiFePO4 exhibits a very stable cycling performance with capacity retention of 98% and coulombic efficiency of 99%; after 50 cycles.

Figure 4(a) Charge and discharge curves of LiFePO4 synthesized with different molar ratios of Fe to citric acid at 1C, and (b) cycleability and coulombic efficiency of LiFePO4/CA1.2.

To clarify the electrochemical differences of the synthesized products under minimized kinetic effect, QOCV profiles were obtained by the galvanostatic, intermittent-titration technique (GITT).29,30 The technique was carried out by applying a current pulse for 10 min to the cells to reach the closed-circuit voltage (CCV); followed by a relaxation step of 50 min so that the voltage reached a quasi-equilibrium value (quasi-open-circuit voltage, QOCV - see Figure 5(a)).31,32 Charging and discharging was continued until the potential of the cell was charged to 4.5 V and discharged to 1.5 V, respectively. Figure 5(b) shows QOCV profiles as a function of the discharge capacity; showing hysteresis at the start and end of the discharge region associated with the citric acid content. At the same QOCV, the various LiFePO4 products exhibited different discharge capacity; indicating that the electrochemical reaction process is different from the citric content. LiFePO4/CA1.2 showed the highest discharge capacity at the same QOCV, LiFePO4/CA0 showed the lowest, and others follows the same tendency toward specific capacity at 1C presented in Figure 4. Therefore, it can be inferred that LiFePO4/CA1.2 is the most favorable thermodynamically, and that LiFePO4/CA0 is least favorable; compared to all the others.

Figure 5.(a) Typical voltage transient in the discharging period and (b) QOCV profiles as a function of discharging capacity.

To demonstrate the influence of citric acid addition on kinetics, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was used. The EIS measurement provides information about the internal resistance of electrochemical systems. Nyquist plots of LiFePO4 at different molar ratios of Fe to citric acid are shown in Figure 6, and the fitting results are listed in Table 2. The RΩ is the total ohmic resistance of the cell; comprising electric conductivity of the electrolyte, separator, and electrodes. The Rct represents the faradic charge-transfer resistance for the electrode reaction; that shows the reaction kinetics.33 As listed in Table 2, RΩ is invariant regardless of citric acid ratios. The Rct; however, showed noticeable differences according to the citric acid ratios. Most significantly, LiFePO4/CA0 showed the highest Rct among those synthesized by adding citric acid; a value which was about seven times higher than LiFePO4/CA1.2 (lowest Rct). From this, it can be deduced that the improved electrochemical properties of LiFePO4/CA1.2 originated from its low Rct.

Figure 6.Nyquist plots of LiFePO4 at different molar ratios of Fe to citric acid.

Table 2.EIS parameters of LiFePO4

 

Conclusion

In summary, hierarchical-structured LiFePO4 as a cathode material was fabricated by one-step microwave synthesis. Adding citric acid is essential in the formation of hierarchical structures, which provide advantages for volumetric energy density and electrode fabrication. The optimum molar ratio of Fe to citric acid for the highest surface area was 1:1.2. The LiFePO4 showed discharge capacity of 170 mAh/g at 0.1C (same as theoretical capacity), and 120 mAh/g at 1C.

References

  1. Andersson, A. S.; Kalska, B.; Häggström, L.; Thomas, J. O. Solid State Ionics 2000, 130, 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(00)00311-8
  2. Prosini, P. P.; Carewska, M.; Scaccia, S.; Wisniewski, P.; Pasquali, M. Electrochim. Acta 2003, 48, 4205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4686(03)00606-6
  3. Arnold, G.; Garche, J.; Hemmer, R.; Ströbele, S.; Vogler, C.; Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M. J. Power Sources 2003, 119, 247.
  4. Yang, H.; Wu, X.-L.; Cao, M.-H.; Guo, Y.-G. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 3345. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp808080t
  5. Yang, S.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Z. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 8086. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0jm01346c
  6. Ellis, B.; Kan, W. H.; Makahnouk, W. R. M.; Nazar, L. F. J. Mater. Chem. 2007, 17, 3248. https://doi.org/10.1039/b705443m
  7. Liu, H.; Wu, Y. P.; Rahm, E.; Holze, R.; Wu, H. Q. J. Solid State Eletrochem. 2004, 8, 450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-004-0521-1
  8. Dokko, K.; Koizumi, S.; Nakanob, H.; Kanamura, K. J. Mater. Chem. 2007, 17, 4803. https://doi.org/10.1039/b711521k
  9. Yang, G.; Ji, H.; Liu, H.; Huo, K.; Fu, J.; Chu, P. K. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2010, 10, 980. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2010.1890
  10. Wang, L.; Huang, Y.; Jiang, R.; Jia, D. Electrochim. Acta 2007, 52, 6778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2007.04.104
  11. Song, M.-S.; Kim, D.-Y.; Kang, Y.-M.; Kim, Y.-I.; Lee, J.-Y.; Kwon, H.-S. J. Power Sources 2008, 180, 546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.01.079
  12. Bilecka, I.; Niederberger, M. Nanoscale 2010, 2, 1358. https://doi.org/10.1039/b9nr00377k
  13. Zhang, Y.; Feng, H.; Wu, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, A.; Xia, T.; Dong, H.; Liu, M. Electrochim. Acta 2009, 54, 3206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2008.11.033
  14. Li, Z.; Zhang, D.; Yang, F. J. Mater. Sci. 2009, 44, 2435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3316-z
  15. Chen, Z.; Zhu, H.; Ji, S.; Fakir, R.; Linkov, V. Solid State Ionics 2008, 179, 1810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2008.04.018
  16. Guo, H.; Xiang, K.; Cao, X.; Li, X.; Wang, Z.; Li, L. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2009, 19, 166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(08)60246-0
  17. Zhou, W.; He, W.; Li, Z.; Zhao, H.; Yan, S. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2009, 13, 1819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-008-0762-5
  18. Hsu, K.-F.; Tsay, S.-Y.; Hwang, B.-J. J. Mater. Chem. 2004, 14, 2690. https://doi.org/10.1039/b406774f
  19. Kim, J.-K.; Choi, J.-W., Chauhan, G. S.; Ahn, J.-H.; Hwang, G.-C.; Choi, J.-B.; Ahn, H.-J. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53, 8258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2008.06.049
  20. Muraliganth, T.; Murugan, A. V.; Manthiram, A. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 5661. https://doi.org/10.1039/b812165f
  21. Wang, Y.; Li, H.; He, P.; Hosono, E.; Zhou, H. Nanoscale 2010, 2, 1294. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0nr00068j
  22. Arico, A. S.; Bruce, P.; Scrosati, B.; Tarascon, J.-M.; Schalkwijk, W. V. Nature Mater. 2005, 4, 366. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1368
  23. Jiang, C.; Hosono, E.; Zhou, H. Nanotoday 2006, 1, 28.
  24. Rui, X. H.; Ding, N.; Liu, J.; Li, C.; Chen, C. H. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55, 2384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2009.11.096
  25. Alcantara, R.; Ortiz, G. F.; Lavela, P.; Tirado, J. L.; Jaegermann, W.; Thissen, A. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2005, 584, 147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2005.07.011
  26. Chae, O. B.; Park, S.; Ryu, J. H.; Oh, S. M. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2013, 160, A11. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.071309jes
  27. Yang, J.; Xu, J. J. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2004, 7, A515. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1819893
  28. Yamada, A.; Chung, S. C.; Hinokuma, K. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2001, 148, A224. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1348257
  29. Arai, H.; Okada, S.; Sakurai, Y.; Yamaki, J. Solid State Ionics 1997, 95, 275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(96)00598-X
  30. Plashnitsa, L. S.; Kobayashi, E.; Noguchi, Y.; Okada, S.; Yamaki, J. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2010, 157, A536. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3298903
  31. Kim, J. W.; Ryu, J. H.; Lee, K. T.; Oh, S. M. J. Power Sources 2005, 147, 227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.12.041
  32. Ryu, J. H.; Kim, J. W.; Sung, Y.-E.; Oh, S. M. Electrochem. Solid- State Lett. 2004, 7, A306. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1792242
  33. Zhang, S. S.; Xu, K.; Jow, T. R. Electrochim. Acta 2004, 49, 1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2003.10.016