DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation of elasto-plastic seismic response analysis method for complex steel bridges

  • Tang, Zhanzhan (Department of Architecture & Civil Engineering, Zhejiang University) ;
  • Xie, Xu (Department of Architecture & Civil Engineering, Zhejiang University) ;
  • Wang, Yan (College of Civil Engineering & Architecture, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University) ;
  • Wang, Junzhe (Department of Architecture & Civil Engineering, University of Bath)
  • Received : 2014.02.18
  • Accepted : 2014.04.13
  • Published : 2014.09.30

Abstract

Multi-scale model can take both computational efficiency and accuracy into consideration when it is used to conduct elasto-plastic seismic response analysis for complex steel bridges. This paper proposed a method based on pushover analysis of member sharing the same section pattern to verify the accuracy of multi-scale model. A deck-through type steel arch bridge with a span length of 200m was employed for seismic response analysis using multi-scale model and fiber model respectively, the validity and necessity of elasto-plastic seismic analysis for steel bridge by multi-scale model was then verified. The results show that the convergence of load-displacement curves obtained from pushover analysis for members having the same section pattern can be used as a proof of the accuracy of multi-scale model. It is noted that the computational precision of multi-scale model can be guaranteed when length of shell element segment is 1.40 times longer than the width of section where was in compression status. Fiber model can only be used for the predictions of the global deformations and the approximate positions of plastic areas on steel structures. However, it cannot give exact prediction on the distribution of plastic areas and the degree of the plasticity.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Natural Science Foundation of China

References

  1. Nonaka, T. and Ali, A. (2001), "Dynamic response of half-through steel arch bridge using fiber model", J. Bridge Eng., ASCE, 6(6), 482-488. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:6(482)
  2. Liang, C.Y. and Chen, A. (2010), "A method for examining the seismic performance of steel arch deck bridges", Front. Archit. Civil Eng. China, 4(3), 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-010-0080-8
  3. Usami, T, Lu, Z, Ge, H. and Kon, T. (2004a), "Seismic performance evaluation of steel arch bridges against major earthquakes", Part 1: Dynamic analysis approach, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 33(14), 1337-1354. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.407
  4. Lu, Z., Tsutomu Usami, T. and Ge, H. (2004b), "Seismic performance evaluation of steel arch bridges against major earthquakes", Part 2: Simplified verification procedure, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 33(14), 1355-1372. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.406
  5. Cetinkaya, O.T., Nakamura, S. and Takahashi, K. (2006), "A static analysis-based method for estimating the maximum out-of-plane inelastic seismic response of steel arch bridges", Eng. Struct., 28(5), 635-647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.09.017
  6. Xie, X., Lin, G., Duan, Y.F. and Zhao, J.L. (2012), "Seismic damage of long span steel tower suspension bridge considering strong aftershocks", Earthq. Struct., 3(5), 767-781. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2012.3.5.767
  7. Kawashima, K. and Unjoh. S. (1997), "The damage of highway bridges in the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu Earthquake and its impact on Japanese seismic design", Earthq. Eng., 1(3), 505-541.
  8. Zheng, Y., Usami, T. and Ge, H.B. (2000), "Ductility of thin-walled steel box stub-columns", J. Struct. Eng., 126(11), 1304-1311. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:11(1304)
  9. Usami, T. (2007), "Guidelines for seismic and damage control design of steel arch bridges", Tokyo: GIHODO SHUPPAN Co. Ltd. (In Japanese)
  10. Ge, H. and Tsumura, Y. (2009), "Experimental and analytical study on the evaluation of ductile crack initiation in steel bridge piers", J. Struct. Eng., JSCE, 55A, 605-616.
  11. Specifications for highway bridges, Part V: Seismic Design. Tokyo, Japan, 2002.
  12. Alvarez, J., Aparicio, A., Jara, J. and Jara, M. (2012), "Seismic assessment of long-span arch bridge considering the variation in axial forces induced by earthquakes", Eng. Struct., 34, 69-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.09.013
  13. Goto, Y., Qingyun, W. and Obata, M. (1998), "FEM analysis for hysteretic behavior of thin-walled columns", J. Struct. Eng., 124(11), 1290-1301. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:11(1290)
  14. Hanbin, G., Shengbin, G. and Usami, T. (2000), "Stiffened steel box columns. Part 1: Cyclic behavior", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 29(11), 1691-1706. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9845(200011)29:11<1691::AID-EQE989>3.0.CO;2-U
  15. Usami, T., Shengbin, G. and Hanbin, G. (2000), "Stiffened steel box columns. Part 2: Ductility evaluation", Earthq. Eng.Struct. Dyn., 29(11), 1707-1722. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9845(200011)29:11<1707::AID-EQE990>3.0.CO;2-7
  16. Kulkarni, N.G., Kasai, A. and Tsuboi, H. (2009), "Displacement based seismic verification method for thinwalled circular steel columns subjected to bi-directional cyclic loading", Eng. Struct., 31(11), 2779-2786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.07.025
  17. Tatsuo, K., Akira, K. and Saeki, I. (2009), "Seismic performance evaluation of steel continuous bridges with rigid superstructure-pier connections[J]", J. Struct. Eng., JSCE, 55A, 564-572. (In Japanese)
  18. Li, Z.X., Jiang, F.F. and Tang, Y.Q. (2012), "Multi-scale analysis on seismic damage and progressive failure of steel structures", Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 48(1), 1358-1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2011.08.002
  19. Zhou M., Nie J. and Fan J. (2013), "Multi-scale analysis of the steel cable anchorage system of selfanchored suspension bridges", Structure Congress 2013, ASCE, 467-478.

Cited by

  1. Earthquake performance of the two approach viaducts of the bosphorus suspension bridge vol.11, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.3.387
  2. Residual seismic performance of steel bridges under earthquake sequence vol.11, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.11.4.649