DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Mountain Eco-Village Revitalization through Social Economic Promotion

사회적 경제 지원을 통한 산촌생태마을 활성화 방안에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Seong-Hak (Div. Forest Recreation & Culture, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Seo, Jeong-Weon (Div. Forest Recreation & Culture, Korea Forest Research Institute)
  • 김성학 (국립산림과학원 산림복지연구과) ;
  • 서정원 (국립산림과학원 산림복지연구과)
  • Received : 2014.06.30
  • Accepted : 2014.07.31
  • Published : 2014.09.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop promotion strategies for revitalizing mountain eco-villages through social economic support. In order to fulfill this purpose, this study analyzed operation conditions, income creation structures of 240 mountain eco-villages formed by Korea Forest Service, and reviewed systems for social economic support. As summarized in research outputs, this study confirmed that the activities of organizations for joint projects had not been properly implemented due to the absence of supporting systems following the construction of mountain eco-villages. In addition, 159 villages formed as experience villages could not be qualified for enterprise systems due to aging population and absence of network systems. As for income creation, as indicated by comparing net incomes for joint projects calculated based on the classification of village management evaluation, the average net income of 51 highly-rated villages was 22 million Won and that of 128 moderately-rated villages was 3.5 million Won. Experience-based projects and the sales of processed forestry products made by young adult associations or women's societies were major sources of income, and the absence of inner economic bases or villages' jobs caused young adults and returned farmers to focus on working for outside economic activities. Finally, this study developed strategies for mountain eco-village's social economic promotion and suggested four stages of social economic revitalization provisions.

Keywords

References

  1. Jacques Defourny, 2001, "Introduction: from Third Sector to Social Enterprise," Carlo Borzaga & Jacques Defourny, edited by, The Emergence of Social Enterprise, Routledg. pp. 1-28.
  2. Jang, W. Theory and Practive of Social economy, House of Sharing.
  3. Jessop, B. 1994, 'The Transition to Post-Fordism and the Schumpeterian Workfare State' in R. burrows & B Loader(eds.), Towards A Post-Fordist Welfare State, London: Routledge.
  4. Jung, G., J. Lee, Y. Kim and H. Shin, 2013, A Study on the Plan for Transforming Social Service Agencied into Social Economy in Gyeonggi-Do, Gyeonggi Research Institute.
  5. KB Financial Group Management Research Center, 2013, Understanding and Status of Village Enterprises, KBdaily Knowledge Vitamin 13-074.
  6. Kim, S., J. Seo, Y. Park and J. Kim, 2013, An Analysis of Residents' Supplementation Demand and Expected Effect by Types of Mountain Village Development Project, Journal of Korean society of rural planning 19(3): 71-80. https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2013.19.1.071
  7. Kim, S., 2014, Policy Directions for Fostering Rural Social Enterprises Based on Their Types, Jeju National University Graduate School of Inustry, Master Thesis.
  8. Lee, J., 2010, Management of Japanese Regional Residents for Communtiy Citizen Participation and Community Business, Korean Review of Public Administration Conference Report 2010.
  9. Seo, J and S. Kim, 2013, Operating Program Development for Rural-Urban Exchange Revitalization in Mountain Village, The Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 17(3): 53-63.
  10. Spear, Roger, 2001, "United Kingdom: A wide range of social enterprise", Carlo Borzaga & Jacques Defourny, edited by, The Emergence of Social Enterprise, Routledg. pp. 252-269.
  11. Wu, J. and G. Ban, 2012, Status and development projects of Village Enterprises in Chung Buk, Chung Buk Focus 59.
  12. Yun, S, 2011, A Comparative Study on the Historical Context of Social Economy and the Characteristic of Social Enterprise, Chung-Ang Graduation University Master Thesis.
  13. 細內信孝, 2008, がんばる地域のコミュニティ.ビジネス 起業ワクショップのすすめ, 學陽書房.

Cited by

  1. Structural Relationships between Ecotourism Village Visitors' Motivation, Value, Satisfaction, and Loyalty vol.26, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7856/kjcls.2015.26.1.87
  2. Changes and development plans in the mountain villages of South Korea: Comparison of the first and second national surveys vol.14, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-3875-9
  3. Analysis of Preference Criteria for a Forest Healing Village Using AHP Method vol.21, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2015.21.1.117
  4. A measure for the promotion of mountain ecological villages in South Korea: focus on the national mountain ecological village investigation of 2014 vol.5, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2206-5