Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

  • 제15권16호
  • /
  • Pages.6811-6817
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1513-7368(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2476-762X(eISSN)
아시아태평양암예방학회 (Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and Validation of a Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model for Thai Women: A Cross-Sectional Study

  • Anothaisintawee, Thunyarat (Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University) ;
  • Teerawattananon, Yot (Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Ministry of Public Health, Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University) ;
  • Wiratkapun, Cholatip (Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University) ;
  • Srinakarin, Jiraporn (Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University) ;
  • Woodtichartpreecha, Piyanoot (Prince of Songkla University) ;
  • Hirunpat, Siriporn (Prince of Songkla University) ;
  • Wongwaisayawan, Sansanee (Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University) ;
  • Lertsithichai, Panuwat (Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University) ;
  • Kasamesup, Vijj (Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University) ;
  • Thakkinstian, Ammarin (Section for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University)
  • 발행 : 2014.08.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: Breast cancer risk prediction models are widely used in clinical practice. They should be useful in identifying high risk women for screening in limited-resource countries. However, previous models showed poor performance in derived and validated settings. Therefore, we aimed to develop and validate a breast cancer risk prediction model for Thai women. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study consisted of derived and validation phases. Data collected at Ramathibodi and other two hospitals were used for deriving and externally validating models, respectively. Multiple logistic regression was applied to construct the model. Calibration and discrimination performances were assessed using the observed/expected ratio and concordance statistic (C-statistic), respectively. A bootstrap with 200 repetitions was applied for internal validation. Results: Age, menopausal status, body mass index, and use of oral contraceptives were significantly associated with breast cancer and were included in the model. Observed/expected ratio and C-statistic were 1.00 (95% CI: 0.82, 1.21) and 0.651 (95% CI: 0.595, 0.707), respectively. Internal validation showed good performance with a bias of 0.010 (95% CI: 0.002, 0.018) and C-statistic of 0.646(95% CI: 0.642, 0.650). The observed/expected ratio and C-statistic from external validation were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.35) and 0.609 (95% CI: 0.511, 0.706), respectively. Risk scores were created and was stratified as low (0-0.86), low-intermediate (0.87-1.14), intermediate-high (1.15-1.52), and high-risk (1.53-3.40) groups. Conclusions: A Thai breast cancer risk prediction model was created with good calibration and fair discrimination performance. Risk stratification should aid to prioritize high risk women to receive an organized breast cancer screening program in Thailand and other limited-resource countries.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Althuis MD, Fergenbaum JH, Garcia-Closas M, et al (2004). Etiology of hormone receptor-defined breast cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 13, 1558-68.
  2. Altman DG, Royston P (2000). What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Stat Med, 19, 453-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000229)19:4<453::AID-SIM350>3.0.CO;2-5
  3. Anothaisintawee T, Teerawattananon Y, Wiratkapun C, et al (2012). Risk prediction models of breast cancer: a systematic review of model performances. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 133, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1853-z
  4. Anothaisintawee T, Wiratkapun C, Lerdsitthichai P, et al (2013). Risk factors of breast cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Asia Pac J Public Health, 25, 368-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539513488795
  5. Beckmann KR, Roder DM, Hiller JE, et al (2014). Influence of mammographic screening on breast cancer incidence trends in South Australia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 3105-12. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.7.3105
  6. Chuthapisith S, Permsapaya W, Warnnissorn M, et al (2012). Breast cancer subtypes identified by the ER, PR and HER-2 status in Thai women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 459-62. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.2.459
  7. Edding W, Marchenko Y (2012). Diagnostics for multiple imputation in Stata. The Stata Journal, 12, 353-67.
  8. Ferlay J, Shin H-R, Bray F, et al (2010). Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer, 127, 2893-917. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25516
  9. Gail M, Brinton L, Byar D, et al (1989). Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst, 81, 1879-86. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/81.24.1879
  10. Gao Y, Huang YB, Liu XO, et al (2013). Tea consumption, alcohol drinking and physical activity associations with breast cancer risk among Chinese females: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 7543-50. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.12.7543
  11. Gokdemir-Yazar O, Yaprak S, Colak M, et al (2014). Family history attributes and risk factors for breast cancer in Turkey. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 2841-6. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.6.2841
  12. Gotzsche PC, Nielsen M (2011). Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 1877.
  13. Guyatt GH (2006). Determining prognosis and creating clinical preiction rules. In 'Clinical Epidemiology: How to do clinical practice research', Eds Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, the United States, 323-55
  14. Han W, Kim SW, Park IA, et al (2004). Young age: an independent risk factor for disease-free survival in women with operable breast cancer. BMC Cancer, 4, 82. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-4-82
  15. Harrell FE, Jr., Lee KL, Mark DB (1996). Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med, 15, 361-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO;2-4
  16. Heneghan HM, Miller N, Lowery AJ, et al (2010). Circulating microRNAs as novel minimally invasive biomarkers for breast cancer. Ann Surg, 251, 499-505 https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cc939f
  17. Keramatinia A, Mousavi-Jarrahi SH, Hiteh M, et al (2014). Trends in incidence of breast cancer among women under 40 in Asia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 1387-90. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.3.1387
  18. Kirwan CC (2013). Breast cancer screening: what does the future hold? BMJ, 346, 87. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f87
  19. Lemeshow S (1990). The two-sample problem. In 'Adequacy sample size in health study', Eds J. Wiley, West Sussex, England, 9-11
  20. Letelier LM, Rada G, Capurro D, et al (2008). Examples of Likelihood Ratios. In 'Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual For Evidence-Based Clinical Practice', Eds McGraw-Hill Pofessional, New York, NY, 449-80
  21. Liao S, Li J, Wei W, et al (2011). Association between diabetes mellitus and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of the literature. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 12, 1061-5.
  22. Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, et al (2009). Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med, 151, 727-37, 237-42. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00009
  23. Putthasri W, Tangcharoensathien V, Mugem S, et al (2004). Geographical distribution and utilization of mammography in Thailand. Regional Health Forum, 8, 84-91.
  24. Rosner B, Colditz GA (1996). Nurses' health study: logincidence mathematical model of breast cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst, 88, 359-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/88.6.359
  25. Rubin DB, Schenker N (1991). Multiple imputation in healthcare databases: an overview and some applications. Stat Med, 10, 585-98. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780100410
  26. Sangrajrang S, Chaiwerawattana A, Ploysawang P, et al (2013). Obesity, diet and physical inactivity and risk of breast cancer in Thai women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 7023-7. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.11.7023
  27. Schonfeld SJ, Pee D, Greenlee RT, et al (2010). Effect of changing breast cancer incidence rates on the calibration of the Gail model. J Clin Oncol, 28, 2411-7. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.2767
  28. Schumacher M, Hollander N, Sauerbrei W (1997). Resampling and cross-validation techniques: a tool to reduce bias caused by model building? Stat Med, 16, 2813-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19971230)16:24<2813::AID-SIM701>3.0.CO;2-Z
  29. Son BH, Kwak BS, Kim JK, et al (2006). Changing patterns in the clinical characteristics of Korean patients with breast cancer during the last 15 years. Arch Surg, 141, 155-60. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.141.2.155
  30. Telli ML, Chang ET, Kurian AW, et al (2011). Asian ethnicity and breast cancer subtypes: a study from the California Cancer Registry. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 127, 471-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1173-8
  31. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. The Lancet, 380, 1778-86.
  32. Tonelli M, Connor Gorber S, Joffres M, et al (2011). Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in averagerisk women aged 40-74 years. CMAJ, 183, 1991-2001. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.110334
  33. Tsakountakis N, Sanidas E, Stathopoulos E, et al (2005). Correlation of breast cancer risk factors with HER-2/ neu protein overexpression according to menopausal and estrogen receptor status. BMC Womens Health, 5, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-5-1
  34. Vainio H, Bianchini F (eds.) (2002). IARC Handbooks of cancer prevention, lyon, france: IARCPress.
  35. van Buuren S, Boshuizen HC, Knook DL (1999). Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis. Stat Med, 18, 681-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990330)18:6<681::AID-SIM71>3.0.CO;2-R
  36. Visvanathan K, Chlebowski RT, Hurley P, et al (2009). American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update on the use of pharmacologic interventions including tamoxifen, raloxifene, and aromatase inhibition for breast cancer risk reduction. J Clin Oncol, 27, 3235-58. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.5179
  37. White IR, Royston P, Wood AM (2011). Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med, 30, 377-99. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4067
  38. Wiechmann L, Sampson M, Stempel M, et al (2009). Presenting features of breast cancer differ by molecular subtype. Ann Surg Oncol, 16, 2705-10. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0606-2
  39. Wu LZ, Han RQ, Zhou JY, et al (2014). Incidence and mortality of female breast cancer in Jiangsu, China. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 2727-32. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.6.2727
  40. Yip CH, Cazap E, Anderson BO, et al (2011). Breast cancer management in middle-resource countries (MRCs): Consensus statement from the Breast Health Global Initiative. Breast, 12-9.
  41. Yip CH (2009). Breast cancer in Asia. Methods Mol Biol, 471, 51-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-416-2_3

피인용 문헌

  1. No Increase in Breast Cancer Risk in Japanese Women Taking Oral Contraceptives: a Case-Control Study Investigating Reproductive, Menstrual and Familial Risk Factors for Breast Cancer vol.16, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.9.3685
  2. Validation of a personalized risk prediction model for contralateral breast cancer vol.170, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4763-5