Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design (대한건축학회논문집:계획계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on Intermediary Agency's Operating Characteristics of Neighborhood Regeneration Governance Types - Focused on Tokyo, Birmingham, Boston case study -

근린재생 거버넌스 유형별 중간지원조직 운영특징 연구 - 도쿄, 버밍험, 보스턴 사례를 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2014.05.29
  • Accepted : 2014.08.19
  • Published : 2014.09.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the intermediary agency's operating characteristics in the three typologies of neighborhood regeneration governance. Case study is focused on Japan, UK, and US's related legal system, planning system, and intermediary agencies activities. Case Study is composed of regeneration type with public-led, semi-public-led, and neighborhood-led. Individual case shows distinguishing roles of intermediary agency governing neighborhood regeneration governance; government-affiliated organizations for Setagaya Machizukuri in Tokyo, non-departmental public body for Castle Vale project in Birmingham, and strong partnership of community organization with local foundation for Dudley Street Neighborhood Initiative in Boston. Policy implications are as follows; first, intermediary agency has an important role for structuring governance, which is vertically engaging public sector with community organizations and horizontally engaging various local agencies. Second, in the early stage of neighborhood regeneration, public-led intermediary agencies are reliable but need to develop the governance framework for more neighborhood-led governance. Third, it is critical to set up community business belong to neighborhood-led governance for sustainable regeneration.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 전북대학교

References

  1. 김우락, 주거지정비사업에서 협력적 거버넌스 구축이 사회적 자본형성에 미치는 영향, 국토계획학회지, 46(4), 2011
  2. 노정민 외, 주거지 재생사업에서 일상활동과 계획활동의 사회적 자본에의 영향관계 분석, 국토도시계획학회지, 48(6), 2013
  3. 서수정 외, 해피하우스 센터의 역할과 과제, 도시와 빈곤, 95권, 2011
  4. 신중진 외, 마을만들기 사업에서 주민의 역할변화에 따른 지원방안 연구, 건축학회지, 26(10), 2010
  5. 신중진 외, 주민참여에 의한 문화.역사마을가꾸기 사업에서 참여주체의 관계구도와 역할에 관한 연구, 건축학회지, 23(2), 2007
  6. 양도식, 도시재생정책의 실체, 국토연구원, 2013
  7. 여혜진, 중소도시 쇠퇴지역 재생정책 합리화를 위한 근린단위 연구, 건축도시공간연구소, 2013
  8. 이승종, 미국 지방정부 정책과정에서의 주민참여기제, 한국정치학회보, 31(4), 1997
  9. 이영환, 점진적 주거지 정비사업에서 코디네이터 조직의 필요성, LHI People, 2013(7), 2013
  10. 임기택, 영국 도시재생 파트너쉽의 클러스터화 과정에 관한 연구, 건축학회지, 26(5), 2010
  11. 하성규, 커뮤니티 주도적 재개발의 새로운 접근, 도시행정학보, 19(2), 2006
  12. 황희연, 도시정비 참여주체와 주민참여지원센터의 역할, 건축학회지, 51(9), 2007
  13. 世田谷區, 都市整備方針, 2005.4
  14. Hooghe, L. and Marks G., Types of Multi-Level Governance and European Integration, Rowman & Littlefield, 2001
  15. Eliassen, K. and Kooiman, J., Modern Governance, London: Sage, 1993
  16. Medoff, P. and Sklar, H., Streets of Hope: The Fall and Rise of an Urban Neighborhood, South End Press, 1999
  17. Oxford City Council, "A Regeneration Framework for Oxford to 2026.", www.oxfordpartnership.org.uk
  18. Rhodes, R., The New Governance: Governing without Government, Political Studies, 44, 1996
  19. Rhodes, R. and Rhodes, F., Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexity and Accountability, Philadelphia: Open University Press, 1997
  20. Stoker, G., The New Management of British Local Governance, London: Macmillan, 1999
  21. Yang, K. and Callahan, K., Citizen Involvement Efforts and Bureaucratic Responsiveness: Participatory Values, Stake holder Pressures, and Administrative Practicality, Public A dministration Review, 67, 2007