Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment

Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment (한국대기환경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Interference of Sulphur Dioxide on Balloon-borne Electrochemical Concentration Cell Ozone Sensors over the Mexico City Metropolitan Area

  • Received : 2014.05.24
  • Accepted : 2014.09.02
  • Published : 2014.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

An abnormal decrease in ozonesonde sensor signal occurred during air-pollution study campaigns in November 2011 and March 2012 in Mexico City Metropolitan Area (MCMA). Sharp drops in sensor signal around 5 km above sea level and above were observed in November 2011, and a reduction of signal over a broad range of altitude was observed in the convective boundary layer in March 2012. Circumstantial evidence indicated that $SO_2$ gas interfered with the electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) ozone sensors in the ozonesonde and that this interference was the cause of the reduced sensor signal output. The sharp drops in November 2011 were attributed to the $SO_2$ plume from Popocat$\acute{e}$petl volcano southeast of MCMA. Experiments on the response of the ECC sensor to representative atmospheric trace gases showed that only $SO_2$ could cause the observed abrupt drops in sensor signal. The vertical profile of the plume reproduced by a Lagrangian particle diffusion simulation supported this finding. A near-ground reduction in the sensor signal in March 2012 was attributed to an $SO_2$ plume from the Tula industrial complex north-west of MCMA. Before and at the time of ozonesonde launch, intermittent high $SO_2$ concentrations were recorded at ground-level monitoring stations north of MCMA. The difference between the $O_3$ concentration measured by the ozonesonde and that recorded by a UV-based $O_3$ monitor was consistent with the $SO_2$ concentration recorded by a UV-based monitor on the ground. The vertical profiles of the plumes estimated by Lagrangian particle diffusion simulation agreed fairly well with the observed profile. Statistical analysis of the wind field in MCMA revealed that the effect Popocat$\acute{e}$petl was most likely to have occurred from June to October, whereas the effect of the industries north of MCMA, including the Tula complex, was predicted to occur throughout the year.

Keywords

References

  1. Almanza, V.H., Molina, L.T., Sosa, G. (2012) Soot and $SO_2$ contribution to the supersites in the MILAGRO campaign from elevated flares in the Tula Refinery. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 12, 10583-10599. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10583-2012
  2. Barnes, R.A., Bandy, A.R. (1985) Electrochemical concentration cell ozonesonde accuracy and precision. Journal of Geophysical Research 90, 7881-7887. https://doi.org/10.1029/JD090iD05p07881
  3. Brummage, K.G. (1968) The calculation of atmospheric dispersion from a stack. Atmospheric Environment 2, 197-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(68)90049-8
  4. de Foy, B., Krotkov, N.A., Bei, N., Herndon, S.C., Huey, L.G., Martinez, A.-P., Ruiz-Suarez, L.G., Wood, E.C., Zavala, M., Molina, L.T. (2009) Hit from both sides: Tracking industrial and volcanic plumes in Mexico City with surface measurements and OMI $SO_2$ retrievals during the MILAGRO field campaign. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 9, 9599-9617. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9599-2009
  5. Fast, J.D., Easter, R.C. (2006) A Lagrangian particle dispersion model compatible with WRF. 7th Annual WRF User's Workshop, 19-22 June 2006, Boulder, CO, USA.
  6. Flentje, H., Claude, H., Elste, T., Gilge, S., Kohler, U., Plass-Dulmer, C., Steinbrecht, W., Thomas, W., Werner, A., Fricke, W. (2010) The Eyjafjallajokull eruption in April 2010 - detection of volcanic plume using in-situ measurements, ozone sondes and lidar-ceilometer profiles. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 10, 10085-10092. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10085-2010
  7. Grutter, M., Basaldud, R., Rivera, C., Harig, R., Junkerman, W., Caetano, E., Delgado-Granados, H. (2008) $SO_2$ emissions from Popocatepetl volcano: Emission rates and plume imaging using optical remote sensing techniques. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 8, 6655-6663. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6655-2008
  8. INEM (2008) National Inventory of Emissions, Inventario Nacional de Emisiones de Mexico, SEMARNAT-INE, Mexico.
  9. Komhyr, W.D. (1969) Electrochemical cells for gas analysis. Annals of Geophysics 25, 203-210.
  10. Komhyr, W.D., Barnes, R.A., Brothers, G.B., Lathrop, J. A., Opperman, D.P. (1995) Electrochemical concentration cell ozonesonde performance evaluation during STOIC 1989. Journal of Geophysical Research 100, 9231-9244. https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD02175
  11. Mage, D., Ozolins, G., Peterson, P., Webster, A., Orthofer, R., Vandeweerd, V., Gwynne, M. (1996) Urban air pollution in megacities of the world. Atmospheric Environment 30, 681-686. https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00219-7
  12. Molina, L.T., Modronich, S., Gaffney, J.S., Apel, E., de Foy, B., Fast, J., Ferrare, R., Herndon, S., Jimenez, J. L., Lamb, B., Osornio-Vargas, A.R., Russell, P., Schauer, J.J., Stevens, P.S., Valkamer, R., Zavala, M. (2010) An overview of the MILAGRO 2006 campaign: Mexico City emissions and their transport and transformation, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 10, 8697-8760. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8697-2010
  13. Morris, G.A., Komhyr, W.D., Hirokawa, J., Flynn, J., Lefer, B., Krotkov, N., Ngan, F. (2010) A balloon sounding technique for measuring $SO_2$ plumes. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 27, 1318-1330. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JTECHA1436.1
  14. Schenkel, A., Broder, B. (1982) Interference of some trace gases with ozone measurements by the KI method. Atmospheric Environment 16, 2187-2190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(82)90289-X
  15. Seinfeld, J.H., Pandis, S.N. (2006) Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.
  16. Skamarock, W.C., Klemp, J.B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D.O., Barker, D.M., Duda, M.G., Huang, X.-Y., Wang, W., Powers, J.G. (2008) A description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3, NCAR/TN-475+STR.
  17. Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P., Wotawa, G. (2005) Technical note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 5, 2461-2474. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005
  18. Thompson, A.M., Yorks, J.E., Miller, S.K., Witte, J.C., Dougherty, K.M., Morris, G.A., Baumgardner, D., Ladino, L., Rappengluck, B. (2008) Tropospheric ozone sources and wave activity over Mexico City and Houston during MILAGRO/Intercontinental Transport Experiment (INTEX-B) Ozonesonde Network Study, 2006 (IONS-06). Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 8, 5113-5125. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5113-2008
  19. Velasco, E., Marquez, C., Bueno, E., Bernabe, R.M., Sanchez, A., Fentanes, O., Wohrnschimmel, H., Cardenas, B., Kamilla, A., Wakamatsu, S., Molina, L.T. (2008) Vertical distribution of ozone and VOCs in the low boundary layer of Mexico City. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 8, 3061-3079. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3061-2008
  20. Whiteman, C.D., Zhong, S., Bian, X., Fast, J.D., Doran, J.C. (2000) Boundary layer evolution and regional-scale diurnal circulations over the Mexico Basin and Mexican plateau. Journal of Geophysical Research 105, 10081-10102. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900039

Cited by

  1. Investigation of Vertical Profiles of Meteorological Parameters and Ozone Concentration in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area vol.9, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5572/ajae.2015.9.2.114
  2. Comparison of Ozone Production Regimes between Two Mexican Cities: Guadalajara and Mexico City vol.7, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos7070091