정보교육학회논문지 (Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education)

  • 제18권2호
  • /
  • Pages.357-370
  • /
  • 2014
  • /
  • 1229-3245(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8428(eISSN)
한국정보교육학회 (Korea Association of Information Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

스마트교육.디지털교과서 효과성 검증 도구 개발

Development of Tools to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Smart Education and Digital Textbooks

  • 투고 : 2014.06.18
  • 심사 : 2014.06.26
  • 발행 : 2014.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 스마트 교육 및 디지털교과서 활용교육에서 교육 효과성을 검증할 수 있는 도구를 개발하는 것이다. 먼저 스마트교육 및 디지털교과서 활용교육의 목표를 21세기 학습자역량 증진, 교수자 역량 증진으로 설정하고 이에 따라 각 하위요소를 7개 영역 5개 영역으로 선정하였다. 선정된 요소에 따라 문헌연구 및 전문가 협의회를 거쳐 하위요소의 정의 및 설문문항을 확정하였다. 학습자 역량 증진의 하위요소는 창의력과 혁신능력, 비판적 사고력과 문제해결력, 의사소통능력, 협업능력, 정보활용능력, 자기주도학습력, 유연성으로 선정하여 26개의 설문문항을 개발하였다. 교수자 역량의 세부 영역은 21세기 학습자역량 이해, 정보활용능력, 학습자와의 관계형성, 수업설계, 평가 및 성찰로 24개의 설문문항을 개발하였다. 본 연구에서 개발된 설문문항은 스마트 교육 및 디지털교과서 활용 교육의 효과를 검증하는 도구로 사용될 수 있다.

The purpose of this research was to develop the tools needed to evaluate the effectiveness of using digital textbooks and smart education. We then developed the tools to evaluate the effectiveness of smart education and digital textbook utilization, which were an identification of 1) seven essential 21st century skills, definitions of each, and prerequisite abilities; 2) five 21st century teacher competencies, definitions of each, and prerequisite abilities; To develop the questionnaire, we conducted a literature review in this area, consulted experts, observed classes, interviewed members of focus groups, and met with policy makers from the Ministry of Education and KERIS. The student questionnaire(26 Questions developed) included; creativity and innovation, critical thinking and problem solving, communication, collaboration, ICT literacy, self-directed learning, and adaptability. The teacher questionnaire(24 questions developed) included; 21st Century Skills, ICT Literacy, Rapport building with learners, Instructional design, Evaluation and reflection. The tools we developed will be able to use for evaluating the effectiveness of smart education and digital textbooks.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : 한국교육학술정보원

참고문헌

  1. Inae Kang, Byungro Lim, Jung- Young Park (2012), Exploring the theoretical framework and reaching & learning : Using cases of university classrooms. The Korean Association for Educational Methodology Studies, 24(2), 283-303.
  2. Jung-Hwa Kang (2011). A Study on Utilizing SNS to Vitalize Smart Learning. The Korea Society of Digital Policy and Management, 9(5), 265-274.
  3. Byeong-Seon Kwak, Suk-Hui Kang, Sung-Eun Kim (1997), A Study Plan on the Development of the Digital Textbook (I), lnstitute for Korea Textbook Research Reports.
  4. Seong-Ho Kwon et al. (2012). Analysis of Smart Education 'Good Teaching' Success Factors, Research Reports CR 2012-13, Korea Education and Research Information Service
  5. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2009), General Remarks Curriculum for Elementary and Secondary Schools. Notice of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology No, 2009-41
  6. Ministry of Educarion, Science and Technology (2011). Implementation Strategy for Smart Education(Plan)
  7. Ministry of Education (2012), Strategies for Improving Textbooks in accordance with the Smart Education plan (plan)
  8. Ministry of Education (2013). Development and Application of Digital Textbook Plan 2013 announced.
  9. Hoe-Su Kim et al. (2012). Study on the Effectiveness of Digital Textbooks, Korea Education and Research lnformation Service, Research Report CR 2012-2
  10. Ji-Heon Keum Chan-Hui Son, YU-ri Lee (2012). Effective Smart Education Strategies for the Environmental Area of Practical .Arts Education. Arts Education Research 18(4). 207-228.
  11. Kyeong-Hui Noh. Byeoung-Jin Kim, Won-Hui Lee, (2011). 2010 Study on the Effectiveness of Digital Textbooks: Research Report CR 2011-1. Korea Education and Research Information Service
  12. Kyoo-Sung Noh, Seong-Hwan Ju. Jin-Taek Jung (2011). An Exploratory Study on Concept and Realization Conditions of Smart Learning. The Korea Society of Digital Policy and Management 9(2), 79-88.
  13. Sun-Ju Park et aI. (2006). The Development and Application of Self-evaluation Tool for the Abilities of ICT Application of Teacher to perform teacher's functions. Korea Association of Information Education, 10(3). 299-300.
  14. Seong-Yeol Park, Geol Yim (2012). Suggestions for Building 'Smart Campus' Based on Case Studies on the Effectiveness of Instructions with Smart-Pads, Digital Policy Research 10(3). 1-12.
  15. Ho-Seung Byeon, Jae-Cheol Kim. Yun- Hui Song. Won-Hui Lee. (2010). Study on the Effectiveness of Digital Textbooks: Research Report CR 2010-5. Korea Education and Research Information Service
  16. Sukyeong Shim. (2010), Relation Between Teachers Beliefs of Constructivism and Attitudes and Competences of ICT in Early Childhood Classrooms, Journal of Koream Coucil for Children & Rights. 14(1), 109-128.
  17. Migyeong Yang (2011), Exploring the principles of callaborative Iearning far realization of collective intelligence. Journal of Instructional Method, 23(2), 457-483.
  18. Gwangu Lee et al. (2009), Redesigning Elementary and Secondary School Curriculum for Developing Future Koreans' core Competence. Research Report RRC 2009-10-1. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
  19. Yuna Lee. Sangsu Lee, (2009). Conceptual Design Principles of Collective Intelligence. Journal of Educational Technology, 25(4), 213-239.
  20. Yunhui Cha, Seonggwon Ha. Byeongo Go (2004), A Study on Recognition Level Analysis and Improvement Directions of Elementary School Teachers about Information Communication Ethics. Journal of The Korean Association of information Education, 8(1), 39-51.
  21. Jaechun Cho, Huiseok Lim (2012). A Conceptual Model of Smart Education Considering Teaching-Learning Activities and Learner's Characteristics, The Journal of Korean association of computer education 16(4). 41-49.
  22. IIyeonho Choi. (2006). A Study on Teaching Methods of Elementary Moral Education for Developing Information Ethics through Ethics of Care. Journal of Moral/Ethics Education. 1(22). 337-358.
  23. Huiok Huh et aI. (2011). Modeling of both 21 st century learner competencies and 21st century teacher competencies: Developing on 21st teaching- learning activities1 for supporting future schools : Research Repolt KR 2011-2. Korea Education and Research Information Service.
  24. Albirini, A. (2006). Teachers' attitudes toward information and commmunication technologies: The case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers & Education, 47(4). 373-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.013
  25. American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. (2007). Atlas of science literocy. Washington. DC: AAAS.
  26. Angeli. C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of lCT - TpCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TpCK). Computers & Education. 52(1), 154 - 168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006
  27. Brown, J., & Isaacs. D. (2008). The world cafe: Awakening collective intelligence and committed action, In M. Tovey (Ed). Collective intelligence: Creating a prosperous world at peace (pp. 47-54). Oakton, Virginia: Earth Intelligence Ketwork.
  28. Butler- pascoe, M. E., & Wilburg. K. M. (2003). Technology and teaching English language learners. Boston, MA: pearson Education Inc.
  29. Chai, C.S., Koh, J.H.L, & Tsai. C.C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers' development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TpACK). Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 63-73.
  30. Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin. N., Kim. S., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st Century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670 - 697. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20424
  31. Dillenbourg, p. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In p. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1 - 9). Oxford: Elsevier.
  32. Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber. H. A. & Shouse, A. (2007), Taking science to school: Learning and teadling science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies press.
  33. Guzey. S.S. & Roehrig, G.H. (2009). Teaching science wrid technology: Case studies of science teachers' development of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TpCK). Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 25-45.
  34. Intel(R) Teach Elements. 2014. 3. 14 검색 http://www.intei.co.kr/content/www/kr/ko/education/k12/teach-elements.html
  35. Levy, p. (1994). L'intelligence collective: pourune anthropologie de cyberspace. paris: La Decouverte.
  36. Sugyeong Kwon Trans (2002). Collective Intelligence-The anthrordogy of cyberspace. Seoul. Moonji Publishing Co.
  37. Moersch. C. (2002). Measures of success: Six instruments to assess teachers' use of technology. Learning & Leading with Technology, 30(3), 10-13.
  38. National Research Courcil [NRC]. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education. Washington, DC: The National Academy press.
  39. P21(partnership for the 21st Century Skills). (2009). A framework for 21st century learning. Washington, DC: p21.
  40. Schmidt, D.A., Baran, E., Thompson, A.D., Mishra, p., Koehler, M.J., & Shin, T, S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TpACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
  41. Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business. Economies. Societies and Nations.
  42. Williams, D., Coles, L., Wilson, K., Richardson, A., & Tuson, J. (2006). Teachers and ICT: Current use and future needs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 307-320.

피인용 문헌

  1. 디지털교과서가 학습자의 자기조절학습 및 문제해결 역량에 미치는 효과 분석 vol.17, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2017.17.02.013