DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A 2D Analytical Modeling of Single Halo Triple Material Surrounding Gate (SHTMSG) MOSFET

  • Dhanaselvam, P. Suveetha (Dept. of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Velammal College of Engg & Technology) ;
  • Balamurugan, N.B. (Dept. of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Thiagarajar College of Engineering) ;
  • Chakaravarthi, G.C. Vivek (Dept. of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Velammal College of Engg & Technology) ;
  • Ramesh, R.P. (Dept. of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Velammal College of Engg & Technology) ;
  • Kumar, B.R. Sathish (Dept. of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Velammal College of Engg & Technology)
  • Received : 2013.10.21
  • Accepted : 2014.01.14
  • Published : 2014.07.01

Abstract

In the proposed work a 2D analytical modeling of single halo Triple material Surrounding Gate (SH-TMSG) MOSFET is developed. The Surface potential and Electric Field has been derived using parabolic approximation method and the simulation results are analyzed. The essential substantive is provided which elicits the deterioration of short channel effects and the results of the analytical model are delineated and compared with MEDICI simulation results and it is well corroborated.

Keywords

1. Introduction

The constant decrease in the device dimensions has been an inevitable factor to achieve the high speed, high packing density and excellent performance. The scaling down of traditional planar MOSFET’s persuades short channel effects such as threshold voltage roll off, Drain induced barrier lowering(DIBL), drive ability degradation and hot carrier effects which in turn put the ultimate performance under threat. Threshold voltage roll off is the ramification of shortening channel length while the strong electric field near the drain induces hot carrier effect. DIBL occurs when the drain voltage increases, the channel length also increases and gate loses its control which owing to the channel becomes more attractive to electrons and the barrier is lowered. The selection of surrounding gate MOSFET [1-5] is to overcome the scaling limitations as it possess high packing density with improved gate controllability and short channel immunity as the gate is all around the silicon pillar and therefore, control over the channel is increased. In addition, the surrounding gate also includes gate engineering which produces dual material surrounding gate MOSFET [6-8]. It is extended further by increasing the number of gate materials and this developed a device called Triple material Surrounding gate (TMSG) MOSFET [9]. We have already derived the analytical model for TMSG MOSFET [10-11] which proved more advantageous than DMSG MOSFET. The threshold voltage roll off is one of the challenging issues in the short channel effects occurring in nanoscale MOSFET devices. It can be reduced further by introducing halo or pocket implants [12- 13]. Hence, the short channel effects can be further reduced by our novel structure which incorporates the advantages of triple material gate surrounding gate MOSFET’s and halo called single halo triple material surrounding gate (SHTMSG) SOI MOSFET is proposed.

 

2. Proposed Model

The single halo triple material surrounding gate (SHTMSG) SOI MOSFET is shown in Fig. 1. The surrounding gate MOSFET consists of three gate material of different work functions. In this TMSG structure, halo is introduced for the first time to form a device structure called Single halo triple material surrounding gate (SHTMSG) MOSFET. The lengths of the gate materials are L2, L3 − L2 and L4 − L3 respectively. The model considers single halo doping in the channel near the source and triple material gate. The length L1 is halo doped with doping concentration Nh whereas the other regions are doped with Nc, assuming Nh is greater than Nc. Considering the gate structure and halo doping, the structure is divided in to four regions.

Fig. 1.Cross sectional diagram of Single halo Triple material surrounding gate (SHTMSG) MOSFET

Due to the cylindrical symmetry of the device structure, a cylindrical coordinate system is used and it consists of a radial direction r , a vertical direction z , and an angular component θ . The symmetry of the structure implies that the potential and electric field have no variation in the θ direction. Hence a two dimensional analysis is sufficient.

The surface potential and the electric field is derived by solving the Poisson equation. Neglecting the influence of the charge carriers and fixed oxide charges on the electrostatics of the channel, the 2D Poisson equation of potential distribution in the silicon pillar can be given as

, i=1, 2, 3, 4

Where N1 = Nh , N2 = N3 = N4 = Nc , L0 = 0 , φi (r, z) represents the potential distribution.

Using parabolic approximation method, the Poisson equation is solved and the solution is given as

Where the arbitrary constants c1(z), c2 (z), c3(z) are found out by solving and substituting the boundary conditions.

The Poisson’s equation is solved separately under different regions using the following boundary conditions.

(a) The electric field in the centre of the silicon pillar is zero by symmetry given as

(b) The electric flux at the gate/oxide interface is continuous for metal gates:

where i=1, 2, 3, 4

(c) The surface potentials at the interfaces of the dissimilar metals are continuous:

(d) The electric field at the interfaces of the dissimilar metals are continuous:

(e) The potential at the source end is

Where built in potential is given by

kB is the Boltzmann Constant and

T is the temperature

(f) The potential at the drain end is

Using the boundary conditions (3)-(10) the surface potential is determined using parabolic approximation method:

Surface potential is expressed as

Where

VFBn =φMn −φsi n=1,2,3,4 Where

φMn represents the work function of the gate materials

φsi is the silicon work function which is given by

The solution of the equations using complementary function and particular integral is obtained as

Substituting the boundary conditions the expressions of the constants are determined and given in Eqs. (18)-(25)

Where β1 = eKL1, β2 = eKL2, β3 = eKL3, β4 = eKL4, β5 = eK(L+ L1+L2) β1-1=e-K L1, β2-1=e-K L2, β3-1=e-K L3, β4-1=e-K L4

The Electric field is defined as the derivative of surface potential. The electric field pattern determines the electron transport velocity through the channel.

In the case of the SH-TMSG structure, due to the coexistence of three metal gates with different work functions as well due to the halo structure, the surface potential minimum is solely determined by the halo part, which lies in the metal gate with higher work function.

Therefore the minimum surface potential of the silicon pillar under the gate can be calculated as, differentiating φS1(z) with respect to z and equating to zero.

The threshold voltage is defined as the gate voltage in region 1 at which the minimum surface potential is twice the bulk potential,

By substituting Vgs =Vt in Eq. (28) and solving for Vt , threshold voltage is obtained as

 

3. Results and Discussions

The performance of the single halo Triple material surrounding gate (SH-TMSG) MOSFET is studied by analyzing the surface potential and electric field. The analytical models are verified by MEDICI simulation. Simulation parameters: Vgs = 0.2V , Vds = 0.6V , tox = 4nm , tsi = 50nm , Nh = 3×1017 cm−3 , Nc = 4×1016cm−3 , ND =1020cm−3 , L1 = 40nm , L2 = 50nm , L3 = 70nm , L4 = 90nm

The surface potential distribution of SHTMSG and TMSG structure is plotted in Fig. 2. It can be seen that the minimum surface potential occurs in the halo part for SHTMSG and it is still lower compared to TMSG structure. The minimum surface potential for TMSG MOSFET occurs in the first metal gate and it is higher when compared. In the proposed SH-TMSG structure, there is an extra potential step on the right of the minimum surface potential when compared. This improves the short channel effects and current drive capability effectively.

Fig. 2.Surface potential distribution of single halo triple material surrounding gate (SH-TMSG) MOSFET

The electric field of SH-TMSG structure is shown in Fig. 3. It can be observed that the electric field has an extra peak over the halo boundary and this improves the performance of the device. Compared to TMSG structure the number of peaks is more in SH-TMSG, thus improving SCEs. The increase in halo concentration improves the first peak and increase in the work function of the first metal gate improves the second peak thus increasing the speed up of the carriers. This produces better performance and current drive capability.

Fig. 3.Electric field of single halo triple material surrounding gate (SH-TMSG) MOSFET

Table 1.Performance analysis of SHTMSG MOSFET

 

4. Conclusion

The 2D analytical model is developed for surface potential and electric field of single halo triple material surrounding gate MOSFET(SHTMSG). It is shown that SHTMSG shows better performance in suppressing the shortchannel effects and hotcarrier effects. The peaks and stepup obtained in the halo boundary of the device makes the carriers travel through the channel more quickly. SHTMSG provides more flexible process for optimizing the performance.

References

  1. J. P. Colinge, "Multiple-gate SOI MOSFETs," Solid State Electron. vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 897-905, Jun. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sse.2003.12.020
  2. A. Nitayami, H. Takato, N. Okabe, K. Sunouchi K. Hieda, F. Horiguchi, F. Masuoka, "Multi-Pillar Surrounding Gate Transistor (M-SGT) for Compact and High-Speed Circuits," IEEE Trans. Electron Devices Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 579-583, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1109/16.75169
  3. T. K. Chiang, "A new two-dimensional analytical model for threshold voltage in undoped surrounding-gate MOSFETs," IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 2006
  4. H. Kaur, S. Kabra, S. Haldar, R. S. Gupta., "An Analytical Drain Current Model for Graded Channel Cylindrical / Surrounding Gate MOSFET," Microelectronics Journal, Vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 352-359, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mejo.2007.01.003
  5. H. Kaur, S. Kabra, S. Bindra, S. Haldar, R. S. Gupta, "Impact of graded channel (GC) design in fully depleted cylindrical/surrounding gate MOSFET (FD CGT/SGT) for improved short channel immunity and hot carrier reliability," Solid State Electronics, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 398-404, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sse.2007.01.025
  6. A. Chaudhry and M. J. Kumar, "Investigation of the novel attributes of a fully depleted dual- material gate SOI MOSFET," IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 1463-1467, Sep. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2004.833961
  7. M. Jagadesh Kumar, Ali A. Orouji, and Harshit Dhakad, "New Dual-Material SG Nanoscale MOSFET: Analytical Threshold-Voltage Model", IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Vol. 53, No. 4, April 2006.
  8. N. B. Balamurugan, K. Sankaranarayanan and M. FathimaJohn, "2DTransconductance to Drain Current Ratio Modeling of Dual Material Surrounding Gate Nanoscale SOI MOSFETs", Journal Of Semiconductor Technology And Science, Vol. 9, No. 2, June, 2009.
  9. J Hsin-Kai Wang, Sean Wu1_, Te-Kuang Chiang 2, and Maw-Shung Lee. "A New Two-Dimensional Analytical Threshold Voltage Model for Short-Channel Triple-Material Surrounding-Gate Metal-Oxide- Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors", Japanese Journal Of Applied Physics 51 (2012).
  10. P. Suveetha Dhanaselvam, N. B. Balamurugan "Analytical approach of a nanoscale triplematerial surrounding gate (TMSG) MOSFETs for reduced short-channel effects", Microelectronics Journal, Vol. 44(5), 400-404, May 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mejo.2013.02.013
  11. P. Suveetha Dhanaselvam, N. B. Balamurugan, V. N. Ramakrishnan, "A 2D transconductance and subthreshold behavior model for Triple Material Surrounding gate (TMSG) MOSFET", Microelectronics Journal,Vol. 44(12), December 2013.
  12. Zun-ChaoLi, Rui-Zhi Zhang, and Yao-LinJiang," Analytical modeling and Simulation of Dual-material Surrounding gate Metal-oxide-semiconductor Field effect transistors with single Halo doping", Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 48, 2009.
  13. LiZun Chao, "Dual-material Surrounding gate metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors with Asymmetric Halo", Chinese Physics Letter, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2009.