Structural Engineering and Mechanics

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effectiveness of different standard and advanced pushover procedures for regular and irregular RC frames

  • Landi, Luca (Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering, University of Bologna) ;
  • Pollioa, Bernardino (Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering, University of Bologna) ;
  • Diotallevi, Pier Paolo (Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering, University of Bologna)
  • Received : 2013.02.11
  • Accepted : 2014.05.01
  • Published : 2014.08.10
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of the research presented in this paper was to investigate the effectiveness of several conventional, multi-modal and adaptive pushover procedures. In particular, an extensive numerical study was performed considering eight RC frames characterized by a variable number of storeys and different properties in terms of regularity in elevation. The results of pushover analyses were compared with those of nonlinear dynamic analyses, which were carried out considering different earthquake records and increasing values of earthquake intensity. The study was performed with reference to base shear-top displacement curves and to different storey response parameters. The obtained results allowed a direct comparison between the pushover procedures, which in general were able to give a fairly good estimate of seismic demand with a tendency to better results for lower frames. The advanced procedures, in particular the multi-modal pushover, provided an improvement of the results, more evident for the irregular frames.

Keywords

References

  1. Antoniou, S. and Pinho, R. (2004a), "Advantages and limitations of adaptive and non-adaptive force-based pushover procedures", J. Earthq. Eng., 8(4), 497-522.
  2. Antoniou, S. and Pinho, R. (2004b), "Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure", J. Earthq. Eng., 8(5), 643-661.
  3. ATC (1996), The Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, ATC 40, Vol. 1, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City.
  4. Aydinoglu, M.N. (2003), "An incremental response spectrum analysis procedure based on inelastic spectral displacements for multi-mode seismic performance evaluation", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 1, 3-36. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024853326383
  5. Bobadilla, H. and Chopra, A.K. (2008), "Evaluation of the MPA procedure for estimating seismic demands: RC-SMRF buildings", Earthq. Spectra, 24, 827-845. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2945295
  6. BSSC (1997), NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA 273, Washington D.C.
  7. BSSC (2000), A Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA 356, prepared by the American Society of Civil Engineers for Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C.
  8. BSSC (2005), NEHRP Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, FEMA 440, Washington D.C.
  9. CEN (2003), Eurocode 8. Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance - Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for buildings, Brussels.
  10. Chintanapakdee, C. and Chopra. A.K. (2003), "Evaluation of modal pushover analysis using generic frames", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32, 417-442. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.232
  11. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2002), "A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 561-582. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.144
  12. Chopra, A.K., Goel, R.K. and Chintanapakdee, C. (2004), "Evaluation of a Modified MPA Procedure Assuming Higher Modes as Elastic to Estimate Seismic Demands", Earthq. Spectra, 20, 757-778. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1775237
  13. Colajanni, P. and Potenzone, B. (2008), "On the distribution of lateral loads for pushover analysis", Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October.
  14. Diotallevi, P.P. and Landi, L. (2005), "On the pushover analysis as a method for evaluating the seismic response of RC buildings", Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Earthquake Resistant Engineering Structures, WIT Press.
  15. Diotallevi, P.P. and Landi, L. (2006), "Response of RC structures subjected to horizontal and vertical ground motions", Proceedings of the 8th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, CA, USA, April.
  16. Diotallevi, P.P., Landi, L. and Cardinetti, F. (2008), "Influence of shear in the non-linear analysis of RC members", Proceedings of the 2008 Seismic Engineering International Conference Commemorating the 1908 Messina and Reggio Calabria Earthquake MERCEA 2008, Reggio Calabria, Italy, July.
  17. Elnashai, A.S. (2001), "Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications", Struct. Eng. Mech., 12(1), 51-69. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2001.12.1.051
  18. Fajfar, P. (1999), "Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 28, 979-993. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199909)28:9<979::AID-EQE850>3.0.CO;2-1
  19. Fajfar, P. (2002), "Structural analysis in earthquake engineering - A breakthrough of simplified non-linear methods", Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, U.K., September.
  20. Gholi Pour, H., Ansari, M. and Bayat, M. (2014), "A new lateral load pattern for pushover analysis in structures" Earthq. Struct., 6(4), 437-455. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.6.4.437
  21. Goel, R.K. and Chopra, A.K. (2005), "Extension of modal pushover analysis to compute member forces", Earthq. Spectra, 21, 125-140.
  22. Gupta, B. and Kunnath, S.K. (2000), "Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures", Earthq. Spectra, 16(2), 367-391. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586117
  23. Han, S.W., Moon, K.H. and Chopra, A.K. (2010), "Application of MPA to estimate probability of collapse of structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 39(11), 1259-1278. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.992
  24. Jiang Y., Li, G. and Yang ,D. (2010), "A modified approach of energy balance concept based multimode pushover analysis to estimate seismic demands for buildings", Earthq. Struct., 32(5), 1272-1283.
  25. Kalkan, E. and Kunnath, S.K. (2006), "Adaptive Modal Combination Procedure for Nonlinear Static Analysis of Building Structures", J. Struct. Eng., 132(11), 1721-1732. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:11(1721)
  26. Kalkan, E. and Kunnath, S.K. (2007), "Assessment of current nonlinear static procedures for seismic evaluation of buildings", Earthq. Struct., 29(3), 305-316.
  27. Kunnath, S.K. (2004), "Identification of modal combinations for nonlinear static analysis of building structures", Comput. Aid. Civil Infrastr. Eng., 19, 246-259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2004.00352.x
  28. Kunnath, S.K. and Kalkan, E. (2004), "Method of modal combinations for pushover analysis of buildings", Proceedings of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancuver, Canada, August.
  29. Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N. and Park, R. (1998), "Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete", J. Struct. Eng., 114, 1804-1825.
  30. Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M.H., Fenves, G.L. et al. (2007), Opensees Command Language Manual. University of California, Berkeley.
  31. McKenna, F. and Fenves, G.L. (2005), Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation, University of California, Berkeley.
  32. Min. LL. PP. (2008), Norme tecniche per le costruzioni, Italian building code, adopted with D.M. 14/01/2008.
  33. Moghadam, A.S. and Tso, W.K. (2002), "A pushover procedure for tall buildings", Proceedings of 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, U.K., September.
  34. Mwafy, A.M. and Elnashai, A.S. (2001), "Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings", Eng. Struct., 23, 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00068-7
  35. Papanikolaou, V.K. and Elnashai, A.S. (2005), "Evaluation of conventional and adaptive pushover analysis I: methodology", J. Earthq. Eng., 9(6), 923-941.
  36. Papanikolaou, V.K., Elnashai, A.S. and Parejia, J.F. (2006), "Evaluation of conventional and adaptive pushover analysis II: comparative results", J. Earthq. Eng., 10(1), 127-151.
  37. Poursha, M., Khoshnoudian, F. and Moghadam, A.S. (2009), "A consecutive modal pushover procedure for estimating the seismic demands of tall buildings", Eng. Struct., 31(2), 591-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.10.009
  38. Shayanfar, M.A., Ashoory, M., Bakhshpoori, T, and Farhadi, B. (2013), "Optimization of modal load pattern for pushover analysis of building structures", Struct. Eng. Mech., 47(1), 119-129. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.47.1.119

Cited by

  1. A Procedure for the Displacement-Based Seismic Assessment of Infilled RC Frames vol.20, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2015.1112324
  2. Nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete frame under lateral load vol.6, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/csm.2017.6.4.523
  3. A stochastic adaptive pushover procedure for seismic assessment of buildings vol.14, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.14.5.477
  4. Evaluation of Seismic performance of RC setback frames vol.66, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.66.5.609
  5. A “direct five-step procedure” for the preliminary seismic design of buildings with added viscous dampers vol.173, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.103
  6. Incorporation of Torsional & Higher-Mode Responses in Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Asymmetric RC Frame Buildings vol.9, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/app9061095
  7. Behavior factor of vertically irregular RCMRFs based on incremental dynamic analysis vol.16, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.6.655
  8. Determination of torsional irregularity in response spectrum analysis of building structures vol.74, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.74.5.699
  9. An energy-based approach to determine the yield force coefficient of RC frame structures vol.21, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.21.1.037
  10. An approximate method for determining the behavior factor of RCMRFs with vertical irregularity vol.28, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2021.28.3.243