DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Studies on Cotton Seed Germinability with Tetrazolium Viability Test and X-ray Contrast Methods

  • Na, Young-Wang (Research Policy Bureau, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Shim, Sang-In (Research Institute of Life Science, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Chung, Jung-Sung (Research Institute of Life Science, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Rho, Il-Rae (Research Institute of Life Science, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kim, Seok-Hyeon (Research Institute of Life Science, Gyeongsang National University)
  • Received : 2014.04.02
  • Accepted : 2014.05.26
  • Published : 2014.06.30

Abstract

Seed viability testing provides valuable information for assessing seed lot germinability. However, most testing methods require destruction of seed prior to test. Because the dissected seeds for viability test cannot be used further evaluation, the nondestructively X-ray photography technique that can be applied for the evaluation of seed quality has been developed. In order to know the validity and accuracy of X-ray photography technique in seed evaluation test that conducted to remove the abnormal seed from a seed lot, we have compared the results from tetrazolium viability test, germination test and X-ray contrast method in cotton. Metallic salts treatment increased the efficiency of X-ray photographic method by enhancing the penetration of X-ray in abnormal or damaged seeds rather than normal seeds that have strong and well-organized tissues in seed. Cotton seeds presoaked for 16 hr in distilled water followed by soaking into metallic salt solution (5% NaI in water) for 60 min were easily classified seeds into dead seed and viable seed based on the radiography images obtained by X-ray radiation. We concluded that soft X-ray photography was reliable to find out the various defective characters due to heat and mechanical damage of seeds.

Keywords

References

  1. Argerich, C. A. and K. J. Bradford. 1989. The effects of priming and ageing on seed vigour in tomato. J. Exp. Botany 40 : 599-607. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/40.5.599
  2. Bulant, H. 1959. Test Instruction according to the Lakon topographical tetrazolium method for determine germination capacity of tree seeds. Proc. ISTA. 22(1) : 1-4.
  3. Chen. P. and Z. Sun. 1991. A review of non-destructive methods for quality evaluation and sorting of agricultural products. J. Agri. Engin. Res. 49 : 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8634(91)80030-I
  4. Devillez, F. 1971. Quelque aspects morphologique de la germination chez Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco var. Menziesii. La Cellule 69:27-44.
  5. ISTA. 2003. ISTA Working Sheets on Tetrazolium Testing I. International Seed Testing Association.
  6. ISTA. 2007. International Rules for Seed Testing. Edition 2007. International Seed Testing Association.
  7. Kamra, S. K. 1964. Determination of germinability of cucumber seed with X-ray contrast method. Proc. ISTA 29(3) : 519-534.
  8. Kamra, S. K. 1976. Use of X-ray radiography for studying seed quality in tropical forestry. Studia Forest. Suecica 131 : 1-34.
  9. Kim, O. R., C. S. Kim, and J. S. Kim. 1982. Use of Soft X-ray photography for studying seed quality in grass and tree. J. Korean For. 55 : 47-54.
  10. Kim, S. H., L. O. Copeland, and R. Baalbaki. 1987. The use of multiple tests in predicting the vigor of soybean seeds. Korean J. Crop Sci. 32 : 268-276.
  11. Kim, S. H., Z. R. Choe, J. H. Kang, L. O. Copeland, and S. G. Elias. 1994. Multiple seed vigour indices to predict field emergence and performance of barley. Seed Sci. & Technol. 22 : 59-68.
  12. Lakon, G. 1950. Die Fsetstellung der keim fahigkeit der koniferensamen nach dem topographischen Tetrazolium-Verfahren. Saatgut-Wirtschaft 4 : 83-87.
  13. MSTATC. 1993. Michigan State University MSTAT Development Team. MSTAT User's Guide. Michigan State University, MI, USA.
  14. Simak, M. and A. Gustanfsson. 1953. X-ray photography and sensitivity in forest tree species. Hereditas 39 : 458-468.
  15. Simak, M. 1957. The X-ray contrast method for seed testing: Scots pine-Pinus silvestris. Medd. F. Stat. Skogsforsk. Inst. 47(4) : 1-22.
  16. Simak, M. 1970. New used of x-ray method for the analysis of forest seed. Proc. IUFRO Sect. 22, Working Group Meeting on Sexual Reproduction. Varparanta, Finland. (Research Note No. 23 : 1-12. Dept. of Reforestion, Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm).
  17. Simak, M. and G. Alfjorden. 1973. Kottfore komst och frovarde hos gran och tall insamlingssasongen 1973-74 : Skogen, 60.
  18. Smith, A. J. and D. F. Grabe. 1985. Radiographic density measurements for determination of viability and vigor in corn (Zea may L.) seeds. Seed Sci. & Technol. 13 : 759-768.
  19. Swaminathan, M. S. and S. K. Kamra. 1961. X-ray analysis of the anatomy and viability of seeds of some economic plants. Indian J. Genetics & Plant Breeding 21 : 129-135.
  20. Van der Burg, W. J., J. W. Aartse, R. A. Van Zwol, H. Jalink, and R. J. Bino. 1994. Prediction of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) seedling morphology by X-ray analysis of seeds. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 119(2) : 258-263.
  21. Yates, H. O. 1974. Radiography for detection and study of insects in plant seeds. Proc. Seed X-ray Symposium, Macon, Ga, USA 65-78.