DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance Analysis for Fire Suppression and Disaster Management R&D Projects

소방·방재 R&D 성과분석 연구

  • Received : 2014.06.16
  • Accepted : 2014.06.27
  • Published : 2014.06.30

Abstract

The growth of disaster/accident damage costs and related industries has increased the necessity of scientific and objective performance analysis for fire suppression and disaster management R&D projects. Most of R&D performance are both academic and public performance according to fire suppression and disaster management R&D projects during the period of 2004 to 2011. This research identified characteristics of performance types by research project teams and research development stages. The research outcome shows the usefulness of relevant performance objective settings by project teams, the evaluation of scientific technology fields, and proper research teams in research team selection process, considering research outcome characteristics by both research teams and research development stages. In addition, this research reveals the applicability of research outcomes to research performance management. This research suggests further studies for evaluation process and methods for including fire suppression and disaster management characteristics to the evaluation process.

재난 안전사고에 따른 피해액 증가 및 재난 안전 관련 산업의 성장은 소방방재 R&D 사업에 대한 과학적 성과평가의 필요성을 높여 주고 있다. 2004~2011년 동안의 소방방재 R&D 성과분석 결과에 따르면 성과유형에 있어서 학술적 성과와 공공적 성과가 다수를 이룬다. 그리고 연구수행주체와 연구개발단계별로 성과유형의 특성이 있음을 확인하였다. 이와 같은 결과는 연구수행주체별 성과물의 특성과 연구개발단계별 성과물의 특성을 감안하여 연구과제 선정평가 시 적절한 연구수행 주체와 과학기술분야의 선정과 수행 주체별 성과목표 설정의 적절성을 판단하는데 활용할 수 있을 것으로 보인다. 아울러 성과관리를 위한 기초적인 자료로 활용될 것으로 보인다. 향후 이와 같은 소방 방재 특성을 개선하기 위한 방안을 마련하기 위한 연구를 전문적으로 수행할 필요가 있는 것으로 보인다.

Keywords

References

  1. Adams, J., Clark, M., Ezrow, L., Glasgow, G. (2006) "Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different from Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties' Policy Shifts, 1976-1998". American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 513-529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00199.x
  2. Ahn, Young Hoon. (2010). A Study for Developing Korea's Integrated Disaster and Safety Management. Proceedings of Korean Association for Public Administration Summer Conference.
  3. Alegre-Vidal, J., Lapiedra-Alcami, & R. Chiva-Gomez, R. (2004). "Linking operations strategy and product innovation: an empirical study of Spanish ceramic tile producers". Research Policy, 33: 829-839 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.003
  4. Bell, M., Albu, M. (1999). "Knowledge Systems and Technological Dynamism in Industrial Clusters in Developing Countries". World Development, 27(9): 1715-1734. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00073-X
  5. Beugelsdijk, S., and M. Cornet. (2002). "A far friend is worth more than a good neighbour: proximity and innovation in a small country". Journal of management and Governance, 6(2): 169-188. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015775321949
  6. Cohen and Levinthal. (1990). "Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation". Administrative Science Quarterly, Volume 35, Issue 1 pp. 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  7. Damanpour, Fariborz. (1991). "Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators". Academy of Management Journal, 34:555-590. https://doi.org/10.2307/256406
  8. Freel, M. (2000). "External linkages and product innovation in small manufacturing firms". Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12(3), 245-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/089856200413482
  9. Garcia-Valderrama, T., Mulero-Mendigorri, E. (2005). "Content validation of a measure of R&D effectiveness". R&D Management, 35(3), 311-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00392.x
  10. Hall, B. H. (1992). "Investment and Research and Development at the Firm Level: Does the Source of Financing Matter?". NBER Working Paper No. 4096.
  11. Kim, Geunyoung (2008). Review of Korea's for Disaster and Safety Management. Ministry of Security And Public Administration
  12. Kimberly, J. R. & Evanisko, M. J. (1981). "Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations". Academy of Management Journal, 24(4): 689-713. https://doi.org/10.2307/256170
  13. Lee, Yoon-Shik (2010). Public Evaluation. Seoul: Dae-young co.
  14. McDavid, James C.& Hawthorn, Laura R. L. (2006). Program Evaluation and Performance Measurement: An Introduction to Practice. Sage Publication, Inc.
  15. OECD (1994). "Performance Management in Government: Performance Measurement and Result-oriented Management". Public Management Occasional Papers, No. 3.
  16. Oerlemans J, Anderson B, Hubbard A, Huybrechts P, Johannesson T, Knap WH, Schmeits M, Stroeven AP, van de Wal R, Wallinga J, Zuo Z. (1998). "Modelling the response of glaciers to climate warming". Clim Dyn, 14: 267-274 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003820050222
  17. Souitaris, V. (2002). "Firm.specific competencies determining technological innovation: A survey in Greece". R&D Management, 32(1): 61-77 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00239
  18. Sung, Tae Kyung (2005). Firm Size, Networks, and Innovation: Evidence from the Korean Manufacturing Firms, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, Vol. 13, No. 3. pp. 77-100.
  19. Thamhain H (2003), "Managing innovative R&D teams". R&D Management, 33(3): 297-312. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00299
  20. VRAKKING, W.J. (1990). The innovative organization. Long Range Planning, 23 (2): 94-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(90)90204-H
  21. Yuh, Cha Min (2007). A Study on National Disaster and Safety Management Policy : Behavior, System, and Efficiency Ph.D Dissertation, Hanyang University