Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy (식물분류학회지)

The Korean Society of Plant Taxonomists (한국식물분류학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The taxonomic implication of leaf anatomy in tribe Sorbarieae (Spiraeoideae: Rosaceae)

쉬땅나무족(Sorbarieae Rydb., 장미과) 잎의 해부학적 형질 및 분류학적 유용성

  • Song, Jun-Ho (Laboratory of Plant Systematics, Department of Biology & Research Institute for Basic Sciences, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Hong, Suk-Pyo (Laboratory of Plant Systematics, Department of Biology & Research Institute for Basic Sciences, Kyung Hee University)
  • 송준호 (경희대학교 이과대학 생물학과 및 기초과학연구소) ;
  • 홍석표 (경희대학교 이과대학 생물학과 및 기초과학연구소)
  • Received : 2014.05.13
  • Accepted : 2014.05.28
  • Published : 2014.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A comparative study of leaf anatomy in tribe Sorbarieae (Adenostoma, Chamaebatiaria, Sorbaria, Spiraeanthus) including one related genus Lyonothamnus was carried out using light microscopy. Anatomical characteristics of the leaf blade and midrib were described and taxonomically evaluated. The anatomical characters which described in this study are as follows: thickness of leaf midrib, blade in cross section, cuticle, epidermal cell, stoma, trichome, mesophyll, crystal, main vasculature type. All features were compared and the vascular patterns of midrib were distinguished two types. - Type 1: Trace tripartite (Adenostoma), Type 2: Trace continuous, subtype 2A: flat arc (Chamaebatiaria, Spiraeanthus), subtype 2B: U-shape arc (Lyonothamnus, Sorbaria). In conclusion, some of leaf anatomical characters (e.g., cuticle, epidermal cell, trichome, mesophyll, main vasculature type) can be useful for diagnostic features. Hypostomatic type, dorsiventral mesophyll, Ushape vasculature type would constitute a major characters for genus Sorbaria in Sorbarieae. The detailed anatomical description of studied taxa is provided, and its systematic importance is also briefly discussed.

쉬땅나무족(Adenostoma: 2spp., Chamaebatiaria: 1sp., Sorbaria: 9spp., Spiraeanthus: 1sp.)과 근연분류군인 Lyonothamnus속 2종을 포함한 총 15분류군의 잎의 해부학적인 형질을 광학현미경(LM)을 이용하여 연구하였다. 모든 해부학적 형질은 잎의 횡단면을 비교하고 기재하였으며, 해부학적 형질로 분류군 간 중륵과 엽신의 횡단면, 중륵의 두께, 각피층, 표피세포, 기공, 모용, 엽육조직, 결정체, 주유관속 유형 등의 형질을 비교하였다. 본 연구 결과에서는 중륵의 주유관속 패턴을 크게 두 타입으로 구분하여 기재하였다. Type 1: 불연속유관속, 독립된 3개의 호형(Adenostoma), Type 2: 연속유관속, subtype 2A: 다소 편평(flat)한 호형(Chamaebatiaria, Spiraeanthus), subtype 2B: U-shape 호형(Lyonothamnus, Sorbaria). 또한 세부적인 해부학적 형질에 대해 자세히 기재하였고, 분류학적 중요성에 대해 논의하였다. 결론적으로, 일부 잎의 해부학적 형질(예, 각피층, 표피세포, 모용, 엽육조직, 유관속 패턴)은 진단형질로서 유용함을 확인하였고, 쉬땅나무족 내 이면기공엽과 배복성의 엽육조직, U-shape의 유관속 패턴의 형질이 쉬땅나무속을 구분하는 주요형질임을 밝혔다.

Keywords

References

  1. Agbaywa, I. O. and B. C. Noukwu. 2004. The value of morphoanatomical features in the systematic of Cucurbita species in Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology 3: 541-546. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2004.000-2106
  2. Almeida, E. B. Jr., J. S. Araujo, F. S. Santos-Filho and C. S. Zickel. 2013. Leaf morphology an anatomy of Manilkara Adans. (Sapotaceae) from northeastern Brazil. Plant Systematics and Evolution 299: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-012-0697-2
  3. Araujo, J. S., A. A. Azevedo, L. C. Silva and R. M. S. A. Meira. 2010. Leaf anatomy as an additional taxonomy tool for 16 species of Malpighiaceae found in the Cerrado area (Brazil). Plant Systematics and Evolution 286: 117-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-010-0268-3
  4. Chang, C. S. and H. Kim. 2002. Overlooked and invalidly published names of Korean woody plants. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 32: 363-371. (in Korean)
  5. Cullen, J. 2001. Handbook of North European Garden Plants. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  6. De Villiers, B. J., P. M. Tilney and E. B. Van Wyk. 2010. The taxonomic significance of leaf anatomical characters in Cussonia and related genera (Araliaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 164: 246-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2010.01085.x
  7. Eberhardt, P. 1903. Influence de l'air et de l'air humide sur la forme et sur la structure des vegetaux. Annales des Sciences Naturelles Botanique Ser VIII. 18: 60-152.
  8. Franceschi, V. R. and P. A. Nakata. 2005. Calcium oxalate in plants: Formation and function. Annual Review of Plant Biology 56: 41-71. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144106
  9. Goncalves, M. M. B. and O. Rodriigo. 2003. Leaf anatomy of rubber tree clones. Scientia Agricola 60: 709-713. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162003000400015
  10. Holmgren, P. K. and N. H. Holmgren. 1998. Index herbariorum. Retrieved Feb. 20, 2014, from http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/IndexHerbariorum.asp.
  11. Hutchinson, J. 1964. The genera of flowering plants, Vol. 1. Dicotyledons. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  12. Jepson, W. L. 1993. Jepson manual: higher plants of California. University of California, Berkeley.
  13. Kalkman, C. 2004. Rosaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, Vol. VI. Flowering Plants. Dicotyledons: Celastrales, Oxalidales, Rosales, Cornales, Ericales. Kubitzki, K. (ed.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Pp. 343-386.
  14. Kamelin, R. V. 1990. Flora Syrdarinskogo Karatau: Materialy k floristicheskomu raionirovaniiu Srednei Azii. Nauka, Leningrad. (In Russian)
  15. Kharazian, N. 2007. The taxonomy and variation of leaf anatomical characters in the genus Aegilops L. (Poaceae) in Iran. Turkish Journal of Botany 31: 1-9.
  16. Komarov, V. L., 1939. Flora of the U.S.S.R., Vol. 4. Rosales and Sarraceniales. Izdatel''stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR. Moscow, Leningrad. Pub. by Israel Program for Scientific Translations Ltd., Jerusalem.
  17. Kim, H., H. S. Lee, S. Park and C. S. Chang. 2005. Invalid names published by T. B. Lee. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 35: 211-226. (in Korean)
  18. Lee, J. H., O. W. Kwon, T. S. Jang, H. S. Roh and S.-P. Hong. 2010. The petiole anatomy of the genus Spiraea L. (Rosaceae) in Korea. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 40: 16-26. (in Korean)
  19. Lee, S. T. 2007. Sorbaria. In The Genera of Vascular Plants of Korea. Park, C.-W. (ed.), Academy Publishing Co., Seoul. Pp. 540-541.
  20. Metcalfe, C. R. and L. Chalk. 1950. Anatomy of the dicotyledons, Vol II. 2nd ed. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  21. Metcalfe, C. R. and L. Chalk. 1979. Anatomy of the dicotyledons: Systematic anatomy of leaf and stem, with a brief history of the subject, Vol I. 2nd ed. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  22. Metcalfe, C. R. and L. Chalk. 1985. Anatomy of dicotyledons: Wood structure and conclusion of the general introduction, Vol II. 2nd ed. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  23. Millan, B. and F. Kahn. 2010. Characterization of leaf anatomy in species of Astrocaryum and Hexopetion (Arecaceae). Revista Peruana de Biologia 17: 81-94.
  24. Moraes, T. M. S., G. R. Rabelo, C. Alexandrino, S. J. S. Neto and M. Da Cunha. 2011. Comparative leaf anatomy and micromorphology of Psychotria species (Rubiaceae) from the Atlantic Rainforest. Acta Botanica Brasilica 25: 178-190. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062011000100021
  25. Noorbakhsh, S. N., A. Ghahreman, F. Attar and K. Mahdigholi. 2008. Leaf anatomy of Artemisia (Asteraceae) in Iran and its taxonomic implications. Iranian Journal of Botany 14: 54-69.
  26. Parkhurst, D. F. 1978. The adaptive significance of stomatal occurrence on one or both surfaces of leaves. Journal of Ecology 66: 367-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2259142
  27. Potter, D., T. Eriksson, R. C. Evans, S. H. Oh, J. E. E. Smedmark, D. R. Morgan, M. Kerr, K. R. Robertson, M. P. Arsenault, T. A. Dickinson and C. S. Campbell. 2007. Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 266: 5-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-007-0539-9
  28. Rahn, K. 1989. A survey of the genus Sorbaria (Rosaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 8: 557-563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.1989.tb01728.x
  29. Raven, P. H. 1963. A flora of San Clemente Island, California. Aliso 5: 289-347. https://doi.org/10.5642/aliso.19630503.08
  30. Ruzin, S. E. 1999. Plant microtechnique and microscopy. Oxford University Press, New York & Oxford.
  31. Rydberg, P. A. 1908. Rosaceae. In North American Flora, Vol. 22. Britton, N. L. and L. M. Underwood (eds.), New York Botanical Garden, New York. Pp. 239-292.
  32. Schroeter, C. 1923. Das Pflanzenleben der Alpen. Eine Schilderung des Hochgebirgsflora. Alberta Ranstein, Zurich.
  33. Schulze-Menz, G. K. 1964. Rosaceae. In Engler's Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien II. Melchior. H. (ed.), 12th ed. Gebruder Borntraeger, Berlin. Pp. 209-218.
  34. Skoss, J. D. 1955. Structure and composition of plant cuticle in relation to environmental factors and permeability. Botanical Gazette 117: 55-72. https://doi.org/10.1086/335891
  35. Smith, W. K., T. C. Vogelmann, E. H. DeLucia, D. T. Bell and K. A. Shepherd. 1997. Leaf form and photosynthesis. Bioscience 47: 785-793. https://doi.org/10.2307/1313100
  36. Smith, W. K., D. T. Bell and K. A. Shepherd. 1998. Associations between leaf structure, orientation, and sunlight exposure in five Western Australian communities. American Journal of Botany 85: 56-63. https://doi.org/10.2307/2446554
  37. Solereder, H. 1908. Systematic anatomy of the dicotyledons, Vol . Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  38. Song, J.-H., C. S. Chang and S.-P. Hong. 2010. First record of Sorbaria kirilowii (Rosaceae-Spiraeoideae) from Korea. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 40: 174-178. (in Korean)
  39. Song, J.-H. and S.-P. Hong. 2012. Comparative petiole anatomy in Forsythieae, Fontanesieae and Myxopyrum (Oleaceae) and its systematic implication. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 42: 49-62. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2012.42.1.050
  40. Stuessy, F. T. 2008. Plant taxonomy: the systematic evaluation of comparative data. 2nd ed. Columbia University Press, New York.
  41. Takhtajan, A. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
  42. Viguier R. 1906. Recherches anatomiques sur la classification des Araliacees. Annales des Sciences Naturelles. Botanique 4: 1-210.
  43. Wilkinson, H. P. 1979. The plant surface (mainly leaf). In Anatomy of the dicotyledons: Systematic anatomy of leaf and stem, with a brief history of the subject, Vol I. 2nd ed. Metcalfe, C. R. and L. Chalk (eds.), Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  44. Zhang, S. Y. 1992. Systematic wood anatomy of the Rosaceae. Blumea 37: 81-158.
  45. Zhang, S. Y., P. Bass and M. Zandee. 1992. Wood structure of the Rosaceae in relation to ecology, habit and phenology. IAWA (International Association of Wood Anatomists) Bulletin 13: 307-349.
  46. 鏑木德二, 1940. 鮮滿實用林業便覽. 朝鮮總督府林業試驗場刊行會, 養賢堂, 東京. (in Japanese)

Cited by

  1. A Study on the Petal Micromorphological Characteristics of the Tribe Sorbarieae (Rosaceae) vol.29, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2016.29.4.376
  2. Taxonomic significance of the leaf micromorphology in the tribe Sorbarieae (Spiraeoideae: Rosaceae) vol.46, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2016.46.2.199
  3. Numerical taxonomic study of the genus Sorbaria (Ser.) A. Braun in Asch. (Rosaceae) vol.48, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2018.48.3.230
  4. Comparative petiole anatomy of the tribe Sorbarieae (Rosaceae) provide new taxonomically informative characters vol.36, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.01702
  5. 삼백초와 약모밀의 내부형태 비교 연구 vol.33, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.6116/kjh.2018.33.3.11
  6. Comparative studies on structure of the floral nectaries and the abundance of nectar production of Prunus laurocerasus L. vol.256, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-019-01412-z
  7. Foliar anatomy of some Prunus L. subgen. Cerasus Mill. (Rosaceae) taxa vol.39, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/njb.03185