Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology

The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology (한국미생물·생명공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Design of Quorum Quenching Microbial Vessel to Enhance Cell Viability for Biofouling Control in Membrane Bioreactor

  • Cheong, Won-Suk (School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Ryoung (School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Oh, Hyun-Suk (School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Sang H. (School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yeon, Kyung-Min (School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Chung-Hak (School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Kee (Department of Life Science and Genetic Engineering, Paichai University)
  • Received : 2013.11.06
  • Accepted : 2013.11.11
  • Published : 2014.01.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Quorum quenching (QQ) with a microbial vessel has recently been reported as an economically feasible biofouling control platform in a membrane bioreactor (MBR) for wastewater treatment. In this study, a quorum quenching MBR with a ceramic microbial vessel (CMV) was designed to overcome the extremely low F/M ratio inside a microbial vessel. The CMV was prepared with a monolithic ceramic microporous membrane and AHL-degrading QQ bacteria, Pseudomonas sp. 1A1. The "inner flow feeding mode" was introduced, under which fresh feed was supplied to the MBR only through the center lumen in the CMV. The inner flow feeding mode facilitated nutrient transport to QQ bacteria in the CMV and thus enabled relatively long-term maintenance of cell viability. The quorum quenching effect of the CMV on controlling membrane biofouling in the MBR was more pronounced with the inner flow feeding mode, which was identified by the slower increase in the transmembrane pressure as well as by the visual observation of a biocake that formed on the used membrane surface. In the QQ MBR with the CMV, the concentrations of extracellular polymeric substances were substantially decreased in the biocake on the membrane surface compared with those in the conventional MBR. The CMV also showed its potential with effective biofouling control over long-term operation of the QQ MBR.

Keywords

Introduction

Commercial use of membrane bioreactors (MBRs) has increased dramatically over the last two decades owing to the high quality of its effluent and compactness. However, biofouling, filterability loss caused by natural biocake formation on the membrane surface, still remains unsolved, significantly reducing its efficiency [1,3].

Recently, the concept of quorum sensing has been introduced as a novel biofouling control strategy, ever since Yeon et al. [22] revealed that quorum sensing is closely related to biofouling in MBRs for wastewater treatment. Quorum sensing (QS) is the density-dependent regulation of versatile microbial functions such as biofilm formation using signaling molecules called autoinducers [6,7,19,20]. Based on QS mechanisms, decomposition of signal molecules, (i.e., quorum quenching (QQ)) has been reported as an effective membrane biofouling control technique [15,16,18,21,23]. For example, acylase, which can hydrolyze Nacyl homoserine lactone (AHL)-type autoinducers from gram-negative bacteria, was successfully applied to mitigate biofouling in MBRs as well as in nanofiltration with various enzyme immobilization techniques [10,14,23].

To achieve economic feasibility of quorum quenching for anti-biofouling in MBRs, however, “enzymatic quorum quenching” has been replaced by “bacterial QQ” using a “microbial vessel” or “cell entrapping beads,” respectively. Oh et al. [18] isolated QQ bacteria, Rhodococcus sp. BH4, from a real MBR plant and prepared a microbial vessel encapsulating QQ bacteria (BH4) to insert the “microbial vessel” into an MBR. Cheong et al. [2] also isolated the natural AHL-degrading Pseudomonas sp. 1A1 strain from a real municipal MBR plant to prepare a “microbial vessel.” Furthermore, Kim et al. [16] prepared “free moving beads” by entrapping the same QQ bacteria. All of them, “microbial vessels” and “moving beads,” were successful in substantially mitigating biofouling in MBRs.

However, in QQ MBRs with a polymeric microbial vessel [2,9,18], the food-to-microorganism (F/M) ratio inside the microbial vessel was extremely small compared with that in a mixed liquor, due to the high population density (M) of the QQ bacteria (> 100,000 mg/l) but the relatively lower substrate available (F) in the vessel than in the broth (< 50 mg COD/l). Such an abnormally small F/M ratio could cause the growth inhibition of QQ bacteria, and eventually lead to the loss of their QQ activity.

In this study, a QQ microbial vessel was designed using a monolithic ceramic microporous membrane with seven lumens to augment the F/M ratio in the microbial vessel. Both air and fresh feed were directly supplied through one lumen located in the center of the ceramic microbial vessel (CMV), while the AHL-degrading QQ bacteria (Pseudomonas sp.1A1) were entrapped inside the remaining six lumens in the CMV. Such a so-called “inner flow feeding mode” was expected to facilitate the mass transfer of air and nutrients and thus augment the local F/M ratio, eventually enhancing the QQ bacterial viability in the CMV. To achieve this goal, the overall experiments were carried out in three phases: (ⅰ) CMV preparation, (ⅱ) evaluation of mass-transfer efficiency and cell viability in the CMV, and (ⅲ) evaluation of its quorum quenching activity for the control of membrane biofouling in the MBR for wastewater treatment.

 

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

An indigenous QQ bacterium, Pseudomonas sp. 1A1, was isolated from a lab-scale MBR using an enrichment culture method [2]. Strain 1A1 was cultured on Luria-Bertani (LB) medium at 30℃. Agrobacterium tumefaciens A136(Ti-)(pCF218)(pCF372) was used as a reporter strain for the detection of N-acyl homoserine lactone (AHL), which is an autoinducer of gram-negative bacteria [5]. A.tumefaciens A136 was cultured on LB medium supplemented with spectinomycin (50 mg/l) and tetracycline (4.5 mg/l) to maintain the two plasmids that provide the AHL response system. Activated sludge obtained from a wastewater treatment plant (Sihwa, Korea) was inoculated into the MBR after being acclimated to synthetic wastewater with the composition previously described elsewhere [23].

Preparation of the Ceramic Microbial Vessel (CMV)

A monolithic ceramic microporous membrane with a nominal pore size of 0.45 µm (KERASEP, Novasep, France) was chosen as a supporting component of the CMV. The monolithic module consists of seven lumens, one located in the center and the other six in a circle (Fig. 1). The bottom sides of the lumens except for the center one were completely sealed with silicon glue, and then the Pseudomonas sp. 1A1 culture was injected into the six lumens in a circle using a sterilized syringe. After cell encapsulation, the top sides of all six lumens were covered with a silicon cap, which can be opened in case of cell replacement. The bacterial population density in the CMV was set to 26.5 or 70.3 mg biomass/cm3-lumen. Pseudomonas sp. 1A1 was inactivated with autoclaving and injected into a ceramic vessel in the same way as the CMV to prepare an “inactive CMV” as a control group. Detailed specifications of the CMV are given in Table 1.

Fig. 1.Schematic diagram of the ceramic microbial vessel under the inner flow feeding mode.

Table 1.Specifications of the ceramic microbial vessel.

AHL Bioluminescence Assay

The concentration of the AHL molecules was measured with the luminescence method using the reporter strain A. tumefaciens A136 (Ti-)(pCF218)(pCF372) [12,17,22]. The reporter strain and the AHL sample were mixed and loaded onto a microwell plate. The microwell plate was placed in an incubator to maintain the temperature at 30℃ for 1.5 h, and then the Beta-Glo Assay System (Promega, USA) was added to the solution for the luminescent reaction with β-galactosidase produced by the reporter strain. After 40 min, the luminescence was measured by a luminometer (Synergy 2; Biotek, USA). The amounts of AHL were calculated using relationship equations based on the calibration curve derived from standard samples of AHL.

Measurement of the QQ Activity of the CMV

The QQ activity was determined by the degradation rate of N-octanoyl-L-homoserine lactone (C8-HSL), which has been identified and reported as one of the major AHL molecules in a previous study [23]. To measure the QQ activity of the CMV, C8-HSL was added to 20 ml of Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7, 50 mM) for a final concentration of 200 nM. Then, the CMV was inserted into the buffer and the mixture was incubated at 30℃ with orbital shaking (200 rpm) for 15, 45, 90, and 180 min. The remaining concentration of C8-HSL at each reaction time was measured using a bioluminescence assay.

Measurement of the Nutrient Transport Rate

Because the purpose of the inner flow feeding was to promote the mass transfer of nutrients to the inside of the lumens entrapping the QQ bacteria (Pseudomonas sp. 1A1), it was necessary to compare the mass transfer rate between the normal feeding and inner flow feeding modes. The six lumens in the circle of both ceramic vessels were filled with deionized water instead of QQ bacteria and then both ceramic vessels were immersed into two MBRs, respectively (Fig. 2). The normal feeding mode was applied to Reactor-1 in which fresh synthetic wastewater was fed into the reactor (i.e., into the mixed liquor), whereas the inner flow feeding mode was applied to Reactor-2 in which the same wastewater was fed directly to the lumen that was in the center of the ceramic vessel. After the operation of both MBRs for 24 h, each ceramic vessel was taken out of the MBR to measure and compare the total nutrient concentrations inside the six lumens located in the circle of each vessel.

Fig. 2.Experimental set-up for the measurement of the nutrient transfer rate under two different feeding modes. Reactor-1: CMV with distilled water under the normal feeding mode. Reactor-2: CMV with distilled water under the inner flow feeding mode.

MBR Operation

Three laboratory-scale MBRs, each with a 3.0 L working volume were operated in parallel using synthetic wastewater (Fig. 3). The composition of the synthetic wastewater was as follows (g/l): glucose, 0.3; peptone, 0.1; yeast extract, 0.014; (NH4)SO4, 0.1; KH2PO4, 0.02; MgSO4, 0.03; MnSO4, 0.003; FeCl3, 0.0002; CoCl2, 0.002; CaCl2, 0.004, and NaHCO3, 0.26.

Fig. 3.Schematic diagram of the three MBRs in parallel operation. MBR-A: CMV with inactivated QQ bacteria under the inner flow feeding mode. MBR-B: CMV with QQ bacteria under the inner flow feeding mode. MBR-C: CMV with QQ bacteria under the normal feeding mode.

MBR-A was operated under the inner flow feeding mode with the CMV filled with inactivated Pseudomonas sp. 1A1. MBR-B was operated under the inner flow feeding mode with the CMV filled with active Pseudomonas sp. 1A1. MBR-C was operated under the normal feeding mode with the CMV filled with active Pseudomonas sp. 1A1. The filtration membranes with an effective membrane area of 0.021 m2 were prepared using hydrophilic polyvinylidenefluoride(PVDF) hollow fiber (ZeeWeed 500; GE-Zenon, USA) with a nominal pore size of 0.04 µm. Other operating parameters are described in Table 2.

Table 2.MBR operating conditions.

Analytical Methods

The LIVE/DEAD BacLight Bacterial Viability Kit (Molecular Probe, USA) was used to determine the active state of the biomass in the CMV according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The biocake that formed on the membrane surface during MBR operation was stained with SYTO 9 (Molecular Probe), which has specificity for nucleic acids from bacterial cells [8,16]. All of these fluorescently stained samples were immediately observed with a confocal laser scanning microscope (Nikon C1 plus, Japan). Images were recorded in the green channel (excitation 488 nm and emission 515/30 nm) and red channel (excitation 543 nm and emission 600/50 nm). A Z-section image stack for each green and red channel was constructed using the IMARIS software (Bitplane AG, Zurich, Switzerland).

Mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) were determined according to standard methods. Soluble microbial products (SMP) were obtained by centrifuging the mixed liquor (5,000 ×g, 5 min) and filtering the supernatant through a glass microfiber filter (pore size of 1.2 µm). Extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) were extracted from the biocake using the heat extraction method [13]. The proteins and polysaccharides in the SMP and EPS were quantitatively analyzed using the modified Lowry method and phenol-sulfuric acid method [4,11], respectively.

 

Results and Discussion

Quorum Quenching Activity of the Ceramic Microbial Vessel

Two CMVs with different biomass packing densities (26.5 or 70.3 mg biomass/cm3-lumen) were prepared and the AHL degradation activity of each was evaluated using C8-HSL as a signal molecule. One control CMV with inactivated Pseudomonas sp. 1A1 was also prepared to check the potential adsorption of C8-HSL by a ceramic vessel and the inactivated bacteria. As shown in Fig. 4, the CMV with the inactivated QQ bacteria did not show a substantial decrease in the C8-HSL concentration, suggesting that its adsorption of C8-HSL was negligible. However, the AHL degradation rates of the two CMVs were 0.013 and 0.032 nmol C8-HSL/min for a 90-min reaction time depending on the QQ bacterial weights in the CMVs, proving that the CMV has AHL quenching activity.

Fig. 4.Quorum quenching activity of the ceramic microbial vessels with different microbial packing densities. Error bar: standard deviation (n = 3).

Effect of the CMV on MBR Biofouling

Two MBRs with different CMVs were run in parallel to investigate the effect of the CMV on membrane biofouling (MBR-A & -B in Fig. 3): (ⅰ) MBR-A, CMV with inactivated QQ bacteria under the inner flow feeding mode; and (ⅱ) MBR-B, CMV with QQ bacteria under the inner flow feeding mode. Membrane biofouling was monitored by TMP rise-up in the operation of the submerged MBRs. In the 1st cycle, the two MBRs were operated without the CMV at constant flux of 30 LMH to confirm there was little difference in the membrane fouling tendency among them (Fig. 5A). The two MBRs had similar rates of TMP rise-up, suggesting the population dynamics of the microorganisms in the mixed liquors were identical for the two MBRs.

Fig. 5.(A) TMP profiles during 30 days of MBR runs, and (B) CLSM images of the biocakes on the surface of the used filtration membranes at points 1 and 2 in the 2nd cycle (CMV with a packing density of 70.3 mg biomass/cm3-lumen).

In the 2nd cycle, two CMVs with a biomass packing density of 70.3 mg biomass/cm3-lumen were installed into each reactor. MBR-A with inactivated QQ bacteria showed the same trend in TMP rise-up as in the 1st cycle, indicating QQ was not carried out because of the inactivation of the QQ bacteria. MBR-B with the QQ bacteria, however, showed a delay in the TMP rise-up compared with MBR-A. This proves the quorum quenching effect of the CMV with QQ bacteria on membrane biofouling under the inner flow feeding mode. When the flux was decreased to 25 LMH from 30 LMH at the 3rd cycle, the rate of TMP rise-up slowed down for both MBRs, but a large gap in TMP between MBR-A and -B was still maintained at the end of 10 days of operation. To elucidate the discrepancy in TMP between the two MBRs, the used filtration membranes were taken out at points 1 and 2 in the 2nd cycle and the total attached biomass (TAB) accumulated on the surface of the filtration membrane was measured. The TAB in MBR-A was 119 (±5.0) mg, whereas that in MBR-B was only 44 (±1.0) mg. The difference in the TAB implies that the development of the biocake on the membrane surface was retarded in MBR-B by the QQ bacteria in the CMV. It was also confirmed visually with CLSM photography of the used membranes at the same points (Fig. 5B). In detail, the reconstructed CLSM images of the used filtration membranes at points 1 and 2 clearly show that the biocake on the membrane surface was developed much less in MBR-B than in MBR-A.

Effect of the Inner Flow Feeding Mode on TMP Rise-Up in QQ MBR at Constant Flux

The main purpose of the “inner flow feeding mode” through the CMV was to enhance the growth of the QQ bacteria by ensuring the nutrient supply, thereby mitigating membrane biofouling. In order to compare the biofouling mitigating effect of the inner flow feeding mode to that of the normal feeding mode, MBR-C, the MBR with the CMV under the normal feeding mode, was operated together with MBR-A and -B (Fig. 3). After confirming that all three MBRs were in the same biological environment based on the TMP profile (the 1st cycle in Fig. 6), the three CMVs with a biomass packing density of 26.5 mg biomass/cm3-lumen were installed into each reactor before starting the 2nd cycle. The profiles of the TMP rise-up during three cycles for MBR-A and -B (Fig. 6) were quite similar to those in the previous run (Fig. 5A). In the 2nd cycle, MBR-C with the QQ bacteria in the CMV under the normal feeding mode showed retardation in the TMP rise-up compared with MBR-A (green color in Fig. 6), but the extent of retardation was less than that in MBR-B under the inner flow feeding mode (red color in Fig. 6). This result was attributed to the greater viability of the active QQ bacteria (Pseudomonas sp.1A1) in the CMV under the inner flow feeding mode. The 3rd cycle of operation for the three MBRs further confirmed the reproducibility of the discrepancy in the rate of the TMP rise-up.

Fig. 6.Effect of the CMV and its inner flow operation mode on MBR filterability (CMV with a packing density of 26.5 mg biomass/cm3-lumen). MBR-A: CMV with inactivated QQ bacteria under the inner flow feeding mode. MBR-B: CMV with QQ bacteria under the inner flow feeding mode. MBR-C: CMV with QQ bacteria under the normal feeding mode.

Of interest is that the MBR-C with the CMV under the normal feeding mode gradually lost most of its quorum quenching activity in the 3rd cycle. Because it was thought that the loss of QQ activity might be related to the deterioration of cell viability with the operation time due to the low F/M ratio in the CMV, the CMVs were taken out of MBR-B and MBR-C, respectively, right after the 3rd cycle of operation, and then the staining of live/dead cells inside the CMVs was conducted to check the cell viability in both CMVs. The portion of live cells (green color) in the CMV in MBR-B under the inner flow feeding mode (Fig. 7A) was observed to be much higher than that in MBR-C under the normal feeding mode without the inner flow (Fig. 7B). Quantitatively, the live/dead ratios in the CMVs of MBR-B and MBR-C were calculated as 4.8 (±0.5) and 1.3 (±0.3). It was concluded that the QQ MBR with the CMV could be more effective as a membrane biofouling control technique by adopting the inner flow feeding mode, which enabled the CMV to maintain a greater bacterial QQ activity through the facilitated nutrient transfer.

Fig. 7.Images of live/dead quorum quenching bacteria from the lumens of the used CMVs. (A) MBR-B with the CMV under the inner flow feeding mode, (B) MBR-C with the CMV under the normal feeding mode. Green color: live cell; red color: dead cell.

Effect of the Inner Flow Feeding Mode on the Rate of Nutrient Transfer to the CMV

To further clarify the greater mass transfer in MBR-B under the inner flow feeding mode than that in MBR-C under the normal feeding mode, the mass transfer rate of nutrients into the six lumens of each ceramic vessel was estimated in terms of the COD level (Fig. 2). After the operation of both MBRs for 24 h as shown in Fig. 2, each ceramic vessel was taken out of Reactor-1 and Reactor-2, and then the total nutrient concentration inside the six lumens located in the circle of each vessel was measured and compared (Fig. 8). Under the normal feeding mode, the soluble COD in lumen 1 (25.4 mg/l) became almost the same as that of the bulk phase (26.3 mg/l) after the operation of the MBR for at least 24 h, indicating the soluble COD in the feed (336 mg/l) was equally distributed in the ceramic vessel and in the mixed liquor of the activated sludge. However, the soluble COD in lumen 2 under the inner flow feeding mode (242 mg/l) was much higher than that in the mixed liquor. This implies that the inner flow feeding mode makes the COD level in the ceramic vessel approach close to that in the fresh feed. Consequently, it was anticipated that the inner flow feeding mode would help compensate the extremely low F/M ratio inside the CMV in the QQ MBR by forced feeding through the center lumen.

Fig. 8.COD concentrations in the feed, broth, and lumens under different feeding modes. Error bar: standard deviation (n = 3). Lumen 1: COD in the lumen under the normal feeding mode. Lumen 2: COD in the lumen under the inner flow feeding mode.

Effect of the CMV on SMP and EPS Production in the MBR

Polymeric substances, which are well known to be related to membrane biofouling, were analyzed in terms of soluble microbial products in the mixed liquor and extracellular polymeric substances in the membranebiocake [3,10]. It was reported that the QQ in MBR can reduce polysaccharides and proteins in both the mixed liquor and the biocake [10]. In order to investigate the effect of the CMV on SMP and EPS production in MBRs, polysaccharide and protein concentrations in the mixed liquor and biocakes were measured from the three MBRs at the end of the 2nd cycle in Fig. 7. The CMV with QQ bacteria reduced substantially polysaccharides in the mixed liquor regardless of the feeding mode (Fig. 9A): from 23.6 (±0.6) to 8.9 (±1.1) for MBR-B or to 11.5 (±0.9) mg/l for MBR-C. However, the proteins in the mixed liquor from the three MBRs had a similar level.

In the case of EPS in the biocake, the CMV with QQ bacteria reduced both polysaccharides and proteins (Fig. 9B): polysaccharide from 980 (±80) to 610 (±50) for MBR-B or to 650 (±40) mg/m2-membrane for MBR-C; protein from 1,840 (±200) to 1,040 (±40) for MBR-B or to 1,290 (±40) mg/m2-membrane for MBR-C. Taking into account that EPS and SMP are closely associated with microbial physiology, the QQ bacteria in the CMV are presumed to have regulated gene transcription for the production of EPS and SMP by inhibiting quorum sensing between microorganisms in the MBRs.

Fig. 9.(A) SMP in the mixed liquor, and (B) EPS in the biocakes on the membrane surface with the insertion of CMV with QQ bacteria. Error bar: standard deviation (n = 3). MBR-A: CMV with inactivated QQ bacteria under the inner flow feeding mode. MBR-B: CMV with QQ bacteria under the inner flow feeding mode. MBR-C: CMV with QQ bacteria under the normal feeding mode.

Effect of the CMV on the Biodegradation of Organics in MBRs

Considering that quorum sensing regulates microbial physiology [10], possible side effects of the CMV should be checked. As shown in Table 2, the biodegradation of organics in terms of COD removal was 95%-99% for all MBRs, suggesting that the insertion of the CMV does not affect the microbial activity of the activated sludge for the biodegradation of organics.

Stability of the QQ Bacteria in the CMV

Maintaining the QQ bacterial activity is one of the most important factors to be considered in QQ MBRs with CMV. Consequently, the activity of the CMV in the QQ MBR under the inner flow feeding mode was periodically monitored during the operation of MBR-A and MBR-B for 30 days. For each time point at 15 and 30 days, the CMVs were taken out of the MBRs and then the activity of the CMV was measured using C8-HSL as a standard signal molecule for the bioluminescence assay (Fig. 10). The degradation rate of C8-HSL with a fresh CMV was 0.032 nmol C8-HSL/min in a 90-min reaction time, whereas that at 15 days was 0.047 nmol C8-HSL/min, which was about 47% higher than the initial rate. This increase in activity was attributed to the good adaptation of the QQ bacteria to their new environment of the mixed liquor in the MBR as well as to their growth inside the CMV. Moreover, the activity of the CMV at 30 days was 0.044 nmol C8-HSL/min, indicating little loss of its activity. As a result, it was concluded that the CMV has the potential of facile and effective biofouling control in MBRs because it can maintain its quorum quenching activity at least during the test period without any further inputs.

Fig. 10.Quorum quenching activity of the CMV with C8-HSL as a standard during 30 days of MBR operation. Error bar: standard deviation (n = 3). MBR-A: CMV with inactivated QQ bacteria under the inner flow feeding mode. MBR-B: CMV with QQ bacteria under the inner flow feeding mode.

In summary, a quorum quenching MBR with a ceramic microbial vessel was designed so as to augment the cell activity in the CMV, which was prepared using a monolithic ceramic microporous membrane and AHL-degrading QQ bacterium Pseudomonas sp. 1A1. The following conclusions were drawn: firstly, the inner flow feeding mode under which fresh feed is supplied to the MBR only through the center lumen in the CMV compensated for the extremely low F/M ratio inside the CMV, and thereby enabled the CMV to maintain greater bacterial QQ activity through the facilitated nutrient transfer. Secondly, the quorum quenching effect of the CMV on the control of membrane biofouling was more pronounced when the feeding mode was changed from the normal mode to the inner flow mode. Thirdly, the QQ bacteria in the CMV are presumed to have inhibited the quorum sensing between the activated sludge in the MBR, which regulates gene transcription for the production of EPS. Lastly, the CMV showed little loss in its initial AHL degradation activity over 30 days of MBR operation, leading to the expectation for its potential in effective biofouling control in long-term MBR operations.

References

  1. Chang IS, Lee CH. 1998. Membrane filtration characteristics in membrane-coupled activated sludge system - the effect of physiological states of activated sludge on membrane fouling. Desalination 120: 221-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00220-3
  2. Cheong W-S, Lee C-H, Moon Y-H, Oh H-S, Kim S-R, Lee SH, et al. 2013. Isolation and identification of indigenous quorum quenching bacteria, Pseudomonas sp. 1A1, for biofouling control in MBR. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52: 10554- 10560. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie303146f
  3. Drews A. 2010. Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors-characterisation, contradictions, cause and cures. J. Membr. Sci. 363: 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.046
  4. DuBois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F. 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 28: 350-356. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017
  5. Fuqua C, Winans SC. 1996. Conserved cis-acting promoter elements are required for density-dependent transcription of Agrobacterium tumefaciens conjugal transfer genes. J. Bacteriol. 178: 435-440. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.178.2.435-440.1996
  6. Fuqua WC, Winans SC, Greenberg EP. 1994. Quorum sensing in bacteria - the luxr-luxi family of cell densityresponsive transcriptional regulators. J. Bacteriol. 176: 269-275. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.176.2.269-275.1994
  7. Hammer BK, Bassler BL. 2003. Quorum sensing controls biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae. Mol. Microbiol. 50: 101-104. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03688.x
  8. Hwang BK, Lee WN, Yeon KM, Park PK, Lee CH, Chang IS, et al. 2008. Correlating TMP increases with microbial characteristics in the bio-cake on the membrane surface in a membrane bioreactor. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42: 3963-3968. https://doi.org/10.1021/es7029784
  9. Jahangir D, Oh HS, Kim SR, Park PK, Lee CH, Lee JK. 2012. Specific location of encapsulated quorum quenching bacteria for biofouling control in an external submerged membrane bioreactor. J. Membr. Sci. 411: 130-136.
  10. Jiang W, Xia S, Liang J, Zhang Z, Hermanowicz SW. 2012. Effect of quorum quenching on the reactor performance, biofouling and biomass characteristics in membrane bioreactors. Water Res. 47: 187-196.
  11. Judd S, Judd C. 2006. The MBR Book : Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors in Water and Wastewater Treatment. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Boston.
  12. Kawaguchi T, Chen YP, Norman RS, Decho AW. 2008. Rapid screening of quorum-sensing signal N-acyl homoserine lactones by an in vitro cell-free assay. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 3667-3671. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02869-07
  13. Kim H-W, Oh H-S, Kim S-R, Lee K-B, Yeon K-M, Lee C-H, et al. 2013. Microbial population dynamics and proteomics in membrane bioreactors with enzymatic quorum quenching. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97: 4665-4675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4272-0
  14. Kim JH, Choi DC, Yeon KM, Kim SR, Lee CH. 2011. Enzyme-immobilized nanofiltration membrane to mitigate biofouling based on quorum quenching. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45: 1601-1607. https://doi.org/10.1021/es103483j
  15. Kim S, Lee S, Hong S, Oh Y, Kweon J, Kim T. 2009. Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: microbial quorum sensing and fouling propensity. Desalination 247: 303-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.12.033
  16. Kim SR, Oh HS, Jo SJ, Yeon KM, Lee CH, Lim DJ, et al. 2013. Biofouling control with bead-entrapped quorum quenching bacteria in membrane bioreactors: physical and biological effects. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47: 836-842. https://doi.org/10.1021/es303995s
  17. Oh H-S, Kim S-R, Cheong W-S, Lee C-H, Lee J-K. 2013. Biofouling inhibition in MBR by Rhodococcus sp. BH4 isolated from real MBR plant. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97: 10223-10231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-4933-7
  18. Oh HS, Yeon KM, Yang CS, Kim SR, Lee CH, Park SY, et al. 2012. Control of membrane biofouling in MBR for wastewater treatment by quorum quenching bacteria encapsulated in microporous membrane. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46: 4877-4884. https://doi.org/10.1021/es204312u
  19. Parsek MR, Greenberg E. 2005. Sociomicrobiology: the connections between quorum sensing and biofilms. Trends Microbiol. 13: 27-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2004.11.007
  20. Ponnusamy K, Paul D, Kim YS, Kweon JH. 2010. 2(5H)- Furanone: a prospective strategy for biofouling-control in membrane biofilm bacteria by quorum sensing inhibition. Braz. J. Microbiol. 41: 227-234. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822010000100032
  21. Xiong Y, Liu Y. 2010. Biological control of microbial attachment: a promising alternative for mitigating membrane biofouling. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 86: 825-837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2463-0
  22. Yeon KM, Cheong WS, Oh HS, Lee WN, Hwang BK, Lee CH, et al. 2009. Quorum sensing: a new biofouling control paradigm in a membrane bioreactor for advanced wastewater treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43: 380-385. https://doi.org/10.1021/es8019275
  23. Yeon KM, Kim J, Lee CH. 2009. Magnetic enzyme carrier for effective biofouling control in the membrane bioreactor based on enzymatic quorum quenching. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43: 7403-7409. https://doi.org/10.1021/es901323k

Cited by

  1. Exploiting Quorum Sensing Interfering Strategies in Gram-Negative Bacteria for the Enhancement of Environmental Applications vol.6, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01535
  2. Quorum quenching MBR operations for biofouling control under different operation conditions and using different immobilization media vol.57, pp.38, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.1086899
  3. Effect of the Shape and Size of Quorum-Quenching Media on Biofouling Control in Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment<xref>S</xref> vol.26, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1605.05021
  4. Addition of Particles for Fouling Minimization in Membrane Bioreactors – Permeability Performance, Fluid Dynamics, and Rheology vol.88, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201500112
  5. Crossing the Border between Laboratory and Field: Bacterial Quorum Quenching for Anti-Biofouling Strategy in an MBR vol.50, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04795
  6. Antibiofilm activity of biomolecules: gene expression study of bacterial isolates from brackish and fresh water biofouled membranes vol.71, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2016-0045
  7. More Efficient Media Design for Enhanced Biofouling Control in a Membrane Bioreactor: Quorum Quenching Bacteria Entrapping Hollow Cylinder vol.50, pp.16, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01221
  8. Effects of Quorum Quenching on the Microbial Community of Biofilm in an Anoxic/Oxic MBR for Wastewater Treatment vol.26, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1604.04070
  9. Process-Oriented Review of Bacterial Quorum Quenching for Membrane Biofouling Mitigation in Membrane Bioreactors (MBRs) vol.6, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes6040052
  10. Exploring the potential of curcumin for control of N-acyl homoserine lactone-mediated biofouling in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment vol.7, pp.27, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra28032c
  11. Enhancing the Physical Properties and Lifespan of Bacterial Quorum Quenching Media through Combination of Ionic Cross-Linking and Dehydration vol.27, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1611.11016
  12. Impact of quorum quenching bacteria on biofouling retardation in submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) vol.9, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/mwt.2018.9.4.279
  13. Bioremediation of wastewater through a quorum sensing triggered MFC: A sustainable measure for waste to energy concept vol.237, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.075
  14. Anti-Biofouling Performance of an Immobilized Indigenous Quorum Quenching Bacterium Bacillus cereus HG10 and Its Influence on the Microbial Community in a Bioreactor vol.16, pp.19, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193777
  15. Quorum quenching for effective control of biofouling in membrane bioreactor: A comprehensive review of approaches, applications, and challenges vol.24, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2018.380
  16. Preparation of a mesoporous silica quorum quenching medium for wastewater treatment using a membrane bioreactor vol.36, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2020.1749601
  17. The Use of the New Quorum Quenching Isolate of Bordetella hinzii S3 to Prevent Biofouling in Membrane Bioreactor Systems vol.11, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-019-00700-2
  18. CeO2 Nanoparticles Regulate the Propagation of Antibiotic Resistance Genes by Altering Cellular Contact and Plasmid Transfer vol.54, pp.16, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c01870
  19. Bacterial signaling and signal responses as key factors in water and wastewater treatment vol.44, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102434
  20. Mitigation of membrane biofouling using quorum-quenching bacteria in a continuously operated membrane bioreactor vol.166, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2021.105339