DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Microshear bond strength according to dentin cleansing methods before recementation

  • Tasar, Simge (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University) ;
  • Ulusoy, Mutahhar Muhammed (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University) ;
  • Meric, Gokce (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University)
  • Received : 2013.08.13
  • Accepted : 2014.03.18
  • Published : 2014.04.30

Abstract

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to determine the efficiency of Erbium, Chromium: Yttrium-Scandium-Gallium-Garnet laser in different output powers for removing permanent resin cement residues and therefore its influence on microshear bond strength compared to other cleaning methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS. 90 extracted human molars were sectioned in 1 mm thickness. Resin cement was applied to surface of sliced teeth. After the removal of initial cement, 6 test groups were prepared by various dentin surface treatment methods as follows: no treatment (Group 1), ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid application (Group 2), Endosolv R application (Group 3), 1.25 W Erbium, Chromium:Yttrium-Scandium-Gallium-Garnet laser irradiation (Group 4), 2 W Erbium, Chromium:Yttrium-Scandium-Gallium-Garnet laser irradiation (Group 5) and 3.5 W Erbium, Chromium:Yttrium-Scandium-Gallium-Garnet laser irradiation (Group 6). The topography and morphology of the treated dentin surfaces were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (n=2 for each group). Following the repetitive cementation, microshear bond strength between dentin and cement (n=26 in per group) were measured with universal testing machine and the data were analyzed by Kruskal Wallis H Test with Bonferroni correction (P<.05). Fracture patterns were investigated by light microscope. RESULTS. Mean microshear bond strength ${\pm}$ SD (MPa) for each group was $34.9{\pm}17.7$, $32.1{\pm}15.8$, $37.8{\pm}19.3$, $31.3{\pm}12.7$, $44.4{\pm}13.6$, $40.2{\pm}13.2$ respectively. Group 5 showed significantly difference from Group 1, Group 2 and Group 4. Also, Group 6 was found statistically different from Group 4. CONCLUSION. 2 W and 3.5 W Erbium, Chromium: Yttrium-Scandium-Gallium-Garnet laser application were found efficient in removing resin residues.

Keywords

References

  1. Prata RA, de Oliveira VP, de Menezes FC, Borges GA, de Andrade OS, Gonçalves LS. Effect of 'Try-in' paste removal method on bond strength to lithium disilicate ceramic. J Dent 2011;39:863-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.09.011
  2. Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Microtensile bond strengths of seven dentin adhesive systems. Dent Mater 2000;16:180-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00007-5
  3. Sümer E, Değer Y. Contemporary permanent luting agents used in dentistry: A literature review. Int Dent Res 2011;1:26-31. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2011.vol1.no1.5
  4. Langer A, Ilie N. Dentin infiltration ability of different classes of adhesive systems. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:205-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0694-4
  5. Lohbauer U, Nikolaenko SA, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Resin tags do not contribute to dentin adhesion in self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:97-103.
  6. Giachetti L, Bertini F, Scaminaci Russo D. Investigation into the nature of dentin resin tags: a scanning electron microscopic morphological analysis of demineralized bonded dentin. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:233-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.021
  7. Tao L, Pashley DH. Shear bond strengths to dentin: effects of surface treatments, depth and position. Dent Mater 1988;4:371-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80052-6
  8. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1992;71:1530-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345920710081301
  9. Gwinnett AJ. Quantitative contribution of resin infiltration/ hybridization to dentin bonding. Am J Dent 1993;6:7-9.
  10. Nakabayashi N. Bonding of restorative materials to dentine: the present status in Japan. Int Dent J 1985;35:145-54.
  11. Obeidi A, Liu PR, Ramp LC, Beck P, Gutknecht N. Acidetch interval and shear bond strength of Er,Cr:YSGG laserprepared enamel and dentin. Lasers Med Sci 2010;25:363-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-009-0652-9
  12. Altintas SH, Tak O, Secilmis A, Usumez A. Effect of provisional cements on shear bond strength of porcelain laminate veneers. Eur J Dent 2011;5:373-9.
  13. Santos MJ, Bapoo H, Rizkalla AS, Santos GC. Effect of dentin- cleaning techniques on the shear bond strength of selfadhesive resin luting cement to dentin. Oper Dent 2011;36:512-20. https://doi.org/10.2341/10-392-L
  14. Adebayo OA, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Dentine bonding after CPP-ACP paste treatment with and without conditioning. J Dent 2008;36:1013-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.08.011
  15. Munirathinam D, Mohanaj D, Beganam M. Efficacy of various cleansing techniques on dentin wettability and its influence on shear bond strength of a resin luting agent. J Adv Prosthodont 2012;4:139-45. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.3.139
  16. Grasso CA, Caluori DM, Goldstein GR, Hittelman E. In vivo evaluation of three cleansing techniques for prepared abutment teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:437-41. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.128123
  17. Roberts S, Kim JR, Gu LS, Kim YK, Mitchell QM, Pashley DH, Tay FR. The efficacy of different sealer removal protocols on bonding of self-etching adhesives to AH plus-contaminated dentin. J Endod 2009;35:563-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.01.001
  18. Usumez A, Aykent F. Bond strengths of porcelain laminate veneers to tooth surfaces prepared with acid and Er,Cr: YSGG laser etching. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:24-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00235-X
  19. Chou JC, Chen CC, Ding SJ. Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser parameters on shear bond strength and microstructure of dentine. Photomed Laser Surg 2009;27:481-6. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2008.2282
  20. Jaberi Ansari Z, Fekrazad R, Feizi S, Younessian F, Kalhori KA, Gutknecht N. The effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG laser on the micro-shear bond strength of composite to the enamel and dentin of human permanent teeth. Lasers Med Sci 2012;27:761-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-0961-7
  21. Gurgan S, Kiremitci A, Cakir FY, Gorucu J, Alpaslan T, Yazici E, Gutknecht N. Shear bond strength of composite bonded to Er,Cr:YSGG laser-prepared dentin. Photomed Laser Surg 2008;26:495-500. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2007.2213
  22. Cvikl B, Moser G, Wernisch J, Raabe M, Gruber R, Moritz A. The impact of Er,Cr:YSGG laser on the shear strength of the bond between dentin and ceramic is dependent on the adhesive material. Lasers Med Sci 2012;27:717-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-0963-5
  23. Lin S, Caputo AA, Eversole LR, Rizoiu I. Topographical characteristics and shear bond strength of tooth surfaces cut with a laser-powered hydrokinetic system. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:451-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70033-8
  24. Ishida K, Endo T, Shinkai K, Katoh Y. Shear bond strength of rebonded brackets after removal of adhesives with Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Odontology 2011;99:129-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-011-0012-7
  25. Ahrari F, Basafa M, Fekrazad R, Mokarram M, Akbari M. The efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG laser in reconditioning of metallic orthodontic brackets. Photomed Laser Surg 2012;30:41-6. https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2011.3088
  26. Ahrari F, Fekrazad R, Kalhori KA, Ramtin M. Reconditioning of ceramic orthodontic brackets with an Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Lasers Med Sci 2013;28:223-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-012-1093-4
  27. Bishara SE, VonWald L, Laffoon JF, Warren JJ. The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of a composite resin orthodontic adhesive. Angle Orthod 2000;70:435-41.
  28. Andrade AM, Garcia E, Moura SK, Reis A, Loguercio A, Silva LM, Pimentel GH, Grande RH. Do the microshear test variables affect the bond strength values? Int J Dent 2012;2012:618960.
  29. Armstrong S, Geraldeli S, Maia R, Raposo LH, Soares CJ, Yamagawa J. Adhesion to tooth structure: a critical review of "micro" bond strength test methods. Dent Mater 2010;26:e50-62.
  30. Toba S, Veerapravati W, Shimada Y, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strengths of adhesive resins to coronal dentin versus the floor of the pulp chamber. Am J Dent 2003;16:51A-56A.
  31. Shabka AA, Khalaf MM. An investigation on the shear bond strength of one dentin adhesive at two different dentin depths. Egypt Dent J 1995;41:1031-4.
  32. Pashley EL, Tao L, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. Bond strengths to superficial, intermediate and deep dentin in vivo with four dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 1993;9:19-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90099-C
  33. Burrow MF, Takakura H, Nakajima M, Inai N, Tagami J, Takatsu T. The influence of age and depth of dentin on bonding. Dent Mater 1994;10:241-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90068-X
  34. Giannini M, Chaves P, Oliveira MT. Effect of tooth age on bond strength to dentin. J Appl Oral Sci 2003;11:342-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572003000400013
  35. Brackett WW, Tay FR, Looney SW, Ito S, Haisch LD, Pashley DH. The effect of subject age on the microtensile bond strengths of a resin and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive to tooth structure. Oper Dent 2008;33:282-6. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-80
  36. International Organization For Standardization. Dental mate- rials-Guidance on testing of adhesion to tooth structure. ISO TR 11405. Geneva; ISO; 1994.
  37. Fawzi EM, Elkassas DW, Ghoneim AG. Bonding strategies to pulp chamber dentin treated with different endodontic irrigants: microshear bond strength testing and SEM analysis. J Adhes Dent 2010;12:63-70.
  38. Kim DS, Park SH, Choi GW, Choi KK, Kim SY. Effect of EDTA treatment on the hybrid layer durability in total-etch dentin adhesives. Dent Mater J 2011;30:717-22. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2011-056
  39. Shokouhinejad N, Sabeti MA, Hasheminasab M, Shafiei F, Shamshiri AR. Push-out bond strength of Resilon/Epiphany self-etch to intraradicular dentin after retreatment: a preliminary study. J Endod 2010;36:493-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.11.009
  40. Gambrel MG, Hartwell GR, Moon PC, Cardon JW. The effect of endodontic solutions on resorcinol-formalin paste in teeth. J Endod 2005;31:25-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000147783.02453.82
  41. Ramzi H, Shokouhinejad N, Saghiri MA, Samieefard A. Efficacy of Three Different Methods in the Retreatment of Root Canals Filled with Resilon/Epiphany SE. Iran Endod J2010;5:161-6.
  42. Vranas RN, Hartwell GR, Moon PC. The effect of endodontic solutions on resorcinol-formalin paste. J Endod 2003;29:69-72.
  43. George JD, Price CJ, Marr MC, Myers CB, Jahnke GD. Evaluation of the developmental toxicity of formamide in New Zealand white rabbits. Toxicol Sci 2002;69:165-74. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/69.1.165
  44. Başaran EG, Ayna E, Başaran G, Beydemir K. Influence of different power outputs of erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium- gallium-garnet laser and acid etching on shear bond strengths of a dual-cure resin cement to enamel. Lasers Med Sci 2011;26:13-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-009-0742-8
  45. Apel C, Meister J, Ioana RS, Franzen R, Hering P, Gutknecht N. The ablation threshold of Er:YAG and Er:YSGG laser radiation in dental enamel. Lasers Med Sci 2002;17:246-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101030200036
  46. Ergücü Z, Celik EU, Unlü N, Türkün M, Ozer F. Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser on the microtensile bond strength of two different adhesives to the sound and caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent 2009;34:460-6. https://doi.org/10.2341/08-005-L
  47. Lee BS, Lin PY, Chen MH, Hsieh TT, Lin CP, Lai JY, Lan WH. Tensile bond strength of Er,Cr:YSGG laser-irradiated human dentin and analysis of dentin-resin interface. Dent Mater 2007;23:570-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.016
  48. Moretto SG, Azambuja N Jr, Arana-Chavez VE, Reis AF, Giannini M, Eduardo CP, De Freitas PM. Effects of ultramorphological changes on adhesion to lased dentin-Scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy analysis. Microsc Res Tech 2011;74:720-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.20949

Cited by

  1. Effects of dentin surface treatments including Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation with different intensities on the push-out bond strength of the glass fiber posts to root dentin vol.73, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2014.968872
  2. Effect of the time-point of acid etching on the persistence of sealer residues after using different dental cleaning protocols vol.30, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2016.vol30.0133
  3. Effect of Airborne Particle Abrasion on Microtensile Bond Strength of Total-Etch Adhesives to Human Dentin vol.2017, pp.2314-6141, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2432536
  4. The effect of resin cement type and cleaning method on the shear bond strength of resin cements for recementing restorations vol.9, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.2.110
  5. Removal of temporary cements following an immediate dentin hybridization approach: a comparison of mechanical and chemical methods for substrate cleaning vol.32, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2017.1381015
  6. Bonding Strategies of Resin Cement to Er, Cr:YSGG Lased Dentin: Micro-CT Evaluation and Microshear Bond Strength Testing vol.39, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5301/ijao.5000483
  7. Comparison between Shear Bond Strength of Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG Lasers-Assisted Dentinal Adhesion of Self-Adhering Resin Composite: An Ex Vivo Study vol.8, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/dj8030066
  8. Effect of an Er,Cr:YSGG Laser on the Debonding of Lithium Disilicate Veneers With Four Different Thicknesses vol.11, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2020.72
  9. Microtensile Bond Strength of Etch-and-Rinse Adhesives in Different Hydroabrasion Conditionings vol.2021, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6649578
  10. Efficacy of root canal treatment in c-shaped canals with adjunctive photodynamic therapy using micro-CT vol.34, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102257