The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of the color reproducibility of all-ceramic restorations fabricated by the digital veneering method

  • Kim, Jae-Hong (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science & Department of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Baek (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science & Department of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Woong-Chul (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science & Department of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Hae-Young (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science & Department of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School & BK21+ Program in Public Health Sciences, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Hwan (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science & Department of Public Health Sciences, Graduate School, Korea University)
  • Received : 2013.09.06
  • Accepted : 2014.01.22
  • Published : 2014.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical acceptability of all-ceramic crowns fabricated by the digital veneering method vis-$\grave{a}$-vis the traditional method. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Zirconia specimens manufactures by two different manufacturing method, conventional vs digital veneering, with three different thickness (0.3 mm, 0.5 mm, 0.7 mm) were prepared for analysis. Color measurement was performed using a spectrophotometer for the prepared specimens. The differences in shade in relation to the build-up method were calculated by quantifying ${\Delta}E^*$ (mean color difference), with the use of color difference equations representing the distance from the measured values $L^*$, $a^*$, and $b^*$, to the three-dimensional space of two colors. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) combined with a Tukey multiple-range test was used to analyze the data (${\alpha}$=0.05). RESULTS. In comparing means and standard deviations of $L^*$, $a^*$*, and $b^*$ color values there was no significant difference by the manufacturing method and zirconia core thickness according to a two-way ANOVA. The color differences between two manufacturing methods were in a clinically acceptable range less than or equal to 3.7 in all the specimens. CONCLUSION. Based on the results of this study, a carefully consideration is necessary while selecting upper porcelain materials, even if it is performed on a small scale. However, because the color reproducibility of the digital veneering system was within the clinically acceptable range when comparing with conventional layering system, it was possible to estimate the possibility of successful aesthetic prostheses in the latest technology.

Keywords

References

  1. Preston JD. Current status of shade selection and color matching. Quintessence Int 1985;16:47-58.
  2. Dozic A, Kleverlaan CJ, Meegdes M, van der Zel J, Feilzer AJ. The influence of porcelain layer thickness on the final shade of ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:563-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00517-1
  3. Seghi RR, Johnston WM, O'Brien WJ. Spectrophotometric analysis of color differences between porcelain systems. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:35-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90279-9
  4. O'Brien WJ, Kay KS, Boenke KM, Groh CL. Sources of color variation on firing porcelain. Dent Mater 1991;7:170-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(91)90038-Z
  5. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of allceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2004;20:449-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.002
  6. Braga RR, Ballester RY, Daronch M. Influence of time and adhesive system on the extrusion shear strength between feldspathic porcelain and bovine dentin. Dent Mater 2000;16:303-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00023-3
  7. Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Effect of zirconia type on its bond strength with different veneer ceramics. J Prosthodont 2008;17:401-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00306.x
  8. Choi YS, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han JS, Yeo IS. In vitro evaluation of fracture strength of zirconia restoration veneered with various ceramic materials. J Adv Prosthodont 2012;4:162-9. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.3.162
  9. Hochman N, Zalkind M. New all-ceramic indirect post-andcore system. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:625-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70220-9
  10. Douglas RD, Przybylska M. Predicting porcelain thickness required for dental shade matches. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:143-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70147-2
  11. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: core materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:4-9.
  12. O'Brien WJ, Groh CL, Boenke KM. A new, small-color-difference equation for dental shades. J Dent Res 1990;69:1762-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690111001
  13. Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 1989;68:819-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680051301
  14. Shotwell JL, Razzoog ME, Koran A. Color stability of longterm soft denture liners. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:836-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90213-T
  15. Douglas RD, Steinhauer TJ, Wee AG. Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:200-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012
  16. Preston JD. Current status of shade selection and color matching. Quintessence Int 1985;16:47-58.
  17. Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD. Ceramics in dentistry: historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:18-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90413-8
  18. Knispel G. Factors affecting the process of color matching restorative materials to natural teeth. Quintessence Int 1991;22:525-31.
  19. Fasbinder DJ. Digital dentistry: innovation for restorative treatment. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010;31:2-11; quiz12.
  20. Luo XP, Zhang L. Effect of veneering techniques on color and translucency of Y-TZP. J Prosthodont 2010;19:465-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00610.x
  21. Lee YK, Cha HS, Ahn JS. Layered color of all-ceramic core and veneer ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:279-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.03.010
  22. Lund PS, Piotrowski TJ. Color changes of porcelain surface colorants resulting from firing. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:22-7.

Cited by

  1. The Effect of Luting Cement and Titanium Base on the Final Color of Zirconium Oxide Core Material vol.26, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12377
  2. Veneered Zirconia-Based Restorations Fracture Resistance Analysis pp.1059941X, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12490
  3. An In Vitro Investigation of Veneered Zirconia-Based Restorations Shade Reproducibility pp.1059941X, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12489
  4. Color in Zirconia-Based Restorations and Related Factors: A Literature Review vol.27, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12740
  5. Chemical Property Changes and Thermal Analysis during the Carbonizing Process of the Pollen Grains of Typha vol.24, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24010128
  6. The effects of nutritional habits on leucite-based ceramic repaired with nanohybrid composites vol.33, pp.15, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2019.1609644
  7. In Vitro Evaluation of Bond Strength between Zirconia Core and CAD/CAM‐Produced Veneers vol.29, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13068