DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Comparison of Applying RDA in US Academic Libraries

미국 대학도서관의 RDA 적용에 관한 비교 연구

  • 이미화 (공주대학교 사범대학 문헌정보교육과)
  • Received : 2014.02.15
  • Accepted : 2014.03.10
  • Published : 2014.03.30

Abstract

It is necessary to find the practical considerations for applying RDA in building up the bibliographic records by importing RDA records from LC or OCLC in Korea. Especially, it is not easy to apply RDA appropriately because there are many alternatives and options in RDA. Therefore, this study is to grasp the way for applying RDA in building up the bibliographic records by reviewing LC RDA guidelines and analyzing RDA cataloging policies of libraries such as University of Chicago, North Carolina State University, and Standford University. As a result, these libraries have catalogued according to LC RDA guidelines and each library has its own guidelines, i.e., in statement of responsibilities, to transcribe all but exceptionally allow to transcribe only first, in publication statement, to use 264 field or 260 field, and in resource types, to transcribe all types of content, media and carrier or to transcribe 33X with GMD. Therefore followings would be considered for RDA application. First, some variations could be allowed for special situations of libraries in applying RDA and LC RDA guidelines. Second, the hybrid records that describe the core element of RDA to non-RDA records would be written in processing AACR2 to RDA. Third;the display of 33X field would be designed for expressing the resource types.

LC나 OCLC에서 RDA 서지레코드를 반입함에 따라 RDA 규칙 적용에 관한 실질적인 방안이 모색되어야 한다. 특히, RDA에는 여러 대안과 선택사항이 포함되어 있어 규칙을 적용하기가 용이하지 않다. 이에 본 연구에서는 국내에서 RDA 적용을 위한 실질적인 방안을 모색하기 위해 LC RDA 지침을 분석하고, 사례로 시카고대학교, 노스캐롤라이나주립대학교, 스탠포드대학교의 3개 도서관에서 RDA 적용 방안을 조사하였다. 분석결과 모든 도서관은 기본적으로 LC RDA 지침을 바탕으로 RDA 레코드를 작성하였으나 각 기관별로 특정 지침을 만들어 적용하였다. 즉 책임사항 기술시 모든 창작자를 기술하는 것뿐만 아니라 첫 번째 창작자만을 기술하도록 예외조항을 두었다. 발행사항에서 도서관에 따라 일부는 260 필드를 일부는 264 필드를 사용하였다. 자원유형 기술에서 33X 필드를 거의 모든 도서관이 입력하였으며, 일부 도서관은 RDA로 구축되지 않은 레코드에 대해 GMD와 33X 필드를 모두 기술하였다. 사례조사를 바탕으로 국내 도서관에서 RDA 적용시 고려할 사항으로 첫째, RDA 규칙 및 LC RDA 지침을 준용하되, 기관별 특수성을 고려하여 변형 적용해야 한다. 둘째, 반입한 레코드 중 RDA 서지레코드가 아닌 경우 최소한의 RDA 요소를 입력하는 하이브리드레코드를 구축해야 한다. 셋째, 33X 필드에 다양한 자원유형 용어가 기술되는 만큼 효과적인 이용자 화면 출력 방안이 모색되어야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 이미화 (2013). RDA의 해외도서관 적용 사례. 2013 디지털도서관 심포지엄 II: RDA 새로운 도전 그리고 과제 (pp. 9-44). 서울: 국립중앙도서관.(Lee, Mihwa (2013). Case study of RDA application. In 2013 Digital library symposium II: RDA, new challenge and problem (pp. 9-44). Seoul: The National Library of Korea.)
  2. ALA (2010). RDA toolkit. IL: ALA.
  3. Cronin, C. (2011). From testing to implementation: Managing full-scale RDA adoption at the University of Chicago. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 49, 626-646. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.616263
  4. Davis, R. (2010, July 13). Changing AACR2 records to RDA records. Retrieved from http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/staffweb/depts/cat/rda/ChangingAACR2recordstoRDArecords.pdf
  5. Dyla, J. (2012, June 26). Report: RDA at Standford. Retrieved from http://lib.stanford.edu/metadata-department/metadata-developmet-unit/see-whats-new/rda-stanford_report26June2012
  6. El-Sherbini, M. (2013). RDA: strategies for implementation. IL: ALA.
  7. Library of Congress (2012, May 16). LC RDA core elements. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/pdf/core_elements.pdf
  8. North Carolina State University (2010, September 23). Rule of 3. Retrieved from https://staff.lib.ncsu.edu/confluence/display/MNC/Rule+of+3
  9. North Carolina State University (2012, February 9). Relationship designators (Relator Terms). Retrieved from https://staff.lib.ncsu.edu/confluence/display/MNC/Relationship+Designators+%28Relator+Terms%29
  10. North Carolina State University (2013a, April 12). 336-338 fields. Retrieved from https://staff.lib.ncsu.edu/confluence/display/MNC/336-338+fields
  11. North Carolina State University (2013b, April 12). 264 field. Retrieved from https://staff.lib.ncsu.edu/confluence/display/MNC/264+Field
  12. North Carolina State University (2013c, April 8). Policy on RDA monographic cataloging. Retrieved from https://staff.lib.ncsu.edu/confluence/display/MNC/Policy+on+RDA+Monographic+Cataloging
  13. OCLC (2013, January 2). OCLC RDA policy statement. Retrieved from http://oclc.org/rda/new-policy.en.html
  14. Stanford University (2011, December). Standford - RDA post-test: Stanford vs. LC decisions. Retrieved from https://lib.stanford.edu/metadata-department/stanford-rda-post-test-stanford-vs-lc-decisions-upd-22011
  15. U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee (2011). Report and recommendations of the U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/rda/source/rdatesting-finalreport-20june2011.pdf
  16. University of Chicago (2010a, June 14). Library timeline for RDA testing. Retrieved from http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/staffweb/depts/cat/rda/uofctimeline.pdf
  17. University of Chicago (2010b, September 28). Policies & Decisions on Choices in RDA. Retrieved from http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/staffweb/depts/cat/rda/policiesandchoicesinrda.pdf