DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

SWATH-based Comparative Proteomic Analysis of the Mycobacterium bovis BCG-Korea Strain

  • Lee, Won-Kyu (Department of Chemistry, College of Natural Sciences, Kookmin University) ;
  • Baek, Je-Hyun (Center of Biomedical Mass Spectrometry (CBMS), Diatech Korea Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Ryoo, Sung Weon (Department of Research and Development, Korean Institute of Tuberculosis) ;
  • Yu, Yeon Gyu (Department of Chemistry, College of Natural Sciences, Kookmin University)
  • Received : 2013.12.16
  • Accepted : 2014.01.13
  • Published : 2014.03.20

Abstract

A derivative of Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) has been used for the preparation of tuberculosis vaccines. To establish a Korean tuberculosis vaccine derived from BCG-Pasteur $1173P_2$, genome sequencing of a BCG-Korea strain was completed by Joung and coworkers. A comparison analysis of the genome sequences of the BCG-Pasteur $1173P_2$ and BCG-Korea strains showed marginal increases in the total genome length (~0.05%) and the number of genes (~4%) in the BCG-Korea genome. However, how the genomic changes affect the BCG-Korea protein expression levels remains unknown. Here, we provide evidence of the proteomic alterations in the BCG-Korea strain by using a SWATH-based mass spectrometric approach (Sequential Window Acquisition of all THeoretical mass spectra). Twenty BCG proteins were selected by top-rank identification in the BCG proteome analysis and the proteins were quantified by the SWATH method. Thirteen of 20 proteins showing significant changes were enough to discriminate between the two BCG proteomes. The SWATH method is very straightforward and provides a promising approach owing to its strong reliability and reproducibility during the proteomic analysis.

Keywords

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis). It typically affects the respiratory system as well as the skin, vertebra, lymph nodes, and brain. Recent estimates showed a prevalence of 8.6 million new TB cases and 1.3 million TB deaths in 2012.2 Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (M. bovis BCG) is the only strain that has been used in the prevention of TB. This attenuated strain was derived from an M. bovis strain after 230 serial passages on glycerol-potatobile medium from 1908 to 1921 by Albert Calmette and Camille Guérin at the Institut Pasteur in Lille, France.3-5 This strain (Pasteur-BCG) was distributed to laboratories world-wide and introduced into the World Health Organization (WHO) Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) in 1974.6

To characterize the distributed BCG strains, many proteomic studies were performed using mostly classical proteomics methods, such as two-dimensional electrophoresis (2DE): the culture supernatants and whole proteomes of M. tuberculosis and M. bovis BCG were compared;7,8 the supernatants of virulent M. tuberculosis H37Rv and attenuated M. bovis BCG-Copenhagen were compared9 and the culture filtrate of M. bovis BCG Moreau and M. bovis BCG Pasteur were compared.10 In 2011, there was also a report on the whole proteome of M. bovis BCG-Mexico 1931.11

Among the many distributed BCG strains are sub-strains from BCG-Pasteur, 1173P2 Lot.D (BCG-Pasteur) seed strain that have been maintained, and one of these sub-strains, BCG-Korea, was prepared for the production of the Korean TB vaccine (Fig. 1).12 The entire BCG-Korea stain genome sequence has been determined,1 and it consists of 4,376,711 bp (GenBank accession number CP003900) and 4,189 genes. Interestingly, an increased genome length (2,189 bp) and number of genes (156 genes) were observed in the BCG-Korea strain compared to the genome of the BCG-Pasteur strain (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/161?project_id=58781), the mother strain of BCG-Korea. However, no study has been reported showing the effects of genomic changes in BCG-Korea on the expression profile of its proteins.

Figure 1.Refined genealogy of BCG vaccines, modified from Liu et al.4 and Joung and Ryoo.7

In this study, we identified from 923 proteins in BCG-Pasteur and BCG-Korea strains and extracted quantitative information on 20 kind of most abundantly expressed BCG proteins using a SWATH-based approach (Sequential Window Acquisition of all THeoretical mass spectra), which is straightforward, highly reproducible, reliable and applicable to a large number of samples and characteristic proteomic analyses.13 Ten proteins out of 20 showed different expression levels in the two BCG strains within a 15-35% range. The SWATH method provided evidence of genomic effects on protein levels using the selected 20 BCG proteins.

 

Materials and Methods

Chemicals. Iodoacetamide was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). Tris-HCl, urea and dithiothreitol (DTT) were obtained from Merck (Germany). All other chemicals were acquired from standard sources and were of molecular biology grade or higher.

BCG Culture. BCG-Korea (M. bovis BCG-Korea 1168P2) was grown in 5 round beakers with 250 mL of Sauton's liquid medium for 3 weeks at 37 ℃ under stationary conditions. The freeze-dried BCG-Pasteur 1173 P2 secondary seed LotD was reconstituted in Sauton’s medium (1 mL) and cultured in Sauton’s potato medium in Roux tubes.

Preparation of Proteome Samples. For the preparation of the protein extracts from the BCG strains, cells were collected by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 10 min and washed 3 times with PBS buffer (pH 7.4). The collected cells were lysed by ultra-sonication in ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.02% sodium azide, pH 7.4) that included protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche, USA). The lysates were incubated for 3 h in denaturing buffer (8 M urea, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0), treated with 10 mM DTT at 37 ℃ for 1 h, and alkylated with 55 mM iodoacetamide at room temperature for 30 min. The proteins in the sample were further digested with modified trypsin (Promega, USA) at 37 ℃ overnight. The peptides in the mixture were recovered using a desalting C18 cartridge (Sep-Pak, Waters, USA) and completely dried in a speedvacuum before mass analysis.

LC-MS/MS Analysis. Triple-TOF-TM 5600+ (AB Sciex, Canada) was used for the BCG strain proteomes. The instrument was coupled with an Eksigent NanoLC-2D+ with Nanoflex cHiPLC system for reproducible peptide sample separation. Solvent A contained 0.1% formic acid (v/v) in water and solvent B contained of 0.1% formic acid (v/v) in 100% acetonitrile. The samples were loaded onto a trap column (0.5 mm × 200 μm) at a flow rate of 1 μL/min, and separated on an analytical column (15 cm × 75 μm) with a linear gradient of 2% to 35% solvent B over 30 min at a flow rate of 400 nL/min on the Nanoflex cHiPLC system. The Chip nanoLC column was regenerated by washing woth 60% solvent B for 50 min and equilibrating with 2% solvent B for 10 min. For data-dependent acquisition experiment, a Triple-TOF-TM 5600+ mass spectrometer was used with a 50-ms survey scan (TOF-MS) and 50-ms automated MS/MS scan for the 15 ions with the highest intensity. The MS/MS triggering criteria for parent ions were as follows: precursor intensity (> 150 counts) and charge state (> 1) with dynamic exclusion option (exclusion time: 6 s). Ions were isolated using a quadruple UNIT resolution (0.7 Da) and fragmented in the collision cell using collision energy ramped from 15 to 45 eV within the 50-ms accumulation time. For SWATH MS-based experiments, the mass spectrometer was operated as previously described by Gillet et al.13 with minor changes. In detail, Triple-TOF 5600+ was used in the looped product ion mode with 20 Da/mass windows (each SWATH window has a 1 Da overlap) in the range of 400 to 1000 Da (Experiment 1: MS1 scan (400-1,600 Da); Experiment 2: 400-420 Da; Experiment 3: 419-444 Da ~ Experiment 24: 979-1,000 Da). The MS2 scan range was set to 100-1,600 m/z. The collision energy for each window was determined based on the appropriate collision energy for a two-charged ion centered upon the window with a spread of 15 eV. An accumulation time of 80 ms was used for each fragment ion scan and for the survey scans (total duty cycle, 2.5 s; number of total cycles, 1,406) in high sensitivity mode.

Data Analysis. All spectra generated from data-dependent acquisitions were searched against the BCG database using ProteinPilotTM (mycobacterium_bovis_bcg_1_proteins.fasta: total 3,953 protein entries) with the following search parameters: fully tryptic digestion, precursor ion and fragment ion mass tolerance for high-resolution Triple-TOF 5600, fixed modifications for cysteine (+57 Da: carbamidomethylation) and biological modifications/artifact such as methionine oxidation (+16 Da). For SWATH MS data, all SWATH MS runs were processed using the PeakViewTM software (Version 1.2). The peak extraction mass window was 50 ppm, and the top 20 proteins were selected for SWATH data analysis. Five peptides per protein were selected and 5 transitions per peptide were also considered. All quantitative analyses (e.g. normalization, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and clustering) were processed using the Perseus software v1.2.0.16 (Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry).

 

Results and Discussion

Identification of Top Abundant Proteins by LC-MS/MS Analysis. The protein extract from the BCG strains was treated with trypsin, and the peptide fragments were analyzed by LC-MS/MS (Fig. 2). Among the several hundred proteins identified, the top 20 most abundant were further analyzed using the SWATH method. The top 20 identified proteins are listed in Table 1 along with accession number, protein/gene name, function, localization, and number of peptides. Many of these proteins are involved in the protein folding and lipid biosynthesis pathway, such as GroEL1, GroLE2, DnaK, ClpC, HtpG, Fas, Mas, and Pks13. The abundance of these proteins indicates that they are critical for the survival of the Mycobacterium species. These proteins were known to be located in the cell wall, cytoplasm, periplasmic space, and plasma membrane. Among the identified proteins, preprotein translocase subunit 1 (SecA1) is a transmembrane protein involved in Mycobacterium virulenence.14

Figure 2.A workflow of SWATH-based quantification for multiple BCG-Pasteur and BCG-Korea strains.

Figure 3.Hierarchical clustering (by average distance correlation) of 20 representative BCG proteins. Proteins were selected by top-rank identification in the BCG proteome by SWATH. Green represents low levels of protein expression, black represents intermediate levels, and red represents high levels of expression. Asterisk-marked proteins indicate a statistically significant change by ANOVA.

Table 1.aSubcellular location was determined using UniProtKB-SubCell (http://www.uniprot.org/locations), Abbreviation key: Bn, bacterial nucleoid; Ch, chromosome; Cp, cytoplasm; Cs, cytosol; Cw, cell wall; DRPc, DNA-directed RNA polymerase complex; Fsc, fatty acid synthase complex; PDc, pyruvate dehydrogenase complex; Pm, plasma membrane; NA, information is not available.

Figure 4.Groups based on responsive expression pattern. All expression levels were normalized to total protein abundances. Errors were calculated from three SWATH run replicates. The expression levels of proteins in BCG-Korea (grey bar) were compared to those of BCG-Pasteur (white bar).

Quantitative Analysis of the BCG top 20 Proteins. The expression levels of the selected 20 proteins in the BCG-Pasteur and BCG-Korea strains were compared using the SWATH method and are color coded (Fig. 3). They were divided into three groups according to their expression level changes. The expression levels of the first group (AceA, Pks13, SecA1, TopA, Icd, and RpoC) were slightly increased in BCG-Korea. The expression levels of these proteins in BCG Korea were 15-40% higher than those in BCG Pasteur (Fig. 4(a)). It is notable that the proteins in the first group are involved in nucleotide metabolism (RpoC and TopA), lipid metabolism (Pks13), carboxylic acid metabolism (AceA), cellular respiration (Icd) and protein transport (SecA1). The expression levels of the second group (GyrB, Gdh, MelE and Mas) in BCG Korea were 10-20% lower than those in BCG Pasteur (Fig. 4(b)). Proteins in the second group are involved in lipid metabolism (Mas), amino acid metabolism (MelE), DNA modification, or are members of the oxidoreductase family (Gdh). The remainder (GroEL2, GroEL1, Can, Tal, Kgd, Fas, DnaK, AlaS, ClpC, and HtpG) showed similar expression levels. Interestingly, the expression levels of the chaperone proteins (GloEL1, GloEL2, DnaK, ClpC, and HtpG) were similar in the BCG Pasteur and BCG Korea strains (Fig. 3). The constant expression levels of these chaperones suggest that these proteins could serve as internal standards when comparing the proteomes of different BCG strains.

The sequences of the 20 genes investigated in this study were identical in the BCG Pasteur and BCG Korea strains (data not shown). In addition, all proteins, except GyrB, had the same copy number in the BCG Pasteur and BCG Korea strains. There are two copies of the gyrB gene in BCG-Pasteur and a single copy in the BCG Korea strain. Interestingly, the expression level of the GyrB protein was slightly reduced in BCG Korea (Fig. 4(b)), suggesting that the higher copy number of gyrB was not correlated to the expression level.

During the establishment of various BCG strains, several regions of the genome sequence were deleted or duplicated.5 In this study, we comprehensively analyzed the proteomes from two BCG strains with different passage numbers. From the identified 923 proteins, the relative expression levels of 20 most abundantly expressed proteins were compared using the SWATH method. Ten proteins out of 20 showed different expression levels in the two BCG strains. The expression level of RpoC, which encode a beta subunit of RNA poly-merase, showed the highest change (32.9% increase in BCG Korea strain). The differences of the expression levels in the two BCG strains were within a 15-35% range, and it is premature to correlate the difference in the protein expression levels to any biochemical or physiological differences between the two strains. However, our study showed that the protein expression levels in different laboratory BCG strains may vary within a limited range.

References

  1. Joung, S. M.; Jeon, S. J.; Lim, Y. J.; Lim, J. S.; Choi, B. S.; Choi, I. Y.; Yu, J. H.; Na, K. I.; Cho, E. H.; Shin, S. S.; Pakr, Y. K.; Kim, C. K.; Kim, H. J.; Ryoo, S. W. Genome Anounc. 2013, 1, 1-2.
  2. World Health Organization 2013, Global tuberculosis report 2013, (WHO/HTM/TB/2013.11)
  3. Calmette, A.; Guerin, C.; Weill-Halle, B. Rev. Tuberc. 1924, 5, 481-491.
  4. Oettinger, T.; Jorgensen, M.; Ladefoged, A.; Haslov, K.; Andersen, P. Tuber. Lung Dis. 1999, 79, 243-250. https://doi.org/10.1054/tuld.1999.0206
  5. Liu, J.; Tran, V.; Leung, A. S.; Alexander, D. C.; Zhu, B. Hum. Vaccin. 2009, 5, 70-78. https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.5.2.7210
  6. World Health Assembly, 27th, 1974; Assignment Child. 1985, 69-72; 87-88.
  7. Jungblut, P. R.; Schaible, U. E.; Mollenkopf, H. J.; Zimny-Arndt, U.; Raupach, B.; Mattow, J.; Halada, P.; Lamer, S.; Kaufmann, S. H. E. Mol. Microbiol. 1999, 33, 1103-1117.
  8. Rodriguez-Alvarez, M.; Mendoza-Hernandez, G.; Encarnacion, S.; Calva, J. J.; Lopez-Vidal, Y. Tuberculosis 2009, 89, 126-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tube.2008.12.001
  9. Mattow, J.; Schaible, U. E.; Schmidt, F.; Hagens, K.; Siejak, F.; Brestrich, G.; Haeselbarth, G.; Muller, E. C.; Jungblut, P. R.; Kaufmann, S. H. E. Electrophoresis 2003, 24, 3405-3420. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200305601
  10. Berredo-Pinho, M.; Kalume, D. E.; Correa, P. R.; Gomes, L. H. F.; Pereira, M. P.; da Silva, R. F.; Castello-Branco, L. R. R.; Degrave, W. M.; Mendonca-Lima, L. BMC Microbiology 2011, 11, 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-11-80
  11. Orduna, P.; Cevallos, M. A.; de Leon, S. P.; Arvizu, A.; Hernandez-Gonzalez, I. L.; Mendoza-Hernandez, G.; Lopez-Vidal1, Y. BMC Genomics 2011, 12, 493. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-493
  12. Joung, S. M.; Ryoo, S. W. Clin. Exp. Vaccine Res. 2013, 2, 83-91. https://doi.org/10.7774/cevr.2013.2.2.83
  13. Gillet, L. C.; Navarro, P.; Tate, S.; Rost, H.; Selevsek, N.; Reiter, L.; Bonner, R.; Aebersold, R. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2012, 11, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.E112.019653
  14. Hou, J. M.; D'Lima, N. G.; Rigel, N. W.; Gibbons, H. S.; McCann, J. R.; Braunstein, M.; Teschke, C. M. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 4880-4887. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00412-08

Cited by

  1. Quantitative proteomic analysis of aqueous humor from patients with drusen and reticular pseudodrusen in age-related macular degeneration vol.18, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0941-9
  2. SWATH-MS analysis of cerebrospinal fluid to generate a robust battery of biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease vol.10, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64461-y