DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of SF6, N2 Pressure Characteristic of Spark Gap According to Simulation

시뮬레이션을 통한 스파크갭의 SF6, N2 압력 특성 분석

  • Choi, Sun-Ho (Department of Electrical Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Lee, Tae-Woo (Department of Electrical Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Bang, Jeong-Ju (Department of Electrical Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Huh, Chang-Su (Department of Electrical Engineering, Inha University)
  • Received : 2014.01.02
  • Accepted : 2014.02.24
  • Published : 2014.03.01

Abstract

Industrial, medical, environment and agriculture application of pulse power technology have been developing rapidly in many field. In order to make use in the form of pulses is applied to the pulse forming technique. At this time, spark gap is generally used for the pulse forming. Spark gap may be possible to simulate the shape of the electrode, to know the uniform or non-uniform electric field of the electrode structure. Further, it can be determined using Paschen's law applied pressure of the insulating gas in accordance with the voltage which is created using the value of the electric field. In this paper, we tried to found using a formula and the simulation process to determine the pressure. The value of the electric field is different according to the shape of the electrode. So, the range of pressure applied also varies. In order to withstand the 100 kV with a gap of 5 mm, the nitrogen gas must be applied to about 7 bar in the electrode structure. On the other hand, in the same conditions, Sulfur hexafluoride gas must be applied to about 2 bar. Consequently, the Sulfur hexafluoride gas has a higher insulation properties than nitrogen gas may be applied to low pressure at the same conditions.

Keywords

References

  1. J. S. Doo, S. M. Han, C. S. Huh, and J. S. Choi, Trans., KIEE, 59, 1850 (2010).
  2. J. M. Lehr, C. E. Baum, and W. D. Prather, Switching Note, 28, (1997).
  3. E. Husain and R. S. Nema, IEEE Trans. Electr. Insul., EI-17, 350 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEI.1982.298506
  4. H. Fujita, T. Kouno, Y. Noguchi, and S. Ueguri, Cryogenics, 18, 195 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2275(78)90001-2
  5. S. H. Nam and H. K. Kang, Trans., KIEE, 60, 1005 (2011).
  6. H. K. Kang and T. K. Ko, PSAC, 12, 52 (2010).
  7. B. T. Lee, C. H. Hwang, T. H. Lee, C. S. Huh, and Y. M. Chang, Trans. KIEE, 59, 1416 (2010).
  8. F. Li, Y. W. Yoo, D. K. Kim, and B. H. Lee, JIEIE, 24, 142 (2010).