DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

공동주택 재건축과 리모델링의 친환경성 비교분석 - CO2 배출량 분석을 중심으로 -

Comparison Analysis of Environmental Performance between Reconstruction and Remodeling Alternatives for Aged - Focused on CO2 Emissions Analysis -

  • Kim, Chibaek (Department of Architectural Engineering, Ajou University) ;
  • Shin, Dongwoo (Department of Architectural Engineering, Ajou University) ;
  • Han, Juyeon (Department of Architectural Engineering, Dankook University) ;
  • Hwang, Youngkyu (Department of Architectural Engineering, Dankook University)
  • 투고 : 2012.04.23
  • 심사 : 2013.12.02
  • 발행 : 2014.01.31

초록

최근 국내외적으로 환경문제와 자원고갈에 대한 관심이 높아지는 가운데, 국내 건물부문의 온실가스 배출량은 매년 증가하는 추세이다. 또한 국내 노후화 공동주택이 지속적으로 발생하여 온실가스 증가에 주요원인이 되고 있다. 이는 정부의 2020년 건물부분의 이산화탄소 배출량 저감을 위해 노후화된 설비나 환경개선에 대한 고려가 필요함을 의미한다. 노후화된 공동주택의 개선방법은 크게 재건축과 리모델링 사업이 고려되는데, 온실가스 문제와 함께 친환경성 평가의 중요성이 대두되고, 사업수행시 사업결정의 주요 지표 중 하나로 자리잡고 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 공동주택 주거환경 개선을 위한 두 가지 대안이라고 볼 수 있는 재건축과 리모델링의 친환경성을 비교분석해 보는 것이다. 이를 위하여 본 논문에서는 재건축과 리모델링사업의 특성을 파악하고, 친환경성 비교를 위해 단계별로 동일한 조건을 설정하여, 전생애주기 친환경성 평가와 그 의미를 해석해 보았다. 연구결과로 전생애주기의 LCA 평가를 하였을 때, 대안A(재건축)대비 대안B(리모델링1)의 $CO_2$발생량 차이는 95.85%로 약 4.1% 정도의 $CO_2$감소효과를 얻는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 대안C(리모델링2)의 경우 대안A(재건축) 대비 90.01%로 10%정도 $CO_2$절감 효과를 나타냈다. 또한 단위세대(85m2)를 기준으로 탄소배출권시세를 적용한 결과 대안C(리모델링2)가 대안A(재건축)에 비하여 40만원 정도 환경비용 절감효과가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 공동주택의 주거환경 개선의 대안을 선택함에 있어서 중요한 근거가 될 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

Environmental problems and the shortage of natural resources are currently gathering more attention in Korea and international countries. With these problems, it is reported that most current domestic buildings are emitting approximately 138 million tons of greenhouse gas. According to a recent report from the investigation of Korean housing population, the total number of households is approximately 12.9 millions, and the apartments that were built more than 15 years ago amounted to 3.1 millions. This shows that the rates of old apartment housings are increasing. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the deteriorated facilities and environmental improvement. Also, the construction industry is benefited by improving these housings which may need either remodeling or reconstruction. Environmental friendly buildings are a rising consideration for remodeling and reconstruction projects; it helps to determine many business matters in construction. The main purpose of this research is to improve environmental condition in apartments with comparison analysis between remodeling and reconstruction alternatives. This research is focused on characteristics of remodeling and reconstruction and it sets up the same condition with each level in order to evaluate the value of environmental friendliness and analyze its definition. The result of this research provides a unique emitting rate at a novel framework and this will cause the reduction of $CO_2$. It is analyzed that the remodeling construction can reduce the great amount of $CO_2$. Therefore, it will be a good decision guideline in selecting the most eco-friendly alternative to improve environment for building construction. Although reconstruction is a popular alternative nowadays in Korea, this research can provide a reason why decision makers should put more emphasis on remodeling as an environment-friendly alternative.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. National Statistics Portal (2011), "Population-Housing Investigation Results," (http://www.kosis.kr).
  2. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transportation (MLIT) (2011), "Guideline for Computing CO2 Emission by Facility"
  3. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transportation (MLIT), "Apartment Housing Management Information System," www.k-apt.net.
  4. Kim, T. H. and Tae, S. H. (2009), "An Exploratory Study on LCA Evaluation for RC Concrete Buildings", Architectural Institute of Korea, pp. 305-309.
  5. Green Growth Committee (2011), "Greenhouse Gas Emmision Reduction Target," http://www.greengrowth.go.kr.
  6. Kim, C. B. (2012), A Study on Environmental Assessment of Reconstruction and Remodeling for Aged-Housing Projects, M.S. Thesis, Department of Arch. Engr., Ajou University.
  7. Korean Institute of Construction Technology (KICT) (2004), A Study on Development of LCA Analysis for Building Projects, pp. 127-128.
  8. Huh, T. (1996), "A Concept of LCA and Current Status of Korea and International Countries ", Indusrial Technology Research Institute, Kunkook University.
  9. Ministry of Environment (MOE) (2006), "A Report on Construction Debris Recycling Statistics Investigation in 2006", pp. 50-51.
  10. Ministry of Environment (MOE) (2011), "National Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Target by Industry Sector", MOE.
  11. Ministry of Environemnt (MOE) (2011), "Climate Change Advertizement Portal (Greenhouse Gas Emission Computation Service)" (http://www.gihoo.or.kr).
  12. Kim, Yoon-Duk, Cha, Hee-Sung, Kim, Kyung-Ra, Shin, Dong-Woo. (2011), "Evaluation Method of Green Construction Technologies Using Integrated LCC and LCA Analysis", Korean journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 12(3), pp. 91-100. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2011.12.3.91
  13. Chae, Swong-Hyun, Kim, Kyung-Rai, Shin, Dong-Woo, Cha, Hee-Sung. (2012), "A Model for Evaluating Eco-friendly Demolition Works for Remodeling in the Pre-construction Stage", Korean journal of Construction Engineering and Management KICEM, 13(1), pp. 14-23. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2012.13.1.014

피인용 문헌

  1. Analysis regarding the Environmental Impact of the Life Cycle of Housing Complexes in Korea vol.15, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2014.15.5.013