Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Developing the Rubric for Measurement in Levels by Areas for the Characteristics of Task Commitment Shown in the Science Gifted

과학 영재의 과제집착력 특성 수준 측정을 위한 루브릭 개발

  • Received : 2014.08.26
  • Accepted : 2014.10.31
  • Published : 2014.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To identify the gifted, it is essential to perform overall evaluation on cognitive and affective aspects considering all the characteristics of the science gifted. Nowadays, not only cognitive factors but also affective factors are being emphasized. Among the affective factors of the gifted, the task commitment is an important factor to describe the gifted and their outstanding achievements. From this research, by measuring the characteristics of task commitment shown in the science gifted, this can offer good implications regarding the selection of the gifted and the education. We developed the rubric of the gifted students by analyzing the students' experience of showing task commitment. By applying the rubric, we measured the levels by areas of the characteristics of task commitment shown in the experiences which the science gifted had by deeply exploring the cause or the principle. To better understand the characteristics of the science gifted students' task commitment, each and every students' characteristics were specifically described. The students' task commitment can be measured objectively and effectively by using the measuring tool in the form of rubric based on the characteristics of the task commitment. Specifically describing the students' characteristics on the basis of their performance criteria is the grounds for the level judgment and enhances the understanding of the characteristics of students' task commitment.

본 연구에서는 과학 영재의 정의적 특성으로 중요하게 언급되고 있는 과제집착력 특성의 영역별 수준을 측정할 수 있는 루브릭을 개발하여 영재 판별에 대한 함의 점을 제공하고자 하였다. 과학 영재들이 과제집착력을 갖고 활동한 경험을 분석하여 탐색한 과제집착력 특성을 기반으로 과제집착력 특성의 영역별 수준을 측정할 수 있는 루브릭을 개발하였다. 제작된 루브릭을 적용하여 과학 영재들이 원인이나 원리를 깊이 있게 탐구했던 경험을 기술한 내용에 나타난 과제집착력 특성의 영역별 수준을 측정해보았다. 개개인의 특징에 대해 구체적으로 기술하여 과학 영재의 과제집착력 특성에 대한 이해를 높이고자 하였다. 본 연구에서 개발된 루브릭 형태의 측정 도구를 통해 학생들의 과제집착력을 효과적으로 측정해 볼 수 있다. 또한 루브릭을 학생들에게 적용할 때 그 수행 준거를 기반으로 학생의 특징에 대해 구체적으로 기술하는 것은 수준 판단의 근거가 되며, 그 학생의 과제집착력 특성에 대한 이해를 높일 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Barron, F. (1969). Creative person and creative process. Oxford, England, Holt: Rinehart & Winston
  2. Brandwein, P. F. (1955). The gifted student as future scientist. New York, NY: Springer
  3. Cho, N.-S., Baek, S.-G., So, K.-H., & Kim, K.-J. (1998). Development of national curriculum-based assessment standards for high school 10 common compulsory courses. RRE 98-3-1. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
  4. Choi, D.-H., Kang, W., Son, Y.-A, & Jhun Y. (2001). Standards for evaluation of a center for scientifically gifted education, Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 11(2), 59-85.
  5. Chung K., Chun, M., & Choe, S.-U. (2008). Investigation research on gifted education teachers' beliefs of gifted education, identification, class preparation, and supports. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 7(2), 161-177.
  6. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
  7. De La Paz, S. (2009). Rubics: Heuristics for developing writing strategies. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34(3), 134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508408318802
  8. Gagne, F. (1985). Giftedness and talent: Reexamining a reexamination of the definitions of the definition. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628502900302
  9. Goodrich, H. (1997). Understanding rubrics. Educational Leadership, 54(4), 14-17.
  10. Herman, J. L., Aschbacher, P. R., & Winters, L. (1992). A practical guide to alternative assessment. Alexandra: ASCD Publishers.
  11. Jang, J., Chung, Y., Choi, Y., & Kim, S.-W. (2013). Exploring the characteristics of science gifted students' task commitment. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.1.001
  12. Jeong, M.-h. (2008). Development of a rubric for evaluation of science-gifted education centers' program. (Doctoral dissertation). Dankook University.
  13. Kim, J., Lee, E., Choi, G., & Song, S. (1996). Development of science gifted identification (I). CR96-27. Seoul: Korea Educational Development Institute.
  14. Kim, J,-G. (2005). Creative personality characteristics and task commitment for gifted. (Master's thesis). Chungnam National University.
  15. Kim, S. Y. (2013). Development of an instrument to measure task commitment by using eye-tracking for identifying science gifted students. (Master's thesis). Korea National University of Education.
  16. Kwag, M.-Y. (2011). Approach to the school adjustment of scientifically gifted high school students by the ground theory. (Doctoral dissertation). Kyungsung University.
  17. Lee, J. (1980). Research on the Characteristics of Gifted. Seoul: Korea Institute for Research in the Behavioral Sciences.
  18. Lee, J.-C. (2010). Development of identification tool for behavioral characteristics of science gifted through qualitative research on behavioral characteristic of KSA students. (Doctoral dissertation). Busan National University.
  19. McMillan, J. H. (2004). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective instruction (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
  20. Mertler, C. A. (2001). Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(25), Retrieved March 3, 2004 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=25.
  21. Moskal, B. M. (2000). Scoring rubrics: What, when and how?. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(3), Retrieved August 1, 2014 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=3.
  22. Moskal, B. M., & Leydens, J. A. (2000). Scoring rubric development: Validity and reliability. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(10), Retrieved August 1, 2004 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=10.
  23. Oh, K.-A., & Kim, S.-W. (1995). The attitude of teachers and parents toward the gifted in science and the behavioral characteristics of science gifted students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 15(3), 291-302.
  24. Park, D., Kwon, S., Kim, S., Kim, O., Kim, J., Kim, H., Nam. H. Paik, S., Yang, K. Lee, K., Lee, W., Lee, H., Cho, J. Kim, M., Kim, Y., Kim, J., Kim, J., Nam, M., Park, W., Seong, T., Eo, Y., Lee, N., Lee, J., Chang, E., & Choi, D. (2012). Educational assessment. Seoul: Gyoyuk-gwahak-sa.
  25. Park, M. J., & Lee. Y. S. (2011). The relationship between learning motivation and task commitment of science-gifted. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 21(4), 961-977. https://doi.org/10.9722/JGTE.2011.21.4.961
  26. Park, S., Choi, K., & Lee, H. (2009). Perceptions of science teachers in education institutes for gifted children in the elements of giftedness. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 9(2), 119-13.
  27. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). How many types of giftedness can your program tolerate? Journal of Creative Behavior, 12, 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1978.tb00158.x
  28. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1994). Research related to the school wide enrichment model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(1), 2-14.
  29. Renzulli, J. S. (2000). The identification and development of giftedness as a paradigm for school reform. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9(2), 95-114. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009429218821
  30. Roe, A. (1952). A psychologist examines 64 eminent scientists. Scientific American, 187(5), 21-25.
  31. Roe, A. (1953). The making of a scientist. New York, NY: Dodd, Mead.
  32. Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educational Psychology Review, 1(3), 173-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320134
  33. Shin, J. E. (2002). A comparative study on creativity between scientifically gifted and normal students. (Master's thesis). Seoul National University.
  34. Shin, M., & Kim, J. (2002). Intelligence characteristics for science gifted. Yonsei Gyoyuk Gwahak, 50, 77-92.
  35. Tannenbaum, A. J. (1979). Pre-Sputnik to post-Watergate concern about the gifted. In A. H. Passow (Ed.), The gifted and the talented (pp. 5-27). Chicago, IL: National Society for the study of Education.
  36. Terman, L. M. (1925 & 1926). Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children (Vol. I): Genetic studies of genius. stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  37. Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1959). Genetic studies of genius: The gifted group at mid-life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  38. Timmerman, B. E. C., Strickland, D. C., Johnson, R. L., & Payne, J. R. (2011). Development of a 'universal' rubric for assessing undergraduates' scientific reasoning skills using scientific writing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(5), 509-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903540991

Cited by

  1. 영재교육기관별 초등과학영재와 일반학생의 회복탄력성 및 과제집착력 비교 vol.39, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2015.39.3.307
  2. Development and Application of a Rubric for Assessing Scientific Inquiry Process vol.65, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.25152/ser.2017.65.1.145