DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characterization of Acetobacter pomorum KJY8 Isolated from Korean Traditional Vinegar

  • Baek, Chang Ho (Fermented Food Science Division, Department of Agrofood Resources, NAAS, RDA) ;
  • Park, Eun-Hee (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Baek, Seong Yeol (Fermented Food Science Division, Department of Agrofood Resources, NAAS, RDA) ;
  • Jeong, Seok-Tae (Fermented Food Science Division, Department of Agrofood Resources, NAAS, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Myoung-Dong (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kwon, Joong-Ho (Department of Food Science and Technology, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jeong, Yong-Jin (Department of Food Science and Technology, Keimyung University) ;
  • Yeo, Soo-Hwan (Fermented Food Science Division, Department of Agrofood Resources, NAAS, RDA)
  • Received : 2014.08.21
  • Accepted : 2014.08.30
  • Published : 2014.12.28

Abstract

Acetobacter sp. strains were isolated from traditional vinegar collected in Daegu city and Gyeongbuk province. The strain KJY8 showing a high acetic acid productivity was isolated and characterized by phenotypic, chemotaxonomic, and phylogenetic inference based on 16S rRNA sequence analysis. The chemotaxonomic and phylogenetic analyses revealed the isolate to be a strain of Acetobacter pomorum. The isolate showed a G+C content of 60.8 mol%. It contained $\small{LL}$-diaminopimelic acid ($\small{LL}$-$A_2pm$) as the cell wall amino acid and ubiquinone $Q_9$ (H6) as the major quinone. The predominant cellular fatty acids were $C_{18:1}w9c$, w12t, and w7c. Strain KJY8 grew rapidly on glucose-yeast extract (GYC) agar and formed pale white colonies with smooth to rough surfaces. The optimum cultivation conditions for acetic acid production by the KJY8 strain were $20^{\circ}C$ and pH 3.0, with an initial ethanol concentration of 9% (w/v) to produce an acetic acid concentration of 8% (w/v).

Keywords

Introduction

Acetic acid bacteria are involved in food spoilage and in indigenous fermentations, where they produce vinegar from alcohol-containing liquids such as wine and beer [2]. In general, they are characterized by their ability to oxidize ethanol to acetic acid and by their resistance to acetic acid and ethanol. Modern acetic acid fermentations are performed in submerged processes, which can achieve final acetic acid concentrations of up to 20% [13]. However, the microbiology of vinegar fermentation is not adequately understood, in particular the taxonomic position of the organisms involved, their responses to ecological factors, and their physiology and genetics [12].

Acetic acid bacteria are Gram-negative, strict aerobic bacteria consisting of four genera: Acetobacter, Acidomonas, Gluconobacter, and Gluconacetobacter [5]. The classification of acetic acid bacteria is still a subject of controversy: Sokollek et al. [13] described Acetobacter oboediens LTH 2460Tand Acetobacter pomorum LTH 2458T; Boesch et al. [3] described Acetobacter intermedius TF2T.

In addition, the type strains of 19 other species are also located in the cluster of the genus Acetobacter, includingA. aceti, A. hansenii, A. pasteurianus [21], A. xylinus [18], A. oboediens, and A. pomorum [13]. Previously, a method for starter preparation was described [12] and the applicability of this approach to cultivate and preserve various isolates from industrial vinegar fermentations was reported [13].

In this study, we isolated an Acetobacter, from vinegar samples collected in Daegu city and Gyeongbuk province, capable of producing acetic acid with high productivity. The chemotaxonomic characteristics of the isolate KJY8, identified as A. pomorum, were investigated, and a phylogenetic analysis was performed based on the nucleotide sequences of its 16S rRNA genes. In addition, the optimal cultivation conditions for acetic acid production were studied.

 

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions

Farm-made vinegar samples were collected in Daegu city and Gyeongbuk province and were plated on GYC agar (5% glucose, 1% yeast extract, 0.5% CaCO3, and 2% agar) according to De Ley et al. [5,24]. Bacterial strains that formed a clear halo around the colonies were isolated at 30℃. For liquid culture, the isolated strains were cultivated at 30℃ on a horizontal shaker at 150 rpm. The initial medium acidity (pH) was adjusted to a desired level using 2N HCl.

Determination of the G+C Content of Chromosomal DNA

The chromosomal DNA was prepared according to the method of Stackebrandt and Liesack [14], and the G+C content was determined using the method of Tamaoka and Komagata [17].

Phylogenetic Analysis

Two primers, 9F (5’-GAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3’) and 1542R (5’-AGAAAGGAGGTGATCCAGCC-3’), were used for amplification of the 16S rRNA gene [22], and the amplified product was purified, sequenced, and aligned with 16S rRNA sequences of Acetobacter species and other related strains using Clustal W software [19]. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method [9]. The GenBank accession number for the 16S rRNA nucleotide sequence of strain KJY8 is AB569643.

Morphological and Physiological Characteristics

The morphology of the cells was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The A. pomorum KJY8 grown in GYC medium was incubated in 4% glutaraldehyde at room temperature for 2 h, dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol, and immersed in isoamyl acetate for 20 min [6]. SEM was accomplished using an Ultra High Resolution Scanning Electron Microscope (Hitachi, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 5.0 kV.

The morphological properties of strain KJY8 were also determined according to Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology [5]. The gram staining was performed using a Gram-color kit (Merck Chemicals, Germany). To observe the motility, the hanging-drop technique was used [20]. The ketogenesis-forming glycerol, growth on glutamate agar, and assimilation of ammoniacal nitrogen were investigated based on the methods described by Asai et al. [1]. The utilization of various substrates as carbon source was tested as described by Shirling and Gottlieb [11]. The acid production from D-glucose, D-sorbitol, and D-mannose was determined as described by Takeuchi and Hatano [15]. An API 20E kit (bioMérieux, France) was used to examine the catalase, oxidase, citrate, lactose, arginine, and nitrate liquefaction.

Analyses of Cellular Fatty Acids and Quinines

The whole-cell fatty acids were extracted and analyzed according to the instructions suggested by Microbial Identification System (MIDI Inc., USA).

After extraction, the ubiquinones were isolated according to the method described by Yamada and Kondo [23], and identified using the methods described by Tamaoka et al. [16].

Effects of Cultivation Conditions on Acetic Acid Production

Effects of temperature and pH on the growth and acetic acid production by strain KJY8 were examined in a GYC broth for 7 days at 30℃. The ethanol content, temperature, and pH were varied during the cultivation of strain KJY8 in liquid GYC medium. The concentration of acetic acid was determined by titratable acidity [4].

 

Results and Discussion

Screening of Acetic-Acid-Producing Bacteria from Vinegar

Acetic-acid-producing bacteria were isolated from traditional vinegar manufactured in Daegu city and Gyeongbuk province. Several hundred colonies were grown on a selective plate. Ten strains that generated a large, clear halo were selected as acetic-acid-producing bacteria. A prominent strain (KJY8) was selected based on the size of the clear halo formed on the GYC plate (Table 1). Compared with the control strain A. pomorum KCTC 22319, the KJY8 strain was superior in the production of acetic acid as determined by the size of the clear halo produced around the colonies.

Table 1.aA. pomorum (KCTC 22319). Symbols (size of halo): +++ (6.6-11.0), strong; ++ (3.1-6.5), good; + (1.0-3.0), normal.

Strain Identification

The complete sequence of the 16S rRNA gene was determined for the isolated KJY8 strain. Fig. 1 shows the phylogenetic tree derived from the 16S rRNA sequences of 19 type strains of Acetobacter species and other members in the family Acetobacteraceae. The phylogenetic analysis revealed that strain KJY8 is a member of the genus Acetobacter, and most closely related to A. pomorum LHT 2458T, which exhibited the highest similarity in 16S rRNA sequence (99.7%) to KJY8. However, the phylogenetic analysis also gave us the idea that A. pomorum LHT 2458Tmight be transferred to A. pasteurianus LMG 1262T, as it oxidizes acetate and lactate, has Q9 as its major ubiquinone, and exhibits a high level of 16S rRNA sequence similarity with the type strain of A. pasteurianus LMG 1262T[13]. Based on our results, strain KJY8 is distinct from G. oxydans DSM 3503T, A. syzygii 9H-2T, A. aceti NCIMB 8621T, and A. indonesiensis NRIC 0313T.

Fig. 1.Phylogenetic tree showing relationships between strain KJY8 and related species. The tree was constructed from an alignment of the full-length sequence of 16S rRNA from various species using the neighbor-joining method. The number on the nodes corresponds to the bootstrap percentages based on 1,000 pseudoreplicates. The bar denotes the relative branch length. The 16S rRNA sequences are identified by their GenBank accession number in parentheses.

Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of KJY8 Strain

Strain KJY8 was Gram-negative, non-spore-forming, and non-motile. The cells were comprised of rods (Table 2, Fig. 2) in GYC medium at 30℃ and occurred singly, in pairs, or occasionally in short chains. After incubation on GYC medium for 7 days, the colonies were pale white, smooth to rough, and convex to flat (Table 2).

Table 2.aData from De Ley et al. [5]. bThe color codes correspond to those in the National Bureau of Standards [7].

Fig. 2.Scanning electron micrograph of A. pomorum strain KJY8 grown on GYC agar for 7 days at 30℃.

Among the various compounds usable as carbon and energy sources, strain KJY8 utilized ethanol, D-glucose, D-mannitol, and D-fructose. Acetic acid was produced from all substrates tested (D-glucose, D-mannose, and D-sorbitol). A negative reaction was recorded for glycerol, sorbitol, methanol, n-propanol, meso-xylitol, L-arginine, L-asparagine, L-glutamic acid, and L-lysine. In GYC broth, the strain grew at temperatures ranging from 20℃ to 35℃, at an optimum pH of 3.0. The KJY8 strain oxidized acetate and lactate into CO2 and H2O. However, the oxidase test was positive and nitrate was not reduced to nitrite. Strain KJY8 had a 60.8 mol% G+C content, as determined by HPLC. The genomic DNA G+C content of other strains from the genus Acetobacter is 53-63 mol%. All these characteristics suggest that strain KJY8 is very similar to A. pomorum LHT 2458T [13] (Table 3).

Table 3.aData from Lisdiyanti et al. [8]. bData from Sokollek et al. [13]. Symbols: +, positive; -, negative; d, weak positive.

Chemotaxonomic Characteristics of KJY8 Strain

Strain KJY8 contained a dehydrogenated ubiquinone, with Q9 as the major quinone. The ubiquinone profile of KJY8 was similar to that of A. pasteurianus LMG 1262Tand A. pomorum LHT 2458T[13] as regards the isoprenoid composition.

Strain KJY8 contained summed feature 7 (66.49%, C18:1 w9c, w12t, w7c), C16:0, C16:02OH, and C14:02OH as the major cellular fatty acids, with small amounts of C16:03OH, C14:0, C18:0, C20:3 w6, 9, 12c, C19:0 cyclo w8c, and summed feature 3 (iso-C16:1 and/or C14:03OH).

Effects of Temperature, pH, and Ethanol Concentration on Acetic Acid Production by KJY8 Strain

The effects of temperature, pH, and ethanol concentration on the production of acetic acid by A. pomorum KJY8 were examined in shake flask cultivations (Fig. 3). As shown in Figs. 3A and 3B, the growth temperature and pH of the medium did not profoundly influence the acetic acid production with a given initial ethanol concentration of 8%. With the exception of medium acidity of pH 2.0, the maximum acetic acid concentration of approximately 6% was obtained after 6 days of cultivation, regardless of the temperature or pH at constant initial ethanol concentration. The production of acetic acid was enhanced by increasing the initial ethanol concentration (Fig. 3C). The maximum acetic acid concentration of 8% was achieved with an initial ethanol concentration of 9%, corresponding to a productivity of 0.13 ± 0.01 (g acetic acid produced/l·day). Yield of acetic acid achieved by strain KJY8 might be comparable with the previous report [10] in which an approximate acetic acid yield of 62% was obtained from optimized rice vinegar fermentation.

Fig. 3.Effects of temperature (A), medium pH (B), and ethanol concentration (C) on the production of acetic acid by A. pomorum KJY8. Cells were grown at 30℃ for 7 days in GYC medium supplemented with 8% ethanol (A and B), or with the indicated concentration of ethanol (C).

In conclusion, this is the first study characterizing a new A. pomorum strain isolated from Korean traditional vinegar. Further research into the medium and operation optimization for scale-up cultivation is now under way in order to utilize this prominent acetobacter.

References

  1. Asai T, Iizuka K, Komagata K. 1964. The flagellation and taxonomy of the genera Gluconobacter and Acetobacter with reference to the existence of intermediate strains. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 10: 95-126. https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.10.95
  2. Bartowsky EJ, Xia D, Gibson RL, Fleet GH, Henschke PA. 2003. Spoilage of bottled red wine by acetic acid bacteria. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 36: 307-314. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-765X.2003.01314.x
  3. Boesch C, Trcek J, Sievers M, Teuber M. 1998. Acetobacter intermedius sp. nov. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 21: 220-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0723-2020(98)80026-X
  4. Cairns AM, Watson M, Creanor SL, Foye RH. 2002. The pH and titratable acidity of a range of diluting drinks and their potential effect on dental erosion. J. Dent. 30: 313-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00044-1
  5. De Ley J, Gillis M, Swings J. 1984. In: Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.
  6. Escalante A, Giles-Gomez M, Hernandez G, Cordova-Aguilar MS, Lopez-Munguia A, Gosset G, Bolivar F. 2008. Analysis of bacterial community during the fermentation of pulque, a traditional Mexican alcoholic beverage, using a polyphasic approach. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 124: 126-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.03.003
  7. Kelly KL, Judd DB. 1976. Color: Universal Language and Dictionary of Names. Special Publication 440. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC.
  8. Lisdiyanti P, Navarro RR, Uchimura T, Komagata K. 2006. Reclassification of Gluconacetobacter hansenii strains and proposals of Gluconacetobacter saccharivorans sp. nov. and Gluconacetobacter nataicola sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 56: 2101-2111. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63252-0
  9. Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4: 406-425.
  10. Shin JS, Jeong YJ. 2003. Changes in the components of acetic acid fermentation of brown rice using raw starch digesting enzyme. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 32: 381-387. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2003.32.3.381
  11. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. 1966. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 16: 313-340. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-16-3-313
  12. Sokollek SJ, Hammes WP. 1997. Description of a starter culture preparation for vinegar fermentation. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 20: 481-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0723-2020(97)80017-3
  13. Sokollek SJ, Hertel C, Hammes WP. 1998. Description of Acetobacter oboediens sp. nov. and Acetobacter pomorum sp. nov., two new species isolated from industrial vinegar fermentations. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 48: 935-940. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-48-3-935
  14. Stackebrandt E, Liesack W. 1993. Nucleic Acids and Classification: Modern Approaches in Bacterial Systematics. Academic Press, London.
  15. Takeuchi M, Hatano K. 1998. Gordonia rhizosphera sp. nov. isolated from the mangrove rhizosphere. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 48: 907-912. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-48-3-907
  16. Tamaoka J, Katayama-Fujimura Y, Kuraishi H. 1983. Analysis of bacterial menaquinone mixtures by high performance liquid chromatography. J. Appl. Microbiol. 54: 31-36.
  17. Tamaoka J, Komagata K. 1984. Determination of DNA base composition by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 25: 125-128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1984.tb01388.x
  18. Tanaka M, Murakami S, Shinke R, Aoki K. 2000. Genetic characteristics of cellulose-forming acetic acid bacteria identified phenotypically as Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 64: 757-760. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.64.757
  19. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673
  20. Tittsler RP, Sandholzer LA. 1936. The use of semi-solid agar for the detection of bacterial motility. J. Bacteriol. 31: 575-580.
  21. Wu J, Gullo M, Chen F, Giudici P. 2010. Diversity of Acetobacter pasteurianus strains isolated from solid-state fermentation of cereal vinegars. Curr. Microbiol. 60: 280-286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-009-9538-0
  22. Yamada Y, Hoshino K, Ishikawa T. 1997. The phylogeny of acetic acid bacteria based on the partial sequences of 16S ribosomal RNA: the elevation of the subgenus Gluconoacetobacter to the generic level. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 61: 1244-1251. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.61.1244
  23. Yamada Y, Kondo K. 1973. Coenzyme Q system in the classification of the yeast genera Rhodotorula and Cryptococcus, and the yeast-like genera Sporobolomyces and Rhodosporidium. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 19: 59-77. https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.19.59
  24. Yeo SH, Lee OS, Lee IS, Kim HS, Yu TS, Jeong YJ. 2004. Gluconacetobacter persimmonis sp. nov., isolated from Korean traditional persimmon vinegar. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 14: 276-283.

Cited by

  1. Towards a Starter Culture for Cocoa Fermentation by the Selection of Acetic Acid Bacteria vol.7, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation7010042