DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Production of DagA, a ${\beta}$-Agarase, by Streptomyces lividans in Glucose Medium or Mixed-Sugar Medium Simulating Microalgae Hydrolysate

  • Park, Juyi (Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Hong, Soon-Kwang (Division of Bioscience and Bioinformatics, Myung-Ji University) ;
  • Chang, Yong Keun (Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2014.05.08
  • Accepted : 2014.07.31
  • Published : 2014.12.28

Abstract

DagA, a ${\beta}$-agarase, was produced by cultivating a recombinant Streptomyces lividans in a glucose medium or a mixed-sugar medium simulating microalgae hydrolysate. The optimum composition of the glucose medium was identified as 25 g/l glucose, 10 g/l yeast extract, and $5g/l\;MgCl_2{\cdot}6H_2O$. With this, a DagA activity of 7.26 U/ml could be obtained. When a mixed-sugar medium containing 25 g/l of sugars was used, a DagA activity of 4.81 U/ml was obtained with very low substrate utilization efficiency owing to the catabolic repression of glucose against the other sugars. When glucose and galactose were removed from the medium, an unexpectedly high DagA activity of about 8.7 U/ml was obtained, even though a smaller amount of sugars was used. It is recommended for better substrate utilization and process economics that glucose and galactose be eliminated from the medium, by being consumed by some other useful applications, before the production of DagA.

Keywords

Introduction

Enzyme hydrolysis of red algal galactan mainly composed of agarose and agaropectin can be accomplished in several steps [7]. Agarose has alternative D-galactose and 3,6-anhydro-L-galactose [1]. Agaropectin has basically the same structure as agarose, but with side groups of sulfate, pyruvate, etc. [9]. Firstly, agarose or agaropectin are broken down to neoagarotetraose and neoagarohexaose by the action of a Type I β-agarase. These oligomers are broken down to neoagarobiose by a Type II β-agarase. Finally, the dimer is degraded by neoagarobiose hydrolase to produce galactose and anhydro-galactose.

DagA is a Type I β-agarase originated from Streptomyces coelicolor. The dagA gene from S. coelicolor A3(2) has been cloned, sequenced, and overexpressed in S. lividans [3,6,20]. Temuujin et al. [24] reported that DagA (Sco3471, 32 kDa), which belongs to the GH16 family, is an endo-type β-agarase that degrades agarose into neoagarotetraose and neoagarohexaose [24]. Neoagarooligomers, including neoagarotetraose and neoagarohexaose, have a potentially high economic value. They are known to have an antioxidative activity, restraining lipid peroxidation and scavenging superoxide anion radicals and hydroxyl free radicals [26]. They have been reported to inhibit bacterial growth, and to slow down the digestion of starch being used in the food industry as a low-calorie additive [12]. Moreover, they have a moisturizing and a whitening effects on skin [18].

In this study, a glucose-based medium was developed for the production of DagA by a recombinant S. lividans. Generally, rich and complex media are used for Streptomyces strain culture in a laboratory scale. However, using such media for the purpose of enzyme production in a large scale would be economically inappropriate. For this reason, the development of a low-cost medium optimized for DagA production was in need. Key nutrients to be included in the medium were selected, and their concentrations were optimized by employing statistical design approaches of Plackett–Burman design (PBD) [10,21,27] and a response surface method (RSM) with the central composite design (CCD) [4,10,25], respectively. The feasibility of using a mixed-sugar medium obtained from the hydrolysis of microalgal biomass was also investigated.

 

Materials and Methods

Strain and Culture Conditions

S. lividans TK24/pUWL201-DagA was prepared as previously reported [24]. It was grown on R2YE agar plates at 28℃ for 4 days The composition of the R2YE agar medium was 103 g sucrose, 10.12 g MgCl2·6H2O, 10 g glucose, 5 g yeast extract, 0.25 g K2SO4, 0.1 g casamino acids, 100 ml of 5.73% TES (pH 7.2), 80 ml of 3.68% CaCl2·2H2O, 15 ml of 20% L-proline, 10 ml of 0.5% K2HPO4, 2 ml of trace elements solution, and 22 g agar per liter [16]. For the seed culture, spores from an R2YE plate were inoculated into 20 ml of the R2YE medium in a 125 ml baffled flask and incubated for 60 h. Then, 1% (v/v) of seed culture was transferred to 50 ml of the main culture medium in a 250 ml baffled flask and then incubated at 28℃ and 200 rpm for 48 h The pH of the main culture medium was adjusted to 7.2 with 1 M NaOH solution. It contained 50 µg/ml of thiostrepton. All the experiments were conducted in triplicate.

Analytical Methods

For monitoring cell growth, 5 ml of culture broth sample was centrifuged at 8,000 rpm for 10 min at 4℃, and the pellet was washed twice by distilled water and dried at 70℃ for 2 days. The agarase activity of DagA in the supernatant was quantified by using the dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method. Twenty-five microliters of the supernatant was mixed with 975 µl of 0.2% agarose solution based on 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.0). After incubation at 40℃ for 10 min, the mixture was mixed with 1 ml of DNS reagent solution (6.5 g of dinitrosalicylic acid, 325 ml of 2 M NaOH, and 45 ml of glycerol in 1 L of distilled water) and boiled for 10 min until the color changed. The reaction was stopped by cooling in an ice bath. The absorbance at 540 nm was measured by UV-spectrometry [13]. The DagA activity (U/ml) was defined as the amount of enzyme required to liberate 1 µmol of reducing sugar (D-(+)-galactose) per minute. The concentrations of sugars, including glucose, were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC, Waters, USA) equipped with an evaporative light scattering detector (ELSD, Sedere, France). An Aminex HPX-87H ion exclusion column (300 mm × 7.8 mm; Bio-Rad, USA) and an Asahipak NH2P-50 4E column (250 × 4.6 mm; Shodex, Japan) were used. The Aminex HPX-87H column was maintained at 60℃ with a mobile phase (deionized water) flow rate of 0.6 ml/min. The Asahipak NH2P-50 4E was operated at 30℃ with a mobile phase (80% ACN) flow rate of 1.0 ml/min.

 

Results and Discussion

Effect of Carbon Source on DagA Activity

Various carbon sources such as glucose, galactose, xylose, sucrose, agarose, cellulose, starch, and dextrin were tested to identify the optimum carbon source for the production of DagA. Each carbon source was dissolved in the sugarfree R2YE medium. The results indicated that the highest DagA activity was obtained with galactose (6.30 U/ml), followed by xylose (5.77 U/ml), glucose (5.34 U/ml), starch (4.45 U/ml), and dextrin (4.08 U/ml) (Fig. 1). Agarose (2.88 U/ml), sucrose (2.61 U/ml), and cellulose (2.55 U/ml) were found to have no contribution to DagA activity. Although galactose, the best carbon source, produced about 20% higher DagA activity than glucose, its price was considered too high to be used on a large scale. For example, the unit price of reagent-grade galactose is about 12-fold higher than glucose. Xylose also showed a better performance than glucose, but its unit price was also considered to be too high. For this reason, glucose was selected as the carbon source for the cultivation of S. lividans TK24/pUWL201-DagA to produce DagA.

Fig. 1.Effect of carbon source on DagA production by S. lividans TK24/pUWL201-DagA (*control: sugar-free R2YE medium).

Screening of Key Nutrients by PBD

The evaluation of seven nutrient sources (glucose as the sole carbon source; three nitrogen sources (yeast extract, malt extract, and bacto peptone); and three mineral sources (K2SO4, MgCl2·6H2O, and CaCl2·2H2O)) was carried out in eight combinations organized by PBD [21]. Table 1 illustrates the candidate variables (nutrients) and their ranges used for the screening work, and the responses (enzyme activities) under given conditions. Data were statistically analyzed by using the software package Minitab 14.0 (Minitab Inc., Pennsylvania, USA). The results as summarized in Table 2 showed that glucose, yeast extract, bacto peptone, and MgCl2·6H2O had a significant (p value < 0.001 ) and positive influence on DagA production. However, CaCl2·2H2O was found to have a negative effect, and was thus removed from the nutrients list. In addition, yeast extract was observed to have greater influence (a higher t value) as the nitrogen source than bacto peptone. Based on these observations, glucose as the carbon source, yeast extract as the nitrogen source, and MgCl2·6H2O as the mineral source were selected.

Table 1.Positive level (+1): G, 10; Y, 5; Ma, 5; P, 5; K, 3; M, 3; Ca, 3. Negative level (-1): G, 1; Y, 1; Ma, 1; P, 1; K, 0.5; M, 0.5; Ca, 0.5.

Table 2.R2 = 0.9731; *Statistically significant at 99% of confidence level.

Medium Composition Optimization by CCD and RSM

After having selected the three key nutrients glucose, yeast extract, and MgCl2·6H2O, RSM with CCD was applied to identify the effects of these nutrients on DagA production and thus to determine their optimal concentrations [4]. The dependency DagA activity produced (y) on the key nutrients could be well represented by the following quadratic equation with a correlation coefficient R2 = 0.931 0.

where G, Y, and M denote glucose, yeast extract, and MgCl2·6H2O, respectively.

Three-dimensional response surface curves and their respective contour plots described by the regression model are presented to elucidate the effects of the key nutrients (Fig. 2). Each response surface curve represents the effect of two nutrient factors, holding the other factor at the zero level. The optimum value is indicated by the surface confined in the smallest ellipse in the contour plot [2]. As shown in Fig. 2, each contour plot has an elliptical nature, indicating that mutual interactions among the nutrients are significant and the optimum values for glucose, yeast extract, and MgCl2·6H2O concentrations are within the tested ranges. The optimum concentrations were calculated based on the regression Eq. (1): 25 g/l of glucose, 10 g/l of yeast extract, and 5 g/l of MgCl2·6H2O. Under the optimized conditions, the predicted response for DagA activity was 6.96 U/ml, whereas the experimentally observed response was 7.25 U/ml.

Fig. 2.3D response surface and contour plots for DagA activity showing the effects of (A) glucose and yeast extract; (B) glucose and MgCl2·6H2O; and (C) yeast extract and MgCl2·6H2O.

DagA Production by Using Mixed-Sugar Medium Simulating Microalgae Hydrolysate

Microalgae are gaining interest as an alternative source of energy fuels owing to their fast growth feature and relatively high lipid content [22]. After lipid extraction, the residue of microalgae biomass is generally used as the fertilizer and feedstuff of domestic animals and thrown away. Recently, it was reported that the microalgae residue can be utilized as a fermentation feedstock after being hydrolyzed to fermentable sugars [15]. Microalgae hydrolysate contains glucose, galactose, xylose, rhamnose, mannose, ribose, arabinose, and fucose together [5]. Several studies reported ethanol production, by using Saccharomyces cerevisiae, from glucose in microalgae hydrolysate with no utilization of the other sugars mentioned above [14,15]. To overcome such limited substrate utilization problem, a new approach hiring microbial strains with broad substrate specificity was in need. Streptomyces strains, including S. lividans, were considered to be a good candidate for this purpose. They are well known to use most of the sugars from hydrolyzed microalgae as carbon sources, except fucose [8,19]. For this reason, a mixed-sugar medium simulating microalgae hydrolysate, a potentially low-cost alternative carbon source, was used instead of glucose medium for the production of DagA in this study.

The mixed-sugar medium contained 25 g/l of six different monosugars: 7 g/l glucose, 5 g/l galactose, 5 g/l xylose, 3 g/l rhamnose, 3 g/l ribose, and 2 g/l mannose. Its composition was determined by considering that of the acid hydrolysate of Nannochloropsis oceanica: 27% glucose, 21% galactose, 20% xylose, 13% rhamnose, 14% ribose, and 5% mannose. Time profiles of DagA activity and cell and sugars concentrations are presented in Fig. 3 together with, for comparison, those in the case when the optimized glucose medium, which contained 25 g/l glucose, was used. When glucose was used as the sole carbon source for DagA production, it was completely consumed in 72 h and the maximum DagA activity was 7.26 U/ml at 48 h; when the mixed-sugar medium was used, 7 g/l of glucose was consumed in 48 h, and galactose and mannose in 60 h. The maximum DagA activity was 4.81U/ml at 36 h (Table 3), which was approximately 34% lower than the control case with 25 g/l glucose. The decrease in the DagA activity in the later part of the fermentation was speculated (with no clear evidence yet) to be due to protease activity in the culture broth. If we decide to stop the operation when the activity reaches the maximum value, that is, at 36 h in the case with the mixed-sugar medium, the main problem would be a very low substrate utilization efficiency of about 31%. Only glucose was noticeably consumed in 36 h, while the consumption of the other sugars was negligible, probably due to the catabolic repression exerted by glucose (Table 3). In many microorganisms, glucose is quickly utilized and represses the production of enzymes related to the consumption of other carbon substrates [11,23].

Fig. 3.Time profiles of DagA activity and cell and sugar concentrations: (A) 25 g/l mixed-sugars medium; (B) optimized glucose medium.

Table 3.Substrate consumed and DagA activity at the time of its maximum activity.

To eliminate such negative effects of glucose, a glucosefree mixed-sugar medium containing 18 g/l of sugars was used, as in the third case in Table 3. As can be seen in Fig. 4A, mannose was completely consumed in 48 h and galactose in 60 h. The maximum DagA activity was 8.76 U/ml at 48 h, which was 82% higher than that in the case of the 25 g/l mixed-sugar medium, and even 21% higher than that of the control case of 25 g/l glucose. In total, 55% of sugars was utilized in 48 h, a much improved substrate utilization. A much higher DagA activity and a slightly smaller amount of cells were obtained with a lower sugars concentrations, in the absence of glucose. Based on these observation it was concluded that glucose had a positive effect on cell growth but a negative effect on enzyme production. Over 93% of sugars could be utilized in 72 h in the absence of glucose.

Fig. 4.Time profiles of DagA activity and cell and sugar concentrations: (A) 18 g/l glucose-free mixed-sugar medium; (B) 13 g/l glucose and galactose-free mixed-sugar medium.

Galactose was also eliminated from the medium to investigate its effects on cell growth and enzyme production. The resulting medium contained 13 g/l sugars with no glucose and galactose (the fourth case in Table 3). As seen in Fig. 4B, mannose was completely consumed in 48 h. Over 92% of sugars was consumed in 72 h. The maximum DagA activity was 8.63 U/ml at 48 h, which was practically the same as that in the case of the 18 g/l mixed-sugar medium. Without galactose, cell growth decreased slightly. These results indicated that galactose had a positive effect on cell growth and that, however, it had no contribution on enzyme production. Considering the results with glucosefree and glucose and galactose-free media, it would be recommendable that these two monosugars be eliminated, before agarase production by the recombinant S. lividans, when a microalgae hydrolysate is to be used.

One possible way to eliminate glucose and galactose from a mixed-sugar medium like microalgae hydrolysate for improved substrate utilization and enzyme production would be the utilization of them as substrates to produce some other bioproduct before the production of agarase. If a yeast strain that can take up galactose as well as glucose is used, for example, for this purpose, bioethanol and DagA could be produced in sequence with much better substrate utilization efficiency. Recently, Saccharomyces cerevisiae KL17, which was very efficient in utilizing glucose and galactose, was isolated by our group [17].

The results of this study with a synthetic medium simulating microalgal hydrolyste should be compared with those obtained with a real hydrolysate solution in the future. By doing that, the necessity of additional medium development efforts such as neutralization, desalting, and/or nutrient complementation could be identified before the microalgal hydrolysate is used for fermentation.

References

  1. Araki C. 1956. Structure of the agarose constituent of agaragar. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 29: 543-544. https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.29.543
  2. Ban di S, Kim YJ, Sa SO, Chang YK. 2005. Statistical approach to development of culture medium for ansamitocin P-3 production with Actinosynnema pretiosum ATCC 31565. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 15: 930-937.
  3. Bibb MJ, Jones GH, Joseph R, Buttner MJ, Ward JM. 1987. The agarase gene (dagA) of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2): affinity purification and characterization of the cloned geneproduct. J. Gen. Microbiol. 133: 2089-2096.
  4. Box GEP, Wilson KB. 1951. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol. 13: 1-45.
  5. Brown MR. 1991. The amino-acid and sugar composition of 16 species of microalgae used in mariculture. J. Exper. Marine Biol. Ecol. 145: 79-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(91)90007-J
  6. Buttner MJ, Fearnley IM, Bibb MJ. 1987. The agarase gene (dagA) of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2): nucleotide sequence and transcriptional analysis. Mol. Gen. Genet. 209: 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00329843
  7. Chi WJ, Chang YK, Hong SK. 2012. Agar degradation by microorganisms and agar-degrading enzymes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 94: 917-930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4023-2
  8. Cochrane VW, Conn JE. 1947. The growth and pigmentation of Actinomyces coelicolor as affected by cultural conditions. J. Bacteriol. 54: 213-218.
  9. Duckwort M, Yaphe W. 1971. Structure of agar. 1. Fractionation of a complex mixture of polysaccharides. Carbohydr. Res. 16:189. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6215(00)86113-3
  10. Fu XT, Lin H, Kim SM. 2009. Optimization of medium composition and culture conditions for agarase production by Agarivorans albus YKW-34. Proc. Biochem. 44: 1158-1163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2009.06.012
  11. Gancedo JM. 1998. Yeast carbon catabolite repression. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62: 334.
  12. Giordano A, Andreotti G, Tramice A, Dr AT. 2006. Marine glycosyl hydrolases in the hydrolysis and synthesis of oligosaccharides. Biotechnol. J. 1: 511-530. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.200500036
  13. Ha JC, Kim GT, Kim SK, Oh TK, Yu JH, Kong IS. 1997. Beta-agarase from Pseudomonas s p. W7: p urification of t he recombinant enzyme from Escherichia coli and the effects of salt on its activity. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 26: 1-6.
  14. Harun R, Danquah MK, Forde GM. 2010. Microalgal biomass as a fermentation feedstock for bioethanol production. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 85: 199-203.
  15. Ho SH, Huang SW, Chen CY, Hasunuma T, Kondo A, Chang JS. 2013. Bioethanol production, using carbohydraterich microalgae biomass as feedstock. Bioresour. Technol. 135: 191-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.015
  16. Kieser T, Bibb MJ, Buttner MJ, Chater KF, Hopwood DA. 2000. Practical Streptomyces Genetics. The John Innes Foundation, Norwich.
  17. Kim JH, Huh IY, Hong SK, Kang HA, Chang YK. 2014. Ethanol production from galactose by a newly isolated Saccharomyces cerevisiae K L17. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 37: 1871-1878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-014-1161-1
  18. Koba yashi R, Takisada M, Suzuki T, Kirimura K, Usami S. 1997. Neoagarobiose as a novel moisturizer with whitening effect. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 61: 162-163. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.61.162
  19. L ee JS, Chi WJ, Hong SK, Yang JW, Chang YK. 2013. Bioethanol production by heterologous expression of Pdc and AdhII in Streptomyces lividans. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97: 6089-6097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-4951-5
  20. Parro V, Mellado RP. 1993. Heterologous recognition in vivo of promoter sequences from the Streptomyces coelicolor dagA gene. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 106: 347-356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1993.tb05987.x
  21. Plackett RL, Burman JP. 1946. The design of optimum multifactorial experiments. Biometrika 33: 305-325. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/33.4.305
  22. Singh J, Cu S. 2010. Commercialization potential of microalgae for biofuels production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14: 2596- 2610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.06.014
  23. Stulke J, Hillen W. 1999. Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2: 195-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5274(99)80034-4
  24. Temuujin U, Chi WJ, Lee SY, Chang YK, Hong SK. 2011. Overexpression and biochemical characterization of DagA from Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2): an endo-type beta-agarase producing neoagarotetraose and neoagarohexaose. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 92: 749-759. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3347-7
  25. Wang YH, Fang XL, An FQ, Wang GH, Zhang X. 2011. Improvement of antibiotic activity of Xenorhabdus bovienii by medium optimization using response surface methodology. Microb. Cell Fact. 10: 98. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-10-98
  26. Wu SC, Wen TN, Pan CL. 2005. Algal-oligosaccharide-lysates prepared by two bacterial agarases stepwise hydrolyzed and their anti-oxidative properties. Fish. Sci. 71: 1149-1159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-2906.2005.01075.x
  27. Zhou JY, Yu XJ, Ding C, Wang ZP, Zhou QQ, Pao H, Cai WM. 2011. Optimization of phenol degradation by Candida tropicalis Z-04 using Plackett-Burman design and response surface methodology. J. Environ. Sci. China 23: 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60369-5

Cited by

  1. 한천 분해효소를 생산하는 해양 미생물 SH-1의 분리 및 특성 분석 vol.42, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4014/kjmb.1410.10009
  2. Characterization of extracellular agarase production by Acinetobacter junii PS12B, isolated from marine sediments vol.6, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2016.04.007
  3. In vitro and in vivo investigation for biological activities of neoagarooligosaccharides prepared by hydrolyzing agar with β-agarase vol.22, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-017-0049-8
  4. Anti-Obesity and Anti-Diabetic Effect of Neoagarooligosaccharides on High-Fat Diet-Induced Obesity in Mice vol.15, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/md15040090
  5. Optimization of heterotrophic cultivation of Chlorella sp. HS2 using screening, statistical assessment, and validation vol.9, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-55854-9
  6. Enhanced production of neoagarobiose from agar with Corynebacterium glutamicum producing exo‐type and endo‐type β‐agarases vol.14, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13899