DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Value-Based Enterprise Architecture Framework: VBEAF

가치기반 엔터프라이즈 아키텍처 프레임워크: VBEAF

  • Received : 2014.09.29
  • Accepted : 2014.11.03
  • Published : 2014.12.30

Abstract

Until now there have been many kinds of enterprise architecture frameworks including the DoDAF in defense domain, the FEAF in administration domain, and the TEAF in finance domain. These EAFs define EA viewpoints for supporting each domain and propose perspectives and models for each viewpoint. These EAFs provide consistent models from different perspectives that interact with each other. However, they have too many perspectives so that their complexities are too high, or they do not define enough models for concrete architecture description. Especially, they neither consider business values, that mean the ultimate purpose of an organization nor execute processes for achieving the business values. This paper thus proposes the VBEAF, business value based enterprise architecture framework that considers and executes business values in organizational business processes.

지금까지 자크만 프레임워크를 포함하여 국방 분야의 DoDAF, 행정 분야의 FEAF, TEAF, 산업 분야의 TOGAF 등 다양한 엔터프라이즈 아키텍처 프레임워크(EAF)가 제안되어 왔다. 이들 EAF는 각 도메인을 지원하기 위한 EA 관점을 정의하고, 관점 별로 모델 및 계층을 제시하고 있다. 또한 이들 EAF는 계층 별 모델들 간 일관되게 연결되어 있으며 타 프레임워크의 모델과 연계할 수 있다는 장점을 가지고 있다. 그렇지만 이들은 너무 많은 계층을 포함하고 있어 복잡도가 높거나, 명확한 아키텍처 기술을 위한 모델을 제시하고 있기 않다. 특히, 기업의 궁극적 지향인 비즈니스 가치를 고려하고 있지 않고, 이를 달성하기 위한 비즈니스 프로세스와의 실천적 연결이 부족하다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 비즈니스 도메인의 특수성을 반영하여 비즈니스 가치 달성에 중요한 비즈니스 프로세스와의 실천적 연결을 고려한 가치기반 엔터프라이즈 아키텍처 프레임워크를 제안한다.

Keywords

References

  1. J. Zachman, "A Framework for Information Systems Architecture" IBM Systems Journal, IBM Publication Vol. 26, No. 3, 276-292, 1987. (journal) https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.263.0276
  2. DoD Architecture Framework Version 2.0. DoD, 2011. (technical report)
  3. A Practical Guide to Federal Enterprise Architecture, CIO council, 2001. (technical report)
  4. Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework Version 1.0, CIO Council, 1999. (technical report)
  5. L. Urbaczewski and S. Mrdalj, "A Comparison Of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks" Issues in Information Systems Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 18-23, 2006. (journal)
  6. B. Boehm, "Value-Based Software Engineering" ACM Software Engineering Notes Vol. 28 No. 2, 2003. (journal)
  7. B. Boehm and L. Huang, "Value-Based Software Engineering: A Case Study" IEEE Computer Mar. pp. 33-41, 2003. (journal)
  8. W. Goethert and M. Fisher, "Deriving Enterprise-Based Measures Using the Balanced Scorecard and Goal-Driven Measurement Techniques" CMU/SEI-2003-TN-024, 2003. (technical report)
  9. R.S. Kaplan and D.P. Norton, "The Balanced Scorecard - Measure that Drive Performance" Harvard Business Review, 1992. (journal)
  10. R.S. Kaplan and D.P. Norton, "Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System" Harvard Business Review Jan.-Feb, 1996. (journal)
  11. P.R. Niven, "Balanced Scorecard Step-By-Step" John Wiley & Sons, 2002. (book)
  12. A. Tang, J. Han, and P. Chen, "A Comparative Analysis of Architecture Frameworks" School of Information Technology, Centre for Component Software & Enterprise Systems, Swinburne University of Technology, Technical Report: SUTITTR2004.01, CeCSES Centre Report: SUT.CeCSES-TR001 August 25, 2004. (Technical Report)
  13. TOGAF, http://www.opengroup.org/public/arch, last accessed in Nov., 2014.

Cited by

  1. R기반 데이터 분석 프레임워크를 이용한 코팅제 배합 분석 기술 vol.18, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.9717/kmms.2015.18.6.734