References
- 곽승준, 유승훈, 장정인. 2006. 컨조인트 분석을 이용한 한강하구의 가치추정. 경제학연구, 54(4): 141-161. (Kwak, S. J., Yoo, S. H. and Chang, J. I. 2006.Valuing the Han-river Estuary: Using Conjoint Analysis. The Korean Economic Association. Kyung Je Hak Yon Gu. 54(4): 141-161.)
- 박성천, 오병희. 2002. 도시하천의 수리학적 특성과 자정능력의 상관성 분석: 광주천을 중심으로. 동신대학교 환경연구소. 환경연구. 7(1): 1-19. (Park, S. C. and Oh, B. H. 2002. Around the Gwang-ju Cheon: Analysis on the Correlation between the Hydraulic Properties and Self-Purification Capacity of Urban Rivers. Journal of Environmental Research. 7(1): 1-19.)
- 박구섭. 2009. 도시하천복원의 사회적 편익 분석: 수원천 분석 중심으로. 홍익대학교 석사학위논문. (Park, K. S. 2009. The Social Benefits Analysis of the Urban Stream Restoration: Focused on Analysis of Suwoncheon. Hongik University. Master's Thesis.)
- 배현회. 2002. Conjoint analysis 기법에 의한 도시 하천의 친수기능 속성가치 추정. 서울대학교 환경대학원. 석사학위논문. (Bae, H. H. 2002. Valuing the Urban Stream Attributes Using Conjoint Analysis Method. Seoul National University. Master's Thesis.)
- 백승우, 김수현, 유찬주. 2002. 컨조인트 분석을 이용한 계란의 소비자 선호도 분석. 한국식품유통학회, 식품유통연구, 29(1): 57-72. (Baek, S. W., Kim, S. H. and Yu, C. J. 2002. Research on Consumer Preference of Egg through Conjoint Analysis. Korean Journal of Food Marketing Economics, 29(1): 57-72.)
- 서울시정개발연구원. 2003. 청계천 하천 복원 생태 평가. (Seoul Development Institute(SDI). 2003. Ecology Evaluation for Rivers Restoration of Cheonggyecheon Stream.)
- 신철오. 2006. 경제학적 가치평가에 대한 이론적 고찰. 월간 해양수산. 2006-03(258): 16-25. (Shin, C. O. 2006. An Introduction to the Economic Valuation: a Basic Concept and the Theories. Korea Maritime Institute. (Monthly)Oceans and Fisheries. 2006-03(258): 16-25.)
- 이영성, 박년배, 김태한. 2004. 선택모형법을 이용한 생태복원의 환경가치추정에 관한 연구: 청계천 복원사업을 사례로. 대한국토.도시학회지, 39(3): 165-177. (Lee, Y. S., Park, N. B. and Kim, T. H. 2004. A Economic Valuation of Ecological Restoration by Choice Modelling: The case of Cheonggyecheon restoration. Journal of Korea Planners Association. 39(3): 165-177.)
- 이훈영. 2006. SPSS를 이용한 데이터 분석. 도서출판 청람. (Lee, H. Y. 2006. Data Analysis using the SPSS. Cheongram Books.)
- 인천광역시. 2011. 자연형 하천 유지관리 모니터링 보고서. (Incheon Metropolitan City. 2011. Monitoring Report for Maintenance of Natural-rivers.)
- 유승훈, 곽승준, 이주석. 2003. 컨조인트 분석을 이용한 서울시 대기오염영향의 환경비용 추정. 한국지역학회, 지역연구, 19(3): 1-17. (Yoo, S. H., Kwak, S. J. and Lee, J. S. 2003. Measuring the Environmental Costs of Air Pollution Impacts in Seoul: A Conjoint Analysis. Journal of Korean Regional Science Association. 19(3): 1-17.)
- 조승국, 신철오. 2005. 한강수질개선의 속성별 경제적 편익: 컨조인트 분석법을 이용하여. 자원.환경경제연구, 14(3): 655-672. (Cho, S. K. and Shin, C. O. 2005. A Conjoint Analysis to the Economic Benefits of Improved Water Quality of Han River. Korea Environmental Economics Association. Environmental and Resource Economics Review. 14(3): 655-672.)
- Adamowicz, W., Boxall, P., Williams, M., and Louviere, J. 1998. Stated preference approach for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 80(1): 64-75. https://doi.org/10.2307/3180269
- Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A. and Lang, Albert. G. 2009. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods. 41(4): 1149-1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
- Kwak, S. J. and Russell, Clifford. S. 1994. Contingent valuation in Korean environmental planning: A pilot application to the protection of drinking water quality in Seoul. Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics. 4(4): 511-526. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00691926
- Lancaster, K. 1966. A New Approach to Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy. 74(1): 132-157. https://doi.org/10.1086/259131
- Morikawa, T. 1994. Correcting state dependence and serial correlation in the RP/SP combined estimation method. Journal of Trasportation. 21(2): 153-165.
- Streever, W. J. 1997. Trends in Australian wetland rehabilitation. Wetlands Ecology and Management. 5(1): 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008267102602
- Tyrvainnen, L. and Vaananen, H. 1998. The Economic Value of Urban Forest Amenities: an Application of Contingent Valuation Method. Landscape And Urban Planning. 43(1-3): 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00103-0