Journal of Korean Clinical Health Science (한국임상보건과학회지)

The Korean Society of Clinical Health Science (한국임상보건과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Analysis of the State of Successful Refractive Surgery's Eye

성공적인 굴절교정수술자 안구상태분석에 대한 연구

  • 장우영 (대구보건대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 이정영 (대구보건대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 박정식 (대구보건대학교 안경광학과)
  • Received : 2014.10.10
  • Accepted : 2014.10.24
  • Published : 2014.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose. Scheduled calibration of refractive error's have various refractive surgery, and a side effect of post refractive surgery for refractive errors's before refractive surgery, by analyzing the eye condition of the refractive error's good state, it tries to increase the satisfaction of refractive error's refractive surgery. Methods. In response to 60 people preoperative data 20-30 generations of age, were analyzed for eye conditions. Results. IOP, thickness of the cornea, liquid leakage amount inspection, the corneal endothelium inspection, the size of the pupil, have been conducted auto refraction test and showed a numerical value in most normal range. Conclusion. Surgery can be of individual differences of patients, it is difficult to define the full normal range, to the surgery based on the case of this study, the side effects of patients after surgery is expected to be prevention.

Keywords

References

  1. Pallikaris IG, Papatzanak ME. Lazwe in situ keratomileusis Laser Surg Med, 1990;10:463-468. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.1900100511
  2. KSCRS. Refractive surgery KSCRS. 2001. Chap 1.
  3. Holzer MP, Sanoval HP, Vargas LG, et al. Corneal flap complications in refractive surgery. Part 2: postoperative treaments of diffuse lamellar keratitis in an experimental animal midel. J Cataract Refractive Surg, 2003;29:803-807. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01915-6
  4. Vinciguerra P, Camesasca FI, Randazzo A. One-year results of butterfly laser epithelial keratomileusis. J Refractive Surg, 2003;19:S223-226.
  5. Leske MC, Heiji A, Hyman L, et al. Predictors of long-term progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial. Ophthalmology, 2007;114:1965-1972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.016
  6. Herndon LW, Weizer JS, Stinnett SS. Central corneal thickness as a risk factor for advanced glaucoma damage. Arch Ophthalmoly, 2004;122:17-21. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.122.1.17
  7. Brandt JD, Beiser JA, Kass MA, Gordon MO. Central corneal thickness in the ocular hypertension treatment study (OHTS). Ophthalmology, 2001;108:1779-1788. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00760-6
  8. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. The ocular hypertension treatment study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol, 2002;108:1779-1788.
  9. Lee BH, Kim JB, Yang KJ. Outcome of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy associated with Schirmer test. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc, 1994;40(8):2121-2122.
  10. Dehm EJ, Puliafito CA, Adler CM, Steinert RF. Corneal endothelial injury in rabbits ollowing excimer laser ablation at 193nm and 248nm. Arch Ophthalmol, 1986; 04:1364-1368.
  11. Dennamo G, Rosa N, Guida E, et al. Evaluation of corneal thickness and endothelial cells before and after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract & Corneal Surg, 1994;10:137-141.
  12. Kim JM, Kim SH. Comparison of preference and empirical fit success rates for spheric and aspheric RGP lenses. J Korean Oph Opt Soc, 2008;13(2):9-16.
  13. Jeong WJ, Jeon IC, Kang JH. Scotopic Pupil Size in Myopes. J Korean Oph Opt Soc, 2013;18(2):198-199. https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2013.18.2.197
  14. Zadnik K, Mutti DO, Adam AJ. The repeatability of measurements of the ocular components. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1992; 33(7):2325-2333.
  15. tometry Textbook Editing Committee, Optometric Instrumentation. 2nd Ed. Seoul; Daehakseolim, 2000;260-262
  16. Nayak BK, Ghose S, Singh JP. A comparison of cycloplegic and manifest refractions on the NR-1000F (an objectivAuto Refractometer). Br J Ophthalmol, 1987;71(1):73-75. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.71.1.73
  17. Bannon RE. A new automated subjective optometer. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1977;54(7):433-438. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-197707000-00001
  18. Lee JW, Lee KS, Hong HK. Research of Difference between the Refractive Powers by Autorefractometer and the Prescription using Phoropter. J Korean Oph Opt Soc, 2014;19(2):233-234. https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2014.19.2.231