The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effect of a diode laser and traditional irrigants on the bond strength of self-adhesive cement

  • Tuncdemir, Ali Riza (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Necmettin Erbakan) ;
  • Yildirim, Cihan (Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Gaziantep) ;
  • Ozcan, Erhan (Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Selcuk) ;
  • Polat, Serdar (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Gazi)
  • Received : 2013.06.03
  • Accepted : 2013.11.13
  • Published : 2013.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of a diode laser and traditional irrigants on the bond strength of self-adhesive cement. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty-five incisors extracted due to periodontal problems were used. All teeth were instrumented using a set of rotary root canal instruments. The post spaces were enlarged for a No.14 (diameter, 1.4 mm) Snowlight (Abrasive technology, OH, USA) glass fiber reinforced composite post with matching drill. The teeth were randomly divided into 5 experimental groups of 11 teeth each. The post spaces were treated with the followings: Group 1: 5 mL 0.9% physiological saline; Group 2: 5 mL 5.25% sodium hypochlorite; Group 3: 5 mL 17% ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA), Group 4: 37% orthophosphoric acid and Group 5: Photodynamic diode laser irradiation for 1 minute after application of light-active dye solution. Snowlight posts were luted with self-adhesive resin cement. Each root was sectioned perpendicular to its long axis to create 1 mm thick specimens. The push-out bond strength test method was used to measure bond strength. One tooth from each group was processed for scanning electron microscopic analysis. RESULTS. Bond strength values were as follow: Group 1 = 4.15 MPa; Group 2 = 3.00 MPa; Group 3 = 4.45 MPa; Group 4 = 6.96 MPa; and Group 5 = 8.93 MPa. These values were analysed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey honestly significant difference test (P<.05). Significantly higher bond strength values were obtained with the diode laser and orthophosphoric acid (P<.05). There were no differences found between the other groups (P> .05). CONCLUSION. Orthophosphoric acid and EDTA were more effective methods for removing the smear layer than the diode laser. However, the diode laser and orthophosphoric acid were more effective at the cement dentin interface than the EDTA, Therefore, modifying the smear layer may be more effective when a self-adhesive system is used.

Keywords

References

  1. Qualtrough AJ, Mannocci F. Tooth-colored post systems: a review. Oper Dent 2003;28:86-91.
  2. Ferrari M, Mannocci F. A 'one-bottle' adhesive system for bonding a fibre post into a root canal: an SEM evaluation of the post-resin interface. Int Endod J 2000;33:397-400. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00310.x
  3. Mannocci F, Bertelli E, Watson TF, Ford TP. Resin-dentin interfaces of endodontically-treated restored teeth. Am J Dent 2003;16:28-32.
  4. Monticelli F, Toledano M, Tay FR, Cury AH, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Post-surface conditioning improves interfacial adhesion in post/core restorations. Dent Mater 2006;22:602-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.018
  5. Goracci C, Raffaelli O, Monticelli F, Balleri B, Bertelli E, Ferrari M. The adhesion between prefabricated FRC posts and composite resin cores: microtensile bond strength with and without post-silanization. Dent Mater 2005;21:437-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.012
  6. Mumcu E, Erdemir U, Topcu FT. Comparison of micro push-out bond strengths of two fiber posts luted using simplified adhesive approaches. Dent Mater J 2010;29:286-96. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2009-089
  7. Hikita K, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Ikeda T, Van Landuyt K, Maida T, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2007;23:71-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.12.002
  8. Gerth HU, Dammaschke T, Züchner H, Schäfer E. Chemical analysis and bonding reaction of RelyX Unicem and Bifix composites-a comparative study. Dent Mater 2006;22:934-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.10.004
  9. Radovic I, Monticelli F, Goracci C, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:251-8.
  10. Serafino C, Gallina G, Cumbo E, Ferrari M. Surface debris of canal walls after post space preparation in endodontically treated teeth: a scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;97:381-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.10.004
  11. Hayashi M, Takahashi Y, Hirai M, Iwami Y, Imazato S, Ebisu S. Effect of endodontic irrigation on bonding of resin cement to radicular dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:70-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00186.x
  12. Bitter K, Paris S, Pfuertner C, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Morphological and bond strength evaluation of different resin cements to root dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 2009;117:326-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00623.x
  13. Monticelli F, Ferrari M, Toledano M. Cement system and surface treatment selection for fiber post luting. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008;13:E214-21.
  14. Piwowarczyk A, Bender R, Ottl P, Lauer HC. Long-term bond between dual-polymerizing cementing agents and human hard dental tissue. Dent Mater 2007;23:211-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.012
  15. Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006;32:389-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.014
  16. Hülsmann M, Heckendorff M, Lennon A. Chelating agents in root canal treatment: mode of action and indications for their use. Int Endod J 2003;36:810-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2003.00754.x
  17. Erdemir A, Ari H, Güngüneş H, Belli S. Effect of medications for root canal treatment on bonding to root canal dentin. J Endod 2004;30:113-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200402000-00013
  18. Pecora JD, Brugnera-Júnior A, Cussioli AL, Zanin F, Silva R. Evaluation of dentin root canal permeability after instrumentation and Er:YAG laser application. Lasers Surg Med 2000; 26:277-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(2000)26:3<277::AID-LSM5>3.0.CO;2-M
  19. Dederich DN, Zakariasen KL, Tulip J. Scanning electron microscopic analysis of canal wall dentin following neodymium- yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser irradiation. J Endod 1984; 10:428-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(84)80264-2
  20. Alfredo E, Silva SR, Ozório JE, Sousa-Neto MD, Brugnera- Júnior A, Silva-Sousa YT. Bond strength of AH Plus and Epiphany sealers on root dentine irradiated with 980 nm diode laser. Int Endod J 2008;41:733-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01418.x
  21. Bystrom A, Claesson R, Sundqvist G. The antibacterial effect of camphorated paramonochlorophenol, camphorated phenol and calcium hydroxide in the treatment of infected root canals. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985;1:170-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1985.tb00652.x
  22. Perez F, Calas P, de Falguerolles A, Maurette A. Migration of a Streptococcus sanguis strain through the root dentinal tubules. J Endod 1993;19:297-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80460-7
  23. Kennedy WA, Walker WA 3rd, Gough RW. Smear layer removal effects on apical leakage. J Endod 1986;12:21-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(86)80277-1
  24. Gencoglu N, Samani S, Gunday M. Dentinal wall adaptation of thermoplasticized gutta-percha in the absence or presence of smear layer: a scanning electron microscopic study. J Endod 1993;19:558-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81286-0
  25. Gutmann JL. Adaptation of injected thermoplasticized guttapercha in the absence of the dentinal smear layer. Int Endod J 1993;26:87-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1993.tb00548.x
  26. Ari H, Yaşar E, Belli S. Effects of NaOCl on bond strengths of resin cements to root canal dentin. J Endod 2003;29:248-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200304000-00004
  27. Demiryürek EO, Kulunk S, Sarac D, Yuksel G, Bulucu B. Effect of different surface treatments on the push-out bond strength of fiber post to root canal dentin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:e74-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.03.047
  28. Kenshima S, Francci C, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Filho LE. Conditioning effect on dentin, resin tags and hybrid layer of different acidity self-etch adhesives applied to thick and thin smear layer. J Dent 2006;34:775-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.03.001
  29. Mayhew JT, Windchy AM, Goldsmith LJ, Gettleman L. Effect of root canal sealers and irrigation agents on retention of preformed posts luted with a resin cement. J Endod 2000; 26:341-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200006000-00008
  30. Takeda FH, Harashima T, Kimura Y, Matsumoto K. A comparative study of the removal of smear layer by three endodontic irrigants and two types of laser. Int Endod J 1999; 32:32-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00182.x
  31. Rosales-Leal JI, Osorio R, Toledano M, Cabrerizo-Vílchez MA, Millstein PL. Influence of eugenol contamination on the wetting of ground and etched dentin. Oper Dent 2003; 28:695-9.
  32. Peters OA. Current challenges and concepts in the preparation of root canal systems: a review. J Endod 2004;30:559-67. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.DON.0000129039.59003.9D
  33. Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PMH. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endodc Topics 2005;10:30-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00152.x
  34. Gu LS, Kim JR, Ling J, Choi KK, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endod 2009;35:791-804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.010
  35. Wu MK, Wesselink PR. A primary observation on the preparation and obturation of oval canals. Int Endod J 2001;34: 137-41. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00361.x
  36. De-Deus G, Gurgel-Filho ED, Magalhães KM, Coutinho- Filho T. A laboratory analysis of gutta-percha-filled area obtained using Thermafil, System B and lateral condensation. Int Endod J 2006;39:378-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01082.x
  37. Berutti E, Marini R, Angeretti A. Penetration ability of different irrigants into dentinal tubules. J Endod 1997;23:725-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80342-1
  38. Zicari F, Couthino E, De Munck J, Poitevin A, Scotti R, Naert I, van Meerbeek B. Bonding effectiveness and sealing ability of fiber-post bonding. Dent Mater 2008;24:967-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.011
  39. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Grandini S, De Sanctis M, Goracci C. Post placement affects survival of endodontically treated premolars. J Dent Res 2007;86:729-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910708600808
  40. Vichi A, Grandini S, Ferrari M. Comparison between two clinical procedures for bonding fiber posts into a root canal: a microscopic investigation. J Endod 2002;28:355-60. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200205000-00002
  41. Weichman JA, Johnson FM. Laser use in endodontics. A preliminary investigation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971; 31:416-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(71)90164-2
  42. Altundasar E, Ozçelik B, Cehreli ZC, Matsumoto K. Ultramorphological and histochemical changes after ER, CR:YSGG laser irradiation and two different irrigation regimes. J Endod 2006;32:465-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.08.005
  43. Esteves-Oliveira M, de Guglielmi CA, Ramalho KM, Arana- Chavez VE, de Eduardo CP. Comparison of dentin root canal permeability and morphology after irradiation with Nd:YAG, Er:YAG, and diode lasers. Lasers Med Sci 2010;25: 755-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-010-0775-z

Cited by

  1. Test methods for bond strength of glass fiber posts to dentin: A review vol.93, pp.1-2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2016.1184094
  2. Influence of silver nanoparticle solution on the mechanical properties of resin cements and intrarradicular dentin vol.14, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217750
  3. Effect of Photodynamic Therapy, Er,Cr:YSGG, and Nd:YAG Laser on the Push-Out Bond Strength of Fiber Post to Root Dentin vol.38, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2019.4687
  4. Post-Space Treatment Influences the Bond Strength In Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies vol.46, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.2341/19-277-lit
  5. The influence of different treatments on fiber post and root canal to bond strength of fiber post vol.35, pp.9, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2020.1829322
  6. The effect of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on shear bond strength of orthodontic bracket: An in vitro study vol.34, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102244